Categories
Berkeley Exam Questions Suggested Reading Syllabus

Berkeley. Syllabus and exams. Regulation and Antitrust. Woroch, 1996

 

Every so often I plunge into the Wayback Machine to search for “ancient” economics course materials from as far back as the 1990’s. Today I return with a syllabus, suggested readings for presentations and for paper topics, and some final examination questions for what has/had been the traditional second course in the field of industrial organization that covers regulation and competition policy. 

The course instructor at UC Berkeley was Glenn Woroch who had received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of California, Berkeley in 1983. According to his August 2013 homepage he taught that graduate course “Regulation and Antitrust” three times (Spring 1994, 1996, 1997).

__________________

Glenn Woroch: Short Bio

Dr. Glenn Woroch is Adjunct Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, and Executive Director of the Center for Research on Telecommunications Policy. Dr. Woroch is an internationally recognized expert in the economics of the telecommunications industry, and has served as a consultant to governments and the private sector on a wide range of telecommunications issues.
Dr. Woroch has published numerous articles on industrial organization, regulation, antitrust, corporate strategy and intellectual property. He served on the editorial boards of Information Economics & Policy, the Journal of Regulatory Economics, and Telecommunications Policy and was a founding member of the International Telecommunications Society.
Dr. Woroch is regularly retained as an economic expert witness on litigation matters involving monopolization claims, mergers, intellectual property infringement, and economic damages. Besides his expertise in telecommunications, Dr. Woroch has extensive experience in the broadcast and cable television, computer software, personal computer, computer networking, ecommerce, electric power and food and beverage industries. Dr. Woroch has been an economic advisor to government agencies including the U.S. Departments of Energy and Justice and the Office of Technology Assessment. In addition to his U.S. engagements, he has consulted to private and public sector clients in Latin America, the Pacific Rim and Western Europe.
Previously, Dr. Woroch taught economics at the University of Rochester and Stanford University, and was Senior Member of Technical Staff at GTE Laboratories. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics and M.A. in Statistics from Berkeley.

Source: Short bio of Glenn Woroch linked to his August 2013 webpage. Archived copy at the Wayback Machine internet archive.

__________________

Department of Economics
University of California
Economics 220B, Spring 1996
REGULATION & ANTITRUST
Glenn Woroch

Description. This is the second of two graduate courses in industrial organization. It will cover regulation and antitrust policy, concentrating on control of natural and artificial monopoly in theory
and in practice. Emphasis will be on theoretical developments although an occasional empirical study or case study will illustrate key points.

Instructor. Glenn Woroch, 669 Evans, 642-4308, glenn@econ.berkeley.edu.

Office hours: Wednesday, 2:30-4:00 PM.

Textbooks. No textbook is assigned for this course, but several books cover large portions of the material and have been put on reserve:

Sandy Berg and John Tschirhart, Natural Monopoly Regulation, Cambridge University Press.
Alfred Kahn, The Economics of Regulation, volumes I and II, (2nd edition) John Wiley, 199?.
Jean-Jacques Laffont and Jean Tirole, A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, 1993.
William Sharkey, The Theory of Natural Monopoly, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Daniel Spulber, Regulation and Markets, MIT Press, 1991.
Kenneth Train, Optimal Regulation, MIT Press, 1991.

Assignments. Students will select a paper, either one of the optional readings or a paper that we agree upon, and present it to the class. Each student will also write a paper of moderate length on a topic
related in some manner to the economics of regulation. I will distribute a list of suggested topics shortly. Lastly, there will be a final exam.

READING LIST

* – required, in reader. + – recommended for presentation.

I. NATURAL MONOPOLY AND ITS REGULATION

1. Natural Monopoly

* Panzar, J., “Technological determinants of firm and industry
structure,” Chapter 1 in Handbook of Industrial Organization, (Vol.
1) North-Holland, 1989.
* Faulhaber, G., “Cross-subsidization: pricing in public enterprises,”
American Economic Review, 1975.
Baumol, W., “On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a
multiproduct industry,” American Economic Review, December 1977.
Faulhaber, G., and S. Levinson, “Subsidy free prices and anonymous
equity,” American Economic Review, 1981.
+ Evans, D. and J. Heckman, “Multiproduct cost function estimates and
natural monopoly tests for the Bell System,” in Breaking Up Bell,
edited by David Evans, 1983.

2. Efficient Pricing

* Baumol, W. and D. Bradford (1970), “Optimal departures from marginal
cost pricing,” American Economic Review, June.
* Willig, R., “Pareto-superior nonlinear outlay schedules,” Bell
Journal of Economics, 1979.
Baumol, W., E. Bailey and R. Willig, “Weak invisible hand theorems on
the sustainability of prices in a multiproduct monopoly, American
Economic Review, 1977.
Braeutigam, R., “Optimal policies for natural monopoly,” in Handbook
of Industrial Organization, (Vol. 2) 1989.
+ Brock, W., and W.D. Dechert, “Dynamic Ramsey pricing,” William Brock
and W. D. Dechert, International Economic Review, October 1985.
+ Braeutigam, R., “Optimal pricing with intermodal competition,”
American Economic Review, 38-49, 1979.
+ Panzar, J., “The Pareto domination of usage-sensitive pricing,” in
Proceedings of the 6th Telecommunications Policy Research
Conference, H. Dordick (ed.) 1979.

3. Reality Check: Alternative Explanations of Regulatory Policy

* Stigler, G., “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” The Bell Journal of
Economics, 1971.
* Peltzman, S., “The economic theory of regulation after a decade of
deregulation,” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, 1989.
* Joskow, P., “Pricing decision of regulated firms: a behavioral
approach, Bell Journal of Economics, 1973.
Peltzman, S., “Towards a more general theory of regulation,” Journal
of Law & Economics.
Noll, R., “Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation,” in
Handbook of Industrial Organization (Vol. 2) 1989.
Posner, R., “Taxation by regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics,
1971.
+ Winston, C., “Economic deregulation: days of reckoning for
microeconomists,” Journal of Economic Literature, September 1993.

II. REGULATION IN PRACTICE

1. Rate of Return Regulation

* Baumol, W. and A. Klevorick, “Input choices and rate of return
regulation: an over of the discussion,” Bell Journal of Economics,
1970.
* Averch, H. and L. Johnson, “Behavior of the firm under regulatory
constraint,” American Economic Review, December, 1962.
* Spence, A.M., “Monopoly, quality and regulation,” Bell Journal of
Economics, Autumn 1975.
+ Petersen, C., “An empirical test of regulatory effects,” Bell Journal
of Economics, Spring 1975.
+ Bailey, E., “Regulation and innovation,” Journal of Public Economics,
December 1974.

2. Contracting vs. Administration

* Demsetz, H., “Why regulate utilities?” Journal of Law & Economics,
1968
* Goldberg, V., “Regulation and administered contracts,” Bell Journal
of Economics, 1976.
* Williamson, O., “Franchise bidding for natural monopoly: in general
and with respect to CATV, Bell Journal of Economics, 1976.”
+ Zupan, M. “The efficacy of franchise bidding schemes in the case of
cable TV: Some systematic evidence,” Journal of Law and Economics,
October 1989.

3. Price Cap and Benchmark Regulation

* Brennan, T., “Regulation by capping prices,” Journal of Regulatory
Economics, 1989.
* Brauetigam, R., and J. Panzer, “Effects of the change from rate of
return to price cap regulation,” American Economic Review, 1993.
* Shleiffer, A. “A theory of yardstick competition,” Rand Journal of
Economics, 1985.
Vogelsang, I., “Price cap regulation of telecommunications services:
a long-run,” Rand Report, 1988.
+ Cabral, L. And M. Riordan, “Incentives for cost reduction under price
cap regulation,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1989.
+ Sappington, D., and D. Sibley, “Strategic nonlinear pricing under
price-cap regulation,” Rand Journal of Economics, Spring 1992.
+ Armstrong, M., S, Cowan and J. Vickers, “Nonlinear pricing and price
cap regulation,” Journal of Public Economics, September 1995.

III. DESIGN OF OPTIMAL REGULATORY MECHANISMS

1. Iterative and Dynamic Mechanisms

* Vogelsang, I. and J. Finsinger, “A regulatory adjustment process for
optimal pricing by multiproduct monopoly firms, Bell Journal of
Economics, 1979.
* Sappington, D., “Strategic firm behavior under a dynamic regulatory
adjustment process,” Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, 1980.
Salant, D., and G. Woroch, “Trigger price regulation,” Rand Journal
of Economics, Spring 1992.
+ Gilbert, R., and D. Newbery, “The dynamic efficiency of regulatory
constitutions,”Rand Journal of Economics, Winter 1994.
+ Blackmon, G., and R. Zeckhauser, “Fragile commitments and the
regulatory process,” Yale Journal on Regulation, 9:1, Winter, 1992.
+ Logan, J., R. Masson and R. Reynolds, “Efficient regulation with
little information: reality in the limit?” International Economic
Review, 30:4 November 1989.

2. Agency Approach

* Loeb, M., and W. Magat, “A decentralized method for utility
regulation,” Journal of Law & Economics, 1979.
* Baron, D., and R. Myerson, “Regulating a monopolist with unknown
costs,” Econometrica, July 1982.
* Laffont, J.-J., “The new economics of regulation ten years after,”
Econometrica, 1994.
Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole, “Using cost observation to regulate
firms,” Journal of Political Economy, 1986.
Baron, D., “Design of regulatory mechanisms and institutions,” in
Handbook of Industrial Organization, (Vol. 2), 1989.
+ Lewis, T., and D. Sappington, “Regulating a monopolist with unknown
demand,” American Economic Review, December 1988.
+ Wolak, F., “An econometric analysis of the asymmetric information
regulator-utility interaction,” draft.

IV. DEREGULATION

1. Regulation with Horizontal Competition

+ Auriole, E., and J.-J. Laffont, “Regulation by duopoly,” Journal of
Economic Management and Strategy, 1993.
+ Riordan, M., “Regulation and preemptive technology adoption,” Rand
Journal, Autumn 1992.
Biglaiser, G., and A. Ma, “Regulating a dominant firm: unknown demand
and industry structure.” Rand Journal of Economics, Spring 1995.

2. Regulation with Vertical Competition

* Laffont, J.-J. and J. Tirole, “Optimal bypass and creamskimming,”
American Economic Review, 1990.
* Panzar, J., “Sustainability, efficiency and vertical integration,” in
Regulated Industries and Public Enterpirse, edited by Paul
Kelindorfer and Bridger Mitchell, 1979.
Vickers, J., “Competition and regulation in vertically-related
markets,” Review of Economic Studies, January 1995.
Baumol, W. “Some Subtle Pricing Issues in Railroad Regulation,”
International Journal of Transport Economics, August 1983.
+ Gilbert, R., and M. Riordan, “Regulating complementary products: a
problem of institutional choice,” Rand Journal of Economics, 1995.
+ Laffont, J.-J. and J. Tirole, “Access pricing and interconnection,”
European Economic Review, 1994.

VI. ANTITRUST POLICY

1. Predation

* McGee, John, (1958), “Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil
(N.J.) Case,” Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 137-169.
* Ordover, J., and G. Saloner, “Predation, monopolization and
antitrust,” chapter 9 in Handbook of Industrial Organization,
(Vol. 2) 1989.
Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts, “Limit pricing and entry under
incomplete inforamtion: an equilibrium analysis,” Econometrica,
1982.
Ordover, J., and R. Willig, “An economic definition of predation:
pricing and product innovation,” Yale Law Journal, 1981.

2. Merger to Monopoly

* Department of Justice, “The Merger Guidelines.”
* Farrell, J., and C. Shapiro, “Horizontal mergers,” American Economic
Review.
+ Baker, J., and T. Bresnahan, (1985), “The Gains from Merger or
Collusion in Product Differentiated Industries,” Journal of
Industrial Economics, 33:4, pp. 427.

3. Exclusion and Foreclosure

* Krattenmaker, T., and S. Salop, “Anticompetitive exclusion: raising
rivals’ costs to achieve power over price,” Yale Law Journal, 1986.
* Ordover, J., G. Saloner, and S. Salop, “Equilibrium Vertical
Foreclosure,” American Economic Review, 1990.
Ordover, J., A. O. Sykes and R. Willig, “Nonprice Anticompetitive
Behavior by Dominant Firms toward the Producers of Complementary
Products,” in Antitrust Regulation: Essays in Memory of John J.
McGowan, Franklin Fisher (ed.), 1985
Whinston, M., “Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion,” American Economic
Review, 1990.
+ Salinger, M., “Vertical mergers and market foreclosure,” Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 1988.
+ Economides, N., and G. Woroch, “Interconnection and foreclosure of
network competition,” draft, 1995.

 

Source: Spring Semester 1996 syllabus archived at the Wayback Machine.

________________________

Department of Economics
University of California
Economics 220B, Spring 1996
ADDITIONAL READINGS FOR PRESENTATIONS
Glenn Woroch

Lawrence Pulley and Yale Braunstein, “A Composite cost function for multiproduct firms with an application to economies of scope in banking,” Review of Economics & Statistics, 1992.

Besanko, David and Donnefeld, Shabtai, and Lawrence J. White, “The Multiproduct Firm, Quality Choice, and Regulation,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 1990, vol. 36, pp. 411-429.

Ma, Ching-to Albert and James Burgess, “Regulation, Quality Competition, and Price in the Hospital Industry,” mimeo, 1991.

Fudenberg, Drew and Jean Tirole, “‘A Signal-Jamming’ Theory of Predation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 1986, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 366-376.

Ordover, Janusz and Robert Willig, “Antitrust for High Technology Industries: Assessing Research Joint Ventures and Mergers,” Journal of Law and Economics, 1985, vol. 28, pp. 311-333.

Guerin-Calvert, Margaret, “Vertical Integration as a Threat to Competition: Airline Computer Reservations Systems,” in L. White and J. Kwoka Jr. (eds.), The Antitrust Revolution, (pp. 338-370). 1989.

Sappington, David, and David Sibley, “Regulating without cost information: the incremental surplus subsidy scheme,” International Economic Review, 29:2, May 1988.

Frank Matthewson and Ralph Winter, “An economic theory of vertical restraints,” Rand Journal of Economics.

Ralph Bradburd, “Privatization of natural monopoly public enterprises: the regulation issue,” Review of Industrial Organization, 1995, 247-67.

Michael Whinston, “Tying foreclosure and exclusion,” American Economic Review, Sept 1990.

Paul Joskow and Richard Schmalensee, “Incentive regulation for electric utilities,” Yale Journal on Regulation, 4:1, Fall 1986.

Baron, David, “Price regulation, quality and asymmetric information,”American Economic Review, March 1981.

Harris, R., and E. Weins, “Government enterprise: an instrument for the internal regulation of industry,” Canadian Journal of Economics, February 1980.

 

Source: Additional Readings for Presentations from the Spring Semester 1996 archived at the Wayback Machine.

________________________

Department of Economics
University of California
Economics 220B, Spring 1996
SUGGESTIONS FOR TERM PAPER TOPICS
Glenn Woroch

The miscellaneous topics listed below are intended to get you thinking about a term paper. Most are applications to specific industries or specific regulatory policies. There are many more possibilities for research in theoretical aspects of regulation.

Problems of erecting incentives for efficient investment and operation of natural monopoly facilities placed under common ownership in a specific case such as an electric power grid or an internet backbone.

Efficient design of auctions to assign rights to common property resources such as radio spectrum or mineral/grazing rights.

Compare the trend toward re-emergence of end-to-end monopoly in telephone with the vertical divestiture in electric power in terms of the tradeoff between vertical economies and anticompetitive behavior.

Efficient design of duopoly policy in markets that are potentially natural monopoly (e.g., cellular telephone)

The increased concentration of hospitals and HMOs through mergers and joint ventures and the implications for the price and availability of health services.

Potential of labor and management sharing in the rents that accrue in trucking, railroad or other regulated industries.

Motivation and long-run sustainability of bypass in the natural gas distribution industry under different regulatory regimes.

Winners and losers from price ceilings, rationing and strategic reserves in the market for oil and gas.

Effectiveness of different ratemaking practices (e.g., ROR vs. price caps) to encourage adoption of new technologies in a specific industry (e.g., electric power, telephone, health care).

Apply principles of economic models of regulation to understand the passage of a particular piece of legislation that regulates, deregulates or re-regulates an industry (e.g., Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, Cable Act of 1992, Telecom Act of 1996).

Cross country comparison (e.g., U.S. vs. Japan) of policy formation on a specific regulatory issue (e.g., regulation of nuclear power or deregulation of telephones), and the relation between the outcome and the possibilities for rent seeking under the different political systems.

Policy alternatives toward a dominant firm that achieves a de facto standard in an industry exhibiting strong complementaries among component products (e.g., Microsoft and Intel).

The use of structural separations or Chinese walls to guard against leveraging market power into complementary product markets.

Compare performance of public enterprises relative to regulated private firms within or across industries (e.g., water, electric power, cable TV, airlines) and relate to management incentives and/or regulatory policies.

Success of regulatory policy that uses a government-owned firm to compete against a dominant private firm.

The relative effectiveness of alternative regulatory mechanisms to elicit relevant information, e.g., yardstick vs. iterative mechanisms.

Success of privatization initiatives based on the nature of the post-privatization regulatory scheme especially with regards to rate regulation and the ease of competitive entry.

Creating efficient incentives for disposal of nuclear and other kinds of hazardous waste.

Tradeoff between efficiency and anti-competitiveness of mergers/alliances/joint ventures among local/long distance/cable/wireless companies aimed at exploiting multimedia opportunities.

Comparison of solutions to pricing interconnection sold to competitors across different industries (e.g., phone v. electric power) or for a single industry across different countries.

Source: Suggested Paper Topics from the Spring Semester 1996 archived at the Wayback Machine.

________________________

Department of Economics
University of California
Economics 220B
Glenn Woroch

TAKEHOME FINAL EXAM
Spring 1996

INSTRUCTIONS: Answer each of the first four questions and then choose just one of the last two questions In each case keep you answers concise. Due the end of business on Friday, May 17th.

  1. Suppose that all firms have available the technology characterized by the cost function:

C(y1, y2) = a y1 + b y2 + c max {y1, y2}

where y1 and y2 are quantities of the two goods, 1 and 2. Further suppose that the market demand for y1 exceeds that for y2 at all relevant output prices.

(a) For y1 > y2 > 0, determine whether this cost function exhibits economies of scope, economies of scale over the entire product set, economies of scale specific to good 1 or economies of scale specific to good 2.

(b) Find the first-best output price for the industry to charge for the two goods. Determine the configuration of firms in the industry that products the corresponding industry wide outputs at least cost for the industry.

(c) Prove that the industry configuration and prices given in you answer to part (b) satisfies the requirements of sustainability

(d) Describe in words what kinds of circumstances might lead to cost functions like this one.

  1. A regulated firm produces two products: A and B. The firm is required by regulators to earn no more than is necessary to cover its operating costs plus a competitive return on invested capital.
    Assume that product B exhibits constant marginal cost of production equal to cB.

(a) Describe the solution to the Ramsey pricing problem. In the process be certain to make explicit whatever demand and cost assumptions you need to support your answer.

(b) Now suppose that an unlimited number of unregulated firms can enter into the market for product B at a constant marginal cost of cE where cE > cB. How does this affect the regulated firm’s pricing, and what is the effect on consumer welfare?

(c) Now suppose that cE < cB. Demonstrate that the regulated firm might gain by selling product B at a price (slightly) below cE.

(d) Since, in general, the regulator does not know the relative sizes of cB and cE , what are the pros and cons of allowing the regulated firm to produce B?

  1. Many schemes for regulating natural monopolies have been tried, and many more have been proposed. Listed below are some the schemes studied in this class.

(i) Rate-of-return regulation
(ii) Vogelsang-Finsinger iterative mechanism
(iii) Yardstick regulation
(iv) Price cap regulation
(v) Demsetz-type franchise auction

Choose two off of this list, and compare their relative merits in terms of each of the following criteria:

(a) short-run allocative efficiency,
(b) speed and likelihood of achieving first/second best outcomes over the long run,
(c) cross subsidization across products
(d) the rents that accrue to producers,
(e) vulnerability to political influence by producers and/or consumers,
(f) incentives to invest in cost-reducing innovations,
(g) informational requirements for implementing the mechanism.

  1. [WARNING: THIS PROBLEM HAD SPECIAL CHARACTERS THAT DID NOT SURVIVE THE ASCII FORMAT SAVE. WHERE YOU SEE A “z”, I HAVE ONLY GUESSED.] Consider the application of the Baron-Myerson Bayesian incentive mechanism to the following special situation. Suppose that production requires an unknown constant marginal cost and a
    known fixed cost: C(y, z) = z y + F, where z is distributed uniformly over the unit interval [0,1]. Let demand for the single product be linear: D(p) = a – bp. Assume that a/b > 1. Finally, assume that the weight attached to consumer surplus, V(p(z),t(z)), is one and the weight attached to firm z’s profit is � where 0 < � < 1.

(a) Find the optimal two-part pricing rule: p(z), t(z). What values do they take on at the extreme of least cost z = 0 and at highest cost z = 1?

(b) At the optimal solution compute the consumer surplus and the firm’s profit as a function of . Again find the values they take on at the extreme of least cost = 0 and at highest cost = 1.

(c) Describe the unit price, fixed fee, consumer surplus and firm profit as z approaches 1.

(d) Compute the profit-maximizing uniform price p(z). Find values for z and for which this unregulated monopoly price is less than the regulated price.

  1. Choose one of the following industries and periods:

(i) Electric power generation and distribution in the 1960s
(ii) Long distance telephone service in the 1970s
(iii) Passenger air transportation in the 1980s
(iv) For-profit hospitals in the 1990s

In that case describe what economic research has to say about the presence of economies of scale and scope, vertical economies and the prevalence of transactions costs. Describer the predominant form of regulation in that industry during that period in the U.S. Evaluate the match between the cost conditions and the form of regulation based on efficiency criteria.

  1. Intense debate has broken out over the years over whether certain industry practices represent an efficient response to market conditions, or an expression of anti-competitive behavior. Identify one of the following practices:

(i) predatory pricing
(ii) exclusive dealing
(iii) product bundling or tying
(iv) resale price maintenance

For the practice that you chose, describe the current antitrust treatment based on court decisions and policies of antitrust authorities. (These may not be unambiguous.) Report the positions of the different sides of the debate, especially the arguments that view the practice as efficiency enhancing and as competitively harmful. Make a persuasive argument for one of these two positions, or for a third position.

Source:  Takehome Final Exam from the Spring Semester 1996 archived at the Wayback Machine.

________________________

Department of Economics
University of California
Economics 220B
Glenn Woroch

FINAL EXAM
Spring 1994

INSTRUCTIONS: The exam has FOUR parts. Please answer each one. To
guide your time allocation, a total of 100 points is distributed as
follows:

Part I: 24 points (= 6 x 4 points)
Part II: 30 points
Part III: 28 points
Part IV: 18 points

  1. Answer TRUE or FALSE and EXPLAIN with 2 or 3 sentences.
    1. If an industry configuration is sustainable, then
      production is cost efficient.
    2. A Ramsey price vector is necessarily subsidy free.
    3. In Peltzman’s private interest model applied to monopoly
      regulation, price obeys an inverse elasticity rule typical
      of efficiency but income distribution may be skewed.
    4. In Joskow’s behavioral model of rate-of-return regulation,
      rate reviews do not occur when unit costs are rising.
    5. Producer and consumer surplus increase with the HH Index in
      a Cournot oligopoly.
    6. The so-called “double markup” that results from monopoly
      power at both the manufacturing and the retail levels can
      be eliminated with a two-part tariff.
  1. Two schemes that are designed to regulate natural monopoly
    are:

(i) Rate-of-return regulation
(ii) Vogelsang-Finsinger iterative mechanism

Evaluate each of the schemes relative to the unregulated
outcome in terms of their effects on:

(a) short-run allocative efficiency,
(b) the rents that accrue to producers,
(c) the welfare of consumers.

  1. Auctioning off monopoly franchises has often been proposed
    as a way to inject some competition into natural monopoly
    markets.
    1. In terms of economic efficiency, compare the following two
      rules for awarding the franchise: give it to the bidder
      with the most attractive price-service-quality package, or
      give it to the bidder that offers the largest cash payment
      for the franchise.
    2. What are the informational requirements needed to implement
      the schemes proposed by Demsetz and by Loeb and Magat?
    3. What difficulties arise over the course of the franchise
      contract that hamper the performance of this scheme?
    4. Under what conditions will the outcome be improved as the
      length of the firm-regulator relationship becomes infinite?
  1. Consider the Baron-Myerson approach to regulating a firm
    with private cost information. For concreteness, let the
    cost function of the firm be C(y,b) which is increasing
    in output of the good y and a cost parameter b.

1. What is meant by an “information rent”? How is it paid to
the firm in the Baron-Myerson scheme?

2. In what sense does a cross subsidization occur across
different cost realizations?

3. What additional features do Laffont and Tirole build into
their model of regulation that generalizes Baron-Myerson?
How does their pricing optimum differ?

Source:  Wayback Machine Archived copy June 1, 2002.

Image Source:  Glenn A. Woroch’s Berkeley webpage (modified 13 Jan 1999). Archived copy at the Wayback Machine internet archive.

Categories
Chicago Economics Programs Economist Market

Chicago. Draft memo of a program to rebuild the department of economics by T.W. Schultz, 1956

 

The following draft memo by T. W. Schultz outlines the serious faculty replacement needs of the University of Chicago department of economics in the mid-1950s. Particularly noteworthy, aside from the impressive list of lost faculty, is the appended table listing the sponsored research/3rd party funders of the economics department at that time. One also sees that the department had been authorized to make offers to Kenneth Arrow, Robert Solow and Arthur F. Burns. So much for the best-laid plans of mice and men. A better historian of economics than I might spin a counterfactual tale of a post-Cowles Chicago with Arrow and Solow on the faculty.

Regarding the ICA Chile Enterprise: Economic Research Center, Schultz wrote “The Chilean enterprise will give us a fine ‘laboratory’ in which to test ourselves in the area of economic development– a major new field in economics.” This reminds me of the old Cold-War Eastern European joke about whether Marx and Engels were scientists (“No, real scientists would have tried their experiments on rats first”). What a “fine ‘laboratory'” for testing oneself!

_________________________

A Program of Rebuilding the Department of Economics
(first draft, private and confidential – T. W. Schultz, May 22, 1956)

Your Department of Economics has been passing through a crisis. Whether it would survive as a first rate department has been seriously in doubt, with one adversity following another as was the case up until last year. It is now clear, however, that we have achieved a turning point in that we can rebuild and attain the objective which is worth striving for – an outstanding faculty in economics.

The crisis came upon us as a consequence of a combination of things: (1) the department, along with others in the University, had been denied access to undergraduate students of the University who might want to become economists; (2) Viner left for Princeton, Lange for Poland, Yntema for Ford and Douglas for the Senate; (3) the Industrial Relations Center drained off some of our talent and when it jammed, Harbison left for Princeton; (4) Mr. Cowles’ arbitrary decision to shift “his” Commission to Yale was a major blow; (5) Nef been transferring his talents to the Committee on Social Thought, and (6) add to all these the retirement of Knight.

Meanwhile, there were several external developments which did not reduce our difficulties: (1) a number of strong (new) economic centers were being established – at Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Yale, Vanderbilt, M.I.T. and with public funds at Michigan and Minnesota; (2) our salaries were falling behind seriously relative to some of the other places, and (3) recruiting of established, highly competent economists became all but impossible given the crisis that was upon us and the (then) low repute of the University neighborhood.

The ever present danger of the past few years has been that we would be in the judgment of competent colleagues elsewhere, in the beliefs of oncoming graduate students and in the eyes of the major foundations – not recover our high standing but instead sing to a second or even a third-rate department and in the process lose the (internal) capacity to recruit and rebuild.

We now have achieved a turning point distinctly in our favor.

The major efforts which have contributed most have been as follows:

  1. We have taken full advantage of our unique organization in combining real research with graduate instruction. Our research and instruction workshops are the result. The Rockefeller Foundation gave us three grants along the way – agricultural economics, money and public finance – to test this approach and advanced graduate work. The Ford Foundation has now financed our workshops with $200,000 (eight 5-year grant) (our proposal of January 1956 to The Ford Foundation states the theory and argues the case for this approach on the basis of the experiences we have already accumulated).
  2. We set out aggressively to recruit outstanding younger economists. The workshops were a big aid to us in doing this; so was the financial support of the University. We had the ability to “spot them”. We now have the best group of talented young economists, age 30 and less, to be found anywhere. This achievement is rapidly becoming known to others in keen “competition” is already upon us as a consequence.
  3. We need urgently to run up a lightning rod, a (rotating) professorship with a salary second to none, to attract talent and make it clear we were in business and would pay for the best. The Ford Foundation took favorably to the idea. (Thought so well of it that they will do the same for 3 other privately supported Universities – Columbia, Harvard and Yale!)
    The $500,000 endowment grant from them for a rotating research professorship is our reward.
  4. The foundations have given us a strong vote of confidence: grants and funds received by the Department of Economics during 1955-56 now total $1,220,000. (A statement listing these is attached).
  5. The marked turn for the better in the number and the quality of students applying for scholarships and fellowships is, also, an affirmative indication.
  6. The Economics Research Center is filling a large gap in providing computing, publishing and related research facilities which was formally a function of the Cowles Commission.
  7. The Chilean enterprise will give us a fine “laboratory” in which to test ourselves in the area of economic development – a major new field in economics.

There remains, however, much to be done. We must, above all, not lose the upward momentum which is now working in our favor.

Faculty and University Financial Support

To have and to hold a first rate faculty in economics now requires between $225,000 and $250,000 of University funds a year.

To have a major faculty means offering instruction and doing research in 8 to 10 fields. Up until two years ago we came close to satisfying the standard in our graduate instruction. We then had 11 (and just prior to that, 12) professors on indefinite tenure.

Then, Koopmans and Marschak were off to Yale, Harbison to Princeton and Knight did reach 70. And, then there were 7. On top of these “woes” came the serious illness of Metzler which greatly curtailed his role; and, Nef having virtually left economics. Thus, only 5 were really active in economics with Wallis carrying many other professional burdens. Meanwhile we added only one – Harberger was given tenured this year.

Accordingly at the indefinite tenure level we are down to about one-half of what is required to have a major faculty. Fortunately, several younger men have entered and have been doing work of very high quality.

It should be said that the Deans and the Chancellor have stood by, prepared to help us rebuild.

Major appointments were authorized – Arrow, Stigler, Solow and others. We still are hoping that Arthur F. Burns will come.

The resignations and the retirement, however, did necessarily reduce sharply the amount of financial support from the University.

In rebuilding, at least five additional tenure positions will be required:

  1. Labor economics (from within)
  2. Trade cycle (we hope it will be Arthur F. Burns, already authorized).
  3. Money
  4. Econometrics and mathematical economics.
  5. Business organization
  6. Consumption economics (when Miss Reid retires; next 3 years we shall have the extra strength of Dr. D. Brady with finances from The Rockefeller Foundation)
  7. International trade (pending Metzler’s recovery)
  8. Economic development.

The faculty and the University financial support recommended is as follows:

Tenured positions (for individuals fully committed to economics).

    1. Now in the harness

6: Friedman, Johnson, Harberger, Hamilton (Metzler), Wallis (Nef), Schultz

    1. To be added

5: Burns pending, (labor), (money), and two other fields, most likely econometrics and business organization

 

Budget:

11 [tenured positions]

 

$165,000

Metzler and Nef $15,000
$180,000
III. Supplementary non-tenure faculty $45,000
Altogether $225,000

 

Outside Financial Support for the Department of Economics

Grants

Amount of grant Available 1956-57

A. Received during 1955-56.

1.     Sears Roebuck Fellowships

$4,000

$4,000

2.     National Science Foundation (2 years)

$13,000

$6,500

3.     Conservation Foundation (2 years)

$33,000

$16,500

4.     Rockefeller Foundation: consumption economics (3 years)

$45,000

$15,000

5.     American Enterprise (2 years)

$17,250

$8,625

6.     Ford Foundation: research and instructional workshops (5 years)

$200,000

$30,000

7.     Earhart Fellowships.

$6,000

$6,000

8.     S.S.R.C. Student Grants

$5,000

$5,000

9.     Ford Foundation: 3 pre-doctoral grants

$10,200

$10,200

10.  Ford Foundation: faculty research grant (Hamilton)

$12,500

$8,000

11.  ICA Chile Enterprise: Economic Research Center Fellowships, research support (3 yrs)

$375,000

$125,000

12.  Ford Foundation: endowment for rotating research professor

$500,000

$25,000

13.  Rockefeller Foundation: Latin America (Ballesteros)

$5,000

$5,000

Sub-totals

$1,225,950

$264,825

B. Received prior to 1955-56 where funds are available for 1956-57.

1.     Rockefeller Foundation: workshop in money (3 years with one year to go)

$50,000

$20,000

2.     Rockefeller Foundation: workshop in public finance (3 years with one year to go)

$50,000

$20,000

3.     Resources for the Future (3 years with one year to go)

$67,000

$27,000

4.     Russian Agriculture (2 years with one to go)

$47,000

$22,000

B sub-totals

$214,000 $89,000

A and B totals

$1,439,950

$353,825

 

Source:  University of Chicago Archives. Department of Economics Records. Box 42, Folder 8.

Image Source: 1944 photo of T.W. Schultz from University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-07479, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. Cf. Wikimedia Commons, same portrait (dated 1944) from Library of Congress.

Categories
Duke Economics Programs Economists

Duke. Career information about the first quarter century of economics Ph.D.’s, 1957

 

Early lists of economics Ph.D. degrees awarded by Harvard (1875-1926) and the University of Chicago (1894-1926) have been posted earlier. Duke University awarded its first Ph.D. in economics in 1932. The department published a survey of its 45 Ph.D. alumni in its October 1957 departmental newsletter that is transcribed below. Year the Ph.D. was awarded, employment in 1957, some employment history,  and sample publications are included.

_________________

Duke Economics Graduates Newsletter
Number 3. October 1957

Duke University
Durham
North Carolina

Department of Economics
and Business Administration

COMMENCEMENT in 1957 marked the end of a quarter century since the University awarded its first Ph.D. in economics. The degrees conferred last June brought the total to 45, distributed as follows.

1932

2 1947 1
1934 2 1948

3

1935

1 1949 1
1937 3 1950

4

1938

1 1951 2
1939 1 1952

1

1940

1 1953 3
1941 5 1954

2

1942

1 1955

2

1943

2 1956 1
1944 2 1957

4

The first few pages of this NEWSLETTER are devoted to the activities of these 45 Doctors of Philosophy in economics. The response to the questionnaire distributed last summer was so abundant that it has proved impossible to report all the data submitted. In particular, the editor has had to pare publications lists in order to keep the NEWSLETTER   within reasonable bounds. It is his hope that its contents nevertheless fairly represent the varied research interests and the wide experiences of our graduates in university, business, and government employment. By the way of preface to the Ph.D. and M.A. rolls [Note: M.A. rolls not included in this post] Professor Hoover has the following greeting for former graduate students in economics:

To all who have been graduate students in Economics at Duke:

            This occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of Duke University’s granting of the first Ph.D. in Economics coincides with the beginning of my thirty-third year at Duke University and with the relinquishment of the Chairmanship of the Department after twenty years’ service. My association with our graduate students has been the closer since for ten years I also served as Dean of the Graduate School. This was in like manner true of my predecessor, Dean W. H. Glasson, who laid the foundations of graduate work in our Department and in the University. We are fortunate in having as the new Chairman of the Department, Dr. Frank de Vyver who has for so long helped so efficiently in carrying on the administrative duties of the Department. Dr. R. S. Smith is currently acting as Director of Graduate Studies in place of Dr. Joseph Spengler, who continues to contribute so much to our program of graduate training and research. Dr. Spengler has a Ford Fellowship for the present academic year.

            We are gratified with the recognition which the research work and graduate teaching of our faculty has received during the past years. It is upon your accomplishments and attainments since leaving Duke, however, that we depend in large degree for our standing in the academic world. We are grateful to you and our best wishes are always with you.

Sincerely
Calvin B. Hoover

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Doctors of Philosophy

DR. CLARK LEE ALLEN ‘42
Head, Department of Economics, North Carolina State College

Regional Economist, OPA, 1942-43; Army Finance Dept., 1943-45; Duke, 1945-46, 1947-49; Northwestern, 1946-47; Head of Department, Florida State, 1949-54; Head of Department, Texas A.&M., 1954-56.

American Economic Association, Graduate Record Examination Comm., 1951, 1953, and Economic Education Comm., 1957-60; Editor, Southern Economic Journal, 1956-.

“Rayon Staple Fiber: Its Past and Its Prospects,” Southern Economic Journal, Oct. 1946.
“Modern Welfare Economics and Public Policy,” Southern Economic Journal, July 1952.
(Co-author) Prices, Income, and Public Policy. 1954.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM R. ALLEN ‘53
Assistant professor, University of California, Los Angeles

Washington University, 1951-52; Northwestern, 1952.

Social Science Research Council Fellow, 1950-51; Conferee, Ford Foundation Seminar on Sociology of Knowledge, 1953; Conferee, Merrill Center for Economics, 1955; Conferee, SSRC Seminar on Diplomatic History, 1956.

“The Effects on Trade of Shifting Reciprocal Demand Schedule,” American Economic Review, Mar. 1952.
“The International Trade Philosophy of Cordell Hull, 1907-1933,” American Economic Review, Mar. 1953.
“Stable and Unstable Equilibria in the Foreign Exchanges,” Kyklos, VII, Fasc. 4, 1954.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. KARL E. ASHBURN ‘34
Director, Division of Business Administration, Alabama College

Southern Methodist; Texas Christian; University of Florida, Texas Technological; Chief of Placement, Tenth U.S. Civil Service Region; Dean, Division of Commerce, McNeese State College, 1952-57.

Editor, Southwest Social Quarterly, 1937-38; Labor Consultant, Executive Dept., State of Texas, 1938; Migratory Labor Comm., State of Louisiana, 1940-41; Louisiana Survey on Higher Education, 1954-56; State of Louisiana Comm. on Industrial Development, 1957; Advisory Board, Port of Lake Charles, 1957.

“Slavery and Cotton Production in Texas”, Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, Dec. 1933.
“The Texas Cotton Control Acreage Law,” Southwestern Historical Quarterly, July 1957.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. ELBERT V. BOWDEN ‘57
Associate professor, College of William and Mary in Norfolk

Duke University, 1952-54 and 1955-56; Bureau of Business Research, U. of Kentucky, 1954-55.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. R. BUFORD BRANDIS ‘43
Chief Economist and Director, Economic Research Division, American Cotton Manufacturers Institute

Littauer Fellow, Harvard, 1940-41; Research Dept., Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1941-45; Supply Officer, U.S. Naval Reserve, 1945-46; Emory University, 1946-52; Research Economist, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 1952-54.

“British Overseas Trade and Foreign Exchange,” Political Science Quarterly, June, 1943.
“British Prices and Wage Rates, 1939-41,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1943.
(Co-author) The American Competitive Enterprise Economy, 1953.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. ROYALL BRANDIS ‘52
Associate professor, University of Illinois

War Regulations Analyst, E.I. du Pont, 1941-43; Foreign Trade Economist, National Cotton Council, 1947-49; Duke, 1949-52.

“Cotton Competition: U.S. and Brazil, 1929-1948,” Journal of Farm Economics, Feb. 1952.
“Cotton and the World Economy,” Southern Economic Journal, July, 1956.
“Notes on the Theory of Games and the Social Sciences,” Erhversokonomisk Tidsskrift, 20, Sept. 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. EVERETT J. BURTT, JR. ‘50
Chairman, Department of Economics, Boston University

University of Maine, 1939-41; Denver University, 1941-42; War Manpower Commission, 1942-43; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1946-47.

“Labor Utilization during National Emergencies,” Monthly Labor Review, Oct. 1951.
“Full Employment in the Postwar Period,” Social Science, Jan. 1943.
“After the Shutdown in Howland, Maine,” Southern Economic Journal, July 1941.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. JAMES J. CARNEY, JR. ‘38
Chairman, Department of Finance, University of Miami

Duke, 1934-37; University of Illinois, 1937-40; Regional Labor Economist, War Manpower Commission, 1942-43; Regional Labor Economist, Fourth Service Command, 1944.

“Some Aspects of Spanish Colonial Policy,” Hispanic American Historical Review, May 1939.
Institutional Change and the Level of Employment: A Study of British Unemployment,1918-1929. 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WALTER H. DELAPLANE ‘34
Dean of Arts and Sciences, Texas A.&M. College

Duke, 1934-43; Economist and Chief, Iberian Section, Blockade Division, 1943-45; National Univ. of Paraguay, 1945-46; Colegio Libre, Buenos Aires, 1946; Head of Dept., St. Lawrence Univ., 1946-48.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM P. DILLINGHAM ‘50
Professor, Florida State University.

Univ. of Georgia, 1947-49; Senior Consultant, President’s Comm. on Veterans Pensions, 1955-56; Research Staff, Florida Citizens Tax Council.

Federal Aid to Veterans, 1917-1941, 1952.
The Historical Development of Veterans’ Benefits in the United States. 1956
Taxation of Intangible Personal Property in Florida. 1956

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. EDWIN WOODROW ECKARD ‘37
Project Evaluator, Glenn L. Martin Company

University of Arkansas, 1946-52; Division Economist, Office of Price Stabilization, 1952-53.

Economics of W. S. Jevons. 1940

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. RALPH T. GREEN
Director, Texas Commission on Higher Education

Financial Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 1949-55; Chairman, Department of Economics, Baylor University, 1955-56.

Southern Regional Education Board, 1957-; Official Texas Delegate, Southern Regional Conference on Education Beyond the High School, 1957; Delegate, Fourth Meeting of Technicians of Central Banks of the American Continents, 1954.

“Evaluating Adequacy of Bank Capital: An Analysis of the Problem,” Journal of Finance, Sept. 1954.
“The Challenge of Inflation,” Texas Industry, Feb. 1951.
“Meeting the Challenge of Public Higher Education in Texas,” Texas School Board Journal, June 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. PERCY L. GUYTON ‘52
Head of Economics Section, Department of Social Sciences, Memphis State University.

Mississippi State, 1928-36; Research Fellow, Brookings Institution, 1938-39; Simpson College, 1939-43; Associate Price Executive, OPA, 1945; Northwestern, 1945-46; Head, Department of Economics and Business, King College, 1946-54.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. RECTOR R. HARDIN ‘35
Professor of Business Administration and Acting Chairman, Dept. of Management, College of William and Mary in Norfolk

Head, Dept. of Economics, Berea College, 1935-46; University of Arkansas, 1946-47; Head, Dept. of Economics, Howard College, 1947-57.

American Institute of Management Fellow, 1954-57; President, Kentucky Academy of Social Sciences, 1940-41; Alpha Kappa Psi Deputy Councillor, 1949-57.

“Conservation of Manpower in Alabama,” Alabama Academy of Science Journal.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. H. WALTER HARGREAVES ‘42
Professor, College of Commerce, University of Kentucky

Texas College of Mines and Metallurgy, 1940-42; Economic Analyst, New York Life Insurance Co., 1946-48.

“The Guaranteed Security in Federal Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 1942.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. DAVID M. HARRISON ‘41
Associate Professor, Ohio State University

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. DOUGLAS G. HARTLE ‘57
Lecturer, Department of Political Economy, University of Toronto

Chief, Employment Labor Market Section, Economics and Research Branch, Dept. of Labor, Ottawa, 1955-57. Governor, Carleton University, 1957-60.

*  *  *  *  *  *

Dr. R. MURRAY HAVENS ‘41
Head, Department of Economics, University of Alabama

Baldwin Wallace College, 1941-43; Regional Analyst, OPA, 1943; Economist, Economic Cooperation Administration in Paris, 1948-1949; Economist, Mutual Security Administration, 1951-52

“Laissez-Faire Theory in the Presidential Messages,” Journal of Economic History, Jan. 1942 (Supplement).
“Federal Government Reactions to the Depression of 1837-1843,” Southern Economic Journal, Oct. 1941
“The Significance for American Policy of British Reserve Losses, 1951-1952,” Southern Economic Journal, July 1951

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. HERMAN BROOKS JAMES ‘49
Head, Department of Agricultural Economics, North Carolina State College

Teacher of Vocational Agriculture and Country Agent, 1933-40; Farm Management Specialist, N.C. Agricultural Extension Service, 1940-42, Agricultural Economist, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, 1943-44.

Chairman, Committee on Agricultural Economics, Social Science Research Council, 1953-56; Vice-chairman, National Committee on Agricultural Policy, Farm Foundation, 1956-; President, American Farm Economics Association, 1956-57.

“Limitations of Static Economic Theory in Farm management Analysis,” Journal of Farm Economics, Nov. 1950.
(Co-author) Farm Mechanization, (N. C. Experiment Station Bulletin 348).
(Co-author) Cotton Mechanization in North Carolina. (N. C. State College Technical Bulletin 104)

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. KEITH W. JOHNSON ‘44
Economist, Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Deane College, 1938-40; Franklin & Marshall College, 1940-42; Economist, War Production Board, 1942-45; Economist, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1945-47; University of New Mexico, 1947-48; Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 1948-52; Statistician, Regional Office, General Services Administration, 1952-54

“Residential Vacancies in Wartime U.S.,” Survey of Current Business, Dec. 1942
“Construction and Housing,” Historical Statistics of the U.S., 1789-1945. (Chapter H).
“The Interstate and Foreign Commerce of Texas,” Monthly Business Review(Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas), Oct. 1948

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. JAMES MAYNARD KEECH ‘37
Chairman, Department of Management, University of Miami

Recruiting Specialist, U.S. Civil Service Commission, 1942-44; Auxiliary Departments Analyst, 1948-49.

Workmen’s Compensation in North Carolina, 1929-40, 1942

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. CLIFTON H. KREPS, JR., ‘48
Wachovia Associate Professor of Banking, School of Business Administration, University of North Carolina

Mt. Union College, 1945-46; Pomona College, 1946-47; Denison University, 1947-49; Economist; Chief, Public Information Division; Chief, Financial Statistics Division, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1949-55

“Federal Reserve Policy Formation,” American Economic Review, Sept. 1950
(Editor) Federal Taxes, 1952
“The Commercial Paper Market” and “Bankers Acceptances,” in Money Market Essays. 1951

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. JUANITA MORRIS KREPS ‘48
Assistant Professor, Duke University

Denison University, 1945-49; Hofstra College, 1952-54; Queens College (N.Y.), 1955.

(Co-editor) Aid, Trade and Tariffs, 1953
Our National Resources, 1955

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. EDWARD T. MC CORMICK ‘41
President, American Stock Exchange

Security Analyst; Commissioner, Securities and Exchange Commission, 1934-51; OPA and WPB (on loan from SEC)

Understanding the Securities Act and the S.E.C. 1948

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. PHILLIP D. MC COURY ‘57
Professor, Division of Social Science, Humboldt State College

Central College (Missouri), 1950-52; University of Tennessee, 1955-57

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. EDWIN MANSFIELD ‘55
Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Institute of Technology

Fulbright Scholar to the United Kingdom, 1954-55; Diploma, Royal Statistical Society, 1955; University of Maryland Overseas, 1954; Research Associate, Duke, 1953-54

“The Measurement of Wage Differentials,” Journal of Political Economy, Aug. 1954.
“Community Size, Region, Labor Force and Income,1950,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov. 1955.
“City Size and Income, 1949,” Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 21, 1957.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM L. MILLER ’50
Professor, Alabama Polytechnic Institute

DePaul University, 1946; Duke, 1946-47; Bowling Green State University, 1947-49

“Some Short-Run Relationships between Changes in the Quantity of Money, the National Income, and Income Velocity,” Southern Economic Journal, 1950
“The Multiplier Time Period and the Income Velocity of Active Money,” Southern Economic Journal, 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. JAMES J. O’LEARY ’41
Director of Investment Research and Economist, Life Insurance Association of America

Wesleyan University, 1939-45; Duke University

“Should Federal Deposit Insurance be Extended?”, Southern Economic Journal, July 1943

The Future of Long-Term Interest Rates. 1945

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. HENRY M. OLIVER, JR. ’39
Professor, Indiana University

Univ. of Mississippi, 1937; Duke, 1937-39; Yale, 1939-41; Associate Economist, National Resources Planning Board, 1941; Economic Analyst, U. S. Treasury Department, 1941-45; Univ. of North Carolina, 1946-47; Northwestern, 1947-49.

Vice-president, Indiana Academy of Social Sciences, 1951; Fulbright Lecturer, University of Ceylon, 1955-56.

A Critique of Socioeconomic Goals. 1954
“Wage Reductions and Employment,” Southern Economic Journal, January 1939
“Average Cost and Long-Run Elasticity of Demand,” Journal of Political Economy, June 1947.
Economic Opinion and Policy in Ceylon. 1957

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. OLIN S. PUGH ’57
Assistant Professor, University of South Carolina

General Education Board Fellow, 1951-52; Southern Fellowship Fund Fellow, 1955-56.

The Export-Import Bank of Washington; Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of South Carolina, 1957.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. CHARLES BRYCE RATCHFORD ‘51
Assistant Director, N. C. Agricultural Extension Service

In charge, Extension Farm Management and Marketing, N. C. Agricultural Extension Service, 1950-54; Assistant Farm Management Specialist, 1942, Farm Management Specialist, 1946-47; In charge, Extension Farm Management, 1947-50; Advisory Committee, Bureau of the Census; National Extension Marketing, Committee; Cotton and Cottonseed Research and Marketing Advisory Committee; Educational Advisory Committee, National Cotton Council; Agricultural Advisor, N. C. Bankers Association.

A Mountain Community Moves Forward: Circular 300, N. C. Agricultural Extension Service, 1947
“Economic Implications of Farm and Home Planning Work,” Journal of Farm Economics, No. 5, 1955.
A Price Support Program for Farm Commodities in the U. S. Department of Agricultural Economics, N. C. State College.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. B. U. RATCHFORD ‘32
Professor, Duke University

District Price Officer, OPA, 1942-43; Economic Advisor, Military Government in Berlin, 1945-46; Deputy Chief, Office of Program Review, E. C. A. (Paris), 1948; Deputy Chief of Mission and Chief Economist, I. B. R. D. Mission to Turkey, 1950; Director of Research, N. P. A. Committee of the South, 1952-55.

Vice-President, American Finance Association, 1946-47; President, Southern Economic Association, 1952-53; Editor, Southern Economic Journal, 1941-45; Editor, American Economic Review, 1946-49; Medal of Freedom, War Department, 1946; Litt. D., Davidson College, 1957.

American State Debts. 1941;
(Co-author) Berlin Reparations Assignment. 1947
(Co-author) Economic Resources and Policies of the South, 1951.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. CHARLES EDWARD RATLIFF, JR. ’55
Chairman, Department of Economics, Davidson College

Aviation Supply Officer, U. S. N., 1945-46

“The Centralization of Government Expenditures for Education and Highways in N. C.,” National Tax Journal, Sept. 1956
“Comment on School Efficiency,” American School Board Journal, July 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM D. ROSS ’51
Dean of the College of Commerce, Louisiana State University

Economist, Military Government in Berlin, 1945-46; Duke, 1946-49

(Co-author) Berlin Reparations Assignment, 1947
Louisiana’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program, 1953
“Highway Development and Financing,” Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, May 1956.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. HOWARD G. SCHALLER ’53
Chairman, Department of Economics, Tulane University

Alabama Polytechnic Institute, 1948-49; University of Tennessee, 1952-53.

“Veterans Transfer Payments and State Per Capita Incomes, 1929, 1939, and 1949,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov. 1953
“Social Security Transfer Payments and Differences in State Per Capita Incomes, 1929, 1939, and 1949,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Feb. 1955
“Federal Grants-in-Aid and Differences in State Per Capita Incomes,” National Tax Journal, Sept. 1955

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. LEONARD S. SILK ’47
Economics Editor, Business Week Magazine

University of Maine, 1947-48; Simmons College, 1948-51; Economist, Housing and Home Finance Agency, Washington, 1951-52; Assistant Economic Commissioner, U. S. Mission to NATO and OEEC (Paris), 1952-54

F. Lincoln Cromwell Fellow, American-Scandinavian Foundation, 1946; Fulbright Scholar to Norway, 1952.

Sweden Plans for Better Housing. 1948
Forecasting Business Trends. 1956
“The Housing Circumstances of the Aged in the U.S.,”Journal of Gerontology, Jan. 1952

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM J. J. SMITH ’48
Department of Economics, University of California, Los Angeles, 1945-53; LL. D., UCLA, 1957.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. ROBERT S. SMITH ’32
Professor, Duke University

Visiting professor: N. C. College, 1940; University of Costa Rica, 1945; Northwestern, 1947; University of San Carlos, 1949; University of North Carolina, 1955-56; University of Buenos Aries, 1956.

Guggenheim Memorial Fellow, 1942; Honorary Professor, University of Costa Rica and University of San Carlos; U.S. Specialist, State Department, 1955, 1956, 1957; Honorary Console, Republic of Guatemala, 1955-

The Spanish Guild Merchant. 1940
“Mill on the Dan: Riverside Cotton Mills, 1882-1901,” Journal of Southern History, February 1955
“The Wealth of Nations in Spain and Hispanic America,” Journal of Political Economy, April 1957.

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. THOMAS M. STANBACK, JR. ‘54
Assistant Professor, School of Commerce, New York University

University of North Carolina, 1947-55; Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1955-56

“Comments,” Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, 1957

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. CHARLES T. TAYLOR ’40
Assistant Vice-president, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Georgia State College for Women, 1938-42

“Population Increase, Municipal Outlays, and Debts,”Southern Economic Journal, April 1943
“Financing of Fishing Vessels by Commercial Banks,” Proceedings, Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 1953
“Recession and Economic Growth,” Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, January 1955

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. ROBERT H. VAN VOORHIS ‘44
Head, Department of Accounting, College of Commerce, Louisiana State University

Duke University, 1941-44; Senior Accountant, Ashlin & Hutchings, 1944-45; Timberlands Accountant, West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 1945-49; University of Alabama, 1949-57.

Chairman, American Accounting Association Committee on Internal Auditing Education, 1953-54; National Research Committee of the Institute of Internal Auditors, 1953-54; Chairman, American Accounting Association Committee on Standards of Accounting Instruction, 1955-56

(Co-author) “Cost Control in the U S Air Force,” N.A.C.A. Bulletin, November 1951
“Internal Auditing Courses in American Colleges,” Accounting Review, October 1952 “Operating Reports and Controls,” Accountants’ Handbook(section 4), 1956
How the Smaller Business Utilizes Internal Auditing Functions. 1957

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. E. S. WALLACE ’37
Professor, Millsaps College

Hendrix College, 1937-39; District Price Executive, Regional Price Economist, and Associate Regional Price Executive, OPA, 1942-46.

Fellow, Case Institute of Economics-in-Action Program, 1950; Fellow, Yale School of Alcohol Studies, 1952; President, Mississippi Association of Collegiate Registrars, 1948-49; President, Mississippi State Council, AAUP, 1957-58

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. WILLIAM H. WESSON, JR. ’50
Associate Professor, College of Commerce, Louisiana State University

Assistant Supervisor, Merit Examination, State Of North Carolina, 1941-42, 1946; Duke, 1946-48; Head, Department of Economics, University of Chattanooga, 1948-56.

Fellow, Case Institute of Economics-in-Action Program, 1956; President, Adult Education Council of Chattanooga, 1955-56

Negro Employment in the Chattanooga Area, 1954

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. W. TATE WHITMAN ’43
Professor, Emory University

Accountant (Durham), 1934-36; The Citadel, 1936-47; Duke, 1939-40

(Co. author) Investment Timing: The Formula Plan Approach, 1953
(Co-author) “Formula Plan and the Institutional Investor,” Harvard Business Review, July 1950
“Liquidation of Partnerships by Installments,” Accounting Review, October 1953

*  *  *  *  *  *

DR. E. R. WICKER ’56
Assistant Professor, Indiana University

“The Colonial Development Corporation,” The Review of Economic Studies, June 1956
“A Note on Jethro Tull: Innovator or Crank,” Agricultural History, January 1957.

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Papers of Lionel W. McKenzie, Box 32, Folder “Personal Correspondence, 1952-1998”

Image Source:  Duke University, 1938. Photographed by Frances Benjamin Johnston. From the Carnegie Survey of the Architecture of the South, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

 

Categories
Economists Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania. A protectionist professor forced to leave the Wharton School, Robert Ellis Thompson, ca 1894

 

 

More and more universities are putting digitized, searchable copies of the student newspaper online. Up to now I have made ample use of the archives of the Harvard Crimson, the Columbia Spectator, and the U of M Daily. While sampling the Yale Daily News archive, I came across the name of a guest lecturer from the University of Pennsylvania, Robert Ellis Thompson in the January 28, 1885 issue.

It was reported that Thompson had been instructor, then assistant professor of mathematics before receiving “a chair of Social Science”. Thompson was also reported to have just delivered a course of lectures on the subject of “Protection” at Harvard. Wondering why I had not come across (or noticed) his name before, I reached for volume three of Joseph Dorfman’s Economic Mind in American Civilization, and came up with relatively little:

…there was general agreement in the academic world on most major [economic] issues. The one exception was the question of the tariff, but even here, by the end of the period, only one leading Eastern institution and a few Midwestern state universities could be said to be clearly protectionist. The one was the University of Pennsylvania, where the Reverend Robert Ellis Thompson (1844-1924), professor of social science, held to Carey’s views throughout, even on money.*

*Robert Ellis Thompson’s Social Science and National Economy (Philadelphia: Porter-Coates, 1875), was promoted far and wide by the powerful protectionist Industrial League of Pennsylvania. For biographical detail, see “Memorial Meeting in Honor of Robert Ellis Thompson,” The Barnwell Bulletin, February 1925, pp. 3-23; James H. S. Bossard, “Robert Ellis Thompson, Pioneer Professor in Social Science,” The American Journal of Sociology, September 1929, pp. 239-49.

Source:  Joseph Dorfman. The Economic Mind in American Civilization. Vol 3, 1865-1918 (New York: Viking Press, 1949), p. 80, bibliographic notes p. xvi.

___________________________

Sketch of Life and Career of Robert Ellis Thompson

The University of Pennsylvania archives provides the following sketch of Robert Ellis Thompson’s life and career. One’s curiosity is naturally aroused by the indication that Thompson had been eased/forced out of his professorship by the Provost. Was there a political/philosophical issue involved? Plot-spoiler: Thompson appears to have been at cross-purposes with the direction of the Wharton School of Finance and Economy and his way or the highway led to an off-ramp into a very successful, 27-year second career as president of Central High School in Philadelphia for him.
On the founding of the Wharton School, see Chapter 8  of Edgar Potts Cheyney’s History of the University of Pennsylvania 1740-1940 , esp. pp. 288-293. This reference and more detail about the Penn economics department are found at Gonçalo L. Fonseca’s History of Economic Thought Website

Robert Ellis Thompson
1844 – 1924

  • A.B. 1865, A.M. 1868, D.D. (hon.) 1887
  • Member of Zelosophic Society and University Chess Club
  • Phi Beta Kappa, class salutatorian, and Junior English Prize recipient
  • Professor of mathematics, social science, history, and English literature

Born in Lurgan, County Down, Ireland, on April 15, 1844, Robert Ellis Thompson was the son of Samuel and Catherine Ellis Thompson. The family came to Philadelphia when Robert was thirteen years old.

Thompson entered the University as a freshman in the Class of 1865 and served as class historian in his sophomore year. During his college years he was a member of the Zelosophic Society and the University Chess Club. He was also a Phi Beta Kappa honoree, recipient of the Junior English Prize, and the class salutatorian.

Thompson’s degrees from the University of Pennsylvania included an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree in 1887. Additionally, he earned a Ph.D. from Hamilton College in 1879 and received a LL.D. from Muhlenberg College in 1909.

A Presbyterian clergyman and educator, Thompson began teaching at the University of Pennsylvania in 1868 as an instructor in mathematics; in 1871 he was promoted to an assistant professor of mathematics. From 1874 until 1883 he taught at Penn as professor of social science, and then from 1883 to 1893, he was John Welsh Centennial Professor of History and English Literature. During these years, Thompson lectured at Harvard and Yale from 1884 to 1887 and also at the Princeton Theological Seminary. Thompson was editor of Penn Monthly from 1870 to 1880, and of The American from 1881 to 1892. He published Social Science and National Economy in 1875, and also served as editor for the first two volumes of the Encyclopedia Americana, a supplement to the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica from 1883 to 1885.

In 1892 Provost William Pepper (nephew of Class of 1865 classmate John Sergeant Gerhard) requested Thompson’s resignation from the John Welsh Chair of History and English Literature. Thompson refused to resign and also declined a proposed transfer to a chair of biblical literature, American church history, and industrial history. Eventually however, he was unsuccessful in the attempt to keep his job and, in 1894, took over the presidency of Central High School in Philadelphia. He remained there for twenty-seven years until he was forced out of this post under a state law which fixed the retirement age for teachers at seventy years. He was an outspoken defender of labor unions (1911) and proponent of female suffrage, predicting in 1911 that a woman would be elected mayor of Philadelphia by 1961. He married Mary Neely in 1874. She died in 1894, while Robert Ellis Thompson died on October 19, 1924 in Philadelphia.

Source: Robert Ellis Thompson (1844-1924). University of Pennsylvania. University Archives & Record Center. Web series “Penn People”.

___________________________

Selection of publications by Robert Ellis Thompson
[results of a relatively casual bibliographic search]

Books

Social Science and National Economy (Philadelphia: Porter & Coates, 1875).

Thompson’s Social Science and National Economy, reviewed. Penn Monthly, Vol. 6 (September 1875), pp. 692-698.

Third, revised edition published as Elements of Political Economy with Especial Reference to the Industrial History of Nations (Philadelphia: Porter & Coates, 1882).

Relief of Local and State Taxation through Distribution of the National Surplus. [Series of revised articles in The American.] Philadelphia: Edward Stern & Co., 1883.

Protection to Home Industry. Four lectures delivered to Harvard University, January, 1885. (New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1886)

De Civitate Dei—the Divine Order of Human Society. Princeton Stone Lectures (Philadelphia: John D. Wattles, 1891).

Syllabus of a Course of Six Lectures on Money and Banking. University Extension Lectures, Series D, No. 3. American Society for the Extension of University Teaching, 1894. [Transcription at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror]

Political Economy for High Schools and Academies. Boston: Ginn & Company, 1895.

A History of the Presbyterian Churches of the United States. New York: The Christian Literature Co., 1895.

The History of the Dwelling-House and its Future. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1914.

 

Articles published in Penn Monthly

The Old Education. Vol. 1 (February 1870), pp. 52-60.

A Current Revolution Vol. 1 (April 1870), pp. 121-130.

Ulster in America. Vol. 1 (June 1870), pp. 202-209.

Harbaugh’s Harfe. [Review of Gedichte in Pennsylvanisch-Deutscher Mundart von H. Harbaugh] Vol. 1 (August 1870), pp. 202-286.

The Three Arches. Vol. 1 (September 1870), pp. 202-329.

The Protective Question Abroad. Vol. 1 (Nov. 1870), pp. 436-440.

The Revision of the Old Testament. Vol. 2 (January 1871), pp. 44-52.

Zeisberger’s Mission to the Indians. [Review of Edmund de Schweinitz’s The Life and Times of David Zeisberger, the Western Pioneer and Apostle to the Indians] Vol. 2 (February 1871), pp. 97-106.

The Race and the Individual in their Parallel Development. Vol. 2 (May 1871), pp. 250-263.

The German Mystics as American Colonists.—I. Vol. 2 (August 1871), pp. 391-403.

The German Mystics as American Colonists.—II. Vol. 2 (September 1871), pp. 443-451.

The German Mystics as American Colonists.—III. Vol. 2 (October 1871), pp. 487-497.

Darwin on his Travels. [Review of second American edition of  the Journal of Researches into the Natural History and Geology of the Countries Visited during the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle Round the World] Vol. 2 (November 1871), pp. 562-572.

The Origin of Free Masonry. [Review of G.. W. Steinbrenner’s The Origin and Early History of Masonry] Vol. 2 (December 1871), pp. 617-626.

Some German Critics of Adam Smith. [unsigned, perhaps Thompson] Vol. 3 (Nov. 1872), pp. 586-96.

Review of E. Dühring’s Kritische Geschichte der Nationalökonomie und des Socialismus. Vol. 3 (Nov. 1872), pp. 631-33.

The Communisms of the Old World. Vol. 5 (January 1874), pp. 12-28

The Teutonic Mark. [This article is in great measure supplementary of the series on “The Communisms of the Old World.”] Vol. 5 (August 1874), pp. 557-578.

Prof. Cairnes on Political Economy. Vol. 5 (September 1874), pp. 637-750

The Economic Wrongs of Ireland. Vol. 5 (October 1874), pp. 713-750

Communism and Serfdom in Russia. Vol. 5 (November 1874), pp. 791-808

National Education.—IV. Vol. 6 (May 1875), pp. 327-341

Carey and Ricardo in Europe. Vol. 8 (July 1877), pp. 548-557.

Recent Economic Literature. Vol. 8 (December 1877), pp. 956-968.

Is Christianity on the Wane among Us?. Vol. 9 (January 1878), pp. 45-65.

Use and Abuse of Examinations. [L. Wiese, German Letters on English Education, 1854 and 1876] Vol. 9 (May 1878), pp. 379-400.

De Laveleye’s Primitive Property. Vol. 9 (August 1878), pp. 620-633.

How It Strikes a Stranger. [Review of Hermann Grothe, Die Industrie Amerikas] Vol. 9 (October 1878), pp. 782-793.

The Commercial Future. Vol. 9 (November 1878), pp. 869-889.

My Neighborhood as a Starting-Point in Education. [Substance of an Address delivered before the National Educational Association, July 31, 1879] Vol. 10 (September 1879), pp. 664-676.

The Proposed Franco-American Treaty. Vol. 10 (October 1879), pp. 772-778.

Henry Charles Carey. [Memorial] Vol. 10 (November 1879), pp. 816-834. Frontpiece.

The Silver Question in England. Vol. 11 (January 1880), pp. 64-74.

Spiritualism in Germany. Vol. 11 (February 1880), pp. 97-117.

The Issues of the Campaign. Vol. 11 (August 1880), pp. 630-649.

Lessons of Social Science in the Streets of Philadelphia. Vol. 11 (December 1880), pp. 919-941.

The Future of our Public School System. Vol. 12 (April 1881), pp. 282-292.

 

Image Source: Robert Ellis Thompson, ca. 1880. University of Pennsylvania. University Archives & Record Center. Web series “Penn People”.

 

Categories
Cambridge Exam Questions

Cambridge. Intercollegiate and preliminary examinations in economics, 1931-33

 

The following examinations were included in a publication of the Cambridge University Economics Tripos for 1931-33. Appended to the publication of the 1921-1926 Cambridge Economics Tripos Papers are the “Papers set in the qualifying examinations 1925 & 1926”. So the following three exams most likely served as an early hurdle to clear before being admitted to the Economics Tripos.

 

Intercollegiate Examination of Economics (June 1931)

Principles of Economics
Subjects for an Essay
Trade and Finance
Industry and Labour

Intercollegiate Examination of Economics (June 1932)

Economic Theory
Currency and Banking
Industry and Trade
Labour

Preliminary Examination in Economics (June 1933)

Principles of Economics
Industry, Labour and Money. Paper I
Industry, Labour and Money. Paper II
Modern Economic History

_________________________

 

INTERCOLLEGIATE EXAMINATION IN ECONOMICS.

Monday, June 8, 1931. 9—12.
PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS.

  1. What is meant by a perfect market? To what extent must fundamental economic theory be modified in view of the fact that in practice markets are not perfect?
  2. “The representative firm was devised to meet the difficulties occurring in the analysis of supply when there is a disparity of efficiency as between different producers.” Comment.
  3. Are there any reasons, for purposes of economic analysis, for drawing a distinction between the royalties received by owners of mining properties and the interest received by debenture holders in mining companies?
  4. “Increasing returns maybe due to external economies or to internal economies.” What are external and internal economies, and under what conditions, and in what sense, can increasing returns be said to be due to each?
  5. “If we were content to dispense with further industrial progress we should no longer have to pay tribute in the form of profits to business men.” Discuss.
  6. What is likely to be the effect on the price and output of agricultural produce of levying a land tax from which agricultural land is exempt?
  7. In what circumstances is a rise in the general level of wages likely to be (a) compatible, (b) incompatible with full employment for labour?
  8. Consider carefully under what conditions the control of an industry by a monopolist is likely to be in the social interest.
  9. “The Theory of Distribution is but a particular application of the Theory of Value.” Elucidate this statement.
  10. How far do economic and social considerations justify the right of private bequest?

 

Monday, June 8, 1931.  1. 30—4. 30.
SUBJECTS FOR AN ESSAY.

Write an essay on one of the following subjects:

  1. “For our great-grandchildren the problem will be how to live rather than how to keep alive.”
  2. The Electrification of the Railways.
  3. “Democracy has had its chance and has failed: let us pass on.”
  4. The Control of the World’s Wheat.
  5. “The Five Years Plan.”
  6. The Economics of Advertising.
  7. “La République n’a pas besoin de Savants.”

 

Tuesday, June 9, 1931. 9—12.
TRADE AND FINANCE.

  1. “Ten years of industrial depression measures the cost to this country of the Return to Gold.” Discuss.
  2. Would you agree that the world price level of the next twenty years is at the discretion of the Central Banks in the chief industrial countries? Why, or why not?
  3. What bearing has the proportion of their resources that people choose to hold in the form of money upon the value of money?
  4. In October 1929 the market rate of discount was about 6¼ % while the yield of fixed-interest stocks was about 4¾ % in March 1931 the former was about 2½ % and the latter about 4½ %. How would you account for these facts?
  5. “To-day, as in the middle of the last century, Free Trade is the best policy for this country: the reasons may be different, the conclusion is the same.” Investigate this argument.
  6. What are the relative advantages or disadvantages for this country of a fixed fiduciary issue as compared with a proportional reserve system of note issue?
  7. State clearly the differences in organisation between the money markets of London and New York, and indicate how these differences affect the nature and extent of the influence of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the two markets respectively.
  8. With what truth is it alleged that whereas before the war the sources of disturbance to the Foreign Exchanges automatically set in motion corrective forces, to-day this no longer tends to be so?
  9. How do you account for the differences in the levels of wages normally prevailing between different countries?
  10. What criteria should a Government hold in view in framing a system of taxes?

 

Tuesday, June 9, 1931.  1. 30—4. 30.
INDUSTRY AND LABOUR.

  1. “It was once regarded as the duty of the State to curb the power of monopoly, but it now does everything possible to encourage it.” Discuss the truth of this statement and the desirability of the change to which it alludes.
  2. Examine the effect that would be produced on the wages of skilled workers by the introduction of a national minimum weekly wage.
  3. Give a reasoned account of what you imagine is likely to be the position of the British cotton industry in ten years time.
  4. Describe the British Trade Boards system. What conditions are necessary for the establishment of a Trade Board in a particular industry and what conditions do you think ought to be necessary?
  5. Consider how far the existence of surplus capacity in an industry can be regarded as socially undesirable.
  6. “Since the war there has been a strong positive correlation between rates of real wages and unemployment.” Explain. Can any moral be drawn?
  7. What are the factors that determine the size of firms? Illustrate your answer by reference to actual industries.
  8. Discuss in the light of the experience of other countries the possibility of improving the efficiency of British farming on the side of (a) production, (b) marketing.
  9. How far and for what reasons is labour in this country immobile at the present time? What benefits, if any, would you expect from increased mobility?
  10. Is it possible for technical improvements in production to be adopted faster than is in the interests of the working classes? Illustrate your answer by reference to the conditions of to-day.

 

Monday, June 6, 1932. 9—12.
ECONOMIC THEORY.

  1. Explain the difficulties involved in measuring the total utility derived from any commodity in terms of money.
  2. “Under private enterprise the consumer is king.” How far do the teachings of modern psychology cast doubt upon the truth of this assertion?
  3. Give examples of the way in which the development of economic theory has been moulded by the course of historical events.
  4. Explain the forces which determine the value of a commodity “in the short period,” making plain what you mean by a “short period.”
  5. Is the existence of monopoly (a) a necessary, (b) a sufficient condition for the existence of a system of differential prices?
  6. “Since rents are merely transfer payments from one member of the community to another, it is impossible for an industry to be conducted under conditions of increasing cost from the standpoint of the community as a whole.” Discuss.
  7. Is there any reason, from the standpoint of the public interest, why the freights and fares on the English railways should be maintained at a level sufficient to yield a normal rate of interest on the capital originally invested in the railways?
  8. How far can the doctrine that each factor of production tends to be rewarded in accordance with its marginal productivity be applied to the factor risk-taking?
  9. “Since cuts in wage-rates destroy purchasing-power, they are bound to prolong and aggravate a trade depression.” Comment.
  10. Is the present pace of agricultural and industrial improvement likely in your opinion to make the problem of chronic unemployment greater in the 20th century than in the 19th?

 

Monday, June 6, 1932. 1. 30—4. 30.
CURRENCY AND BANKING.

  1. “The Purchasing Power of Money is a phrase which admits, not of one, but of many meanings, some more useful than others.” Elucidate this statement.
  2. Explain briefly the points at issue between the Currency and Banking Schools in the eighteen-forties. How far was the doctrine of the victorious school justified by the events?
  3. What support does history afford to the contention that the gold standard leads to one set of results in theory, and to quite another set in practice?
  4. “The duty of banks is to act merely as honest brokers between people who have made savings and people who want to use them.” Explain and discuss.
  5. Discuss the relation between changes in long-term and in short-term rates of interest.
  6. Why would you agree, or disagree, with the view that the price-level is the one passive element in the equation of exchange?
  7. How do you account for the course which the prices of imported goods in this country have followed since our suspension of the gold standard in September last?
  8. How far are existing arrangements as to bank reserves adapted to ensure efficient control by the Central Bank over the other banks in the London and New York money markets respectively? What alterations, if any, would you propose?
  9. “The trade cycle constitutes recurrent proof of the absence of tendencies towards equilibrium in the economic system.” Examine the validity of this assertion.
  10. Consider, with reference (a) to past experience, (b) to present circumstances, the relation of the export of capital to equilibrium in our balance of payments.

 

 

Tuesday, June 7, 1932. 9—12.
INDUSTRY AND TRADE.

  1. Show the importance, in past years, of the emigration traffic to the shipping companies of this country and the railroad systems of the New World.
  2. Give some account of the direction and composition of British overseas investment between 1850 and 1900.
  3. “It is obviously to the general interest that sources of supply should grow up as near as possible to centres of consumption; subject to the condition that, where one source has a natural advantage in climate, mineral resources, or deep-set human aptitudes for a particular industry, it may be advantageously developed even at the cost of somewhat large expenditure of labour and material on marketing its products.” (Marshall.)
    Examine, in the light of this statement,
    Either (a) the aggregation of industries in Birmingham and the Black Country;
    Or (b) the location of the milling industry in North America and England.
  4. Define a public utility. How would you approach the problem of whether a particular public utility should be owned and operated by the public?
  5. What evidence would you require to convince you that the organised Produce Exchange renders an indispensable service to the farmer?
  6. Why have the producers of agricultural staples in the New World and in England fared so badly in the last few years? What is the position in continental Europe?
  7. “The 20th century has shown clearly that competitive industry never ends in complete monopoly.” Critically examine this statement.
  8. Seeing that mass production gives decreasing costs, is it not reasonable to suppose that industrial progress and a falling price level will go hand in hand? Consider, in this connection, the price record of soap, automobiles, and electric power.
  9. “Advertisement is a necessary business cost, but of no value to the community as a whole.” Criticise this.
  10. Examine the various causes which may set a limit to the size of a business unit.

 

 

Tuesday, June 7, 1932.  1. 30—4. 30.
LABOUR.

  1. “Our democratic age will be remarkable to posterity for having dimmed the time-honoured belief in the virtues of the poor” (Bosanquet). Is this fair comment on the extension of the Social Services during the past half century?
  2. Discuss the effect of recent changes in the distribution of the National Income on the volume and direction of saving.
  3. Discuss the probable effect on the earnings of workers in the electrical engineering industry of the introduction of a six-hour day coupled with the shift system.
  4. Examine the view that the future of labour organisation lies in Industrial Unionism. Is it supported by the history of Trade Unions in this country?
  5. An industrial combine employing some 30,000 people wishes to introduce a scheme for periodic consultation and discussion between management and employees. Draft an outline constitution. What subjects, if any, would you exclude from discussion?
  6. Give a critical account of the history of government intervention in labour disputes in this country.
  7. Consider the problems involved in the introduction of a means test for claimants to transitional payments under the Unemployment Insurance legislation.
  8. Discuss the decay of apprenticeship. What alternative systems of recruitment are desirable and practicable?
  9. Consider the probable effects of a permanent ban on immigration by the countries of North and South America.
  10. What value do you attach to the suggestions which have been put forward for arresting the growth of unemployment by the speeding-up of expenditure on public works?

 

_________________________

PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION IN ECONOMICS.

Monday, June 5, 1933. 9—12.
PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS.

  1. “Natura non facit saltum.” How far can this be regarded as a satisfactory axiom in Economics?
  2. “It is easier to interpret the classical doctrine that ‘Rent does not enter into the cost of production’ in a sense in which it is not true, and to scoff at it, than in the sense in which it was intended and is true. It seems best therefore to avoid the phrase.” Explain and discuss.
  3. State carefully the conditions which must be satisfied in order that an industry may be in long-period equilibrium.
  4. In what circumstances could the distribution of the resources of a community between different uses be improved by government intervention?
  5. On what theoretical grounds can the varying differences between the wages of skilled and unskilled workers in different countries be explained?
  6. “The doctrine that the earnings of a worker tend to be equal to the net product of his work has by itself no real meaning: since in order to estimate net product we have to take for granted all the expenses of production of the commodity on which he works other than his own wages.” Explain the difficulty involved here.
  7. What is the meaning of “normal profits”? How far is it true that profits in all industries tend to reach a uniform “normal” level?
  8. If you had to calculate the most profitable method and rate of exploitation of a mine with a limited supply of ores of varying grades, what factors would you take into account?
  9. Discuss the meaning which is to be attached to the word “utility” in the Theory of Value.
  10. “Increasing and diminishing returns are attributes rather of production as a whole than of production in one individual industry.” Discuss.
  11. In what circumstances if any would you regard it as desirable that a seller should discriminate in the prices charged to different consumers?
  12. “The chief factors determining the rate of interest are the growth of population and the rate of invention.” Discuss.

 

Monday, June 5, 1933. 1½—4½ .
INDUSTRY, LABOUR AND MONEY.

Paper I.

  1. How far is it true to say that the world gold standard before the War was (i) automatic, (ii) managed, (iii) dependent upon the economic and financial policy of England?
  2. “The Quantity Theory of Money throws no light upon the forces which most directly and actively influence the price level.” Discuss this statement.
  3. “The limit of wealth is never deficiency of consumers but deficiency of productive power” (John Stuart Mill). Discuss.
  4. To what extent do you consider that the progressive supersession of private businesses by joint stock companies has been a gain from the point of view of the community as a whole?
  5. Compare, with reference to any industries with which you are familiar, the relative importance of proximity to the market and proximity to the source of raw materials as factors in determining industrial localisation.
  6. Give an account of the difficulties which confront the Lancashire cotton industry in the world markets to-day. What remedies have been attempted or proposed in recent years for improving the position of the industry?
  7. How far does the nature of the product determine the possibilities of success in the co-operative marketing of agricultural produce?
  8. “In disputes between employers and workpeople, the stoppage of work is analogous to a war, or still more to a trade embargo, in disputes between nations.” Discuss.
  9. Give a rough estimate of the proportions of workpeople whose wage-rates are laid down in collective agreements, or fixed by the various statutory wages boards. How far and in what way do these wage-rates affect the levels of wages in unorganised and unregulated trades and services?
  10. Discuss compulsory arbitration in labour disputes from the standpoint of (a) principle, (b) practice, with illustrations from experience at home or abroad.

 

Tuesday, June 6, 1933. 1½—4½.
INDUSTRY, LABOUR AND MONEY.

Paper II.

  1. What would be the probable effects on the economic system of a country which was previously in equilibrium, if the people were to decide to save an additional £100 million per annum and to put the whole of the money thus saved on deposit account with the banks?
  2. Assuming that an important cause of the present depression in England lies in the fact that prices are below the level of costs, consider the relative merits of attempting (a) to raise prices to meet costs, (b) to lower costs to meet prices.

December 1931

December 1932

Treasury Bills outstanding…

£m. 605

£m. 928

Deposits of 12 Joint Stock Banks

£m. 1,806

£m. 2,049

Advances of 12 Joint Stock Banks

£m. 918

£m. 785

Investments of 12 Joint Stock Banks

£m. 298

£m. 488

Bankers’ Deposits at Bank of England

£m. 82

£m. 134

Wholesale prices (1927=100)

65.8

61.1

How do you account for the changes shown in the above table?

  1. Do you consider that discrimination against road transport in favour of the railways would be advantageous to the community as a whole in England to-day?
  2. “‘The optimum firm’ is a meaningless phrase unless we know the price of machinery, the rate of interest and the rate of invention in a given industry.” Discuss this statement.
  3. “The typical manufacturer of the more elaborate goods tends to become little more than an assembler of components bought from specialist makers.” How far is this true? What effects, if any, is it likely to have on labour and industrial organisation?
  4. Why have so many countries been compelled to take special steps for the re-organisation of their agriculture?
  5. In a firm belonging to an industry in which employers and workpeople are well organised, a dispute arises between some of the workpeople and the management as to how many workers, of what grade, and at what wage, shall operate a new type of machine. Describe the kind of agreements that are likely to exist for settling the issue without a stoppage of work, and sketch the procedure.
  6. “Under well organised production the distinction between payment by time and payment by results disappears. The manager who introduces or retains piece-work or bonus systems thereby stands confessed a second-rate organiser.” Discuss.
  7. Discuss the changes in the functions and status of the foreman consequent upon “scientific management” and “labour control,” and the problems such changes create.
  8. Recount briefly the history of any joint industrial council of employers and employed. Discuss the causes of its successes and failures and suggest any reforms you think desirable.

 

Tuesday, June 6, 1933. 9—12.
MODERN ECONOMIC HISTORY.

  1. “Mercantilism was the economic expression of the militant nationalism which sprang out of the social and political changes of the sixteenth century.” Discuss this. Was mercantilism peculiar to England?
  2. Estimate the importance of Spanish silver to the development of capitalism in Great Britain and Europe.
  3. Why was England the mother country of the Industrial Revolution?
  4. Did John Law seriously damage the economic and financial position of France?
  5. Explain the steps by which England originally reached a gold standard.
  6. What was the teaching of Malthus on the subject of population? Was his problem our problem?
  7. Estimate the economic consequences of the Napoleonic regime to Western Europe.
  8. Examine the points at issue between the Currency and Banking Schools in the 1840’s.
  9. Show the relation between the corn law controversy (1813 to 1846) and the formation of economic theory.
  10. How did German thought and policy between 1800 and the death of Bismarck react to English fiscal doctrine?
  11. Give some account of the rise of Socialism on the continent of Europe.

 

Source:  Cambridge University. Economics Tripos Papers 1931-1933, with the Papers Set in the Intercollegiate and Preliminary Examinations 1931-1933. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1933, pp. 71-83.

Source: Trinity College, Cambridge University. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

Categories
Cambridge Exam Questions

Cambridge. Economics Tripos, 1933

 

Examination questions for the Cambridge Economics Tripos from 19211931 and 1932 have been posted earlier. Today we add the 1933 Economics Tripos for good measure.

Economics Tripos Part I (1933)

General Principles I
Social Problems
General Principles II
Essay Subjects
English Economic History
Economic Structure

Economics Tripos Part II (1933)

Economic Principles
Industry
Money
Essay Subjects
Labour
Principles of Politics
Public Finance
The Economic Development of the United States
Statistics
International Law

______________________________

 

PART I.

Monday, May 29, 1933.  9—12.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES I.

  1. “Economics may be described as a scientific study of the best means of avoiding waste.” Discuss.
  2. “Value in all cases tends to equal cost.” Consider the most important ways in which this dictum requires modification or amplification, and bring out clearly what is meant by “cost.”
  3. Is it possible for a community to save and invest too much for its own welfare?
  4. “Since it is evident that any industry is liable in the course of expansion to flood the market with its products and find its profits falling to zero or below zero, it seems pointless to pick out particular industries, such as agriculture, as being special cases requiring the use of the classificatory term ‘Diminishing Returns.'” Comment.
  5. What effects would you expect a great increase in the income of all classes to have upon (a) the rate of interest, (b) the size of the population?
  6. How far is it true to say that capital is free to migrate from declining to expanding industries?
  7. In what way does the true rent of land either resemble or differ from (a) the rent of buildings, (b) the high incomes of successful professional men?
  8. “The rate of interest tends to equality with the marginal net yield on the capital in use.” How does this come about? Is it an adequate explanation of the forces governing the rate of interest?
  9. Why do the prices of some commodities fluctuate much more than others?
  10. What are the chief benefits that might accrue to the community as a whole if a highly competitive industry were compulsorily converted into a monopolistic corporation?

 

Monday, May 29, 1933. 1½—4½
SOCIAL PROBLEMS.

  1. What evidence, if any, is there that poverty has diminished during the present century?
  2. Discuss the difficulties involved in abolishing or modifying the “means test.”
  3. Can relief of unemployment be dealt with on an insurance basis?
  4. Would a uniform national reduction of wages increase employment?
  5. Is England over-populated?
  6. Discuss the proposal to build a million houses in five years and pay for them with new bank credits and notes.
  7. By what chief methods are industrial disputes settled in Great Britain?
  8. Could a general strike improve the position of the wage- earning class?
  9. How do you account for the growing use of piece-rates in Russia since they seem inconsistent with the communist principle, “From each according to his capacity, to each according to his needs”?
  10. Would you support the proposed international convention for a 40-hour week?

 

Tuesday, May 30, 1933. 9—12.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES II.

A.

  1. Discuss the more important ways in which the world with which Economics is concerned differs from that of real life.
  2. Explain what you mean by “the supply of labour” and discuss how far it is affected by changes in the rates of remuneration offered.
  3. What do you understand by the phrase “the representative producer”? For what purposes is the idea useful?
  4. Two commodities are produced under conditions of joint supply. A given tax per unit is laid upon the output of one. Consider the effect upon the price of the other.
  5. What conditions are most favourable to the success of a combination of workpeople in order to raise the price of their labour?
  6. In what ways is the burden of risk in production and trade distributed under present-day conditions?

B.

  1. Give an account of the factors influencing the value of money.
  2. Discuss the difficulties involved in the construction and use of index numbers of the cost of living.
  3. How is the rate of exchange determined between two inconvertible paper currencies?
  4. Describe the working of the London Discount Market and indicate where its importance lies for the student of monetary conditions.
  5. Expand the statement that “the ability of any one bank to extend credit depends partly at least on the policy of the others.”
  6. How far is “the stabilisation of the level of prices” likely to promote the stability of general business conditions?

 

Tuesday, May 30, 1933. 1½—4½.
ESSAY SUBJECTS.

Write an essay on one of the following subjects:

  1. The final goal of society.
  2. “A little college is a dangerous thing.”
  3. Statesmanship and economics.
  4. Hoarding.
  5. The future of the English village.

 

Wednesday, May 31, 1933. 9—12.
ENGLISH ECONOMIC HISTORY.

  1. “Until the end of the seventeenth century England’s economic position was only of secondary importance.”
    Account for this and for the change which took place in the ensuing century.
  2. What was the “yeoman class”? When and why did it decline in importance?
  3. What was the influence of the wars of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic period on the economic development of England?
  4. Outline the events and the discussions which preceded the Bank Charter Act of 1844 and consider the settlement then achieved.
  5. Give a brief account of the “humanitarian movement” and indicate its rôle in the economic and social life of this country.
  6. Give some account of the principal factors which influenced the history of British shipping in the second half of the nineteenth century.
  7. What were the main features of the financial policy of Gladstone?
  8. Indicate and account for the principal changes in the general level of gold prices between 1821 and 1873.
  9. What is meant by “economic imperialism”? What forms did it take in this country in the generation preceding the outbreak of the World War?
  10. Contrast the structure and general situation of British agriculture in 1850 and in 1914.

 

Wednesday, May 31, 1933. 1½—4½.
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE.

  1. “A shift in the geographical distribution of industrial activities is usually associated with technical changes.” Discuss this, giving examples from recent changes in Great Britain.
  2. How do you explain the rapid growth in the proportion of the population employed in the distributive trades?
  3. “In expanding industries productive capacity can be created far more rapidly than of old.” Consider this statement, giving illustrations.
  4. If to-morrow you were appointed dictator of the Lancashire cotton industry for ten years, what would you do? Give your reasons.
  5. Give some account of recent developments in retail trading in this country.
  6. Under what conditions will an increase in the total output of an industry be secured most cheaply (a) by the expansion of existing plants, (b) by the opening of branches, (c) by the establishment of new firms?
  7. In what ways do you consider that public control over the provision of capital for industrial purposes can be improved?
  8. In what circumstances will organised restriction of output in any one industry be in the public interest?
  9. “It may be a true instinct which foresees the decadence of national prosperity in any special change of industry.” Comment.
  10. “Business is becoming a profession which requires a professional training and outlook.” Discuss the truth of this, and its possible effect on the efficiency of management.

 

______________________________

 

PART II.

Monday, May 29, 1933. 9—12.
ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES.

  1. State and criticise the case for the view that the conception of Utility is superfluous in economic theory.
  2. With what qualifications is it legitimate to suppose that the quantity of a commodity demanded at a given place and time is a function of the price of that commodity only?
  3. “The specious symmetry of the expressions ‘law of diminishing returns’ and ‘law of increasing returns’ conceals differences of fundamental importance.” Explain.
  4. What part, if any, do the principles governing the increase of population play in the modern theory of value? If you hold that they play no part, show precisely how population theory has been extruded.
  5. “Collective bargaining can only secure wage advances at the price of unemployment.” Discuss.
  6. Is there any respect in which the laws which govern the rent of land differ from those which govern the value of other factors of production in equilibrium?
  7. On what principles should a socialist state determine the optimum rate of saving for the community?
  8. Construct, if possible, a general definition of normal profit that will cover the cases both of perfect and of imperfect competition. Or, if that is impossible, give specific definitions appropriate to each case. Justify your procedure.
  9. On what grounds would you decide whether a practice of price discrimination was to be condemned?
  10. If a particular factor of production is not fully employed in a community, its employment can normally be increased by a reduction in the price at which it is offered. What relevance has this for the problem of raising output in a community in which none of the factors is fully employed?
  11. What facts would you need to know in order to measure the advantage which a country derived from its foreign trade?
  12. “Monetary theory is destined soon to swallow up the general theory of value.” Discuss.

 

Monday, May 29, 1933. 1½—4½.
INDUSTRY.

  1. How do you account for the increase since the War in the proportion of the occupied population engaged in the distributive trades? Is this increase to be deplored from the economic standpoint?
  2. Do you think it is correct to regard the last quarter of the nineteenth century as a period of stagnation for British industry, and the early years of the present century as a period of recovery? What evidence is available in support of or in opposition to this view?
  3. How would you explain the spread of international industrial combinations since the War? Do the post-War international combinations differ in any important respect from the pre-War international combinations? Have they contributed to economic stability?
  4. It is said that the State regulation of railway charges and services has been developed on the assumption that the railway companies are monopolists. Discuss this contention, and consider how State regulation affects the present distribution of traffic between railways and roads.
  5. What are “secret reserves”? Does the provision of “secret reserves” afford any advantages to business concerns? Can they be justified from the standpoint of the investor and the public?
  6. What is the economic significance of the recent extension of instalment selling? Has this development had an adverse or a favourable effect on the stability of economic life?
  7. Discuss the broad changes in industrial localization within Great Britain during the last hundred years, and their bearing on the theory of industrial localization.
  8. Do you think that the State is ever justified in enforcing rationalization on an industry? What evidence should the State regard as relevant in considering action of this kind?
  9. It is said that certain costs which are variable or prime costs from the standpoint of the employer are overhead costs from the standpoint of the community. Discuss this contention, and consider its bearing on the question of State interference in industrial affairs.
  10. Account for the progressive decline in the British cotton industry during the last decade.
  11. Discuss the causes of the extension of valorization schemes in world agriculture during the post-War period. Estimate the main economic effects of these schemes.

 

Tuesday, May 30, 1933. 9—12.
MONEY.

  1. What light, if any, does the experience of the last three years throw on the comparative merits of the British, German and American systems of deposit banking?
  2. Examine the view that an index number of prices must be differently weighted according as to whether the forces determining the value of money are analysed with the aid of the conception of velocity of circulation or with the aid of the conception of a demand for “real balances.”
  3. How do you account for the popular notion that money, to serve its purpose well, must be “backed by” some particular kind or kinds of asset? Give instances of the expedients which have been adopted to satisfy this notion in times of crisis.
  4. Examine, with special reference to the course of events in the United States in 1922-29, the theory that economic crises are brought about by a deficiency of saving.
  5. “The controversy which culminated in the Bank Act of 1844 was simply an episode in the agelong warfare between inflationist and deflationist.” Discuss.
  6. Examine the nature, and estimate the strength, of the forces which, in the absence of pressure from a central bank, will tend to bring about adjustment in a country’s balance of payments.
  7. Some people hold that, if productivity per head is increasing, the stabilisation by a world monetary authority of an index number of wholesale prices of raw materials would have seriously inflationary consequences. Do you agree with this view? Can you propose any better objective of international banking policy?
  8. The present slump has been compared with that of the early ‘nineties. Explain the main points of resemblance and difference.
  9. If a Government in a slump spends £100 million, raised by loan, on public works, would you expect the “indirect employment” created to last only as long as the “direct employment,” or to outlast it?
  10. You are Finance Minister of an “off gold” country which has decided to re-adhere to an international gold standard. What considerations would you take into account in deciding upon the new parity of exchange?
  11. “Foreign investment on a generous scale by the creditor countries was the root cause of the world crisis: it is also the only possible remedy.” Discuss.
  12. Discuss the influence of central banking operations on the relation between long and short interest rates, with special reference to the maxim that a central bank should endeavour to secure the equality of natural to market rates of interest.

 

Tuesday, May 30, 1933. 1½—4½.
SUBJECTS FOR AN ESSAY.

  1. Japanese Expansion in Asia.
  2. Rivers.
  3. The Economic Background of the Present Situation in Germany.
  4. The Place of Technological and Psychological Factors in Economic Analysis.
  5. Graft.
  6. The Creative Artist in a Socialist State.
  7. The Colour Problem in Africa.
  8. Class War.

 

Wednesday, May 31, 1933. 9—12.
LABOUR.

  1. Compare broadly the standard of comfort attained by the mass of the people in Great Britain with the standards attained in Germany and the United States of America; and briefly account for the differences.
  2. “Unless drastic action is taken to effect a change in the ownership of property, no substantial advance can be made in the direction of equalizing incomes.” Discuss the grounds for this opinion.
  3. Did the legislation passed by Parliament between 1832 and 1850 on balance promote or retard the material progress of the working class? Give reasons for your opinion.
  4. Explain how the volume of employment in Great Britain would probably be affected if the hours of work for all manual workers in industry and commerce were reduced to 40 per week, without any reduction in weekly wage-rates, (a) in this country only, (b) in all countries.
  5. “Experience shows that, while sickness is an insurable risk, unemployment is not, and ought therefore never to have been brought within the scope of social insurance.” Discuss this view.
  6. In a recent enquiry into the Sheffield cutlery trade, relating to the period July—December 1931, information was obtained from 67 manufacturing firms (approximately one-third of those known to be engaged in the trade) selected at random, from the outworkers employed by them and from a number of other outworkers. It showed the following results for men and women of 21 years and over:
Earnings per Hour
(Pence)
Earnings per Week
Upper Quartile Median Lower Quartile Upper Quartile Median Lower Quartile
Time Workers:
Men 15.7 13.7 11.5 61s. 1d. 54s. 10d. 45s. 0d.
Women 6.7 5.9 5.5 26s. 0d. 23s. 0d. 21s. 0d.
Piece Workers:
Men 18.2 14.1 11.1
Women 8.4 6.9 5.4

Of the 2,926 workpeople covered by the enquiry, 61.1% were males and 38.9% females. According to figures supplied by representatives of the trade unions, it would appear that in 1932 less than 20% of the workers in the trade were organized in trade unions. If you had been Minister of Labour, would you have regarded this information as affording sufficient ground for applying the Trade Board Acts to the trade? And how would you have defended your decision?

  1. “To show that wages in a depressed industry with an international market are higher than those paid for similar work in the same industry abroad does not afford sufficient reason for thinking that a reduction of wages is an appropriate remedy for its depression: in order to establish that conclusion it must be shown also that they are higher than those paid for the same skill and efficiency in other industries at home.” Examine this contention.
  2. It has been proposed that a national authority, constituted similarly to the railways’ National Wages Board, should be established to regulate wages and conditions of work in coal mines throughout the country. Discuss the merits of this proposal.
  3. “The differences of structure and policy between the trade union movements of England and the United States are to be traced to historical accidents rather than to any differences in the present character or organisation of the industries of those countries.” How far is this true?
  4. What statistical or other scientific evidence is there as to the effect of (a) noise, (b) rest-pauses, (c) temperature upon output?
  5. Explain, with reference to the history and the underlying economic conditions of the two industries, why the “sliding-scale” principle of wage-settlement worked successfully in the iron and steel trade, but failed to preserve industrial peace in the coal trade.

 

Wednesday, May 31, 1933. 1½—4½.
PRINCIPLES OF POLITICS.

  1. “The Nation, by its power and its duration, is an organism, with an existence, ends and means of action superior to that of the individuals, separate or grouped, who compose it.” (Italian Charter of Labour, 1927. ) Discuss this view.
  2. “The normal course of improvement starts from origination by pure social invention, and passes subsequently, if at all, into adoption by the State” (Bosanquet). Discuss the view of the relation between Society and the State which is implied in this statement.
  3. What are the limits, if any, to the application by the State of the principle of Equality among its members?
  4. “Liberty is not one, but many, and its various forms may contradict one another.” Discuss this statement.
  5. Discuss the idea that law is the enforcement by the community upon its members of a moral minimum of conduct.
  6. How far can an international sovereign authority co-exist with national State-sovereignty?
  7. Would you agree with the view that a system of representative institutions for the economic world ought to be placed by the side of representative political institutions?
  8. On what principles may the State seek to regulate or control the freedom of thought of its members?
  9. On what grounds would you seek to justify the necessity of party and party-organisation for the proper working of Government?
  10. The French Declaration of Rights of 1789 includes the right of resistance among les droits de I’homme et du citoyen. In what sense, if any, can a citizen have a “right” to resist the State?
  11. Discuss, with reference to your general conception of rights, the idea of a “right to work.”
  12. Would you agree that the “separation of the powers” (or functions) of government is a necessary principle of politics?

 

Thursday, June 1, 1933.  9—12.
PUBLIC FINANCE.

  1. Consider the attempts that have been made to frame general rules for Expenditure analogous to those established for Taxation. Account for the relatively backward condition of the former division of Public Finance.
  2. Examine the views that have been put forward concerning the principle according to which motor-vehicle owners should be taxed, and consider the principle or principles to which the present taxes on motor-vehicle owners tend to conform.
  3. Discuss the extent to which the main differences between the various theories of taxation may be attributed to divergent views of the functions and the nature of the State.
  4. What is there to be said for and against having a quinquennial instead of an annual budget?
  5. On what considerations is the maxim that a government should not issue loans below par based? Does the maxim admit of exceptions?
  6. Discuss the view that the Government should spend the revenue derived from death duties on capital purposes.
  7. As a means to increasing prosperity, it has been proposed (a) to reduce taxation without reducing government expenditure, or, alternatively, (b) to increase government expenditure without increasing taxation. Compare the probable effects of these two policies.
  8. “The law of diminishing utility is sound enough when applied to a particular commodity, but it cannot be extended to wealth in general: consequently all the elaborate arguments and formulae for tax-graduation are without logical foundation.” Comment.
  9. Explain exactly what is meant by Most Favoured Nation treatment, and examine the view that its prevalence constitutes an obstacle to the recovery of world trade.
  10. Discuss, with reference to the practice of other countries, possible alternatives to the methods of local taxation at present in force in England.
  11. Is there any foundation for the view that inter-governmental war-debts are more harmful to trade than (a) other debts owed by governments to foreigners, (b) internal war-debts?
  12. Compare the effects, (a) on home producers, (b) on consumers, of an import duty and an import quota.

 

Thursday, June 1, 1933. 1½—4½.
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

  1. “America is really a federation of sections rather than of States.” Consider this statement from the economic point of view as applied to American conditions in 1789, 1850 and to-day.
  2. Examine, in the light of the first half century of American history after 1789, the economic powers which the constitution gave to the National Government.
  3. Discuss the policy of the United States Government in dealing with the Public Lands down to the Homestead Act of 1862.
  4. Criticize the methods used by the North to finance the Civil War.
  5. “Southern experience before and since the Civil War condemns slavery as an economic institution.” Discuss this statement.
  6. Illustrate the influence of the westward movement within the continent on the economic outlook of the American.
  7. What problems were created by the consolidation of the railways and what measures were taken as a consequence to protect the public interest?
  8. Account for the leading position acquired by the United States in the iron and steel industry.
  9. Explain the change that has taken place in the twentieth century in the American attitude towards immigration.
  10. To what extent have economic motives influenced the oversea expansion of the United States?
  11. “America has no national economic history, in the sense in which France or England has, until the generation after 1880.” Discuss this statement.

 

Thursday, June 1, 1933. 1½—4½.
STATISTICS.

Part A.

  1. Estimate the average, mode and median for the group of rents in Table A. Criticise the use of the formula skewness = (average—mode) \div standard deviation in this case, and suggest or calculate an alternative measurement.

Table A. Three-roomed tenements.

Rent Number
Under 2s. 6d. 1
2s. 6d. to 5s. 3
5s. to 7s. 6d. 14
7s. 6d. to 10s. 29
10s. to 12s. 6d. 27
12s. 6d. to 15s. 13
15s. to 17s. 6d. 11
17s. 6d. to 20s. 2
100

 

  1. Fit a straight line by least squares or any other method to the series of index-numbers in Table B.

Table B. Index of Production.

Years
Quarters 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931
1st 110 105 108 109 84
2nd 107 103 110 100 80
3rd 105 95 107 90 80
4th 107 104 114 92 90
Average 100

Make a graph of the figures, marking in (1) the straight line found and (2) moving averages based on eight successive quarters.
Comment on the results.

  1. If \bar{x},\,\bar{y} are the averages of n observations of (x, y) pairs, and in the array \bar{x}+{{x}_{s}} at there are ns cases with average \bar{y}+{{y}_{s}}, show that r=\frac{\sum{{{n}_{s}}{{x}_{s}}{{y}_{s}}}}{n{{\sigma }_{x}}{{\sigma }_{y}}}.

Work out r and the correlation ratio for the figures in Table C.

Table C.

Number of earners Number of families Average number
of dependents
x ns \bar{y}+{{y}_{s}}
0 8 1.5 \bar{x}=1.6
1 54 2.1 \bar{y}=2.0
2 19 1.8 {{\sigma }_{x}}=1.13
3 11 2.0 {{\sigma }_{y}}=1.42
4 5 2.2
5 3 2.5
100

Make a graph of the averages showing the regression line. Comment on the utility of the procedure in this case.

  1. From a large population 100 workmen are selected at random and are classified thus:
Occupation
Birthplace Skilled Unskilled
Town of residence 30 38
Elsewhere 10 22

Do you find any relationship between skill and birthplace? Table D may be used if needed.

Table D. Values of P.

{{\chi }^{2}}
Number of Compartments 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
2 1 0.48 0.32 0.22 0.16
3 1 0.78 0.61 0.47 0.37
4 1 0.92 0.80 0.68 0.57

 

Part B.

  1. What data are used for forecasting the future trend of population and what assumptions are made? Consider also the more limited question of determining whether a population is self-productive or is tending towards diminution.
  2. Among the statistics used for studying the change of the industrial position are (a) an index of physical production, (b) the number of insured persons in employment, (c) an index of wage-rates, (d) occasional accounts of average earnings. What relationships do you expect to find between these statistics in a period of increasing depression or in a period of recovery?
  3. Explain in some detail the construction of index-numbers of average prices and of volume of trade from statistics of exports and of imports. Describe some of the purposes for which these figures are used and consider whether they are sufficiently accurate for these purposes.
  4. Examine carefully the question whether index-numbers of wages and of cost of living can be combined so as to show the relative movements of real wages in different countries.
  5. Describe one of the mathematical methods of constructing “demand curves” from existing data, and consider in what sense they can be called demand curves.

 

Friday, June 2, 1933. 9—12.
INTERNATIONAL LAW.

  1. Comment upon the international status (if any) of the following:

(a) The Dominion of Canada;
(b) The Saar Basin;
(c) The State of California;
(d) Switzerland.

  1. What are the main legal consequences that flow from the independence of States?
  2. Show in what respects a mandated territory differs from (a) a colony, (b) a protectorate. What (if any) is the sanction for the enforcement of the terms of a mandate?
  3. Describe the constitution and purpose of the International Labour Organisation and the method of the composition of the delegations sent by members to its Conferences. Mention any two of the Labour Conventions adopted by it and now in force.
  4. How far has the process of codification been applied to international law? What are the difficulties in the way of further codification?
  5. Describe the three principal methods for the settlement of disputes prescribed by the Covenant of the League.
  6. Discuss the lawfulness and the effectiveness of an economic boycott,

(a) when applied by the nationals of one State against the commerce of another;
(b) when applied by the international community against a wrongdoing State.

  1. Summarise the effect of the outbreak of war upon

(a) treaties to which all the belligerents and no neutrals are parties, and
(b) contracts between the nationals of opposing belligerents.

  1. How much of the Declaration of Paris, 1856, has in your opinion survived the developments of maritime warfare in the Great War?
  2. In what respects do you consider that the Covenant of the League, the Kellogg-Briand Pact, and the Convention on Financial Assistance (1930) have modified the law of neutrality?

 

Source:  Cambridge University. Economics Tripos Papers 1931-1933. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1933, pp. 53-70.

Image Source: King’s College, Cambridge, England. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Socialism

Harvard. Labor Movement in Europe, Final Exams. Meriam, 1924 and 1925.

 

Harvard’s semester course “The Labor Movement in Europe” was introduced by Professor William E. Rappard in 1912-13 and 1913-14 but then not offered again until 1923-24 and 1924-25 when it was taught by Richard Stockton Meriam. The course was then once again bracketed in the annual course announcements until 1930-31 when it was “reintroduced” by Dr. William Thomas Ham.

Judging from the examination questions below, Meriam appears to have dedicated about a third of his course to socialist economics and socialist labor movements.

___________________

Meriam’s Harvard Ph.D. record, 1921

Richard Stockton Meriam, A.B. 1914.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Social Ethics. Thesis, “Trade Unions in Germany, 1865-1914.” Instructor in Economics, and Tutor in the Division of History, Government, and Economics, Harvard University.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1920-21.Page 62.

___________________

Course Announcement

6bhf. The Labor Movement in Europe. Half-course (second half-year). Tu., Th., Sat., at 10. Asst. Professor Meriam.

This course will deal primarily with the development of trade unionism, of the coöperative movement, and of the political labor movement in Europe from the beginning of the nineteenth century and with the trend of opinion concerning their significance. Special attention will be given to the theories of the relations of labor to industry in the state which have gained adherents among wage earners or have influenced the labor policies of European states. The development of labor legislation and of social insurance prior to the war and the labor problems of the war and reconstruction periods will also be examined.

Candidates for distinction will be given an opportunity to write theses.

Source:  Division of History, Government, and Economics 1924-25. Official Register of Harvard University. Vol. XXI, No. 22 (April 30, 1924), page 69.

___________________

Course enrollment
2nd semester 1923-24

[Economics] 6bhf. Dr. Meriam.—The Labor Movement in Europe.

Total 30: 3 graduates, 12 seniors, 11 juniors, 1 sophomore, 3 others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1923-24. Page 106.

___________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Economics 6b2
Final examination 1924

I. (One hour)

  1. Write a critical review of the Webbs’ The Consumer’s Coöperative Movement, discussing in particular
    1. the Webbs’ interpretation of the movement;
    2. their comparison of the coöperatives with private enterprise;
    3. their comparison of the coöperatives with government enterprise.

 

II. (One hour)
Answer 2 and either 3 or 4.

  1. What do you consider the most important single step to be taken in the United States either (a) to obtain for this country the benefits of the labor movement in Europe, or (b) to avoid its dangers?
  2. Do you accept Sombart’s thesis that “there is a distinct tendency in the social movement to uniformity”?
  3. Answer two.
    1. Compare the characteristics of the German labor movement in 1875, 1890, in 1913.
    2. Compare the position of trade unionism within the labor movement in France and Great Britain in the period 1905-13.
    3. Account for the peculiarities of the French labor movement prior to 1900.

 

III. (One hour)

Explain and criticize four of the following quotations.:

  1. “The books on socialism deal largely with controversies which do not proceed to the heart of the matter. This seems to me to hold of K. Marx, Das Kapital, the most famous and influential of socialist books.”
  2. “Property is theft.”
  3. “Though it (the program of the British Labor Party) lacks a single constructive feature, though it is made up exclusively of scraps of Marxian jargon, catchphrases, and shibboleths, nevertheless it is the kind of program which any class is likely to adopt in its own interest when it for the first time concludes that it can outvote other classes and controlled the state.”
  4. “Even if the state of affairs characterized by peasant protectorship is destined by fate to disappear, socialism does not have to precipitate its disappearance. Its role is not to separate property and labor, but on the contrary to reunite in the same hands these two factors of production, whose division results in the servitude and poverty of the workers who have fallen to the state of proletarians.”
  5. “All this (the schemes of guild socialists) is quite different from producers’ coöperation.”

Source: Harvard University Archives.  Examination Papers. Finals 1924.(HUC 7000.28, vol. 66). Papers Printed for Final Examinations. History, History of Religions,… , Government, Economics, Anthropology,… , Psychology, Social Ethics. (June 1924).

 

___________________

Course enrollment
2nd semester 1924-25

[Economics] 6bhf. Asst. Professor Meriam.—The Labor Movement in Europe.

Total 34: 10 graduates, 8 seniors, 12 juniors, 1 sophomore, 3 others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1924-25. Page 75.

___________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Economics 6b2
Final examination 1925

(Avoid duplication in selecting questions)

I. (One hour)

  1. Write an essay on one of the following subjects:
    1. Marxian socialism and the labor movement.
    2. “Democracy has forced one concession after another from the pure theory of individualism.”
    3. “Violent political passions have but little hold on those who have devoted all their faculties to the pursuit of their well-being. The ardour which they display in small matters calms their zeal for momentous undertakings.”

II. (One hour)
Answer 2 and either 3, 4, or 5

  1. (20 minutes for a or b.) What are the obstacles to the formation in the United States of the Labour Party like either (a) the British Labor Party or (b) the German Socialist Party?
  2. Does a comparison of the characteristics of the labor movement in various European countries in the period 1865-1875 with those in the period 1905-1914 support Sombart’s thesis on The Tendency to Uniformity?
  3. Do you agree with the conclusion of the following quotation from an article on the “labor banks” recently established in the United States? –

“The labor movement in America is far in advance of that in any other country. This will sound strange to ears which are tuned to the current phrases regarding labor movements. They who are still thinking in terms of the primitive tactics of class war will, of course, repudiate it at once. The labor movement of this country is passing out of the primitive fighting stage in which leadership concerned itself chiefly with the immediate tactics of battle. It is passing into a stage in which it is concerning itself with the higher strategy of maneuvering for permanent advantage. The leaders of labor in no other country show any sign of being aware of the first principles of this higher strategy, nor, for that matter, do the more vociferous self-appointed champions of labor in this country. They are fighting capital either directly or politically. They are not even encouraging laborers to become their own capitalists, or to get possession of the machinery of production by the one effective method of purchase.”

  1. Account for:
    1. The comparative results of consumers’ and producers’ coöperation.
    2. The comparative strength of consumers’ coöperation in the United States and Great Britain.
    3. The persistence of the ideal of producers’ coöperation among the wage-earners.

III. (One hour)

Explain and criticize four of the following quotations:

  1. “The final goal is nothing; the movement is everything.”
  2. “Instead of the conservative motto, ‘A fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work!’ they ought to inscribe on their banner the revolutionary watchword, ‘Abolition of the wages system!’”
  3. “Universal suffrage considered by 89 to 96 per cent of the population as a question of the belly and spread throughout the entire national body with the belly’s warmth! Have no fear, gentlemen. There is no power that could withstand it long. Universal suffrage is the standard you must raise. This is the standard which will give you victory.”
  4. “We do not regard Co-operation particularly as a method by which poor men may make savings and advance their own position in the world.… To us the social and political significance of the Co-operative Movement lies in the fact that it provides a means by which, in substitution for the Capitalist System, the operations of industry may be….carried on under democratic control without the incentive of profit-making, or the stimulus of pecuniary gain.”
  5. The Bolsheviki are followers of Karl Marx, in their experiment was based upon his teachings.”
  6. “If the Co-operators would guarantee to the Trade Unionists in their employment distinctly preferential terms, and if the eight million Trade Unionists would, in return, give, not merely all their custom to the Co-operative Societies, but also absolute continuity of service, even when striking against profit-making employers, and an actual superiority in conscientiousness and skill in Co-operative employment, this ‘Direct Action’ would… transfer trade after trade to the joint control of the democracy of consumers in alliance with the democracy of producers without the necessity of paying any compensation to the capitalists.”

 

Source:Harvard University Archives.  Examination Papers. Finals 1925.(HUC 7000.28, vol. 67). Papers Printed for Final Examinations. History of Science, History,… , Government, Economics, Philosophy,… , Anthropology, Military Science. (June 1925).

Image Source: Robert Stockton Meriam in the Harvard Class Album 1925.

Categories
Chicago Columbia Economists Gender Northwestern Social Work

Chicago. Economics Ph.D. Alumna, Helen Fisher Hohman, 1928

 

We have just met Helen Fisher Hohman’s husband Elmo Paul Hohman by way of his Northwestern reading list on labor problems that somehow found its way into the Harvard course syllabi archives. Helen herself went on to get a Ph.D. at the University of Chicago in 1928 (Elmo was teaching at Northwestern) and her dissertation won the distinguished Hart, Schaffner and Marx competition over Simon Kuznets’ dissertation that was given honorable mention. 

One wonders what Helen Fisher Hohman’s career path might have looked like had she been born to a later cohort. It would be nice if we could find a picture of her, maybe some descendent will stumble upon this page and share with Economics in the Rear-View Mirror.

_____________________

Helen Fisher Hohman

1916. B.A. University of Illinois.

1919. A.M. Columbia University.

1919. New York School of Social Work (completed two year program).

1920. Assistant in the economics department, Vassar College.

1921-22. Instructor of economics at Simmons College.

1928. Ph.D. University of Chicago. Thesis: The Trade Board Acts and the Social Insurance Acts in Relation to a Minimum Standard of Living in Great Britain: A Study in Attitudes toward Poverty and Methods of Dealing with It, 1880-1926.

Received first prize in the Hart, Schaffner and Marx competition in 1928 (honorable mention went to Simon S. Kuznets for his “Secular Movements in Production and Prices”)

1931. Edited Essays on Population and other papers by James Alfred Field. (Chicago: University of Chicago).

1933. The Development of Social Insurance and Minimum Wage Legislation in Great Britain: A Study of British Social Legislation in Relation to a Minimum Standard of Living. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

1940.  Old Age in Sweden: A Program of Social Security. U.S. Social Security Board.

Source:  Kirsten Madden. Women economists of promise? Six Hart, Schaffner and Marx Prize winners in the early twentieth century. Chapter 13 in Kirsten Madden, Robert W. Dimand (eds). Routledge Handbook of the History of Women’s Economic ThoughtLondon: Routledge, 2018.
Also: Simmons College yearbook Microcosm 1922, p. 38.

_____________________

1940. Helen Fisher Hohman was listed as Consultant, Bureau of Research and Statistics [Social Security Board]; and Lecturer in the Division of Social Work, Northwestern University.

Source:  Helen Fisher Hohman. Social Democracy in Sweden. Social Security Bulletin, Vol.3, No. 2. February 1940, pp. 3-10

_____________________

Obituary of Helen Hohman (nee Fisher)
August 2, 1894 – December 18, 1972

Mrs. Helen Fisher Hohman, 78, of 606 Trinity Ct., Evanston, former professor of economics at Northwestern University and an authoress, died yesterday in the infirmary of Presbyterian Home, Evanston.

Mrs. Hohman, who taught at N. U. during World War II, wrote the book “British Insurance and Minimum Wage Legislation in Great Britain,” which won a Hart, Schaffner and Marx prize in 1928. Survivors include her husband, Elmo; a daughter, Mrs. Rene Wadlow; and two grandchildren. Private services will be held.

Transcribed from Chicago Tribune, December 19, 1972 by Marsha L. Ensminger

Source:  Genealogy Trails History Group for Washington County, Illinois.

 

 

 

Categories
Economists Harvard Northwestern

Harvard. Economics PhD alumnus, Elmo Paul Hohman, 1925

 

In the previous post Economics in the Rear-View Mirror salvaged part of a reading list for a course on labor problems from a new assistant professor of economics at Northwestern University who would go on to complete his economic history dissertation at Harvard on the American whaling industry (1785-1885). 

Below we add to our record some biographical and career information on this economics Ph.D. alumnus of Harvard.

Elmo Hohman’s wife, Helen Fisher Hohman,  was herself an economics Ph.D. alumna of the University of Chicago. Her post in our series “Get to know an economics Ph.D.” immediately follows.

____________________

Pre-Harvard history theses at the University of Illinois

Hohman wrote his B.A. thesis in history at the University of Illinois:  “The Ku Klux Klan: Its Origin, Growth, and Disbandment” (1916).  His M.A. thesis in history at the University of Illinois is also available: “The Attitude of the Presbyterian Church in the United States Towards American Slavery” (1917).

____________________

Traces from Harvard graduate school

“The Ricardo Prize Scholarship in Economics has been awarded to Elmo P. Hohman 1G. of Nashville, Ill” (Harvard Crimson, 4 June 1920).

“Among the men appointed tutors in History, Government, and Economics for next year is James W. Angell ’18, son of president-elect Angell of Yale. The other newly-appointed tutors are James Hart, William A. Berridge ’14, Karl W. Bigelow, Elmo P. Hohman, and Norman J. Silberling ’14.” (Harvard Crimson, 17 June 1921).

____________________

Harvard Ph.D. awarded 1925

ELMO PAUL HOHMAN, A.B. (Univ. of Illinois) 1916, A.M. (ibid.) 1917, A.M. (Harvard Univ.) 1920.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Labor Problems. Thesis, “The American Whaleman: A Study of the Conditions of Labor in the Whaling Industry, 1785-1885.” Assistant Professor of Economics, Northwestern University.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1924-25. Page 100.

____________________

Career of Elmo Paul Hohman

Assistant and tutor, department economics, Harvard, 1920-1923. Instructor economics, Northwestern University, 1923-1925, assistant professor, 1925-1931, associate professor, 1931-1938, professor since 1938. Special referee, division of unemployment compensation, Illinois Department of Labor, 1939-1942.

Regional price executive, OPA, Chicago, 1942, district price executive Chicago Metropolitan office, 1942-1944. Vice chairman, shipbuilding commission National War Labor Board, 1944, war shipping panel, 1945. Chairman advising committee, Yale Fund for Seamen’s Studies since 1946.

Observer, visiting scholar, International Labor Office, 1928-1929, 1936-1937, 1946, 1958-1959. National panel arbitrators Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Member maritime division International Labor Organization, Geneva.

Student, 3d R.O.T.C., Camp Grant, Illinois, 1918. Commander Second lieutenant infantry, 1918. Associate field director, American Red Cross transport service, 1919.

Source:  Prabook entry for Elmo Paul Hohman.

____________________

Obituary of Elmo Paul Hohman
August 2, 1894 [in Salem,Washington County, Illinois]– January 1, 1977 [Evanston, Illinois]

Services for Elmo Paul Hohman, 82, professor emeritus of economics at Northwestern University, were pending. Mr. Hohman, of 606 Trinity Ct., Evanston, died last Saturday in Evanston Hospital. He joined the faculty of Northwestern in 1923 as an instructor of economics and retired as a professor in 1962. He wrote several books on the American Merchant Marine, among them, “The American Whale Man,” Seamen Ashore,” and “The History of American Merchant Seamen.” He is survived by a daughter, Mrs. Eleanore Wadlow, and two grandchildren. His late wife, Mrs. Helen Fisher Hohman, was also a professor of economics at Northwestern.

Transcribed from Chicago Tribune January 5, 1977 by Marsha L. Ensminger

Memorial service for Elmo Paul Hohman

A memorial service for Elmo Paul Hohman, professor emeritus of economics at Northwestern University, will be at 1:30 p.m. Sunday in the Presbyterian Home Chapel, 3131 Simpson St., Evanston. Mr. Hohman died Jan. 1. He retired as a professor at Northwestern in 1962 after 39 years on the faculty. His late wife, Helen Fisher Hohman, who died in 1972, also was a professor of economics at Northwestern. He is survived by a daughter, Mrs. Eleanore Wadlow, and two grandchildren.

Transcribed from Chicago Tribune February 26, 1977 by Marsha L. Ensminger

Source:  Genealogy Trails History Group for Washington County, Illinois

Image Source: Photo of Elmo Paul Hohman from his passport application dated 30 January 1919. Hohman applied for a passport to join the Transport Service of the American Red Cross in France and England.

 

 

 

Categories
Harvard Northwestern

Northwestern [?]. Partial reading list for labor problems. Hohman [?], 1924

 

 

The following artifact was found all alone, an orphan in a folder in the Harvard University archives marked “Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics 1923-24”. The course outline is obviously incomplete since the second semester of the academic year 1923-1924 at Harvard ran from the second week of February through  the end of April 1924. Also peculiar is the fact that the course number “B3”  on the outline does not correspond to an economics course at Harvard. The only clue we have is the handwritten (and crossed out) name Hohman in the upper right corner of the page.

It turns out that Elmo Paul Hohman (Harvard Ph.D. 1925) was appointed at Northwestern University as an assistant professor of economics in 1923-24. I have also been able to confirm that “B3” is consistent with the course numbering system used at Northwestern at that time. Based on the handwritten additions and underlining noted in the transcription below, one can reasonably conclude that someone teaching a labor economics course at Harvard added the items on British labor experience from Hohman’s outline.

Since the reading list at Northwestern was for the second semester of 1923-24, it seems likely that the reading list was forwarded to the Harvard library reserve desk for either the second semester of 1923-24 or 1924-25. The second semester of the two Harvard labor economics courses, “The Labor Movement in Europe”, was taught by Richard Stockton Meriam (Harvard, Ph.D. 1921) who briefly overlapped with Elmo Hohman as an economics tutor. Exams from 1913-1932 for the first semester labor course (Trade-Unionism and Allied Problems) taught by W. Z. Ripley have been posted earlier. Since one finds an examination question about British trade-unions in Ripley’s course, it is also possible that some of Hohman’s readings were included for Ripley’s course.

In subsequent posts I’ll provide biographical and career information for Harvard Ph.D. alumnus Elmo Paul Hohman and for his wife, Chicago Ph.D. alumna, Helen Fisher Hohman.

______________________

Links to Items on Homan’s Labor Problems Reading List

Watkins, Gordon S. An Introduction to the Study of Labor Problems. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1922.

Douglas, Paul H., Curtice N. Hitchcock, and Willard E. Atkins. The Worker in Modern Economic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1923.

Hammond, J.L. and Barbara Hammond. The Town Labourer, 1760-1832. The New Civilisation. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1920.

Blanshard, Paul. An Outline of the British Labor Movement. New York: George H. Doran Company, 1923.

Perlman, Selig. A History of Trade Unionism in the United States. New York: Macmillan, 1922.

______________________

[handwritten] British
[handwritten] Hohman

ECONOMICS B3.—LABOR PROBLEMS.
(Second Semester, 1923-1924)
OUTLINE OF SUBJECT-MATTER OF COURSE, WITH ASSIGNED READINGS.

I.—Historical Development of the Labor Movement in England and the United States.

1.—English Background Up to and Including the Industrial Revolution.

Feb. 11 Readings:

Watkins, 9-23.
Douglas, 89-96;101-111;121-129.
Hammond, 17-36; 144-150; 156-163; 172-182.

2.—Recent British Experience. [underlined in pencil]

Feb. 18 Readings:

Douglas, 706-718.
Blanshard[underlined in pencil with added note in margin:“look up”], 22-31; 49-90; 100-107; 156-163.

3.—Early American Labor Conditions.

Feb. 25 Readings:

Watkins, 24-40.
Perlman, 3-66.

4.—Modern development of American Labor.

Mar. 3 Readings:

Perlman, 68-80; 106-128; 130-145; 163-166; 235-261; 279-284.

 

II.—The Various Types of Activity Which Have Played a Part, Effective and Ineffective, in the Development of the Labor Movement.

A.—Self-Help; Methods Springing from and Controlled by the Laborers Themselves.

5.—Trade Unionism.

Mar. 10 Readings:

Watkins, 298-324; 330-338; 351-387; 438-444.

6.—Mutual Insurance; Demand for a Larger Share in the Control of Industry; Political Action; Workers’ Education.

Mar. 17 Readings:

Watkins, 366-369; 449-473.
Douglas, 667-668; 719-739; 761-765.
Perlman, 285-294.
Blanshard, 137-145. [underlined in pencil]

 

B.—Public and Governmental Activities.

7.—Labor Legislation.

Mar. 24 Readings:

Watkins, 592-602; 609-620; 120-144; 146-186.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 1, Folder “Economics, 1923-1924”.

Image Source: Cigar box label from the collections of the Museum of the City of New York.