Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Laughlin’s 310 Examination Questions, 1884

 

J. Laurence Laughlin published an abridged version of John Stuart Mill’s Principles of Economics in 1884 after five years of using Mill’s Principles as his political economy textbook at Harvard. He added “critical, bibliographical, and explanatory notes, and a sketch of the history of political economy”. Given Laughlin’s important role as founding head of the department of political economy at the University of Chicago, his selection of 310 examination questions provides us a convenient list of economic concepts and ideas that were taught in a first course in economics at a leading American university in the 1880s.

_________________

 

APPENDIX II.
EXAMINATION QUESTIONS.

The following problems and questions have been arranged to indicate to the reader the character of examinations set by English [See Milnes’s “Problems in Political Economy.”] and American universities. They have been taken in each case from papers actually given. It is hardly necessary to state, perhaps, that these questions do not exhaust the subject, and are only some of a kind of which many more might be added:

 

Definitions.

  1. Define briefly, Fixed Capital; Unproductive Consumption; Law of Diminishing Returns; Effective Desire of Accumulation; Law of Increase of Labor; Communism; Wages Fund; “Wages of Superintendence; Real Wages; Value; Price; Demand; Medium of Exchange; Gresham’s Law.
  2. Explain carefully the following terms: Productive Consumption, Effectual Demand, Margin of Cultivation, Cost of Production, Value of Money, Cost of Labor, Wealth, and Abstinence.
  3. Explain the following term: Real Wages, Fixed Capital, Allowance System, Margin of Cultivation, Price, Demand, Medium of Exchange, Seignorage, Value of Money, and Bill of Exchange.
  4. Define Supply, Value of Money, Productive Consumption, Cost of Production, Cost of Labor, Exchange Value, Law of Production from Land, Rate of Profit, Capital, and Gresham’s Law.
  5. Define Political Economy: State the parts into which it may be divided, and show how they are mutually related.

 

Labor.

  1. Distinguish between direct and indirect labor, and give an illustration of the distinction.
  2. Apply the distinction between productive and unproductive labor, and productive and unproductive consumption, respectively, to each of the following persons: a tailor, an architect, an annuitant, a sailor, and a brick-layer.
  3. Is an actor to he classed as a productive laborer? The inventor of a machine? A confectioner?
  4. In which of the two classes of laborers, productive and unproductive, would you place the following?

(1.) The officers of our Government.
(2.) The maker of an organ.
(3.) An organist.
(4.) A schoolmaster.
(5.) An artist.
(6.) He who makes an article for which there is no use.

  1. Classify as productive or unproductive the following laborers: a clergyman, musical-instrument maker, actor, soldier, and lace-maker.

 

Capital.

  1. Explain fully what you understand by capital, and what function it discharges in production. Consider whether or not the following ought to be included in capital: (1) the original and acquired powers of the laborer, (2) the original properties of the soil, (3) improvements on land, (4) credit, (5) unsold stock in the hands of a merchant, (6) articles purchased but still in the consumer’s hands.
  2. Does a national loan add to the capital of a country?
  3. Inquire how far, or in what cases, or in what sense, it may be said that a common dwelling-house, an hotel, a school-house, a police-station, a theatre, and a fortification, constitute part of the capital of the country.
  4. Discuss carefully the question whether money lying in a bank (or corn lying in a granary) is always capital, or whether its economic nature depends upon the intentions of the owner.
  5. Are railway-shares, stocks of wine, wheat, munitions of war, and land, to be considered capital, or not?
  6. Explain fully whether you consider that United States bonds are capital or not.
  7. Is an investment in government funds capital, or not? Give your reasons.
  8. In what manner does a large expenditure for military purposes affect the operations of capital and labor?
  9. Distinguish between wealth and capital. Show that there is no assignable limit to the employment of capital in bettering the condition of the members of a community.
  10. “If there are human beings capable of work, and food to feed them, they may always be employed in producing something.” Explain the meaning of this fully.
  11. What is meant by saying wealth can only perform the functions of capital by being wholly or partially consumed?
  12. Explain and illustrate the statement that demand for commodities is not demand for labor.
  13. Show that expenditure of money does not necessarily increase the demand for labor.
  14. In what way would a general demand for luxuries affect productive laborers and the wealth of the community?
  15. In a community where capital is all employed, what would be the effect if one employer gradually withdrew some of his capital, and spent this for personal luxuries?
  16. It is contended that “the demand for commodities, which can only be got by labor, is as much a demand for labor as a demand for beef is a demand for bullocks.” Criticise this position.
  17. “It is often said that, though employment is withdrawn from labor in one department, an exactly equivalent employment is opened for it in others, because what the consumers save in the increased cheapness of one particular article enables them to augment their consumption of others, thereby increasing the demand for other kinds of labor.” Point out the fallacy.
  18. A college undergraduate, with the applause of shopkeepers, bought twenty waistcoats, under the plea that he was doing good to trade. Examine the economical soundness of his act.
  19. A man invested a portion of his capital in a loan to a state which subsequently repudiated its debts. The man thereupon gave up his carriage, discharged superfluous gardeners, and reduced the number of his domestic servants. Examine the effect of these changes on the employment of labor in the district where he resides.
  20. In the sixteenth century a great change in the mode of expenditure took place. Retainers were dismissed, households were reduced and a demand for commodities was substituted for a demand for labor. How would this change affect wages, and why?
  21. It is supposed by some persons that expenditure by the rich in costly entertainments is good for trade. What is your opinion on the subject?
  22. A is an absentee who spends his income abroad. B spends his income chiefly on American pictures and other works of art. C spends most of his income on American servants. D saves and buys United States bonds. E employs most of his income in the production of manufactures. Explain the various effects of these different modes of expenditure on the amount of wealth in the United States, and on the working-classes of the country.
  23. Compare the economic effects of defraying war expenditure (1) by loans, (2) by increased taxation.
  24. Define the term capital, and distinguish between fixed and circulating capital, giving instances of each.
  25. Distinguish between fixed and circulating capital, and point out how far, or in what manner, each of the following articles belongs to one kind or the other: a dwelling-house, a crop of corn, a wagon, a load of coal, an ingot of gold, a railway-engine, a bale of cotton goods.
  26. Of the following, which would you class under fixed and which under circulating capital: cash in the hands of a merchant, a cotton-mill, a plow, diamonds in a jeweler’s shop, a locomotive, a nursery-gardener’s seeds, greenhouses, manures; a carpenter’s tools, woods, nails?
  27. If in a country like this a large amount of capital becomes fixed in the building of railroads, what effect will this change taken by itself have upon the laboring-class, supposing the capital to be (1) domestic, or (2) borrowed wholly or in part from abroad?
  28. “What conclusion is reached by Mr. Mill respecting the objections to the use of labor-saving machinery?
  29. Is the extension of machinery beneficial to laborers?
  30. What is “the conclusive answer to the objections against machinery”?

 

Efficiency of Production.

  1. Explain briefly the chief causes on which the productiveness of labor depends.
  2. What are the principal ways in which advantage arises from the division of labor?
  3. What are the principal advantages of division of labor? In what cases and why is it better to carry on a productive enterprise on a large scale?
  4. Under what circumstances, and in what callings, can the division of employment be carried out to the fullest extent?
  5. Show how the amount of available capital and the extent of the market for products limit division of labor.

 

Population.

  1. Give a brief statement of Malthus’s theory of population, explaining the different checks on population in different stages of civilization.
  2. Enunciate Malthus’s law of population, and give an outline of the reasoning by which he established it. Give an account of any objections that have been brought against Malthus’s position, and criticise those objections.
  3. When the growth of population outstrips the progress of improvements, what are the means of relief for the laborer?
  4. Does the increased facility of emigration nullify the Malthusian law of population in your opinion or not, and why?
  5. Explain the law of diminishing return and the Malthusian doctrine of population; and trace the connection between them.

 

Increase of Production.

  1. Compare the motives to saving in the case of savages, and of a country like the United States. State the causes of diversity in the strength of the effective desire of accumulation.
  2. Capital is said to be accumulated by saving; what is saving? Is hoarded money a saving while hoarded?
  3. How far does the increasing productiveness of manufacturing industry tend to neutralize the effect on profits of the diminishing productiveness of agricultural industry?
  4. “What conclusion as to the limit to the increase of production does Mr. Mill deduce from his investigation of the laws of the various requisites of production?

 

Property.

  1. “What are the essential elements of property? Are the grounds of property in land the same as those of property in movables?
  2. Give what you conceive to be the chief arguments in favor of the institution of private property, as opposed to common ownership.
  3. What arguments does Mr. Mill suggest in favor of some redistribution of landed property?
  4. What are the economic arguments for and against Communism?
  5. In what way, and by what means, do Socialists want to alter the present distribution of wealth?
  6. Sketch the principal forms of Communistic and Non-communistic Socialism.
  7. Should the power of bequest be limited?

 

Wages.

  1. On what, according to Mill, does the rate of wages depend? Hence, show the fallacy of the popularly proposed remedies for low wages.
  2. State and examine the principal theories which have been put forward as to the circumstances which regulate the general rate of wages, saying which you deem to be correct, and why so.
  3. Mr. Thornton argues that the wages-fund is neither “determined” nor “limited”: not “determined,” because there is no “law” to compel capitalists to devote any portion of their wealth to the payment of labor, nor are they morally “bound” to do so; and not “limited,” because there is nothing to prevent them from adding to the portion of their wealth so applied. Criticise this argument, and, if you dissent from Mr. Thornton’s view, state the causes which “determine” and “limit” the fund in question.
  4. State precisely what you mean by the “wages-fund,” and explain the conditions on which its growth depends.
  5. Explain generally the circumstances which determine the rate of wages. Mention some of the reasons why wages should be higher in one occupation than in another.
  6. In what way does dearness or cheapness of food affect money wages?
  7. What determines —

(1.) The general rate of wages in a country?
(2.) The relative rates of wages in different employments?

  1. What causes different rates of wages in different employments, and by what methods might wages be raised?
  2. How do you explain the fact that some of the most disagreeable kinds of labor are the most badly paid?
  3. What, according to Mr. Mill, are the most promising means for the improvement of the laboring-classes?
  4. In the Island of Laputa a law was passed compelling each workman to work with his left hand tied behind his back, and the law was justified on the ground that the demand for labor was more than doubled by it. Examine this argument.
  5. Some coal-workers are calling for a diminution of the output of coal, so as to keep up their wages. Examine how far, if at all, this result would follow from their proposed action.
  6. Discuss any remedies for low wages that have been or might be suggested.
  7. Why are the wages of women habitually lower than those of men?

 

Profits.

  1. What is the cause of the existence of profits? And what, according to Mr. Mill, are the circumstances which determine the respective shares of the laborer and the capitalist?
  2. (1.) What is the lowest rate of profit which can permanently exist? (2.) Why is this minimum variable?
  3. Analyze the remuneration received by any of the following: (1) the proprietor of a cotton-mill managing his own mill; (2) a merchant conducting his own business; (3) a railway shareholder; (4) a holder of government funds.
  4. Into what portions may we divide the return which is usually called profit? Which of these portions would he received by a merchant carrying on business with borrowed capital?
  5. Analyze the payment called profits into its various elements. Point out in what respects the earnings of the employer differ from or resemble the wages paid to other classes of laborers.
  6. It is asserted that “profits tend to an equality.” What conditions must be satisfied before this position can be maintained?
  7. How is the alleged tendency of profits to equivalence in different employments to be reconciled with the notorious difference in the profit of different individuals?
  8. “Which one of the elements in profit has the greatest effect on its amount? Explain by comparing the causes which regulate each element.
  9. How does Mill reconcile the high wages in America with Ricardo’s law of profits?
  10. Explain the proposition that the rate of profits depends on the cost of labor, stating carefully what elements are included in cost of labor.
  11. Explain what connection there may be between an increase of population and any of the elements entering into cost of labor.
  12. What effect would an increase or diminution of population have upon cost of labor?
  13. Explain Mill’s view as to the cost of labor being a function of three variables, considering the passages in which he says, 1. “If without labor becoming less efficient its remuneration fell, no increase taking place in the cost of the articles composing that remuneration;” 2. “If the laborer obtained a higher remuneration, without any increased cheapness in the things composing it; or if, without his obtaining more, that which he did obtain would become more costly”: profits in all these cases would suffer a diminution; and discussing — Firstly, if the remuneration of labor falls, what can the cost of the articles composing that remuneration signify to the capitalist? Secondly, if the laborer gets a higher remuneration, what can the increased cheapness of the things composing it signify to the capitalist?
  14. Is the contest between capital and labor permanent and fundamental? If not, give your reasons for your answer.
  15. What is the effect on wages and profits of the introduction of machinery?

 

Rent.

  1. “What connection exists between the law of Malthus and Ricardo’s doctrine of rent?
  2. “What is the reason why land-owners can demand rent?
  3. Explain and illustrate the distinction between rent and profits. In what cases are they nearly indistinguishable?
  4. It has often been observed that in America land is much less highly cultivated than in England. Explain the economic reasons for this.
  5. How does the theory of rent apply in a country like the United States, where the farmer owns his land instead of hiring it?
  6. How is it that some agricultural capital pays rent, even if resort is not had to different grades of land?
  7. Give a brief description of the theory of rent, and point out to what payments not usually called rent the theory may be applied.
  8. State briefly Ricardo’s theory of rent, and show that, if it be true, the following statements of Adam Smith must be false:

“The most fertile coal-mine regulates the price of coals at all the other mines in the neighborhood.”
“In the price of corn one part pays the rent of the landlord, another pays the wages, and another the profit of the farmer.”

  1. Why does the farming business pay rent, and the cotton business (ground-rent excluded) pay none? Define rent.
  2. “As population increases, rents estimated in corn increase, and the price of corn rises; rents, therefore, doubly tend to increase.” Prove this.
  3. Professor Rogers adduces, in refutation of the common theory of rent, the fact that land near New York pays a high rent, while land of the same natural fertility in the Western States pays no rent. How far do you admit the force of this objection?
  4. Examine the following doctrine:

“If invention and improvement still go on, the efficiency of labor will be further increased, and the amount of labor and capital necessary to produce a given result further diminished. The same causes will lead to the utilization of this new gain in productive power for the production of more wealth; the margin of cultivation will be again extended, and rent will increase, both in proportion and amount, without any increase in wages and interest. And so, . . . will . . . rent constantly increase, though population should remain stationary.” — Henry George, “Progress and Poverty” (p. 226).

  1. What answer is made to Mr. Carey’s objection to Ricardo’s theory of rent, that in point of fact the poorer, not the richer, lands are first brought under cultivation?
  2. Explain how land, “even apart from differences of situation, . . . would all of it, on a certain supposition, pay rent.”
  3. Explain clearly how it is possible for the land of a country which is all of uniform fertility to pay rent.
  4. “If the earth had a perfectly smooth surface the same everywhere, and if it were all tilled and cultivated in exactly the same way, there would be no such thing as rent.” Examine this proposition.
  5. Show that rent does not increase the price of bread.
  6. How is it shown that “rent does not really form any part of the expenses of production or of the advances of the capitalist?”
  7. (1.) What connection exists between the price of agricultural products and the amount of rent paid? (2.) Can rent affect the price?
  8. “Rent is the effect and not the cause of price.” Prove this.
  9. Does rent enter into the cost of production of the following commodities or not, and why: Corn, cloth, the wine of the best vineyards?
  10. “Rent arises from the difference between the least fertile and the most fertile soils, and from the fact that the former have been taken into cultivation. . . . Rent is the difference between the market price of produce and the cost of production.” Harmonize these statements.
  11. In order that the actual payments made by farmers to landlords should generally correspond with “economic rent,” what conditions must be observed?
  12. “What is assumed, as to competition, in all Mr. Mill’s reasoning on wages, profits, and rent? Explain its action in each case.

 

Value.

  1. Enumerate, compare, and criticise any opinions known to you which have been held concerning the nature, origin, or measure of value in exchange.
  2. Define precisely what it is which gives value to objects, and point out the causes which vary the value of the same object under differing circumstances.
  3. Do men dive to the bottom of the sea to get pearls because they are valuable; or are pearls valuable because men must dive to the bottom of the sea to get them?
  4. There are three forms of difficulty of attainment. State the law of value applicable to each.
  5. Explain the exact economic meaning of the words supply and demand.
  6. When it is said that the value of certain commodities depends upon supply and demand, what is meant by demand?
  7. If the supply of all commodities were suddenly doubled, would any changes in their relative values ensue or not, and why?
  8. State the laws which regulate the permanent and temporary values of agricultural products.
  9. How far does the value of commodities depend on the quantity of labor required for their production?
  10. Has the term exchange value any precise meaning when we are comparing times or places very remote from one another?
  11. What is meant by the natural (or normal) price and the market price of commodities? To what extent can they differ?
  12. Does a general rise of wages raise the prices of commodities in general or not, and why? Does it tend to cause any change in the relative prices of commodities or not, and why?
  13. Suppose that wages were double, would the values of commodities be affected? What would be the effect on prices and profits of such an increase of wages?
  14. Are wages and profits influenced by prices?
  15. Can employers recoup themselves by a rise of prices for a rise of—

(a.) Wages in particular employments?
(b.) General wages? How does this question bear on the efficacy of trades-unionism?

  1. Do values depend on wages?
  2. Explain the following statement: “It is true the absolute wages paid have no effect upon values; but neither has the absolute quantity of labor.”
  3. Explain the statement that “high general profits can not, any more than high general wages, be a cause of high values. … In so far as profits enter into the cost of production of all things, they can not affect the value of any.”
  4. Explain fully why it is that capitalists can not compensate themselves for a general high cost of labor through any action on values and prices.
  5. “The value of a commodity depends on its cost of production.” Under what conditions is this true, and what causes interfere with it?
  6. Describe the hindrances which impede the free movement of capital to those fields which apparently offer the highest return for its employment.
  7. Give J. S. Mill’s analysis of the “cost of production,” and also Professor Cairnes’s, with the arguments for and against each.
  8. Analyze cost of production. What is its connection with cost of labor?
  9. Give an analysis of cost of production of any commodity.
  10. Show carefully the distinction between wages, cost of labor, and cost of production.
  11. Define clearly value, price, real wages, and cost of production.
  12. Define real wages, money wages, cost of labor.

 

Money.

  1. Point out the difference between the scientific and popular conceptions implied in the terms wealth and money.
  2. Show the fallacy of confounding capital with money. Can there be a glut of capital?
  3. “What is money? To what sort of necessity does it owe its existence? What articles have been used for money? Enumerate the qualities which render a commodity fit to serve as money.
  4. “What are the qualities requisite in any commodity in order that it may serve as money?
  5. Distinguish accurately between the functions of money.
  6. How far is a fixed standard of value possible?
  7. “What effect does the great durability of gold and silver have upon the value of money?
  8. How far does the law of demand and supply govern the value of money?
  9. Explain fully how it is that the value of the precious metals is affected by “questions of quantity only, with little reference to cost of production.”
  10. What is to be said to the following: “Some political economists have objected altogether to the statement that the value of money depends on its quantity combined with the rapidity of circulation; which, they think, is assuming a law for money that does not exist for any other commodity”?
  11. Under what conditions is it true that the “value of money is inversely as its quantity”?
  12. Explain carefully the following: “The average value of gold is made to conform to its natural value in the same manner as the values of other things are made to conform to their natural value.”
  13. In what various meanings is the phrase “the value of money” used? How far does the value of money in each of these meanings depend on (1) the cost of production, (2) supply and demand?
  14. Are the values of gold and silver subject to exactly the same natural laws as other commodities?
  15. Give the explanations and qualifications required to render the following proposition true: “The quantity of coin in every country is regulated by the value of the commodities which are to be circulated by it.”
  16. “Would the world be richer if every individual in it suddenly found the quantity of money in his possession doubled?
  17. How far, or in what way, do you consider it correct to say that the general level of prices in a country depends upon the quantity of gold coin existing in that country?
  18. A single good harvest causes a considerable fall in the value of wheat; but a great addition to the year’s supply of gold from the mines produces little effect on its general value. How do you account for the difference?
  19. Show the effect of establishing a double standard.
  20. Show how Gresham’s law is illustrated by the history of the currency in the United States between 1834 and 1873.
  21. What effect had the discovery of gold in this century upon the coinage of the United States?
  22. What is the system upon which the small silver currency of the United States is coined and issued?
  23. State briefly the aim of the United States coinage act of 1853.

 

Credit.

  1. How do you define credit? Form a classification of credit documents.
  2. It has been said that “credit is capital.” Is this so or not?
  3. Define capital, and examine the meaning of the term in the following statements:

(a.) Demand for commodities can not create capital.
(b.) Credit is not a creation, but a transfer of capital.
(c.) Wages depend upon the proportion between population and capital.

  1. State the law of the value of money which governs general prices. What change is to be made in the statement, if credit is to be taken into consideration?
  2. What is the part which instruments of credit, other than banknotes, play in the exchange of commodities?
  3. Mention some of the principal features of a credit crisis.
  4. What are inconvertible notes? What objections are thereto currency of this description?
  5. Can an inconvertible currency be made to maintain the same value as a convertible currency, and, if so, how? Supposing that it can, what objections are there, nevertheless, to it?
  6. “Nothing is subject to more variation than paper money, even when it is limited, and has no guarantees; for this simple reason, that, having no value of its own, it depends on the idea that each person forms of those guarantees.” Comment on this passage.
  7. How is it that a bad dollar does the work of buying as well as a good one until it is found out? Is it that it makes no difference whether it is made of gold or not?
  8. To what extent is a government capable of giving fictitious value to a paper or a metallic currency?
  9. In a country with an inconvertible paper currency, how can it be determined whether the issues are excessive or not, and why?
  10. What will be the effect if the circulating medium of a country is increased beyond its natural amount —

(1) when the medium is coin?
(2) when it is coin and convertible paper?
(3) when it is inconvertible paper?

  1. What is the error involved in the assumption, frequently made by writers and public speakers, that the currency of a country ought to increase in like ratio with its wealth and population?
  2. On what does the desire to use credit depend? What connection exists between the amount of notes and coin in circulation and the use of credit?
  3. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of a metallic and paper currency.
  4. A member of Congress advocated expansion of the paper currency by the following argument: “Our currency, as well as everything else, must keep pace with our growth as a nation. . . . France has a circulation per capita of thirty dollars; England, of twenty-five; and we, with our extent of territory and improvements, certainly require more than either.” State your opinion of this argument.
  5. Trace the effects, immediate and ultimate, on general prices of (a) an extended system of credit, (b) an enlarged issue of paper money, and (c) an addition to the stock of precious metals, respectively.
  6. What is the error in the common notion that “a paper currency can not be issued in excess so long as every note represents property, or has a foundation of actual property to rest on”?
  7. Explain the action of the check and clearing-house system, and state what is meant by the restoration of barter.

 

Over-Production.

  1. State the relation between supply and demand as aggregates, e. g., between the aggregate supply of commodities in a given community and the aggregate demand for them, and show the bearing of the principle involved on the doctrine of “general over-production.”
  2. Prove that the increase of capital and the extension of industry can not lead to a general over-production of commodities.
  3. What is the error of those who believe in the danger of overproduction?
  4. Distinguish “excess of supply” from a “commercial crisis.”
  5. Give the substance of Mill’s examination of the theories of excess of supply.
  6. “When production is fully equal to consumption, every discovery in the arts, or in mechanics, is a calamity, because it only adds to the enjoyment of consumers the opportunity of obtaining commodities at a cheaper rate, while it deprives the producers of even life itself.” Discuss this opinion of Sismondi.
  7. Explain the difference in the theories of Dr. Chalmers and Mr. Mill on over-production, and the excess of supply.

 

Peculiar Cases of Value.

  1. It costs as much to produce straw as to produce grain; how, then, do you explain the comparatively low value of straw?
  2. Suppose a considerable rise in the price of wool to be foreseen, how should farmers expect the prices of mutton to be affected, and why?
  3. Explain the operation of the laws of value by which the relative prices of wool and mutton are regulated.

 

International Trade and Values.

  1. What is the meaning of the statement that “it is not a difference in the absolute cost of production which determines the interchange [of commodities between countries], but a difference in the comparative cost”?
  2. What are the advantages which a country derives from foreign trade?
  3. Explain clearly the following passage: “We may often, by trading with foreigners, obtain their commodities at a smaller expense of labor and capital than they cost to the foreigners themselves.”
  4. Is there any essential difference between trade between country and country, and trade between county and county, or even between man and man? What is the real nature of trade in all cases?
  5. Why is it necessary to make any different statement of the laws of value for foreign than for domestic products? What is the cause for the existence of any international trade?
  6. How would a serious decline in the efficiency of England, as compared with other countries, in the production of manufactures affect the scale of money incomes and prices in England, and why?
  7. Mr. Mill refers the value of home products to the “cost of production “; of foreign products to the “cost of acquisition.” Examine the truth of this distinction.
  8. It is said that in the home market the value of commodities depends on the cost of production, in the foreign market on the cost of acquisition. Comment on this distinction.
  9. Is the cost of production the regulator of international values?
  10. Discuss the following statement: “International value is regulated just as inter-provincial or inter-parishional value is. Coals and hops are exchanged between Northumberland and Kent on absolutely the same principles as iron and wine between Lancashire and Spain.” — Ruskin, “Munera Pulveris,” p. 84.
  11. “What determines the value of imported commodities?
  12. “Why does cost of production fail to determine the value of commodities brought from a foreign country? Does it also fail in the case of commodities brought from distant parts of the same country?
  13. It is on the matter of fact that there is not much migration of capital and labor from country to country that Mr. Mill has based his whole doctrine of “international trade and international values.” Explain and comment on the above statement.
  14. “What are the causes which determine for a nation the cost of its imports?
  15. It follows from the theory of international values, as laid down by Mill, that the permanent residence of Americans in Europe may enhance the cost of foreign imports to Americans residing at home. Explain in what way.
  16. Suppose two countries, A and B, isolated from the rest of the world, and a trade established between them. In consequence of the labor of A becoming less effective, the cost of production of every article which can be produced in that country is greatly increased, but so that the relation between the costs of any two articles remains the same. “What, if any, will be the effect of the change on the trade between A and B? Does your answer depend upon your using the phrase “cost of production” in a sense different from that given to it by some economists?
  17. Show that every country gets its imports at less cost in proportion to the efficiency of its labor.

 

Foreign Exchanges.

  1. “What is the ordinary limit to the premium on foreign bills of exchange, and why?
  2. What are the chief effects on the foreign exchanges which are produced by the breaking out of a war? Account for the fact that in 1861 the exchanges on England in America fell considerably below specie point.
  3. Suppose that the next harvest in England should be very defective, and extraordinary supplies of American grain needed, now would this probably affect the price of bills of exchange between England and America, and the profit on the exportation of English manufactures to the latter, and why?
  4. Trace the process by which the precious metals spread from the mines over the world.
  5. Suppose the exchange between England and the United States to be heavily against England, how will this fact affect the export and import trade between the two countries, and why?
  6. “What is meant by exchanges being against a country?
  7. Enumerate the principal circumstances which affect the rate of exchange between two countries. How is the par of exchange ascertained?
  8. In what way are gold and silver distributed among the different trading countries? Between different parts of the same country?
  9. Trace the effects of large and continuous issues of inconvertible paper currency on the prices of commodities, on importation and exportation, and on the foreign exchanges.
  10. State the conditions under which international trade can permanently exist. “What will be the ultimate effect of a large movement of foreign gold upon prices, imports, and exports in the receiving country?
  11. State the theory of the value of money (i. e., “metallic money”), and clear up any apparent inconsistencies between the following statements: (1.) The value of money depends on the cost of production at the worst mines; (2.) The value of money varies inversely as its quantity multiplied by its rapidity of circulation; (3.) The countries whose products are most in demand abroad and contain the greatest value in the smallest bulk, which are nearest the mines and have the least demand for foreign productions, are those in which money will be of lowest value.
  12. The effects of the depreciation of the paper currency in the United States are thus described by Mr. Wells: “It renders it impossible to sell abroad the products which have cost too much at home, and invites from other countries the products of a cheaper labor paid for in a sounder currency. It exaggerates imports, while destroying our ability to pay in kind.” State how far you agree with the deductions here drawn, assigning your reasons where you differ.
  13. “When the foreign exchanges are manifestly against a country, and a balance of indebtedness is the cause, the equilibrium can be restored in two ways. State and explain the operation of each.
  14. What are the conditions which determine for a country a high range of general prices? How far is this advantageous?
  15. “What is the effect of the imposition of a tribute by one country on another upon the course of trade between them, and the terms on which they exchange commodities; and why?
  16. For what reasons may a nation’s exports habitually exceed or fall short of its imports?
  17. Explain the real and nominal exchange.
  18. Expound Mr. Mill’s theory of the influence which a convertible currency exercises on foreign trade.
  19. “What is the effect of a depreciated currency on (1) foreign trade, and (2) the exchanges?

 

Interest.

  1. How does the general rate of interest determine the selling price of stocks and land?
  2. Is there any relation between the rate of interest and the value of money?
  3. What are the relations of interest and profit? On what causes does the rate of interest depend?
  4. “High interest means bad security.” Comment on this saying.
  5. Is the rate of interest affected by the supply of the precious metals?
  6. What determines the rate of interest on the loanable funds? Is the “current [or ordinary] rate of interest the measure of the relative abundance or scarcity of capital”?
  7. What are the chief causes that determine the rate of interest?
  8. If it be true that in America every man, however rich, is engaged in some business, but that in England many rich men have no trade or profession, how is the rate of interest in each country affected in consequence, and why?
  9. How does a fall in the purchasing power of money tend to affect, if at all, and why, (1) the rate of interest, (2) the price of land, (3) the price of government bonds, (4) the price of gold and silver ornaments and plate?

 

Foreign Competition.

  1. Explain the grounds of Mr. Mill’s proposition that general low wages never caused any country to undersell its rivals, nor did general high wages ever hinder it from doing so. If you think the proposition needs qualification, give your reason.
  2. (1.) What is the true theory of one country underselling another in a foreign market? (2.) What weight should be attributed to the fact of generally higher or lower wages in one of the competing countries?
  3. Discuss the question whether a high rate of wages necessarily lays the commerce of a country under a disadvantage with reference to a country where the rate of wages is lower.
  4. What are the conditions under which one country can permanently undersell another in a foreign market?
  5. Point out distinctly the connection between the money wages of laborers in the United States and the productiveness of the soil.
  6. In the Eastern States iron-molders earn from fourteen to seventeen dollars a week; in California their wages run from twenty-one to twenty-seven dollars. Account for this variation.

 

Progress of Society.

  1. What are the reasons for the change in the normal values of manufactured and of agricultural commodities, respectively, during the progress of society?
  2. Wages and profits in different employments and neighborhoods are not uniformly proportional to the efforts of labor and abstinence of which they are the respective rewards. Classify the circumstances which prevent this correspondence, and show how far their effect is likely to be reduced (a) by general economical progress, and (b) by the extension of the division of labor.
  3. What is the law of diminishing returns? Can you point out any connection between this law and the following phenomena? —

(a.) Density of population.
(b.) Rate of wages.
(c.) Rate of profits in different countries.

  1. Sketch the influence on rents and profits of an increase of population and capital concurrently with a stationary state of the arts of production.
  2. Is there reason to believe that Mr. Mill has underrated the powers possessed by man of extending the area of production and facilitating the market of food? If such a statement has been made, to what extent is his theory of population modified, and the risks he had indicated rendered distant?
  3. Compare the effects on rent, profits, and wages, of a sudden improvement in the production (a) of food, (b) of some manufactured articles largely consumed by the working-classes.
  4. Trace the connection between Ricardo’s theory of rent and the decline in the general rate of profits as a country increases in population. Explain clearly the connection which exists between wages and profits.
  5. What effect is produced upon rents, profits, and wages, respectively, in a country like France, where population is stationary and capital advancing?
  6. If capital continued to increase and population did not, explain the proposition that “the whole savings of each year would be exactly so much subtracted from the profits of the next and of every following year,” if improvements were stationary.
  7. How does social and industrial progress tend to affect the prices of land, raw produce, and manufactures, respectively, and why?
  8. The capitalized value of land rises, in the progress of society, from two causes — from one which affects land in common with all investments; from another which is peculiar to land.
  9. “The tendency of improved communications is to lower existing rents.” How far is this true, and in what directions is it true?
  10. What would be the effect on profits, wages, and rents of an improvement in a manufactured article consumed by the laboring-class?
  11. Explain the doctrine of the tendency of profits to a minimum, the cause of that tendency, and the circumstances which counteract it.
  12. What was Adam Smith’s doctrine as to the decline of profit in progressive communities? Criticise his argument.
  13. Mention some of the principal causes which, in the ordinary progress of society, respectively tend to increase or to reduce the current rate of profits.
  14. Why do profits tend to fall as population increases, and how may this result be retarded or prevented?
  15. What is the effect of a general rise of money wages, apart from the consideration of a greater efficiency of labor, in prices, profits, and rent? Give reasons for your answer.
  16. How does the general progress of society in wealth and industrial efficiency tend to affect the rate of wages, the rate of profit, and the rate of rent, respectively?
  17. What is the general effect of the progress of society on the landowner, the capitalist, and the laborer?

 

Future of Laboring-Classes.

  1. Examine the influences of machinery on the economic condition of the working-classes.
  2. Mention and discuss some of the popular remedies for low wages, and especially the effect of the subdivision of landed property among peasant proprietors.
  3. Explain briefly what is meant by co-operation, and indicate the more prominent forms assumed by the co-operative movement.
  4. What is meant by the co-operative system of industry? Show ways in which this system may affect, for good or for evil, the productiveness of labor; and mention any moral benefits, or the opposite, in which it may be expected to issue.
  5. What are the difficulties in the way of co-operation for the production of salable objects?
  6. Explain the advantages of industrial partnership, in which the employés share, in proportion to the wages received, half the profits of the business beyond a certain fixed minimum which is assigned to the employers.

 

Taxation.

  1. How is the state justified in undertaking any manufacture or service which might be performed by private enterprise?
  2. Enumerate Adam Smith’s canons of taxation.
  3. Examine the argument in favor of the resumption by the state of what is called the unearned increment in the value of land arising from the development of society.
  4. A picture by Gainsborough and a house in Broadway are sold in the same year at the same price; at the end of fifty years each sells for five times its first cost. Is there any, and, if so, what, reason why the increase should be sequestrated for the public benefit in the one case and not in the other?
  5. Explain the incidence of taxes laid on wages.
  6. “Why should a tax on profits, if no improvements follow, fall on the laborer and capitalist?
  7. Explain what effect, if any, will be produced on the price of corn by —

(1) a tax upon rent;
(2) a tithe;
(3) a tax of so much per acre, irrespective of value;
(4) a tax of so much per bushel.

  1. On whom does a tax of a fixed proportion of agricultural produce fall?
  2. Discuss the question whether the income-tax ought to be a tax upon income and property, or upon expenditure.
  3. Discuss the expediency of a graduated income-tax.
  4. State the arguments which you think strongest both for and against exempting savings from the income-tax.
  5. Explain the conditions which should he observed in imposing taxes on commodities.
  6. What taxes does a tradesman get back in the price of the articles he sells, and what does he not?
  7. Test by Adam Smith’s four maxims of taxation the policy of indirect taxes on the necessaries of life.
  8. All indirect taxation violates Adam Smith’s fourth canon.
  9. Discuss the following:

“A man with $100,000 in United States bonds comes to Boston, hires a house . . .; thus he lives in luxury. … I am in favor of taxing idle investments such as this, and allowing manufacturing investments to go untaxed.”

  1. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect taxation.
  2. On what principles is this country now taxed?
  3. Explain the arguments for and against the policy of maintaining a surplus for the purpose of redeeming a national debt.
  4. In estimating the ability of the United States to pay its public debts, it is usual to include among the data of the question the increased productiveness of industry in that country. How far is this a pertinent consideration?

 

Protection.

  1. Mention some of the principal arguments brought forward in favor of protective tariffs.
  2. Connect the principle of the division of employments (or labor) with the policy of free trade and the functions of government.
  3. Sketch the effects of discriminating duties, including the operation of the corn laws.
  4. Examine the following argument, emending, if you think it necessary, the free-trader’s doctrine on the point raised: The free- trader’s belief is that a customs duty is added to the price of the article upon which it is imposed. If the article is imported, according to his theory, the increase of the price goes into the public treasury; if the article is made in the country, the increase of the price goes into the pocket of the producer. But in the former case there is no protection; and competition will prevent the latter. Therefore protection does not increase the price of the protected article. If a customs duty is imposed upon a commodity, and its price is not raised in consequence, what inference can you draw?
  5. Under what circumstances did Mr. Mill think nascent states might be justified in adopting a policy of protection? Criticise his opinion, and, if you agree with it, give some examples of its application.
  6. American protectionists allege that the high rate of wages prevailing in the United States disables them from competing with “the pauper labor”of Europe. Examine the grounds of this statement, and consider how far it forms a justification for protection to American industry.
  7. A high rate of wages indicates, not a high, but a low cost of production for all commodities measured in which the rate of wages is high.
    Explain and prove this proposition, and illustrate it from the circumstances of the United States.
  8. State under what limitations the proposition is correct, that profits vary inversely with wages. Explain the circumstances which cause both a higher rate of wages and profits to prevail in a young country, such as the United States, than in England.
  9. In America wages are much higher than in England, yet the general rate of profits is higher also, according to Mr. Mill. How do you reconcile the two facts?
  10. Examine the following:

“It seems to me that protection is absolutely essential to the encouragement of capital, and equally necessary for the protection of the American laborer. … He must have good food, enough of it, good clothing, school-houses for his children, comforts for his home, and a fair chance to improve his condition. To this end I would protect him against competition with the half-paid laborers of European countries.” — Congressional Globe.

  1. An American newspaper has said of the burning of Chicago: “The money to replace what has been burned will not be sent abroad to enrich foreign manufacturers; but, thanks to the wise policy of protection which has built up American industries, it will stimulate our own manufactures, set our mills running faster, and give employment to thousands of idle working-men.” Comment on this passage.
  2. On whom does a tax on imports, if not prohibitory, fall?
  3. In what cases would duties on imported commodities fall on the producers?
  4. Are taxes on imports in any way paid by foreigners?
  5. Discuss the effects of duties on exports.
  6. Trace the effects of duties on the importation of raw materials, and distinguish, with examples, between duties that violate and duties which do not violate the principle of free trade.
  7. Is it possible for any country by legislative enactments to engross a larger share of the advantages of foreign trade than it would naturally have? Discuss the question fully.
  8. “Those are, therefore, in the right who maintain that taxes on imports are partly paid by foreigners; but they are mistaken when they say it is by the foreign producer. It is not on the person from whom we buy, but on all those who buy from us, that a portion of our customs duties spontaneously falls.” Explain and examine the reasons for this conclusion.
  9. State the principle which determines the relation between the amount of a country’s imports and that of its exports, and show how this relation is affected by a system of protective duties.

 

Source: Appendix II in Principles of Political Economy by John Stuart Mill. Abridged, with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explanatory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political Economy by J. Laurence Laughlin (New York: Appleton, 1884), pp. 637-658.

Image Source: James Laurence Laughlin. University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-03687, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

 

 

Categories
Chicago Duke Economists Harvard Northwestern Texas

Harvard. Economics Ph.D. (1929). Transcripts of Earl J. Hamilton

 

 

University archives are very strict about releasing the academic records of their alumni. Every so often I find that one of the pack-rats I encounter in my archival visits kept a personal copy of his or her own transcripts. The economic historian Earl J. Hamilton had copies of his transcripts from his B.S. from Missippi State University, M.A. from Texas and his graduate work leading up to his Ph.D. from Harvard. Thus we are able to trace Hamilton’s academic progress from his high-school days (at least we know the courses for which he was given entrance credit) up through his Harvard A.M. I have added the course titles and instructors for Hamilton’s courses taken at Harvard.

Hamilton’s book American Treasure and the Price Revolution in Spain, 1501-1650 was assigned reading in my Yale undergraduate course on the economic history of Europe before 1750 taught by Professor Harry Miskimin.

_____________________________

Earl Jefferson Hamilton (1899-1989)

Earl Jefferson Hamilton was born on May 17, 1899 in Houlka, Mississippi. He received a B.S. with honors from Mississippi State University (1920), an M.A. from the University of Texas (1924), and a Ph.D. from Harvard (1929). In 1952, he received a Docteur Honoris Causa from the University of Paris and again from the University of Madrid.

Hamilton also held a Thayer Fellowship and a Frederick Sheldon Traveling Fellowship (Harvard University), a Social Science Research Fellowship, a Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship, and a Faculty Research Fellowship from the Ford Foundation.

Hamilton was an Assistant Professor of Economics at Duke University (1927-1929), a Professor of Economics at Duke University (1929-1944), Professor of Economics at Northwestern University (1944-1947), and a Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago (1947-1967).

Hamilton was the editor of the Journal of Political Economy from 1948 to 1954 and president of the Economic History Association from 1951 to 1952. His books include American Treasure and the Price Revolution in Spain, 1501-1650 (1934), Money, Prices, and Wages in Valencia, Aragon and Navarre, 1351-1500 (1936), War and Prices in Spain, 1651-1800 (1947), and Landmarks in Political Economy (1962). Late in his career Hamilton developed an interest in the work of John Law of Lauriston.

Source: Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. Guide to the Earl J. Hamilton Papers 1927-1975.

_____________________________

 

MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE
A. AND M. COLLEGE, MISSISSIPPI

J.C. Herbert, Registrar

December 16, 1925.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

This certifies that Mr. E. J. Hamilton graduated with honors from the Mississippi Agricultural and Mechanical College. He received his Bachelor of Science degree from the School of Business and Industry in May of 1920.

Mr. Hamilton has on file in the office of the Registrar, the following entrance units and college credits:

[Graduated from Buena Vista High School, Mississippi in 1915]

Entrance Subjects Units
English 4
History 2
Latin 2 ½
Mathematics:
Algebra 1 ½
Geometry ½
Science:
Agriculture 2
Chemistry ½
Physiology ½
Physics ½

 

 

Credit Hours Grades
1916-1917
Commerce:
Bookkeeping 15 6 82
Bookkeeping 16 4 68
Bookkeeping 17 4 70
Business Methods 24 10 80
Typewriting 12 6 81
English 1, Composition 15 70
Geology 15, Commercial Geography 5 85
History:
English 1 3 74
Mediaeval and Modern 21 3 86
American History Since 1750 22 3 94
Markets 1 4 80
Mathematics:
Plane Geometry 10 Credit
Solid Geometry 5 65
 

1917-1918 (One Term)

Commerce:
Typewriting 2b 2 90
Stenography 2a 3 70
History:
American Government 1 5 90
American Government 7 5 89
Public Discourse:
Business Correspondence and Conversation 3 5 80
1918-1919 and Summer of 1918
Commerce:
Business Organization 307 5 95
Business Law 303 5 95
Advanced Business Law 305 5 80
Economics:
Outlines of Economics 1-3 6 94
Money and Banking 7 5 95
English 19, Composition 3 94
History 7, Europe Since the Reformation 3 80
Modern Language:
Spanish 1-215 10 93
Spanish 205-213-219-225 16 95
French 109 5 94
French 101-103 8 94
French 111-113-125 11 95
Philosophy and Sociology:
Latin American Relations 5 92
International Relations 1-3-5 9 96
Sociology 17 5 97
1919-1920
Commerce:
Accounting 204 5 91
Investments 315 5 95
Typewriting 104 5 90
Education:
The Educative Process 9 5 93
Classroom Management 11 5 92
Rural Schools 27 3 90
Psychology 1 5 98
Modern Languages:
French 107-115-119 11 94
Spanish 215-219 10 96
Italian 401a 3 94
Public Discourse:
Advertising 5 5 85
Thesis 13 5 85

Note: One credit hour represents one recitation of not less than 45 minutes for theory and 100 minutes for laboratory, once a week for twelve weeks, prior to the session of 1917-1918. Since the session of 1917-1918, the lecture periods have been 50 minutes and the laboratory periods 110 minutes.

Respectfully,
(Signed) J. C. Herbert
Registrar

_____________________________

 

RECORD OF COLLEGE WORK
University of Texas

Hamilton, Earl Jefferson
Degree Obtained, M.A., 1924

 

Course No. Descriptive Title of Course Value in Semester Hours Clock hours: Lec. Total Weeks Grades
Summer
Session
Ed. 21 Educational Organization, Administration and Supervision 6 15 7 ABA 1922
Gov. 15 Comparative Municipal Government 6 15 7 BAB 1922
Eco.214a The Labor Problem 2 5 7 A 1923
Eco. 117 Socialism 2 5 7 A 1923
Eco.31ac World Politics 4 10 7 AA 1923
Eco.148 Land Problems 2 5 7 A 1923
Gov. 14b American Diplomacy 2 5 7 A 1923
Thesis 6 15 7 Credit 1924

 

Grades: A, 90-100; B, 30-89; C, 70-79; D, 60-69; E, condition; F, failure; G, failure too bad to continue the course; P, examination postponed. Passing grade is D.

_____________________________

COPY

Harvard University
The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
24 University Hall, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Transcript of the record of Mr. Earl Jefferson Hamilton

 

1924-25
COURSE GRADE
Economics 7b2 (½ course)
[Programmes of Social Reconstruction, T.N. Carver]
A
Economics 11 (1 course)
[Economic Theory, F.W. Taussig]
A
Economics 12a1 (½ course)
[Problems in Sociology and Social Reform, T.N. Carver]
A minus
Economics 14 (1 course)
[History and Literature of Economics to the year 1848, C.J. Bullock]
A
Economics 322 (½ course)
[Economics of Agriculture, T.N. Carver]
A
Economics 331 (½ course)
[International Trade and Tariff Problems, F. W. Taussig]
B plus
Summer of 1924
Economics S2a (½ course)
[European Industry and Commerce since 1750, A. P. Usher]
A
Economics S2b (½ course)
[Economic History of the United States, A. P. Usher]
A
1925-1926
Economics 7a1 (½ course)
[Theories of Value and Distribution, Williams]
A
Economics 10a1 (½ course)
[History of Commerce and Industry to 1500, A. P. Usher]
A
Economics 10b2 (½ course)
[History of Commerce and Industry, 1500-1750, A. P. Usher]
A
Economics 151 (½ course)
[Modern Schools of Economic Thought, A.A. Young]
A
Economics 20 (1 course)
[Economic Research Course]
A
Economics 38 (1 course)
[Principles of Money and of Banking, A.A. Young]
credit
Received A. M. in March, 1926

 

The established grades are A, B, C, D, and E.

A grade of A, B, Credit, Satisfactory, or Excused indicates that the course was passed with distinction. Only courses passed with these grades may be counted toward a higher degree.

(Signed) Lawrence S. Mayo
Assistant Dean.

_____________________________

COPY

Harvard University
Division of History, Government, and Economics
Cambridge, Massachusetts
September 29, 1928

To Whom It May Concern:

This is to certify that Mr. E. J. Hamilton has completed all the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. in Economics. The degree will be conferred in February, 1929.

(Signed) Gladys E. Campbell
Secretary of the Division

 

Source: Economists’ Papers Archive. Duke University, David Rubenstein Library. Papers of Earl J. Hamilton, Box 4, Folder “Correspondence: 1920’s-1960’s; 1980’s and n.d.”.

Image Source: Earl J. Hamilton (1937) from John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation website.

Categories
Curator's Favorites ERVM

ERVM. Curator’s Favorites. Fourth in a Series

 

 

The newest addition to the series of Curator’s Favorites provides complete links to the works cited by Moritz Kaufmann in the forward to his 1879 book:

Utopias; or, Schemes of Social Improvement from Sir Thomas More to Karl Marx.

 

Categories
Chicago Economists

Cowles Commission. Evsey Domar’s Four Salient Episodes, 1947-48

 

When asked by Clifford Hildreth who was working on his project, The Cowles Commission in Chicago, 1939-1955, for suggestions and/or observations from economists who had worked at Cowles during that period, Evsey Domar had few vivid recollections to offer of his year there some thirty five years earlier. Two items were associated with Jacob Marschak, one with Lawrence Klein, and one with Kenneth Arrow.

Having written the last Ph.D. dissertation supervised by Evsey Domar, I feel it my obligation to include such nuggets of Domaresque delight as his characterization of the difference between the economist (Kenneth Arrow) and the political scientist (David Easton) whom Domar had introduced to each other: “the political scientist assumed all except what he had explicitly rejected; the economist assumed only what he had explicitly stated.” 

___________________

Carbon copy of Domar letter to Hildreth

November 26, 1982

Professor Clifford Hildreth
Department of Economics
University of Minnesota
1035 Business Administration
271 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, NM 55455

Dear Cliff:

This is in reply to your letter of October 27th regarding my impressions of the Cowles Commission.

I really have very little to say, because my connection with the Commission was short (about a year) around 1947-48, and also because I was only nominally a member of the group. I remember four episodes:

  1. Jacob Marschak asking for another dozen years or so to make economics truly scientific.
  2. Same, discussing the economics of free (atomic) energy.
  3. Larry Klein predicting such a low GNP for (I believe) 1947, that after some six months hardly anything was left for the remainder of the year.
  4. I introduced Ken Arrow and David Easton (the political scientist) to each other. it took them some time to find a mutual language. Reason: the political scientist assumed all except what he had explicitly rejected; the economist assumed only what he had explicitly stated. Perhaps this episode was the most educational of all.

Sorry I cannot help you more.

Cordially,

Evsey D. Domar

/gjk

Source: Economists’ Papers Archive, David M. Rubenstein Library, Duke University. Evsey Domar Papers, Box 4, Folder “Correspondence Hf-Hz”.

___________________

Arrow on David Easton

The exposition of the book [Social Choice and Individual Values] was developed in the next year back in Chicago. I presented the material over a number of seminars. I was grateful to these people [Tjalling Koopmans, Herbert Simon, Franco Modigliani, T.W. Anderson, and Milton Friedman] because they thought it was a good idea, encouraged me and asked good questions; parts of the book are making clear points they found obscure.

Easton was a little different. He was the first political scientist I talked to about this. He gave me the references to the idealist position which was sort of the opposite idea. In a way the idealist position was the only coherent defense that I could see in political philosophy. It wasn’t a very acceptable position, but it was the only one that had at least a coherent view of why there ought to be a social ordering.

Source:  J. S. Kelly and Kenneth J. Arrow, An Interview with Kenneth J. Arrow, Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 4, No. 1 (1987), pp. 55-56.

Image Source: Economists’ Papers Archive, David M. Rubenstein Library, Duke University. Evsey Domar Papers, Box 18, Folder “Photographs (Domar)”.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Exam questions for Mason and Leontief’s Marxian economics course, 1937

 

Course listings and enrollment data for the course, “Karl Marx”, that was offered three times in the 1930’s at the Harvard economics department have been posted earlier along with Wassily Leontief’s own draft outline. Before posting below the only set of final examination questions for this course that I have been able to locate, I think it is most interesting to read what Leontief thought about Marx as expressed in his 1938 paper. I have highlighted a terrific obiter dictum in Leontief’s conclusion in which he characterizes much of present-day theorizing as “purely derivative”. Still, Marx hardly comes away unbloodied: “these theories in general do not hold water”.

__________________

 Leontief’s conclusion to his 1938 article on Marxian economics

“Neither his analytical accomplishments nor the purported methodological superiority can explain the Marxian record of correct prognostications. His strength lies in realistic, empirical knowledge of the capitalist system.

Repeated experiments have shown that in their attempts to prognosticate individual behavior, professional psychologists systematically fall behind experienced laymen with a knack for “character reading.” Marx was the great character reader of the capitalist system. As many individuals of this type, Marx had also his rational theories, but these theories in general do not hold water. Their inherent weakness shows up as soon as other economists not endowed with the exceptionally realistic sense of the master try to proceed on the basis of his blueprints.

The significance of Marx for modern economic theory is that of an inexhaustible source of direct observation. Much of the present-day theorizing is purely derivative, secondhand theorizing. We often theorize not about business enterprises, wages, or business cycles but about other people’s theories of profits, other people’s theories of wages, and other people’s theories of business cycles. If before attempting any explanation one wants to learn what profits and wages and capitalist enterprises actually are, he can obtain in the three volumes of Capital more realistic and relevant first- hand information than he could possibly hope to find in ten successive issues of the United States Census, a dozen textbooks on contemporary economic institutions, and even, may I dare to say, the collected essays of Thorstein Veblen.”

Source: Wassily Leontief. “The Significance of Marxian Economics for Present-Day Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 28, no. 1 (1938): 1-9.

 

__________________

1936-37
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 1171

Answer THREE or FOUR questions

  1. “The totality of productive relations determines the economic structure of the society; it constitutes the real basis of its juridical and political superstructure which determines also the corresponding forms of social consciousness.” K. Marx, “Introduction to the Critic [sic] of Political Economy.” Interpret.
  2. Marx does not attempt a general definition of a class. If he had given one what elements would he have emphasized?
  3. “Revolution is the inspired frenzy of history.” Is this comment by Trotsky strictly Marxian or must we consider it another of his “deviations”?
  4. Does the doctrine of the “withering away of the state” make the Marxian view of the ultimate form of socialism indistinguishable from anarchism?
  5. Does Marx’s economic system stand and fall with his labor theory of value?
  6. Is the Marxian explanation of the “surplus army of unemployed” essentially identical with the modern theory of technological unemployment?
  7. Discuss the Marxian explanation of business cycles.

Final. 1937.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, … ,Economics, … , Military Science, Naval Science. Jan—June, 1937. (HUC 7000.28, item 79 of 284)

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Draft of Marxian Economics Course Outline. Leontief, ca 1935

 

Edward S. Mason and Wassily Leontief co-taught a semester course “Karl Marx” in the economics department of Harvard in the 1935-36 and 1936-37 academic years. There were few students enrolled in the course and it was not offered in 1937-38, but due to student demand for the course it was offered (it turns out for the last time) by Leontief and Paul Sweezy in 1938-39. The material was incorporated into the course Economics of Socialism.

From Leontief’s papers I have transcribed the undated handwritten outline that was apparently drafted for this course. 

________________________

Outline of Marxian course.

Meetings 1 & 2 to be devoted to bibliography on Marx and the historical and intellectual setting of Marx’s works.—(Perhaps only the 1st meeting)

 

Subjects of discussion.

  1. Dialectical materialism.—

Theses on Feuerbach
Deutsche Idealogie
Engels’ Anti-Dühring
Engels on Feuerbach. —

Hook’s version (Towards an Understanding of Karl Marx)
Eastman—The last stand of dialectical materialism.

(Misère de la Philosophie)

  1. Economic interpretation of history.

(a) Mode of production—productive relations—forces [of] production

(b) Concept of class—proletariat—

How class consciousness is acquired—{Relation of class to productive relations
Role of economic interests—
The class view of history—Marxian interpretation of particular events

(c) Marxian theory of the state and law.

Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie—
Texts from Marx’s writing. —

 

  1. Equilibrium economics vs. Marxian economics

—Lange’s article.          —methodology

 

  1. Marx’s economic analysis—

(a) Theory of value and surplus value.

(b) Laws of capitalist development. —

(c) Capital accumulation, population, theory of crises—wage tendencies, etc.

 

  1. Dictatorship of the proletariat and democracy. —

  2. Marxian theory of revolution—

 

[second page]

Communist Manifesto

  1. Capital 1st vol. Entire. 800
  2. Theses on Feuerbach. — 20
  3. Comments Gotha Program 20
  4. Anti-Dühring—Same parts— 150
  5. Rev. & Counterrev. 150

or Civil War in France. {Letters—[unclear word] Publishers 300 pp.

  1. Intro. to Critique.

______________

            Hook— 100 p.

Eastman— 60

 

________________________

Links to Leontief’s Reading Assignments.

Marx, Karl. Critique of the Gotha programme, in Marx/Engels Seleccted Works Vol Three, pp. 13-30. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1970.

Frederick Engels. Landmarks of Scientific Socialism “Anti-Duehring”. Austin Lewis, trans. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company. 1907.

Marx/Engels: Karl Marx and Frederic Engels. Manifesto of the Communist Party. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company, ca. 1910.

Marx: Karl Marx. Capital.

Engels, Friedrich. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of classical German philosophy, by Frederick Engels (1886).

Marx, Karl. Revolution and counter-revolution. Or Germany in 1848. Ed. by Eleanor Marx Aveling. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1919.

Marx, Karl. The Paris Commune […including “The Civil War in France”], New York: New York Labor News Company, 1920.

Selected correspondence, 1846-1895 [of] Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels; [translated with commentary and notes by Dona Torr]. Published 1934 by Martin Lawrence Ltd. in London .     New edition published in 1936. (The Marxist-Leninist Library, vol. 9)

Marx, Karl. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy with an Appendix Containing Marx’s Introduction to the Critique. Chicago, Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1904.

 

Source:  Harvard University Archives. HUG 4517.30, Wassily Leontief Papers. Manuscripts and Research Notes 1930-1970, Box 5, Folder “Marx and Theory”.

Categories
Cornell Economists Harvard Michigan

Harvard 1909 PhD Alumnus, Edmund Ezra Day. Cornell Memorial Minute, 1951

 

Edmund Ezra Day received his Ph.D. in economics from Harvard in 1909. In 1910 he joined the Harvard economics department with his specialty in the theory, organization, and practice of statistics. Following service with the War Industries Board in Washington during World War I, Day was promoted to professor at Harvard in 1920. He went on ultimately to become the president of Cornell University. His career is outlined in the Faculty Memorial Statement following his death in 1951 that is reproduced below.

______________________

Cornell University Faculty Memorial Statement
Edmund Ezra Day
December 7, 1883 — March 23, 1951

Edmund Ezra Day, destined to be the fifth President of Cornell University, was born in Manchester, New Hampshire, on December 7, 1883. His parents were Ezra Alonzo and Louise Moulton Nelson Day. He attended Dartmouth College, and there made a brilliant scholastic record. He was awarded a Rufus Choate scholarship, and thus acquired the nickname of “Rufus,” which clung to him all his life. He was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and Theta Delta Chi. He received his B. S. from Dartmouth in 1905 and an M. A. in 1906. He then entered the Harvard Graduate School, and gained a Ph. D. in Economics in 1909.

He began his teaching career as Instructor in Economics at Dartmouth, from 1907 to 1910. He entered the Harvard Department of Economics in 1910, and rose rapidly to become Professor of Economics and Chairman of the Department. During the first World War he served as statistician for the U. S. Shipping Board and the War Industries Board.

In 1923 he left Harvard for the University of Michigan. There he was Professor of Economics, organizer and first Dean of the School of Business Administration, and Dean of the University.

His administrative ability and his understanding of economic and social problems attracted the attention of the great Foundations. In 1927-28 he was associated with the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial; in 1929 he left Michigan to become director for the social sciences with the Rockefeller Foundation. He carried on concurrently the duties of director of general education with the General Education Board. His signal success in these responsible positions prompted his appointment to the presidency of Cornell in 1937.

In the following years he added to his onerous presidential duties many important tasks in educational and social realms. It is impossible here to list more than a few examples. He was president of the New York State Citizens Council, the Association of Land-Grant Colleges and Universities, the World Student Service Fund, the American Statistical Association; he was chairman of the American Council on Education, director of the National Bureau of Economic Research, director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Councillor of the National Industrial Conference Board. He held fifteen honorary degrees. He was the author of “Index of Physical Production,” “Statistical Analysis,” “The Growth of Manufactures,” (with W. Thomas), and “The Defense of Freedom”.

In 1912 he married Emily Sophia Emerson, daughter of Dean Charles F. Emerson of Dartmouth College. He leaves two sons and two daughters. One son (Dr. Emerson Day) at present holds a professorship in the Cornell Medical College.

Dr. Day was suddenly stricken by a heart attack on the morning of March 23, 1951.

Dr. Day was President of Cornell University from 1937 until his resignation on July 1, 1949. He was then appointed Chancellor, with the larger interests of the University in his hands. Counselled to disburden himself of such responsibilities for reasons of health, he resigned the Chancellorship on January 31, 1950.

The twelve years of his presidency were a period of rapid growth of the University. The student enrollment and the Faculty lists nearly doubled. New schools and units were established, responsive to new educational and social concerns of the nation: the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, the School of Industrial and Labor Relations, the School of Business and Public Administration, the School of Nutrition, the School of Aeronautical Engineering, the School of Nursing. The Floyd Newman Laboratory of Nuclear Studies in Ithaca and the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory in Buffalo were inaugurated.

The physical development of the University kept pace with the new demands. Important buildings were erected, among them Olin Hall, the Newman Laboratory, Savage Hall, Moore Hall, Clara Dickson Hall, and the Administration Building. Arrangements were made for other buildings, now rising on our campus. The Greater Cornell Fund was carried triumphantly to its goal, raising over $12,500,000 for university needs.

To assess the value of Dr. Day’s contributions to the University would require far more space than can be here afforded. This much is clear and certain: that during a period of war, of disorganization and reorganization, of rapid social and economic change, of inflation, insecurity, fear, his strong hand at the helm guided us through the storms to calmer waters. We cannot know how much of his own strength, his own life, he sacrificed to this terrifying task.

The writer of the notice on the death of President Livingston Farrand (in the Necrology of the Faculty, 1940) said: “No doubt every true leader communicates something of himself to his companions. The Cornell of Andrew D. White partook of his indomitable idealism; the Cornell of Jacob Gould Schurman shared his superb, almost resistless energy; the Cornell of Livingston Farrand became somehow more urbane, more kindly, more human.” To these words we may now add that the Cornell of Edmund Ezra Day became more socially conscious, more cognizant of its duties to the state and the world, more aware of its function as an organ of the body politic. The Cornell new schools established during Dr. Day’s regime were mostly schools of social service. Within the older units of the University a corresponding influence was at work. Such Departments as Sociology and Psychology were reconstituted; the need for social justification was felt throughout the University.

Dr. Day liked to ask provocative and sometimes infuriating questions. He liked to affront a Professor of, for instance, English, with the demand: “What are you trying to do? What is the use of the study of literature?” The Professor of English usually found, after his first bewilderment or anger had died, that the necessity of defining his aims was very wholesome. Dr. Day of course knew his own answers before he asked the question.

His mood was often quizzical. He liked to shock, unsettle, disturb; he enjoyed playing dumb. He was convinced that the great menace to successful teaching is complacency, satisfaction with routine. Tirelessly experimental himself, he could easily be exasperated by the conservatism of the Faculties. And if, as was inevitably the case, Faculty members found themselves in disagreement with him, they had only to visit him to be most cordially received and most fairly heard. In such circumstances his visitors were usually astonished to find how minutely Dr. Day was acquainted with the least operations of his great, far-flung, multifarious University, and how he had given serious attention to the smallest of her problems.

He gained this knowledge by giving to Cornell the best part of his thought and his life. He had little time for recreation, all too little for the intellectual diversions he earnestly desired. His obligation to Cornell came always first, and this obligation never ended, never left him free.

He had planned, on his retirement, to take at last his rewards: the pleasure of friendship, the pleasure of reading, the mere simple pleasure of rest. He did not have time for his rewards. He had never had time. He had time only for his duty.

Morris Bishop, S. C. Hollister, L. A. Maynard

 

Source: Cornell University. Cornell University Faculty Memorial Statement, 1951.

Image Source: Edmund Ezra Day from Harvard Class Album 1920.

Categories
Berkeley Chicago Columbia Cornell Harvard Michigan Minnesota Princeton Regulations Stanford Wisconsin Yale

Harvard. Memo on Master’s degree requirements in ten other departments, 1935

 

The following memo was found in the papers of the Harvard department of economics outlining the formal requirements for the award of a master’s degree in economics for ten other departments ca. 1935.  Harvard requirements for 1934-35 have been previously posted here at Economics in the Rear-View Mirror.

____________________

REQUIREMENTS FOR A.M. IN ECONOMICS

University of Chicago
—Catalogue Vol. XXV, March 15, 1935—
No. 7, p. 293.

“The specific requirements for the Master’s degree are:

  1. A minimum of 8 courses, or their equivalent (of which at least 6 must be in Grades II and III above*). Either in his undergraduate or graduate work the candidate should cover the substantial equivalent of the requirements for the Bachelor’s degree in economics…(May be shown by examination.)
  2. A thesis involving research of at least semi-independent character.
  3. A final examination (either oral or written at discretion of the department). The examination is on the thesis and its field and on one other field chosen by the candidate.
  4. All candidates…are expected to show ability to think clearly…on abstract economic questions, and familiarity with terms and common concepts of economic science.

No language requirement for A.M. apparently.

No set time limit, but (p. 282) they seem to regard three of work in economics (either as graduate or as undergraduate) as “normal preparation” although “exceptionally capable” students may do it in less time.

* Grade II and III being respectively survey and problem courses (II), and Research, reading and seminar courses (III). Grade I includes intermediate courses.

 

Stanford University

  1. One academic year of graduate work (A “normal time” but also minimum).
  2. Thesis
  3. Examinations (general or final and at discretion of department).

 

Cornell University

  1. At least one full year of residence at Cornell.
  2. “No student may be admitted to candidacy for any of the degrees of A.M., M.S.,…, or Ph.D. whose training has not included work in a foreign language equivalent to three units of entrance in one language or two in each of two languages.
  3. A thesis or (at departmental discretion) an essay.
  4. Written or oral (at departmental discretion) final examination.

He must show a knowledge of:

Three special fields, such as: in Economic Theory and History:

(1) Good general knowledge of history of economic thought, including classical school and contemporary.
(2) Familiarity with economic analysis and controversial area of economic thought.
(3) A background knowledge of social and intellectual history.

or in Monetary Theory:

One requirement:
(1) A detailed understanding of the theory and history of money; monetary system of the United States, theory and history of banking; banking system of United States, foreign exchange, monetary aspects of cyclical fluctuations.

No specific course requirements as far as I can see.

 

University of Minnesota

  1. At least one full academic year’s work (in residence).
  2. Thesis required.
  3. Nine credit hours each quarter of graduate courses for three quarters.
  4. He must have done in three years (undergraduate) work in his major subject if it is open to freshmen, or two years otherwise.
  5. A reading knowledge of a foreign language to be determined by the department is necessary.
  6. An examination.

 

University of Michigan

  1. Residence requirement: One semester and one summer session, or three summer sessions; nine hours work a semester and six hours a summer session are minimum to establish residence at the respective sessions.
  2. A minimum of 24 hours of graduate work is required (i.e. necessary but not alone sufficient).
  3. Thesis may be required at discretion of department (apparently economics does not require it).

 

University of Wisconsin

  1. At least two semesters’ work, at least one of which to be at Wisconsin.
  2. An oral examination.
  3. A thesis may be required of students seeking to specialize in a definite line of study.

 

Princeton University

“After Commencement Day, 1935, the degree of M.A. will be awarded only to a student who has passed the general examination for the Doctor’s degree.” This implies a knowledge of French and German; and implies not less than two years graduate study. The examination may be written, oral, or both. One year of residence is required.

 

Yale University

  1. Two full years of resident graduate study required (but may be in less time in exceptional cases where unusual scholarship is demonstrated).
  2. Reading knowledge of either French or German.
  3. An essay is required of all candidates.
  4. (Apparently) A comprehensive written examination in field of concentration in Department of Economics (it is not specified for which degree so that it seems to apply to both M.A. and Ph.D.).

 

Columbia University

  1. “The candidate shall have registered for and attended courses aggregating not less than thirty tuition points, distributed over a period of not less than one academic year or its equivalent.”
  2. “The candidate shall have satisfied the department of his choice that he has satisfied requirements specified by the department for the degree.” (May include courses, examination, an essay, seminars, or “other work”.)

 

University of California

“There are required 20 semester units and in addition a thesis.”

“At least eight of the 20 units must be strictly graduate work.”

“The student must spend one year of residence.”

Rate of taking units:

“Graduate students in the regular session taking only upper division courses are limited to a program of 16 units” (a semester or a year? probably a semester).

“Graduate students…taking only graduate courses are limited to 12 units.” Mixtures are regulated in proportion thereto.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Department of Economics, Correspondence and Papers 1930-1961. (UAV 349.11) Box 13, Folder “Graduate Instruction, Degree Requirements.”

 

 

Categories
Fields Harvard

Harvard. Four Ph.D. Examinees in Economics, 1910-11

 

 

For four Harvard economics Ph.D. candidates this posting provides information about their respective academic backgrounds, the six subjects of their general examinations along with the names of the examiners, the subject of their special subject, thesis subject and advisor(s) (where available).

________________________________________

 

DIVISION OF HISTORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE
EXAMINATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF PH.D.
1910-11

Notice of hour and place will be sent out three days in advance of each examination.
The hour will ordinarily be 4 p.m.

Alfred Burpee Balcom.

General Examination in Economics, Monday, May 1, 1911.
Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), Bullock, Carver, Sprague, Young, and Perry.
Academic History: Acadia College, 1904-07; Harvard Graduate School, 1908-11; S.B., Acadia, 1907; A. M., Harvard, 1909. Austin Teaching Fellow, 1910-11.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History since 1750. 3. Sociology and Social Reform. 4. Public Finance and Financial History. 5. Labor Problems and Industrial Organization. 6. Philosophy.
Special Subject: Economic Theory.
Thesis Subject: “Nassau William Senior as an Economist.” (With Professor Taussig.)

Lucius Moody Bristol.

General Examination in Economics (Social Ethics), Thursday, May 4, 1911.
Committee: Professors Peabody (chairman), Taussig, Carver, Sprague, Young, and Dr. Brackett.
Academic History: University of North Carolina, 1894-95; Boston University School of Theology, 1896-99; Harvard Divinity School, 1909-10; Harvard Graduate School, 1910-11; A.B., North Carolina, 1895; S.T.B., Boston University, 1899.
General Subjects: 1. Ethical Theory. 2. Economic Theory. 3. Labor Problems. 4. Social Reforms. 5. Sociology. 6. Statistics.
Special Subject: Social Reforms.
Thesis Subject: “Conservation of Vital Forces in Boston.” (With Professor Peabody.)

Johann Gottfried Ohsol.

General Examination in Economics, Thursday, Friday, May 5, 1911.
Committee: Professors Gay (chairman), Bullock, Carver, Sprague, Dr. Foerster, and Dr. Holcombe.
Academic History: Polytechnic Institute of Riga, 1899-1903; Harvard Graduate School, 1909-11; Candidate in Commerce, Riga, 1903.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History since 1750. 3. Sociology and Social Reform. 4. Public Finance and Financial History. 5. Labor Problems and Industrial Organization. 6. History of American Institutions.
Special Subject: Labor Problems.
Thesis Subject: (undecided).

Ralph Emerson Heilman.

General Examination in Economics (Social Ethics), Thursday, May 11, 1911.
Committee: Professors Peabody (chairman), Taussig, Bullock, Carver, Dr. Brackett and Dr. McConnell.
Academic History: Morningside College, 1903-06; Northwestern University, 1906-07; Harvard Graduate School, 1909-11; Ph.B., Morningside, 1906; A.M., Northwestern, 1907.
General Subjects: 1. Ethical Theory. 2. Economic Theory and its History. 3. Poor Relief. 4. Social Reforms. 5. Sociology. 6. Labor Problems.
Special Subject: (undecided).
Thesis Subject: “Chicago Traction.” (With Professor Ripley.)

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examinations for the Ph.D. (HUC 7000.70), Folder “Examinations for the Ph.D., 1910-11”.

Image Source:  Harvard University, ca. 1910. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA

Categories
Economists NBER

NBER. Mitchell to Burns about Friedman. 1945

 

 

Reading the letter written by Wesley Clair Mitchell, the Director of Research at the NBER, to Arthur Burns in which Mitchell offers discouraging words regarding an appointment at NBER for Milton Friedman in 1945, it is interesting to see how Milton Friedman and his wife report on the controversy that very clearly influenced Mitchell’s personal opinion of Milton Friedman. What is not yet clear is whether Arthur Burns ultimately made an offer to Friedman or whether it was perhaps the timely offer arranged by George Stigler for Milton Friedman to teach at the University of Minnesota that made a NBER appointment a moot point.

_______________________________

The Friedmans Remember

The publication of the NBER book by Simon Kuznets and Milton Friedman Incomes from Independent Professional Practice (1945) was delayed four years in part because of the new demands for statistical and economic analyses due to World War II. In Milton Friedman’s judgment the delay was caused “mostly by a controversy about one part of the manuscript” that attributed half the observed excess average income of physicians over dentists to “the difference in ease of entry, produced at least in part by the success of the American Medical Association in limiting entry into medicine.” (pp. 71-72) A member of the special reading committee of directors appointed to evaluate the manuscript, C. Reinhold Noyes, did not agree and wrote “I suggest that the subject of freedom of entry is a hot poker and be dropped.” Friedman described how he and Kuznets wrote eighty pages worth of memos in response to this and other criticisms of Noyes. In his account of the controversy, Milton Friedman has nothing but praise for Wesley Clair Mitchell: “Three years of back and forth discussion followed, with Wesley Mitchell…supporting the scientific freedom of bureau authors…In later years I came to appreciate how rare is the combination of toughness and diplomacy that Mitchell demonstrated in defense of our scientific freedom.” (pp. 74-76)

Rose Friedman wrote about her worries about her husband’s job prospects after World War II ended.

“Presumably he could have gone back to the Treasury but that was the last thing he wanted to do. A government career was never Milton’s choice. He could always return to the National Bureau, but I knew that too was not Milton’s preference. An academic career was what he wanted. By early September, when we moved back to our apartment in Manhattan, Milton had received no offer for the fall. As an inveterate worrier always fearing the worst, I was not happy. I remember very well a visit from the Burnses and Arthur’s attempt, while Milton was temporarily out of the room to reassure me by telling me that Milton was very gifted and would make it to the top and that I had no reason to be concerned.” (p. 147)

 

Source: Milton and Rose D. Friedman, Two Lucky People: Memoirs (Chicago, 1998).

_______________________________

 

Letter from Wesley Clair Mitchell to Arthur Burns

 

Huckleberry Rocks
Greensboro, Vermont

August 27 1945

Dear Arthur

Milton offers a problem that is painful indeed, but we ought to face it squarely. You know how highly I value Simon’s [Kuznets] judgment as well as your own. Both of you have longer + more intimate acquaintance with M. than have I. I am sure both of you try to be objective about him. So do I. That we differ must be due to the unlike weights we attach to qualities we agree, or admit, he possesses.

We agree about his acute mind, about his thorough training in mathematical statistics + mathematical economics, about his creative powers at least in the first of these fields and probably in the second, about his personal likeability, + about his honesty of intention. We must admit that he has fooled himself, unwittingly, + thereby fooled all three of us who were so predisposed to accept his findings. Do you remember that first paper in which M. argued that the incomes of physicians run substantially higher than those of dentists, + the criticisms Fred Mills made of the averages on which M. rested his conclusion? Simon was annoyed by Mills; you were annoyed by him; I was a little annoyed; but Mills was right in large part. Then came the second + graver case brought out by Noyes’ rather brutal attack which enlisted my sympathies as well as yours + Simon’s warmly on Milton’s side. M. drew up a table that seemed to settle the critical issue in his favor. It was made from data he had collected + studied. We knew nothing about these materials in detail. Simon accepted the results. You accepted them. I accepted them with pleasure. Noyes’ second set of criticisms forced a more searching examination. I put in more than a month of careful study + concluded that M. had misused his data in several ways + reached an indefensible conclusion. The best thing about that sad affair was that M. frankly admitted his errors.

I think Milton’s troubles arose from accepting a conclusion about the monopolistic practice of the medical societies, feeling sure that restriction of entry must tend to increase the incomes of medical practitioners, + so accepting at face value any statistical evidence that pointed in the direction he knew to be right. We are all of us subject to this type of error. We examine far more critically evidence that appears to run counter to our hypotheses than evidence that supports them. But M. seems to me worse than most of us on this respect.

Another weakness that I think hurts Milton is lack of interest in and appreciation of non-rational factors that influence, + sometimes dominate, economic behavior. They cannot be handled effectively by the calculus of economic theory concerned with what it is to the interest of men to do. Milton’s clever appraisal of the effect of the higher costs of medical than of dental education is a brilliant specimen of this sort of theorizing. Of course he knows his argument is most unrealistic + says so. Under pressure of criticisms he stressed his qualifications still further. What does such an analysis really add to our knowledge of how men choose their occupations? Can’t the simple bits of truth in the proposition that high costs of training limit the number who enter a profession be put better in simpler form? Why work out an accountant’s estimate in detail when you have to add that few men are able to do such work correctly; that still fewer possess the concrete evidence needed to give the estimate some air of reality; that a man clever enough to do the job + possessed of the factual data would realize that conditions might well change by the time he or his son was ready to set up in practice, + that no one should suppose that choices are really made in this way?

I wish I could share your intuitive faith that M. “has more to contribute to economic science than any man of his generation.” If only we could find the man of whom this remark is true + draw him into the National Bureau, I should be happy indeed! Whoever he may be, he has more insight into human nature than Milton has been blessed with.

Nor do I think you would be wise in taking on a man whom you would have to follow through all the details of his work to make sure that his deficiencies, genuine or problematical, would never again embarrass us. As director of research, you need colleagues who know a great deal more than you will have time to learn about the materials they are severally handling. The kind of watching M. needs is not critical examination of his statistical methods + general reasoning, but detailed study of his data + the way he uses them. That is a time consuming job. None of us did that for M. until far too late. I must accept primary responsibility for this error of omission. I don’t want to see you put in a position where your conscience will force you to spend weeks in making good the guarantee you suggest.

You know that I am grieved to write as I do. To me it seems that you are letting admiration for Milton’s technical proficiencies + personal liking warp your judgment. Loyalty to the aims we both cherish requires me to be candid, though at cost to your feelings as well as mine. If you can produce genuine evidence that my present opinions are wrong, I shall be glad. In the meantime, please do your best to give proper weight to my misgivings.

[…]

Ever yours

[signed]

Wesley C. Mitchell

 

Source: Arthur F. Burns Papers at the Economists’ Papers Archives. Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Library. Box 2, Folder “Correspondence: Wesley Clair Mitchell 1911-1945”.

Image Source: Columbia 250 Website:  Arthur F. Burns,  Milton Friedman. Foundation for the Study of Cycles Website: Wesley Clair Mitchell.