Category: Princeton

Categories
Princeton Suggested Reading Syllabus

Princeton. Graduate Banking and Money Course Outlines. F.W. Fetter, 1931-32

 

 

Frank Albert Fetter‘s son, Frank Whitson Fetter, taught money and banking at Princeton. Material from his undergraduate course Economics 401 for 1933-34 has been posted earlier. Following a short obituary for Frank Whitson Fetter, I have transcribed the course outlines and readings for his Banking (first semester) and Money (second semester) courses. I have included a list of the reading assignments that come from Frank D. Graham’s money course of the previous year. It is interesting to note that a full half of Fetter’s second semester money course was devoted to the history of monetary economic theories and monetary history with only the last half devoted to monetary theory.

______________________________

Frank Whitson Fetter *26
By Princeton Alumni Weekly

FRANK WHITSON FETTER aged 92, distinguished economist, monetary authority, and professor, died July 7, 1991, in Hanover, N.H. Born in San Francisco, Prof. Fetter earned his bachelor’s degree from Swarthmore College in 1920. In 1922 he received a master’s degree from Princeton, followed in 1924 by a second master’s degree from Harvard, and then he received his doctoral degree in economics from Princeton in 1926. His teaching career spanned more than 40 years, interspersed with service to our government in Washington and to several other countries in Latin America. He taught economics as a professor or visiting lecturer at Princeton, Haverford College, Johns Hopkins, the Univ. of Wisconsin, Northwestern Univ., and Dartmouth College. In 1937 he was named a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellow. His most distinguished work, published in 1965, was entitled “Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy, 1797-1875.”

His first wife died in 1977. He married a second time in 1978, and his second wife also predeceased him, in 1985, Deep sympathy is extended to his daughter, two sons, and extended family of grandchildren, stepsons, and cousins.

The Graduate Alumni, Graduate Class of 1926

Source: Princeton Alumni Weekly. 

______________________________

ASSIGNMENTS IN BANKING 507

First Assignment, October 7, 1931.

Hoggson [, Noble Foster], Banking through the ages.
Martin [, Frederick], Stories of Banks and Bankers.
History of Banking in all the leading nations, Vol. II, pp. 1-29.

Second Assignment, October 14, 1931.

Andréades [, Andreas Michael. History of the Bank of England], pp. 1-186
Conant [, Charles A. A History of Modern Banks of Issue (5th ed.)], Chs. 4 and 5
Richards [, Richard D. The Early History of Banking in England], entire.

Third Assignment, October 21, 1931.

Individual reports on Banking History to 1914–
Germany, Canada, France, Scotland, Russia, England and U.S. Colonial only.

Fourth Assignment, October 28, 1931.

Individual reports (continued)
Reading for all –

White [, Horace. Money and Banking illustrated by American History, 5th edition], Book II, Chs. 1 and 2; Book III, Chs. 4, 5 and 16
Dunbar [, Charles F. The Theory and History of Banking, 3rd ed.], pp. 132-219
Conant, pp. 38-77, 138-166, 182-208, 386-412
Adam Smith, Book II, Ch. 3, “digression concerning banks of deposit.”

Fifth Assignment, November 4, 1931.

Bagehot [Walter. Lombard Street (Hartley Withers edition, 1920)], Chs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 12.
Powell [, Ellis T. The Evolution of the Money Market (1385-1915)], pp. 142-194, 243-321 and skim over pp. 322-410
Adam Smith, Book II, Ch. 2

Sixth Assignment, November 11, 1931.

Powell [, Ellis T. The Evolution of the Money Market (1385-1915)], pp. 411-705
Gregory, Vol. II, pp. 1-50

Seventh Assignment, November 18, 1931.

Banking in the U.S. up to 1860:

Miller, entire
Myers, Part I
Original documents (see bibliography)

Eight Assignment, November 25, 1931.

Finish Banking in U.S. to 1914

Myers, Part II and complete last week’s assignment
Notice to documents on Independent Treasury and its abolishment (see bibliography).

Ninth Assignment, December 2, 1931

State Banks, Trust Companies, Savings Banks and Investment Banks in the U.S.

Smith, Chs. 1-8 and 12-16
Barnett, Intro. and Chs. 1, 4, 5, 7 in Pt. I, and Ch. 2 in Pt. II.
White, Book III, Chs. 9-11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 and 20
Moulton, Chs. 13, 14, and 15 and 18
Galston, syndicate operations, pp. 1-36
Pujo Report, pp. 55-106.

Rolph reports on Tippetts

Tenth Assignment, December 9, 1931

The Federal Reserve System

Kemmerer, ABC entire
Kemmerer, S.V. study (Gresham reports)
Wall, Bankers Credit Manual (Hand reports)
Brandeis, Other People’s Money (Smith reports)
Rodky, Chs. 11, 12, 13 and App. D.
Willis and Edwards, Ch. 11
Dunbar, Ch. 3
Dewey & Shugrue, Ch. 9
Willis and Edwards, pp. 9-13, Chs. 2 and 3
Dewey & Shugrue, Chs. 3, 4, 6
(Last five on the subjects “the bank statement” and “credit economy”)
Also referred to White on the bank statement.

Eleventh Assignment, December 16, 1931

Deposits

Dewey & Shugrue, Ch. 11
Willis & Edwards, Chs. 7 and 13
Rodky, Ch. 3

Interbank Relationships

Watkins, Ch. 7
Dewey & Shugrue, Ch. 21
Willis & Edwards, Ch. 15

Financing Business

Moulton, Ch. 10
Willis & Edwards, Ch. 9
Dewey & Shugrue, Chs. 13 & 26
Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1921, pp. 920-6, 1052-7
Phillips, Chs. 1 & 2

Bank Administration

Willis & Edwards, Chs. 4-6,
Dewey & Shugrue, Chs. 7 and 8

Reports

Lin on Owens & Hardy
Rolph on Riefler
Hinkle on Hanson, Theories of the Business Cycle
Dzidjuziski on Snyder
Gresham on Haney
Huber on Pigou
Smith on Kuznets
Hand on Spahr (Clearings & Coll.)

Twelfth Assignment, January 6, 1932

Bank Credit and Prices:

Keynes, Treatise on Money, Chs. 2, 3, 18, 23, 24, 25 and 26
Munn, Bank Credit, Chs. 1, 2 and 3
Rodky, The Banking Process, Ch. 16
Phillips, Bank Credit, Chs. 3, 4, 5 and 7-12
Willis & Edwards, Chs. 28, 29 and 30
Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1930, pp. 400-5, 456-65, 519-26; 1931, pp. 160-6, 435-9, 121-4, 551-7, 495-8.
Study statistics in last Federal Reserve Bulletin.

Reports

Lin on Munn and Cr. and its management
Hand on Dowry, Monetary Banking Policies
Gresham on Einzig, International gold movements
Rolph on Edie, Cap. money market and gold
Hinkle on Edie, Money, Bank Credit and Prices
Huber on Burgess, Reserve Banks and Money Market
Dzidjusizki on Young, Ind. Cr.

Thirteenth Assignment, January 13, 1932

Branch, Chain and Group Banking
Bank Competition

Senate Hearings on Consolidation of National Banks, 1926, S. 1782 and HR 2, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Following pages—pp. 1-45, 53-102, 133-137, 143-160, 175-194 (important opposition), and pp. 204-211, 218-222, 227-236, 299-306, 328-29, 338-346, 354-59.
House Hearings on Branch, Chain and Group Banking, HR 141, 71st Cong., 2nd sess., 1930. Following pages: 3-40, 43-7, 88-90, 105-109, 113-18, 154-5, 203-4, 216-18, 226-32, 259-62, 268-71, 420-47, 450-60, 787-800, 808-13, 882-90, 919-24, 1037-47, 1169-73, 1404-15, 1535-67, 1569-79, 1665-88 and 1752-80. Last few particularly important in opposition.

Reports

Hand on Willitt, Sel. art.
Lin on Osterlenk, Br. Bk.
Rolph on Jamison, Mgt. of unit banks
Hilken on Starves, 60 yrs of br. bk. in Va.
Gresham on Lee, Pr. of Agr. Cr.
Huber on Lawrence, Bank Conc.
Dzidjuziski on Collins Rural Bank Reform
Austin, Leg. bk. wrecking
Smith on Cartinhour,
Hilken on Borgenson [sic, “Bergengren” is correct] cooperative banking.

Fourteenth Assignment, January 20, 1932

Gregory, Vol. II, pp. 307-91; Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Board for 1930, pp. 232-42, 252-7, 260-2, 269-72; Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1930, p. 519; Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1931, pp. 571, 374-8; Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1930, pp. 400-5, 456-64; Federal Reserve Bulletin, 1931, pp. 121-4, 160-6, 435-9, 495-8, 551-7.
Senate Hearings before the Committee on Banking and Currency on Brokers’ Loans, S. Res. 113, 70th Cong., 1st sess. (1928), pp. 2-41, 51-96.
Hearings of sub-committee of the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency on the Operation of the National and Federal Reserve Banking System, S. Res. 71, 71st Cong., 3rd Sess., Appendix, Pt. 6, Fed. Res. Questionnaire, pp. 701-727 and 748-840.
Report of the Committee on Bank Reserves of the Federal Reserve System, GPO, 1931, pp. 5-26.

Reports

Hubert, Beckhart, Disc. policy, and Spahr, Federal Reserve and control of credit.
Hilken, Einzig, Fight for financial supremacy.
Hand, Shaw, Central banks theory and Mlynarski, gold and central banks.
Rolph, Kisch and Elkin on centrol banks and Rogers, America weighs her gold.
Lin, on Burgess, Gov. Strong’s federal reserve policy, and Peel, Economic War.
Gresham, Peddie, dual system of stabilization and Reed, Federal Reserve Policy.
Dzidjuziski, Hirst, Wall St. and Lombard St.
also, as follows on Annual Reports of the Federal Reserve Board:

Huber, 1924, pp. 1-18
Hilken, 1925, pp. 1-24
Hand, 1926, pp. 1-18
Rolph, 1927, pp. 1-20
Lin, 1928, pp. 1-19
Gresham, 1929, pp. 1-10
Dzidjuziski, 1930, pp. 1-19
Smith, 1916-1923.

______________________________

Assignments in Graduate Course in Money, 1931.
(Given by Frank D. Graham).

  1. ✓Carlile, W.W.- The Evolution of Modern Money.
    ✓Nicholson, J. S.- Money and Monetary Problems [sic, “A Treatise on Money and Essays on Monetary Problems, 3d ed.], Part I to p. 161.
  2. ✓Hepburn, A.B.- History of Currency in The United States, Chapters 1-13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 28, 29.
  3. Fisher, Irving—Purchasing Power of Money, Whole book except Appen.
  4. ✓Anderson, B.M.- The Value of Money. First half.
  5. ✓Anderson, B.M.- The Value of Money. Finish book
  6. ✓Gregory, T.E.- Select Documents [Select Statutes, Documents, & Reports Relating to British Banking]. Book I-all; Book II, p. 307 to end.
  7. ✓Keynes- Treatise on Money. Vol. I
  8. ✓Keynes- Treatise on Money. Vol. II
  9. Foster and Catchings.- Profits.
  10. ✓Lawrence [, Joseph Stagg]- Stabilization of Money [sic, Stabilization of Prices: A Critical Study of the Various Plans Proposed for Stabilization (1928)”], in particular Ch. 20-27.
  11. ✓Hawtrey, R.G.- Currency and Credit. (New ed.) Pay particular attention to theory of business cycles.
  12. Mitchell, W.C.- Business Cycles. Do first half, theoretical and statistical part, but omit annals.

✓Indicates that are to be given in 1932.

______________________________

[Handwritten notes]
Graduate Course (Money)

Graham, with 12 meetings, gave only 1 to U.S. monetary history, 1 to evolution of money, 1 to English monetary history, and the remaining 9 to theory. Except for Carlile and Nicholson, all of theory is of past 25 yrs., and most of it of past 10 years.

Believe should be some modifications, along following lines:

  1. More U.S. monetary history, perhaps 3 or 4 weeks.
  2. Emphasis on Bullion controversy, spending 2 or 3 weeks.
  3. Historical development of Theory, tying it in with particular relations to monetary problems of the day.
    Bodin—Locke—Hume—Steuert—Smith.
  4. Present controversy over gold standard
  5. Bimetallism, and the silver issue.

In everything, give the men more history, and more in original sources.

______________________________

[Handwritten Notes]
Graduate Course in Money—1932.

Term Reports.

Men who have to turn in a paper, may elect to do so.

Short Term Reports

These are not to involve any reading outside of the regular assignments. They should trace certain ideas, and their developments, thru our regular reading. Each man should take 2 (ordinarily one, but class small this year).

Suggested topics:

  1. Development of views on causal influences and price changes [Helfen]
  2. Changing emphasis in monetary theory.
  3. Development of monetary theory, and its background of practical problems of monetary reform.
  4. Meaning of “quantity theory”
  5. Meaning of “fiat money”, or “fiat theory” of prices.
  6. Concept of velocity and its effect on prices.
    6a. Proportionality between money & prices. [Platz]
  7. Idea of stability of gold (or silver).
  8. Necessity for money to be based on something with commodity value (i.e., has a power in exchange outside of money use).

(Should run between 5+10 pp. Type—with carbon for me).

Special Reports.-

In some meetings, will have special reports, so as to cover more ground.
In particular will do this on Bullion Controversy, and U. S. Monetary History.

______________________________

ASSIGNMENTS IN ECONOMICS 508 (GRADUATE COURSE IN MONEY)
Princeton University—Second Semester—1931-32

February 10

A. E. Monroe, “Monetary Theory Before Adam Smith,” pp. 3-146.
W. W. Carlile, “The Evolution of Modern Money,” pp. 1-77, 120-137.

[February] 17

A. E. Monroe, “Early Economic Thought.”

Nicole Oresme, “On The First Inventions of Money,” pp. 79-102.
Jean Bodin, “Reply to the Pardoxes of Malestroit,” pp. 123-41.

John Locke, Works, Vol. II, “Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest and Raising the Value of Money,” pp. 3-55.

[February] 24

A. E. Monroe, “Early Economic Thought.”

David Hume, “Of the Balance of Trade,” pp. 323-38.
Richard Cantillon, “On the Nature of Commerce in General,” pp. 247-79.
David Hume, Works, “Of Money,” pp. 317-32.

Sir John Stewart, [sic, “James Steuart” is correct] “An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy,” Book II, Chaps. 26, 28, 29, Book III, Chs. 1-7.

March 2

Adam Smith (Cannan ed.)

Vol. I, Ch. 5 (pp. 32-48), “Of the Real and Nominal Price of Commodities,” pp. 177-216.
“Digression on Silver,” pp. 285-312.
“Banking,” Book IV, Ch. 1 (pp. 396-417) Mercantile System.
(This not a regular assignment, but recommended that men glance over it.)

J. H. Hollander, “The Development of the Theory of Money from Adam Smith to David Ricardo,” Q. J. E., Vol. 25, p. 439.

David Ricardo, “Three Letters on the Price of Gold”; “The High Price of Bullion,” pp. 1-66.

Reports on following:

By Platz: Lord King, “Thoughts on the Restriction,” pp. 1-86.
By Hilen: “An Inquiry into the Nature and Effects of Paper Money.”
By Rolph: Walter Boyd, “A Letter to Pitt,” pp. 1-80; Sir F. Baring, “Observations on the Publication of Walter Boyd.”

March 9

Charles Bosanquet, “Practical Observations on the Report of the Bullion Committee,” pp. 1-110.
David Ricardo, “Reply to Mr. Bosanquet’s Practical Observations on the Report of the Bullion Committee,” pp. 1-141.
J. W. Angell, “The Theory of International Prices,” pp. 40-71.

If not familiar with The Report of The Bullion Committee, glance thru it. The argument is essentially the same as found in Ricardo. It is available in convenient form in Edwin Cannan, “The Paper Pound.”

Reports by the following:

By Carter: N. J. Silberling, “Financial and Monetary Policy of Great Britain During the Napoleonic Wars,” Q.J.E., Vol. 25, Feb. and May, 1924, pp. 214-73, 397-439.
By Rolph: Jacob Viner, “Angell’s Theory of International Prices,” J.P.E., Oct., 1926, pp. 601-11 only.

March 16

Establishment of Gold Standard in England

English Monetary Debates and Legislation of 1717, Report of Paris Monetary Conference, pp. 315-16.
Sir Isaac Newton’s Report of 1717, Paris Conference, pp. 317-20.
Lord Liverpool, “A Treatise on the Coins of the Realm,” Chs. 1-5, 17-19, 29, 30.
English Monetary Law of 1816, Art. 1-4, 11-13, Paris Conf., pp. 373-77.

American Monetary History

Morris Report of 1782, Paris Conference, pp. 425-32.
Jefferson Report, Paris Conference, pp. 437-43.
Hamilton’s Report on a Mint, Paris Conference, pp. 454-84. (Hamilton’s Report may be found in his Works, and in a number of other places.)

March 23

Letter of William J. Crawford, Sec. of Treas., on Exportation of Coins of The United States. American State Papers, Finance, Vol. III, pp. 393-95. No. 549, 15th Cong., 2d Session.
Report of Lowndes Committee of 1819. American State Papers, Finance, Vol. III, pp. 398-401. No. 551, 15th Cong., 2d Session.
Report on Currency by Committee of House of Representatives, Feb. 2, 1821. Paris Conference, pp. 554-57.
Ingham Circular Letter on Relative Value of Gold and Silver. Paris Conference, pp. 602-29.
Gallatin’s Report on Relative Values of Gold and Silver. Paris Conference, pp. 589-97.
Report of Sec. of Treas., May 4, 1830. Paris Conference, pp. 558 and seq.
Report of Sanford Committee, Jan. 11, 1830. Senate Document 19, 21st Cong., 1st Session.
House Resolution of 1832. Paris Conference, p. 677.
Report of Director of Mint to House of Rep., 1832, Paris Conf., p. 678.
Report of White Committee, Feb. 19, 1834. House of Representatives, Report 278, 23d Congress, 1st Session.

April 6

D. K. Watson, “History of American Coinage,” Chs. 6, 7, 10, 11.
F. W. Taussig, “Silver Situation in The United States,” pp. 2-112.

April 13

W. H. Harvey, “Coin’s Financial School.”
Horace White, “Coin’s Financial Fool.”
(Glance thru these two books, but do not make a careful study of them.)
Willard Fisher, “Coin and his Critics, “ Q.J.E., Vol. 10, Jan. 1896, p. 187 and seq.
J. L. Laughlin, “Principles of Money,” (1903 ed.), pp. 281-419.
Scott, “Money and Banking,” pp. 50-6.

April 20

Irving Fisher, “The Purchasing Power of Money,” pp. 1-348.
Proceedings of 1910 Meeting of American Economic Association, “Causes of Recent Price Changes,” pp. 27-70. (Fisher’s discussion, pp. 37-45, may be passed over, as it is all in his Purchasing Power of Money.)

April 27

B. M. Anderson, “The Value of Money,” pp. 1-291.

May 4

B. M. Anderson, “The Value of Money,” pp. 292-591.

May 11

J. M. Keynes, “A Treatise on Money,” Vol. I.

May 18

J. M. Keynes, “A Treatise on Money,” Vol. II.

May 25

J. S. Lawrence, “The Stabilization of Prices,” Part III, pp. 187-473.

June 1

Reports on Foster and Catchings, “Profits;” Edie, “The Banks and Prosperity.”

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Papers of Frank Whitson Fetter, Box 55, Folder “Teaching, Ec 507-508 Money (Princeton) 1931-32”.

Image Source: (ca. 1937) John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Princeton Suggested Reading Syllabus

Princeton. Microeconomic Theory. Lutz, 1949-50

 

This post includes: A typed page of course readings for Friedrich August Lutz’s Princeton economics theory course from 1949-50, transcribed from Martin Shubik‘s course notes, has been augmented with handwritten additions found scattered throughout the notes (identified in italics); several handwritten lists of readings from later during the course.

_____________________

Economics 501
Typed page of course readings, Parts I-III
[with inserts based on hand-written course notes]

THE THEORY OF VALUE
F.A. LUTZ

PART I                       THEORY OF DEMAND

Stigler: Theory of Price
Boulding: Economic Analysis
[Lerner: Ec. of control]

  1. a) Measurable Utility
    b) Indifference Curves
    c) The Controversy over Utility

a) [old theory]
Marshall Bks. 3 & 5 [+ appendix contract curve)
Wicksteed [ Ec. Vol. I ch 1&3 Vol II 1,2,3,4]
Böhm-Bawerk Bk 3 on Value
Wicksell: [Pol. Ec.] Vol 1 pt. 1
[Walras first chapters]

b) [new theory]
Hicks: Value and Capital Pt. I [1-50]
Schultz: Theory of Measurement of Demand Chap. I
[Pareto—Manuel]
Samuelson: Foundations of Ec. Analysis Ch. 5
Friedman: The Marshallian Demand Curve J.P.E. 1949
Morgenstern: Demand Theory Reconsidered Q.J.E. 1947-1948

c) Theory of Games: V. Neumann & Morgenstern
Friedman & Savage: Choices involving Risk J.P.E. 1948

 

Consumer’s Surplus:—

Knight: Realism & Relevance in the Theory of Demand J.P.E. 1944
Henderson: Consumer’s Surplus & Compensating Variation R.E.&S. 1941
Bishop: Prof. Knight & Theory of Demand J.P.E. 1946
Samuelson: Ch. 7

Duesenberry: Income, Saving & Consumer Behaviour

See: Lerner: Econ. of Control p. 30

 

PART II          THEORY OF PRODUCTION

Carlson: Pure Theory of Production
Robinson: Economics of Imperfect Competition
Viner: Cost curves & Supply curves
Sraffa: Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions
Pigou: Analysis of Supply E. J. 1928
Harrod:         E. J. 1931
Knight: Risk, Uncertainty & Profit Ch. 4
Lerner: Economics of Control Ch. 13

 

PART III         THEORY OF DEMAND & THEORY OF COSTS

Joan Robinson
Chamberlin
Fellner [Comp. among the few.]
[Triffin]
[Hicks: theory of monop. Eca 35]
[Kaldor: Eca 35
Ec J 35]
[Eiteman Equ of firm Q.J.E. 44-45]
[Ralph Theory of Income Distribution]
[Chamberlin: Proportionality, Divisibility, Economices of scale Q.J.E. ‘48]

PART IV         THEORY OF DISTRIBUTION

[no references listed, or next page missing]

 

________________________________

Two topics in consumer’s choice left.
[handwritten notes]

1) Consumer Surplus

  1. Marshall
  2. Hicks value & capital appendix ch II
  3. Q.J.E. 42-43 C.S.< Utility
  4. Consumer surplus R.E. 1940-41
    Henderson
  5. Knight Realism Theory of Demand 1934
  6. Bishop Reply to Knight 1946
  7. Realism and Relev J.P.E. Aug 1946
  8. Samuelson Cons. surplus

2) Measurability of Utility

  1. Frisch J.P.E. ‘33
  2. Lange The det of the Ut fn. RES Jun 34
  3. Zeuthen R.E.S. June 37
    1936-37
  4. Knight J.P.E. 1944
  5. D 6 [sic]
  6. Theory Games Ch I part 3.
  7. Vickrey Eca 1945
  8. Friedman & Savage Ut…Risk J.P.E. 1948
  9. J. N. Morgan can we measure mar ut of money Economica ‘45
  10. Samuelson R.E.S. ’37 Feb Ec. Oct 38.

________________________________

Theory of Distribution
[handwritten notes]

F. Lutz

Part I Capital Theory
Part II Keynes via M.E. of capital

 

Reading: The Austrian Theory:

Böhm-Bawerk: Positive Theory of Capital book 2, 5,6,7 [The 3 reasons for time preference in book 5 received much later attention. Lutz says that the important part of the book is capital market [see: Stigler]
Wicksell: Lectures. Section on Capital Theory
Knight: “The Quantity of Capital, the Interest Rate” J.P.E. 1936          433, 612
“Capital, Time and the Interest Rate” Economica 1934
Lutz: The Criterion of Maximum Profits in the Theory of Investment Q.J.E. Nov. 1946
Keynes: General Theory ch. 6, app. on user cost
Lutz: Interest Rate and Investment in a Dynamic Econ. AER Dec 1945 pp. 811-830
Fisher: Theory of Interest

The Hayek-Kaldor Discussion

Hayek: The Ricardo Effect (See: Profits, Interest, Invest) Economica 1942 IX N.S. pp. 127-152
Kaldor: “Prof. Hayek and the Concertina? Effect” Economica 1942
Capital Intensity and the Trade Cycle, Economica 1934

Uncertainty and Risk

Pigou: Economics of Welfare app. I
Hart: “Anticipation, Uncertainty and Dynamic Planning” in Studies in Business Administration
Knight: Risk, Uncertainty and Profit
Steindl: On Risk, Oxford Ec Papers, 1941

[random paper mentioned (Mar 2 lecture:   Preipeich? Econometrica Jan 1940]

________________________________

 

Capital Theory of F. H. Knight (based on 16 articles)
[handwritten notes]

A.E.R. Mar 1950 Theory of Profit Weston
J.P.E. 1936 F. H. Knight
Economica 1934 Capital, Time and the Interest Rate Knight
[1933 Essay in honor of G. Cassel]

 

Source: Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Economists’ Papers Archive. Martin Shubik Papers. Folder: “Notes, Economic Theory; Prof. F. Lutz (Fall 1949-Spring 1950).”

Image Source: Princeton University Library from The Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Division of Art, Prints and Photographs: Photography Collection, The New York Public Library. “The Library, Princeton Univ., Princeton, N. J.” New York Public Library Digital Collections. Accessed December 8, 2017.

Categories
Courses Princeton Suggested Reading Syllabus

Princeton. Money and Banking Syllabus. F.W. Fetter, 1933-34

 

Today’s posting takes us to the money and banking course at Princeton taught by Frank W. Fetter in the first semester of the 1933-34 academic year. The course outline along with the reading assignments come from his papers at Duke’s Economists’ Papers Archive. I have tracked down the assignments and have provided links where I have found them. What I particularly like about this course syllabus is that the reading assignments appear to be feasible, i.e. real and not nominal.

________________

List of Lectures, 1933-34
Economics 401 – Money and Banking

A. Money

  1. Nature and Evolution of Money
  2. Functions and Qualities of Money
  3. Characteristics of an Ideal Monetary System
  4. Credit (in general) and Commercial Bank Credit as Money
  5. The Value of Money
    1. The Quantity Theory
    2. Other Theories
    3. Synthesis
  6. Monetary History
    1. General
    2. In the United States
  7. Price Movements and their Consequences
  8. Foreign Exchange
  9. Monetary Standards
    1. The Gold Standard
    2. The Silver Standard
    3. Bimetallism
    4. Paper Standards
    5. The Tabular Standard

B. Banking

  1. Financial Institutions
  2. Commercial Banking
    1. Theory
    2. Social Effects
    3. Structure
    4. Federal Reserve System
    5. Branch Banking

C. Monetary and Banking Policy in Relation to Business Stability

  1. The Banks, the Money Market, and the Stock Exchange
  2. Banking and the Business Cycle

D. Monetary and Banking Reform

  1. Monetary Reform
  2. Banking Reform
  3. General Conclusions

________________

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Assignments in Money and Banking
1933-1934

Week of
1. Robertson: Money. Chs. 1-3 Oct. 2
2. White: Money and Banking. Pp. 79-139; 150-81 9
3. Warren & Pearson: Prices. Chs. 1-3, 22. 16
4. Bradford: Banking. Chs. 12, 13.
Griffin: Foreign Exchange. Pp. 61-72; 205-47. (Supplementary: To be read in case the subject is not clear from material in Bradford.)
The Business Section of a Newspaper.		 23
5. Robertson. Ch. 4.
Gregory: The Gold Standard and Its Future. Pp. 1-83.		 30
6. Graham: The Fall in the Value of Silver and Its Consequences. Nov. 6
7. Dunbar: The Theory and History of Banking. Pp. 9-58.
Robertson. Ch. 5		 13
8. Bradford. Chs. 2-5. 20
9. Bradford. Chs. 8-11. 27
10. Burgess. Pp. 65-168. Dec. 4
11. Burgess. Pp. 169-296. 11
12. Bradford. Chs. 16-20
Vanderlip: What About the Banks?		 18
13. Warren & Pearson. Chs. 9-17, 19. Jan. 8
14. Robertson. Chs. 9-17, 19.
Anderson: Equilibrium Creates Purchasing Power.
Magee: New Deal Legislation.		 15
(The assignments for the last three meetings are subject to changes or additions.)

Source: Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Library, Economists’ Papers Archive. Frank Whitson Fetter Papers, Box 55, Folder “Teaching, Ec 401-Money and Banking (Princeton University) 1933-1934”.

________________

 Course Bibliography and Links

D. H. Robertson. Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1922.

Horace White. Money and Banking—Illustrated by American History. (Fifth edition). Boston: Ginn and Company, 1914.

George F. Warren and Frank Ashmore Pearson. Prices. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1933.

Frederick A. Bradford. Banking. New York: Longmans Green, 1932.

C. E. Griffin. Principles of Foreign Trade. New York: Macmillan, 1924. [pages from chapters V and XIII]

T. E. Gregory. The Gold Standard and Its Future (3nd ed.). New York: E. P. Dutton, 1935.

Frank D. Graham. The Fall in the Value of Silver and Its Consequences. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Aug. 1931), 425-470.

Charles F. Dunbar. The Theory and History of Banking. (3rd edition, enlarged by Oliver M. W. Sprague). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1917.

W. Randolph Burgess. The Reserve Banks and the Money Market. New York: Harper & Bros., 1927.

Frank Arthur Vanderlip. What about the Banks? Saturday Evening Post (5 November 1932), 3-5, 64-66.

Benjamin M. Anderson, Jr.. Equilibrium Creates Purchasing Power. The Chase Economic Bulletin 11 (June 12, 1931), 3-16.

James D. Magee, W. E. Atkins and E. Stein. The National Recovery Program. New York: Crofts. 1933. (Magee writes about money, banking and finance. “Reprints of portions of recent legislation are included.”)

Image Source: (ca. 1937) John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Categories
Berkeley Chicago Columbia Cornell Harvard Michigan Minnesota Princeton Regulations Stanford Wisconsin Yale

Harvard. Memo on Master’s degree requirements in ten other departments, 1935

 

The following memo was found in the papers of the Harvard department of economics outlining the formal requirements for the award of a master’s degree in economics for ten other departments ca. 1935.  Harvard requirements for 1934-35 have been previously posted here at Economics in the Rear-View Mirror.

____________________

REQUIREMENTS FOR A.M. IN ECONOMICS

University of Chicago
—Catalogue Vol. XXV, March 15, 1935—
No. 7, p. 293.

“The specific requirements for the Master’s degree are:

  1. A minimum of 8 courses, or their equivalent (of which at least 6 must be in Grades II and III above*). Either in his undergraduate or graduate work the candidate should cover the substantial equivalent of the requirements for the Bachelor’s degree in economics…(May be shown by examination.)
  2. A thesis involving research of at least semi-independent character.
  3. A final examination (either oral or written at discretion of the department). The examination is on the thesis and its field and on one other field chosen by the candidate.
  4. All candidates…are expected to show ability to think clearly…on abstract economic questions, and familiarity with terms and common concepts of economic science.

No language requirement for A.M. apparently.

No set time limit, but (p. 282) they seem to regard three of work in economics (either as graduate or as undergraduate) as “normal preparation” although “exceptionally capable” students may do it in less time.

* Grade II and III being respectively survey and problem courses (II), and Research, reading and seminar courses (III). Grade I includes intermediate courses.

 

Stanford University

  1. One academic year of graduate work (A “normal time” but also minimum).
  2. Thesis
  3. Examinations (general or final and at discretion of department).

 

Cornell University

  1. At least one full year of residence at Cornell.
  2. “No student may be admitted to candidacy for any of the degrees of A.M., M.S.,…, or Ph.D. whose training has not included work in a foreign language equivalent to three units of entrance in one language or two in each of two languages.
  3. A thesis or (at departmental discretion) an essay.
  4. Written or oral (at departmental discretion) final examination.

He must show a knowledge of:

Three special fields, such as: in Economic Theory and History:

(1) Good general knowledge of history of economic thought, including classical school and contemporary.
(2) Familiarity with economic analysis and controversial area of economic thought.
(3) A background knowledge of social and intellectual history.

or in Monetary Theory:

One requirement:
(1) A detailed understanding of the theory and history of money; monetary system of the United States, theory and history of banking; banking system of United States, foreign exchange, monetary aspects of cyclical fluctuations.

No specific course requirements as far as I can see.

 

University of Minnesota

  1. At least one full academic year’s work (in residence).
  2. Thesis required.
  3. Nine credit hours each quarter of graduate courses for three quarters.
  4. He must have done in three years (undergraduate) work in his major subject if it is open to freshmen, or two years otherwise.
  5. A reading knowledge of a foreign language to be determined by the department is necessary.
  6. An examination.

 

University of Michigan

  1. Residence requirement: One semester and one summer session, or three summer sessions; nine hours work a semester and six hours a summer session are minimum to establish residence at the respective sessions.
  2. A minimum of 24 hours of graduate work is required (i.e. necessary but not alone sufficient).
  3. Thesis may be required at discretion of department (apparently economics does not require it).

 

University of Wisconsin

  1. At least two semesters’ work, at least one of which to be at Wisconsin.
  2. An oral examination.
  3. A thesis may be required of students seeking to specialize in a definite line of study.

 

Princeton University

“After Commencement Day, 1935, the degree of M.A. will be awarded only to a student who has passed the general examination for the Doctor’s degree.” This implies a knowledge of French and German; and implies not less than two years graduate study. The examination may be written, oral, or both. One year of residence is required.

 

Yale University

  1. Two full years of resident graduate study required (but may be in less time in exceptional cases where unusual scholarship is demonstrated).
  2. Reading knowledge of either French or German.
  3. An essay is required of all candidates.
  4. (Apparently) A comprehensive written examination in field of concentration in Department of Economics (it is not specified for which degree so that it seems to apply to both M.A. and Ph.D.).

 

Columbia University

  1. “The candidate shall have registered for and attended courses aggregating not less than thirty tuition points, distributed over a period of not less than one academic year or its equivalent.”
  2. “The candidate shall have satisfied the department of his choice that he has satisfied requirements specified by the department for the degree.” (May include courses, examination, an essay, seminars, or “other work”.)

 

University of California

“There are required 20 semester units and in addition a thesis.”

“At least eight of the 20 units must be strictly graduate work.”

“The student must spend one year of residence.”

Rate of taking units:

“Graduate students in the regular session taking only upper division courses are limited to a program of 16 units” (a semester or a year? probably a semester).

“Graduate students…taking only graduate courses are limited to 12 units.” Mixtures are regulated in proportion thereto.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Department of Economics, Correspondence and Papers 1930-1961. (UAV 349.11) Box 13, Folder “Graduate Instruction, Degree Requirements.”

 

 

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economics Programs Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Stanford Texas Undergraduate Vanderbilt Wisconsin Yale

Size distribution of graduate and undergraduate programs in economics. U.S., 1963-65

 

 

These are the last two statistical tables from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of leading economics departments in the U.S. intended to provide orientation for departmental chairpersons in salary negotiations. Today’s posting gives the numbers of undergraduate and graduate majors reported by 29 departments. 

Earlier postings gave the distribution for full-professors, the distribution for associate professors, and the distribution for assistant professors across departments. Two previous postings have the actual distributions for entering salaries for new Ph.D.’s for 1964-65 and 1965-66 and the anticipated range of salary offers for new Ph.D.’s for 1966-67. Those first five reports from The Cartel provide distributions of median or average incomes or ranges of salary offers by ranks across departments. Table 6c from the summary report that gives the salary distributions by rank for 335 professors, 143 associate professors and 185 assistant professors from all 27 departments.

Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

____________________

 

TABLE 7c
Graduate majors in Economics – 29 institutions:

 

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
(Estimate)
300 and over 2 2

1

200-299

 0 0 2
150-199 3 4

5

100-149

 6 5 6
80-99 4 4

3

60-79

 5 7 5
40-59 6 4

4

20-39

 2 1 0
1-19 1 1

1
Number of departments reporting:

29

 28

27
Total number of students:

2,963

 3,057

3,118

____________________

 

TABLE 8C
Undergraduate majors in Economics – 29 institutions

 

1963-64 1964-65
300 and over 4

4

250-299

 1 1
200-249 3

2

150-199

 4 6
100-149 8

5

80-99

 1 1
60-79 2

1

40-59

 2 3
20-39 1

1

1-19

 1

1
Number of departments reporting:

27

25
Total number of students:

4,550

4,312

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

Image Source: quick meme website.

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Salaries Stanford Texas Vanderbilt Virginia Wisconsin Yale

Economics Professors’ Salaries by Rank (6), 1965-66

 

 

This is the sixth table from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of 9-10 month salaries paid in U.S. economics departments. In the previous five tables The Cartel reports median or average incomes or ranges of salary offers by ranks across departments. In this posting we have Table 6c from the summary report that gives the salary distributions by rank for 335 professors, 143 associate professors and 185 assistant professors from all 27 departments.

Earlier postings gave the distribution for full-professors, the distribution for associate professors, and the distribution for assistant professors across departments. Two previous postings have the actual distributions for entering salaries for new Ph.D.’s for 1964-65 and 1965-66 and the anticipated range of salary offers for new Ph.D.’s for 1966-67.

Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

Using the BLS web CPI Inflation calculator, one can inflate nominal levels (say for December 1965, the date of the report) to April 2017 using a factor of 7.69.

 

____________________

TABLE 6c

Salaries of Economists (9-10 month, academic year, 1965-66) in 27 of the 29 Departments of Economics (The Cartel):
N = Number of Persons

MID POINT OF RANGE PROFESSORS ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS ASSISTANT PROFESSORS
26,750/and over 2
26,500 0
26,000 2
25,500 1
25,000 8
24,500 0
24,000 4
23,500 2
23,000 7
22,500 2
22,000 12
21,500 7
21,000 10
20,500 5
2,0000 22
19,500 10
19,000 13
18,500 11
18,000 24
17,500 8
17,000 19
16,500 23
16,000 27
15,500 20 1 0
15,000 21 2 1
14,500 14 2 0
14,000 22 10 0
13,500 10 12 0
13,000 10 13 1
12,500 7 18 2
12,000 6 20 1
11,500 3 21 7
11,000 3 13 9
10,500 0 18 18
10,000 0 9 35
9,750 1 9
9,500 2 28
9,250 1 11
9,000 0 24
8,750 0 8
8,500 0 13
8,250 2
8,000 15
7,750 1
N=335 N=143 N=185

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

Image Source:  “Me and my partner” by C. J. Taylor on cover of Punch, December 25, 1889. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

 

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Salaries Stanford Texas Vanderbilt Virginia Wisconsin Yale

Expected New PhD Starting Salaries in U.S. Economics Departments (5), 1966/67

 

 

This is the fifth table from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of 9-10 month salaries paid in U.S. economics departments. Table 5c give figures for the anticipated range of salaries for “freshly completed PhD’s” for the coming academic year (1966-67) across the departments reporting. Earlier postings gave the distribution for full-professors, the distribution for associate professors, and the distribution for assistant professors. The previous posting has the actual distributions for entering salaries for new Ph.D.’s for 1964-65 and 1965-66. Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

The copy of this table in the Johns Hopkins University archives has a useful handwritten addition. It is noted that the median lower bound of the range is $9,250 and the median higher bound of the range is $10,000. Thus one might say a measure of the range of the anticipated, as of December 1965), 9-10 month salary offers for “freshly completed PhDs” for 1966-67 was ($9,250 — $10,000), though such a range was not necessarily anticipated by any one of the 27 departments responding to that question.

Compared to Table 4c, this table tells us that the range of offers for “freshly completed PhDs” was anticipated to move up $250 about a 2.67% nominal increase from 1965-66 to 1966-67.

Using the BLS web CPI Inflation calculator, one can inflate nominal levels (say for December 1965, the date of the report) to April 2017 using a factor of 7.69.

 

____________________

TABLE 5c
Departments Expect to Have to Offer to Get
“Freshly Completed PhD’s for Next Year, 1966-67

 

MID-POINT OF RANGE

 FROM TO
13,000 0

0

12,500

 0 0
12,000 0

1

11,500

 0 0
11,000 0

6

10,500

 0 7
10,000 5

6

9,750

 0 0
9,500 8

4

9,250

 1 0
9,000 8

2

8,750

 1 0
8,500 1

1

8,250

 0 0
8,000 3

0

N=

 27

27

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

Image Source:  Caption under the drawing: “No class of labor feels the grip of grinding monopoly more than our underpaid, overworked ball-players.”  “The base-ball Laocoon” by L. M. Glackens. Cover of Punch, May 14, 1913. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Salaries Stanford Texas Vanderbilt Virginia Wisconsin Yale

New PhD Starting Salaries in U.S. Economics Departments (4), 1964/5-1965/66

 

 

This is the fourth table from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of 9-10 month salaries paid in U.S. economics departments. Table 4c give figures for the distribution of salaries for “freshly completed PhD’s” across the departments reporting. Previous postings gave the distribution for full-professors, the distribution for associate professors, and the distribution for assistant professors. The next posting has the anticipated (as of December 1965) range of salaries to hire freshly completed PhD’s for the coming academic year, 1966-67. Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

Using the BLS web CPI Inflation calculator, one can inflate nominal levels (say for December 1965, the date of the report) to April 2017 using a factor of 7.69.

______________________

TABLE 4c
Entering Salaries of “Freshly Completed PhD’s” of New Staff Members
in the Fall of 1965-66 1964-65

 

MINIMUM MEDIAN MAXIMUM
MID-POINT OF RANGE 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66

1964-65

Over 10,999

 0 0 0 0 1 0
10,500 0 0 0 0 2

1

10,000

 2 0 4 3 7 0
9,750 2 0 4 0 1

0

9,500

 4 1 2 0 2 4
9,250 1 2 3 3 1

3

9,000

 3 6 0 5 3 6
8,750 1 1 3 5 0

1

8,500

 4 5 3 5 2 5
8,250 1 1 0 2 0

1

8,000

 2 3 1 0 1 0
7,750 0 0 0 0 0

1

7,500

 0 1 1 2 0 1
7,250 1 1 0 0 0

0

N=

 21 21 21 25 20 23
Median $9,000 $8,500 $9,250 $8,750 $9,750

$9,000

Mean

 $8,952 $8,583 $9,190 $8,820 $9,600

$8,913

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

 

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Salaries Stanford Texas Vanderbilt Virginia Wisconsin Yale

Assistant Professors’ Salaries in U.S. Economics Departments (3), 1964/5-1965/66

 

 

This is the third table from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of 9-10 month salaries paid in U.S. economics departments. Tables 3c give figures for the distribution of assistant professor salaries across the departments reporting. Last posting gave the distribution for full-professors and the distribution for associate professors. The next posting has the distribution for entering salaries for new Ph.D.’s. Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

Also there is a table of the anticipated (as of December 1965) range of salaries to hire freshly completed PhD’s for the coming academic year, 1966-67.

Using the BLS web CPI Inflation calculator, one can inflate nominal levels (say for December 1965, the date of the report) to April 2017 using a factor of 7.69.

____________________

TABLE 3c
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(1)
Median Salaries
All Assistant Professors

MID-POINT
OF RANGE

 1965-66 1964-65
Over 11,249 0

1

11,000

 0 0
10,500 3

0

10,000

 7 1
9,750 2

0

9,500

 6 6
9,250 3

2

9,000

 4 5
8,750 1

6

8,500

 1 2
8,250 1

3

8,000

 1 2
7,750 0

0

7,500

 0 0
7,250 0

1

N=

 29 29
Median $9,500

$8,900

Mean

 $9,402

$8,936

 

 

TABLE 3c
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(2)
Average Salaries
“Superior Assistance Professors”
(Top 1/3)

MID-POINT
OF RANGE

 1965-66 1964-65
Over 11,249 4

1

11,000

 3 2
10,500 8

5

10,000

 7 3
9,750 2

2
9,500 3 4
9,250 0

3

9,000

 1 3
8,750 1

3

8,500

 0 0
8,250 0

2

8,000

 0 0
7,750 0

0

7,500

 0 0
7,250 0

1

N=

  

29

  

29
Median $10,250

$9,500

Mean

 $10,333

$9,575

 

 

TABLE 3c
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(3)
Average Salaries
“Average Assistant Professors”
(Lower 2/3)

MID-POINT
OF RANGE

 1965-66 1964-65
Over 10,749 0

1

10,500

 1 0
10,000 5

0

9,750

 2 0
9,500 4

3
9,250 7 1
9,000 2

8

8,750

 4 3
8,500 1

5

8,250

 2 3
8,000 1

1

7,750

 0 2
7,500 0

1

7,250

 0 1
N= 29

29

Median

 $9,300 $8,800
Mean $9,251

$9,063

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

Image Source: Brussells conference, cartel magnate (detail). Postcard from 1902. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA.

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Colorado Columbia Cornell Duke Economist Market Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota North Carolina Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Salaries Stanford Texas Vanderbilt Virginia Wisconsin Yale

Associate Professors’ Salaries in U.S. Economics Departments (2), 1964/5-1965/66

 

This is the second table from the so-called “Cartel” summary report from December 1965 of 9-10 month salaries paid in U.S. economics departments. Tables 2c give figures for the distribution of associate professor salaries across the departments reporting. Last posting gave the distribution for full-professors. Future postings include the actual salary distributions for assistant professors and freshly completed PhD’s 1964/65 and 1965/66. Refer to the first posting in this series of tables for information about the compiler Professor Francis Boddy of the University of Minnesota and a list of the 30 departments belonging to the Chairmen’s Group.

Also there is a table of the anticipated (as of December 1965) range of salaries to hire freshly completed PhD’s for the coming academic year, 1966-67.

Using the BLS web CPI Inflation calculator, one can inflate nominal levels (say for December 1965, the date of the report) to April 2017 using a factor of 7.69.

____________________

TABLE 2c
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(1)
Median Salaries
All Associate Professors

MID-POINT
OF RANGE		 1965-66 1964-65
Over 13,749 3 0
13,500 2 0
13,000 2 1
12,500 6 3
12,000 5 2
11,500 4 3
11,000 3 11
10,500 2 4
10,000 0 0
9,750 0 1
9,500 0 2
N= 27 27
Median $12,000 $11,000
Mean $12,173 $11,093

 

 

TABLE 2c
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(2)
Average Salaries
“Superior Associate Professors”
(Top 1/3)

MID-POINT
OF RANGE		 1965-66 1964-65
Over 16,249 0 1
16,000 1 0
15,500 1 0
15,000 2 0
14,500 2 0
14,000 5 2
13,500 6 4
13,000 4 6
12,500 3 3
12,000 0 4
11,500 1 3
 [sic, cell empty] 1 2
 [sic, cell empty] 0 1
N= 26 26
Median $13,000 $12,186
Mean $13,082 $12,159

 

 

TABLE 2c
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS 1965-66, 1964-65

(3)
Average Salaries
“Average Assoc Professors”
(Lower 2/3)

MID-POINT
OF RANGE		 1965-66 1964-65
14,500 0 0
14,000 1 0
13,500 0 0
13,000 4 1
12,500 4 1
12,000 2 2
11,500 3 2
11,000 7 8
10,500 3 4
10,000 2 4
9,750 0 1
9,500 0 2
9,250 0 0
9,000 0 0
8,750 0 1
8,500 0 0
N= 26 26
Median $11,265 $10,775
Mean $11,640 $10,760

 

Source: Johns Hopkins University. The Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 5, Box 6, Folder 2 “Statistical Information”.

Image Source: “The monopolists’ may-pole” by F. Opper.  Centerfold of Puck, vol. 17, no. 425 (April 29, 1885). Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA.