Tag: Leontief

Categories
Economists Harvard

Harvard. Appointment of Leontief as Economics Instructor in 1932

 

 

Wassily Leontief was appointed in April, 1932 at Harvard for a three year appointment as instructor, beginning September 1, 1932. In light of current Rube Goldberg procedures and a Noah’s ark of bureaucratic species required to sign off at each stage of the hiring process in universities today, one wonders at this ease of instructor appointment in 1932 as reflected in the following two letters. Of course, in all fairness I should try to fish out similar appointments that were made for lesser lights endowed with stronger personal relations to the departmental and university movers-and-shakers, but visitors to Economics in the Rear-View Mirror might excuse me for oversampling at the top of the scientific significance distribution. Certainly in this case, merit mattered.

___________________________________

To President Lowell from Dean Murdock, February 23, 1932

Harvard University
Cambridge

Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Office of the Dean
20 University Hall

February 23, 1932.

Dear Mr. Lowell:

The Department of Economics is very eager to have appointed as Instructor for three years, beginning September 1 next, Mr. Wassily Leontieff. They would like to have his salary for the first year $3600, for the second, $4000, and for the third, $4400. At present they are budgeted for a member of their staff with a salary of $5,000, who would be replaced by Leontieff, so that there would be a decrease rather than an increase in the salary budget. In talking to Mr. Burbank, I have been very hesitant about encouraging him in regard to the appointment of Leontieff, since it seems to me that ordinarily, and particularly in these times, a new and untried man should come on a one-year appointment. Leontieff, however, will not consider a one-year appointment. The more I hear about him, the more I think that he is, as the Department feels, a young man of unusual brilliance and promise, and that we should miss a real opportunity if we did not appoint him now. Professor Burbank has not only got testimony about him from various people who know him, and examined his publications, but he has also had him here in Cambridge and has interviewed him. Professor Schumpeter, who is probably coming next year and who did not know that we were considering Leontieff, wrote to Professor Taussig the other day, and in his letter included a passage about Leontieff which I send you with this letter.

I realize that this sort of case creates a possibly dangerous precedent; but, on the other hand, since it involves no increase in our expenses for the next few years, and since Leontieff seems to be a thoroughly unusual person I am inclined to think that we might well take whatever risk there is involved. If you approve, perhaps you will be willing to consider this letter as my formal recommendation. If you wish to discuss the matter with me, or, if you disapprove, I hope you will let me know, since I must give Mr. Burbank some report at once, as Leontieff is considering offers elsewhere.

The following information about Mr. Leontieff has been sent to me by Professor Burbank:

“Wassily Leontieff was born in St. Petersburg in 1906, the son of a professor of Political Economy in the University of St. Petersburg. He began his university training in 1921 in the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Leningrad, and in 1925 received the degree of Learned Economist. For one year he remained at the University as an Instructor in Economic Theory. He then went to Berlin to continue his studies, and received the degree of Ph.D. from that university in 1928. While at Berlin he worked particularly with Professor L. von Bortkiewicz and with Professor Werner Sombart. In the fall of 1928 he was appointed a member of the research staff at the University of Kiel. After spending two years at Kiel he went to China as an adviser in the economic planning of the prospective railway system of that country. Since 1931 he has been a research associate in the National Bureau of Economic Research in New York.”

Very truly yours,

(signed)

Kenneth B. Murdock
[Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences]

 

President A. Larence Lowell,
5 University Hall.

________________________

To Professor Taussig from Professor Schumpeter, February 6, 1932.

“Leontief has been to Harvard (i.e. on a visit here). He will, under present circumstances, hardly be reappointed at the National Bureau of Econ. Research; and I despair of getting anything for him in Germany. What about Harvard? The great argument in favor of appointing him to some teaching or research position, seems to me to be, that, whatever we think of his two papers on statistical demand and supply curves (and I not only accept some of the criticisms leveled against his method, but I also have a few of my own), yet they are so striking proofs of brilliant gifts and they have made so much impression, that his is one of those cases in which it is to the interest of a great University to have a given man on her staff and under her wings. If a man makes himself internationally known by one paper at 23 as L. did, he almost certainly will go a considerable way, and I should think it good policy for Harvard to use the present opportunity, quite apart from the fact, that I should be glad to have him near me. I am sure he would do good work, the results of which would then be associated with Harvard’s name.”

Source: Harvard Archive, President Lowell’s Papers Oct 1930—Sept. 1933. UAI.5.160. Box 301, Folder 676.

Image Source: Wassily Leontief in Harvard Class Album, 1934.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Final Exam Questions for Second Term of Honors Theory, 1940

 

This is one of those cases where one sorely misses the final examination for the first-term of a two-term course. Next time I go to the Harvard archives, I’ll have to check whether I have systematically overlooked the mid-year exams, or the keepers of the Harvard record merely limited themselves to mostly just collecting the exams administered at the end of each academic year. Maybe some visitor to Economics in the Rear-View Mirror happens to check this and let us all know by posting a welcome comment.

Anyhow, this posting continues the current series of exams that correspond to syllabi and course reading lists already transcribed since I have set up shop (not quite two years ago). The 1939-40 undergraduate honors course in economic theory at Harvard was taught by the team of Edward Chamberlin, Wassily Leontief and Overton Taylor.

_____________________________

 

 

Final Examination
Economic Theory (Honors degree candidates)
Professor Chamberlin, Dr. O. H. Taylor, and Associate Professor Leontief

1939-40
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 1

Answer SIX questions, including number 7 or 8.

  1. Explain the concept of the “period of production” in its connection with the theory of interest.
  2. Is the marginal productivity theory applicable to piece wages? Answer and discuss.
  3. Explain the relation between the wage rates and marginal physical productivity in the case in which the entrepreneur sells his product in a competitive market but at the same time holds the position of a monopolist on the labor market.
  4. Discuss the effect of increased interest rates upon the employment of labor as compared with the use of machines.
  5. How would the height of rent be determined if all land were of the same quality?
  6. “Pigou has tried in vain to build a useful ‘economics of welfare’ on the false assumptions, that society is a collection of (a) purely selfish and (b) perfectly rational individuals, who infallibly maximize their private gains and satisfactions; and that such a society can, nevertheless, develop a regime of institutions, laws, and policies under which there will be a complete agreement of all private interests with the public interest, and an economic process working automatically to maximize collective welfare.” Discuss the validity of that interpretation and condemnation of Pigou’s assumptions, and the problem, as you see it, of achieving ‘realism’ in the basic ideas of a theory of ‘welfare economics’.
  7. Explain, and discuss critically one of the following: (a) Knight’s thesis concerning the ‘limitations of scientific method in economics’; (b) Wolfe’s demand for a ‘functional welfare economics, using a generally accepted, psychologically grounded, norm of welfare’; or (c) Clark’s ‘experiments in non-Euclidean economics’.
  8. “Profits are a special type of differential income”. Discuss.

 

Final. 1940.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University. Final Examinations, 1853-2001 (HUC 7000.28, Box 5). Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Papers Printed for Final Examinations: History, History of Religions, … , Economics, … , Military Science, Naval Science, June 1940.

Image Source: From left to right: Chamberlin, Leontief, Taylor from the Harvard Class Album, 1939.

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Junior Year Theory of Production and Distribution of National Income. Haberler and Leontief, 1942.

 

 

The last time Economics 1 was offered as a year course (1939-40), it was taught by Professor Chamberlin, Associate Professor Leontief and Instructor O.H. Taylor. Starting in the academic year 1940-41, Economics 1 was split into the two semester courses Economics 1a (Chamberlin: Economic Theory) and 1b (O.H.Taylor: Intellectual Background of Economic Thought). Two years later, 1941-42, the second semester course 1b was taught by Professor Haberler and Associate Professor Leontief under the title “Theory of Production and Distribution of the National Income”. In 1942-43, Economics 1b as “Theory of Production and Distribution of the National Income” was taught a last time by Professor Leontief and Dr. Monroe.

Here is a recently added link to the final examination questions for the 1941-42 course taught by Haberler and Leontief.

__________________________

Course enrollment

*1b 2hf. Professor Haberler and Associate Professor Leontief.–Theory of Production and Distribution of National Income.

Total 27: 2 Seniors, 22 Juniors, 3 Sophomores.

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1941-42, p. 62.

__________________________

Economics 1b
1941-42

 

  1. Theory of Wages
  2. Theory of Capital and Interest
    1. Capital goods as factors of production. Stock vs. flow concepts. Durable and non-durable goods. Money capital and the rate of interest. Demand for capital by an individual firm.
    2. Time preference. Propensity to save.
    3. Interrelation of production and consumption goods industries. General equilibrium. national Income, Saving, and Investment.
  1. Theory of Profits
  1. Introduction to Welfare Economics

Modern theory of utility. Individual vs. social utility. Distribution of national income. Private vs. social marginal product.

 

Readings in: (Specific chapter and page of assignments will be given later.)

Paul Douglas, The Theory of Wages.
Meade and Hitch, An Introduction to Economic Analysis.
Böhm-Bawerk, Positive Theory of Capital.
J. B. Clark, The Distribution of Wealth.
Irving Fisher, The Theory of Interest (1930).
J. M. Keynes. General Theory of Interest and Unemployment.
K. Wicksell, Lectures on Political Economy. [Volume I; Volume II]
Pigou, Economics of Welfare.
Triffin, Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium Theory.

Articles by Frank Knight in the Journal of Political Economy and by A. Lerner in the Economic Journal.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. (HUC 8522.2.1) Box 3, Folder “Economics, 1941-1942”.

Image Source:  Harvard Class Album 1942.

 

Categories
Courses Economists Fields Harvard

Harvard. Edward Chamberlin Lobbies to Teach a Graduate Theory Course. 1935

 

 

With the retirements of Charles J. Bullock and Frank W. Taussig in 1935 Edward H. Chamberlin saw his opportunity to start to break out of his designated field box “government and industry” and into “theory”. We have here a letter that Chamberlin wrote to the head of the economics department, Harold H. Burbank. The letter is of the putting-this-conversation-into-the-written-record variety. His deference to Burbank and recognition of the established claims of other colleagues to the theory field are complemented with a dash of false-modesty—“Perhaps I may, however,…put in my own ‘claim’ (if such it may be called) for whatever consideration it deserves.”

In any event, from the subsequent shuffle in instructional assignments for the 1935-36 academic year, we see that Chamberlin succeeded in joining Schumpeter and Leontief at the Harvard theory table.

________________________

Letter from Associate Professor Chamberlin to Chairman Burbank
Requesting to teach a graduate course in theory

 

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

14 Ash Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts
February 26, 1935

Professor H. H. Burbank, Chairman
Department of Economics,
Harvard University,
Cambridge, Mass.

 

Dear Burby:

This is to confirm our conversation of the other day. I should like to ask if arrangements could possibly be made at this late date for me to give a graduate half course next year on “Contemporary Value Theory.”

I have been asked by several people recently why it was that, although the theoretical problems which Mrs. Robinson and myself have raised are the subject of lively controversies in numerous other universities, one finds them very much in the background at Harvard. There does seem to be a general interest in the subject, and, since I have a strong continuing interest in it myself, the occasion seems to present itself of offering to graduate students at Harvard a better opportunity than they now have to study and discuss this set of problems and others related to it.

I realize that others than myself have claims to theory courses and that the problems of fitting the members of the Department to courses are not easy. Perhaps I may, however, even for this very reason, put in my own “claim” (if such it may be called) for whatever consideration it deserves. My work in Public Utilities and Industrial Organization could be reduced without difficulty. Donald Wallace could take my part in Economics 49 with Professors Crum and Mason, and, I am sure, would do an excellent job of it. This arrangement, together with a slight reduction in my tutorial load, would give me the time for another half course and I should continue in the undergraduate 4a and 4c. I should have, even then, only one-fifth of my time in theory, the other four fifths in the practical field of government and industry.

You have recently intimated in conversation that I might soon be given a share of the work in theory. I hope it may be next year, and also that a way can be found to arrange for it without interfering with the work which others are now doing or plan to do in the field.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Edward H. Chamberlin

________________________

Copy of letter from Chairman Burbank to Dean Murdock
with changes to 1935-36 course announcements

April 17, 1935

Dear Dean Murdock,

Owing to the retirement of Professor Taussig, several changes in the Course Announcement for the coming year will have to be made. The Department recommends the following:

*Economics 7b1. Theories of Value and Distribution. [listed as “Modern Economic Thought” in Report of the President of Harvard College 1935-36, p. 82; ]

Half-course (first half-year). Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Fri., at 11. Associate Professor Chamberlin.
[Replacing Taussig, Schumpeter and Sweezy who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 8a2. Introduction to the Mathematical Treatment of Economics.

Half-course (second half-year). Mon., 4-5. Asst. Professor Leontief.
[Replacing Schumpeter who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 11. Economic Theory.

Mon., Wed., Fri., at 2. Professor Schumpeter.
[Replacing Taussig and Schumpeter who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 14b2. History of Economic Thought since 1776.

Half-course (second half-year). Mon., Wed., Fri., at 11. Dr. Monroe.
[Replacing “History and Literature of Economics from the Physiocrats through Ricardo” taught by Professor Bullock in 1934-35. Bullock retired from Harvard September 1, 1935.]

Sincerely yours,

H. H. Burbank

Dean Kenneth B. Murdock
20 University Hall

 

 

Source: Harvard University Archives, Department of Economics, Correspondence & Papers 1902-1950. Box 23, Folder “Course offerings 1926-1937”.

Image Source: Harvard Class Album, 1939.

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Programs of Social and Economic Reconstruction, Leontief and Taylor. 1942-43

This course on socio-economic reform and revolution was team taught the previous year by Wassily Leontief, Paul Sweezy and Overton Taylor. Sweezy took leave from Harvard to join the War effort so he was unavailable for the 1942-43 version of this course that has been in the Harvard economics course catalogue almost as long as courses in public finance and labor problems.

____________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 115. Associate Professor Leontief and Dr. O. H. Taylor.—Programs of Social and Economic Reconstruction.

Total 10: 3 Graduates, 1 Junior, 1 School of Public Administration, 4 Radcliffe.

 

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of the Departments for 1942-43, p. 47.

____________________________

 

Course Assignments

Reading for the Monday Oct. 19 Meeting of Ec 115

Bastiat Frédéric. Harmonies of Political Economy, pp. 1-46, 196-217.

Sismondi, Simond de. Essays on Political Economy, pp. 113-122, 224-244. (Nouveaux Principes d’Economie Politique, Vol. I and II[,] to browse For those who read French)

Gray, John. A Lecture on Human Happiness, pp. 1-72.

Clark, J. B. Distribution of Wealth, pp. 36-76.

Carver. Essays in Social Justice, pp. 232-263.

Keynes, J. M.  The General Theory of Interest and Employment, pp. 372-384.

 

Economics 115
Assignment for October 26

  1. Handbook of Marxism, pp. 313-38.
  2. Capital, Vol. I, Ch. X, Sections 1, 2, 5, 6.
  3. Marx-Engels Selected Correspondence, Letter no. 214.
  4. Lenin, State and Revolution.
  5. J. Laski, The State in Theory and Practice, Ch. 2.

 

Economics 115
November 2, 1942
Social and Economic Theories of the New Deal

  1. Immediate Background
  2. New Deal Movement as a Dynamic Organism of Diverse Potentialities
  3. Specific Analysis of the Program Adopted
  4. Significance of the New Deal
  5. Where did the New Deal Fail?

Assignment

Background for those who need it:

A. M. Schlesinger, New Deal in Action
or
R. H. Jackson, The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy

For everyone:

Golden and Ruttenberg, The Dynamics of Industrial Democracy, pp. 317-42.
Robert and Helen Lynd, Middletown in Transition, Chs. IV, XII.
C. A. Beard, Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, pp. 149-188.
F. D. Roosevelt, Papers and Addresses, Vol. I, nos. 139, 141; Vol. II, nos. 1, 50, 101; Vol. III, nos. 1, 102; Vol. V, nos. 1, 53, 176.

Also recommended:

Thurman Arnold, Folklore of Capitalism
Thorstein Veblen, Absentee Ownership

 

Economics 115
November 9, 1942
The Revisionist Movement in German Socialism

  1. The beginnings of reformist socialism in Germany
  2. Bernstein and the Revisionist offensive
  3. The counterattack and the split on the Left
  4. The social roots of reformism
  5. German Social-Democracy vs. socialism: 1914, 1919, 1933

Assignment

Eduard Bernstein, Evolutionary Socialism, pp. ix-xviii, 1-94, 165-199
Rosa Luxemburg, Reform or Revolution
M. Philips Price, Germany in Transition, pp. 18-47

 

Economics 115
Assignment for Nov. 16, 1942

CLASSICAL LIBERALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM
–A Comparison and a Critique—

  1. The historical development of Liberalism.
  2. Common elements in both types of Liberalism.
  3. Political implications of the divergence.
  4. Neo-Liberalism — Will it work?

Assignment:-

J. S. Mill, Principles of Political Economy, Bk. V, ch. 11.
Herbert Spencer, Social Statics (Abridged Edition, D. Appleton & Co., 1892) pp. 55-61, 121-140.
Walter Lippman, The Good Society, chs. 10 and 11.
Henry Simon, Positive Program for Laissez-Faire.
Max Lerner, It is Later Than You Think, Chs. 1 and 6.
J. M. Keynes, The End of Laissez-Faire, pp. 39-54.

Suggestions for those who may wish to go further into the problem:-

John Dewey, Liberalism and Social Action.
Articles “The Rise of Liberalism” and “Individualism and Capitalism” in the Introduction to The Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Thorstein Veblen, “Preconceptions of Economic Science,” in The Place of Science in Modern Civilization.

 

Economics 115
Assignment for November 23, 1942
The Economic Doctrines of the Bolsheviks

  1. The relationship between Marxism and Bolshevism—Marxism restored and militant.
  2. The Bolshevik elaboration of the Marxian theory of capitalist development; its application to the analysis of the period of monopoly capitalism or imperialism.
    1. The transition from free competition to monopoly as a result of the concentration and centralization of capital.
    2. Finance capital and the role of the banks.
    3. The struggle for markets, for raw materials and for outlets for capital export and the resulting tariff and colonial policy of imperialism
    4. The growth of international cartels and the ‘theory’ of ultra-imperialism.
    5. The progressive intensification of the contradictions of capitalism — crises, wars and catastrophe.
    6. The proletarian revolution as the only way out.
  3. The political implications of the Bolshevik analysis of imperialism — the working class must gird itself for a struggle à outrance for the overthrow of world capitalism and the establishment of a socialist order.

Assigned Reading

Lenin: Imperialism.
P. M. Sweezy: The Theory of Capitalist Development, Part IV.

Suggested Reading

Marx-Engels: The Communist Manifesto.
Marx: Value, Price and Profit, Chapter VI to the end.
Lenin: The Proletarian Revolution.

 

Economics 115
The Theory of Marx and Engels Concerning the Transition From Capitalism to Socialism
November 30, 1942

  1. Sources and Constituent Parts of Marxism
  2. Class-Domination Theory of the State
  3. The Overthrow of the Bourgeois State by Revolution
  4. Establishment of Proletarian Dictatorship — First Phase of the Communistic Society
  5. Withering Away of Proletarian State and the Higher Phase of the Communistic Society

Assignment:

Marx, Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, pp. 9-15.
Burns, A Handbook of Marxism, pp. 537-570.
Engels, The Origin of the Family, Chap. 9.
Lenin, The State and Revolution, Chaps. 1 and 5.
Engels, Socialism, Utopian and Scientific, Chap. 3.
Engels, Landmarks of Scientific Socialism, Chap. 9.
Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program.

Suggested:

Chang, Sherman, The Marxian Theory of the State.

 

Economics 115
January 3, 1943
Socialism In The British Labour Party

  1. A definition of the term Socialism
  2. Necessary reforms arising from frictions of the Industrial Revolution
  3. Socialist gains acquired through self-interest of pressure groups
  4. Growth of the Labour Party
  5. Socialism as a policy of the Labour Party
  6. Socialist administrations
  7. Future of Socialism in England

Assignment

Clifford Allen, Labour’s Future At Stake.
G. D. H. Cole, British Working Class Politics, Epilogue.
Arthur Greenwood, M. P., The Labour Outlook.
J. Ramsy McDonald, A Policy for the Labour Party.

Optional

Arthur Henderson, The Aims of Labour.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003, Box 3, Folder “Economics, 1942-43 (2 of 2)”.

Image Source: Leontief and Taylor from Harvard Class Album 1939.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Economists Harvard

Harvard. Discussion of “Road to Serfdom”. Sorokin, Leontief, Usher. 1945

The previous post provided the syllabus (with links to the readings) for Abbott Payson Usher’s 1921 course “European Industry and Commerce in the Nineteenth Century”. While looking for some background on Usher in the on-line archive for the Harvard Crimson, I came across the following two stories about a public discussion of Hayek’s Road to Serfdom that involved both Usher and Wassily Leontief.

____________________

Newly-Formed Group To Hold First Meeting

Harvard Crimson, April 10, 1945

Following close on the heels of two seminars conducted here this past weekend by Friedrich A. Hayek, author of the currently-controversial book “The Road to Serfdom,” the newly-organized, non-partisan Harvard Political Science Forum is presenting in its first meeting a three-way discussion on the question “Is a planned economy the ‘Road to Serfdom’?”

Sharing the platform in the Lowell House Junior Common Room Thursday evening at 7:30 o’clock will be Pitirim A. Sorokin, professor of Sociology, Wassily W. Leontief, associate professor of Economics, and Abbott P. Usher, professor of Economics.

 

SOROKIN HITS HAYEK THESIS
Usher Deplores Trend to Planned Economy at Forum

Harvard Crimson, April 13, 1945

No political or economic machinations-not Yalta nor Dumbarton Oaks nor any other agreement-can give us lasting peace so long as the corpse of the capitalist economy continues to exist.” Thus declared Pitirim A. Sorokin, professor of Sociology, speaking last night together with Wassily W. Leontief, associate professor of Economics, and Abbott P. Usher ’04, professor of Economics, on the topic “Is the planned economy ‘the Road to Serfdom’?” at the first forum of the newly-organized Harvard Political Science Forum.

“I am not, however,” stressed Sorokin, “a partisan of totalitarian economy. I am merely ‘a conservative Christian anarchist’; I do not like any government.” With this declaration, Harvard’s stormy sociologist clarified his position in the controversy that, is currently raging over Friedrich A. Hayek’s new book “The Road to Serfdom.”

Usher Defends Hayek’s Ideas

Speaking first on the program, Professor Usher developed Hayek’s basic antithesis between that society which sets up a definite, unflexible end toward which it must constantly strive, and that society which recognizes a multiplicity of ends.

“This concept of ‘end result,'” said Usher, “Is in conflict with the concept of unplanned social evolution, which has characterized the growth of society.”

Professor Leontief, choosing the middle road between the two other speakers, took issue with Hayek’s thesis that society has, after several thousand years of growth, reached the peak of its development, beyond which we can progress no further. In seeking to forestall the inevitable evolution of the planned economy, Hayek is attempting, said-Leontief, to “prevent, as it were, the consummation of a solar eclipse.”

 

Image Source: Sorokin, Usher and Leontief from Harvard Album, 1946.

Categories
Curriculum Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Advanced Economic Theory. Franco Modigliani, 1957-8

During the academic year 1957-58 Wassily Leontief was on academic leave from Harvard and Franco Modigliani of the Carnegie Institute of Technology took a leave of absence to accept a visiting professorship filling in for Leontief. From Modigliani’s papers in the Rosenstein Library of Duke University I have been able to piece together outlines and readings for the two semesters of advanced economic theory that he taught.

For the Summer session and Fall semester of 1957 it is possible to construct a topical outline for the first semester of Harvard’s Economics 202 from Modigliani’s own handwritten notes. We see that the outline matches that of the corresponding course “Advanced Economics I” that Modigliani taught in the spring semesters of 1957 and 1959 at his home university, i.e. before and after his year at Harvard. We note some additions and deletions in the readings for Modigliani’s Carnegie Tech courses, but since the outline was not significantly changed, it is reasonable to assume that his Fall Semester reading list at Harvard was some “average” of these two Carnegie Tech courses. A copy of Modigliani’s exam questions for the first semester of Advanced Economic Theory (January 25, 1958) completes the material for the first semester.

For the Spring semester of 1958 we have a cover page to his lecture notes indicating four broad topics to be covered. For three of the topics I found short mimeographed reading lists in another folder in a different box of Modigliani’s papers. For the topic “Money and Keynesian Economics” there is a two page handwritten outline that precedes his lecture notes. I cannot explain why the first semester covers parts I-IV and the second semester apparently begins with part VI.

 

____________________________________

 

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 202. Advanced Economic Theory. Professor Modigliani (Carnegie Institute of Technology). Full Course.

(F)      1 Junior, 1 Senior, 29 Graduates, 4 Radcliffe, 3 Other: Total 38
(S)      1 Junior, 1 Senior, 27 Graduates, 3 Radcliffe, 4 Other: Total 36

 

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments, 1957-58, p. 82.

 

____________________________________

Modigliani Outline for Fall Semester, 1957 (Handwritten)

Ec. Analysis I
Summer & Fall 1957 Harvard

Outline

Part I. Methodology.

(A) Subject matter and the areas

(B) The methodology of positive economics and of Welfare economics

(C) Discussion of types of model and sequence of presentation

Part II. Theory of Demand and application

II(a) Partial Equilibrium Analysis-Demand function and application

(A) The law of demand and the description of demand functions

(1) The law of demand
(2) Cournot formulation. The notion of functions and some mathematics
(3) The slope of demand functions and responsiveness
(4) Criticism of slope as measure of responsiveness
(5) The notion of demand elasticity and its computation
(6) The behavior of total outlays and its relation to η

(B) Application to problem of random supply. Price and income variation and stabilization.

(C) Application to the elementary theory of Monopoly.

(1) Nature of the model
(2) The case of no costs. Total curves
(3) Graphical computation of MR
(4) η and MR
(5) Fixed costs. Comp. Statics
(6) Effect of Taxes
(7) Introduction of costs. Equilibrium Analysis
(8) Comparative Statics and Taxation

II (b) Utility Analysis

(A) Introduction

(1) Utility and M.U. The Marshallian approach
(2) Shortcoming. The alternative approach.

(B) Indifference Approach

(1) The fundamental postulates
(2) Graphical Representation of tastes
(3) Indifference map and utility function
(4) Slope of I.C.—m.r. of s. and expression in terms of m.u.
(5) Generalizations and the role of two commodities
(6) Types of indifference maps.
(7) The opportunity set. The case of perfect markets
(8) Pathological cases and the law of d.m.r. of s.
(9) Effect of variation in income. Engel curves
(10) Effect of variations in prices. The demand curve
(11) The case of two commodities; income derived from the commodities. Demand and supply.
(12) Generalization to n commodities; complementarity and substitution

(C) Applications of utility analysis

(1) Consumers surplus
(2) Elements of Index number theory

II (c) General Equilibrium of Exchange.

(A) Nature of Problem and approach.

(1) What we wish to explain
(2) Nature of model’s assumptions.

(B) The two person, two commodity case.

(1) The Edgeworth Box.
(2) The offer curves
(3) The behavior of excess demand as function of p and competitive equilibrium (normal case) [illegible] market
(4) The relation between Ex and Ey. Walras law.
(5) Multiple intersection of offer curves. Stable and unstable equilbria. The correspondence Principle.
(6) The pure monopoly solutions.
(7) Comparison of competitive and monopoly solution. Welfare maximization.
(8) The Pareto locus and the Weak Welfare ordering.
(9) Necessary and sufficient condition for max. welfare under individualistic welfare function. The [illegible word] feasibility function. Every point on Pareto locus achievable by perfect market, lump sum taxes and subsidies.
(10) Comparative statics.
(11) Uses of Edgeworth Diagram in the study of barter and bilateral monopoly

(C) General Equilibrium of Exchange

III. Theory of supply and production

(A) Introduction

(1) Nature of production and relation to consumption and exchange model.
(2) The organization of production and the nature of the firm in the model.
(3) Factors of production; general notions and the classical dichotomy[?]
(4) Profit maximization and the definition of profit.

(B) Production functions and cost functions.

B(I). One output and two inputs.

(1) Three dimensional representation.
(2) A single variable factor. Product curve.
(3) The cost curve

B(II). Two variable inputs

(1) Determination of equilibrium can be broken up into two parts. Cost minimization, and choice of best output along the minimized cost function.
(2) Cost minimization.

[(C) Supply function]

(1) Long run cost functions and returns to scale
(2) The long run supply curve
(3) Short run costs and supply curves

IV. Market Structures.

(A) Classification of Markets

(B) Monopolistic competition.

(1) Equilibrium for the firm
(2) Simultaneous equilibrium of the group.
(3) Essential characteristics of equilibrium in relation to monopoly and perfect competition, welfare aspects.
(4) Relaxation of the pure model.
(5) Forces making for [illegible] higher prices

(C) Oligopoly with homogeneous selling and no free entry

(1) Duopoly, Cournot solution
(2) Oligopoly and the limit solution as n goes to infinity

 

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T6. Folder “Economics 1956-57”

 

____________________________________

Mimeographed Course Outline,
Carnegie Institute of Technology 1957

February, 1957

GI-581—Advanced Economics I
Course Outline and Major References (Provisional)

I. Methodological issues:

(1) Kaufman — Methodology of the Social Sciences
(2) Friedman — Essays in Positive Economics — Part I
(3) Robbins — The Nature and Significance of Economic Science

II. Theory of Demand and Applications

(A) Partial equilibrium approach — Marshallian Demand functions and applications to simple monopoly.

(B) General equilibrium approach — Utility analysis and indifference curves

(C) General equilibrium of exchange: (i) the two person, two commodity case; (ii) the general case

(1) Marshall — Principles of Economics, Book III, Ch. III and IV; Mathematical Appendix, Notes II and III
(2) Cournot — The Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Ch. IV, V, VI
(3) Bowley — The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics, Ch. I
(4) Hicks — Value and Capital, Part I (pages 12-52) and Part II, ch. IV and V.
(5) Mosak — General Equilibrium Theory in International Trade, Ch. 1 and 2
(6) Samuelson — Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. 1, 5, 6, 7
(7) Slutsky — On the Theory for the Budget of the Consumer, Readings in Price Theory
(8) Hicks — Revision of Demand Theory

III. Theory of supply and costs under competitive conditions

(A) Partial equilibrium approach — theory of Rent

(B) General equilibrium approach — production functions and marginal productivity

(C) General equilibrium of production and exchange

(D) Some welfare implications

(1) Viner — Cost Curves and Supply Curves, Readings in Price Theory
(2) Stigler — The Theory of Prices
(3) Hicks — Value and Capital, Ch. VI and VII
(4) Mosak — Ch. V
(5) Lerner — The Economics of Control

IV. Imperfect Competition Theories and Market Structures

(A) Theory of monopoly

(B) Small numbers and imperfect competition

(1) Cournot — Ch. 7
(2) Chamberlin — Theory of Monopolistic Competition
(3) Robinson — Economics of Imperfect Competition
(4) Readings in Price Theory, Part V, Imperfect Competition
(5) Hall and Hitch — Price Theory and Business Behavior, Oxford Economic Papers, 1939
(6) Stigler — Notes on the Theory of Duopoly, JPE, 1947, page 521
(7) Fellner — Competition among the Few
(8) Bain — A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly, AER, 1949, page 448
(9) Hurwicz — The Theory of Economic Behavior, Readings in Price Theory
(10) Henderson — The Theory of Duopoly, QJE, December, 1954
(11) Harrod — Economic Essays, The Theory of Imperfect Competition revised
(12) Hicks — The Process of Imperfect Competition, Oxford Economic Papers, 1954
(13) Paul — Notes on Excess Capacity, Oxford Economic Papers, 1954
(14) Hahn — Excess Capacity and Imperfect Competition, Oxford Economic Papers, 1955

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T8. Folder “(Notes on Advanced Monetary Theory III , 1953-1960”.

 

____________________________________

 

Mimeographed Course Outline, Carnegie Institute of Technology 1959

February, 1959

GI-581—Advanced Economics I
Course Outline and Major References

I. Methodological issues:

(1) Kaufman — Methodology of the Social Sciences
(2) Friedman — Essays in Positive Economics — Part I
(3) Robbins — The Nature and Significance of Economic Science

II. Theory of Demand and Applications

(A) Partial equilibrium approach — Marshallian Demand functions and applications to simple monopoly.

(B) General equilibrium approach — Utility analysis and indifference curves.

(C) General equilibrium of exchange: (i) the two person, two commodity case; (ii) the general case

(D) Basic concepts of Welfare Economics. Index number theory.

(1) Marshall — Principles of Economics, Book III, Ch. III and IV; Mathematical Appendix, Notes II and III
(2) Cournot — The Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Ch. IV, V, VI
(3) Samuelson — Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
(4) Hicks — Value and Capital, Part I (pages 12-52) and Part II, ch. IV and V.
(5) Slutsky — On the Theory for the Budget of the Consumer, Readings in Price Theory
(6) Hicks — Revision of Demand Theory Parts I and II
(7) Bowley — The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics, Ch. I
(8) Mosak — General Equilibrium Theory in International Trade, Ch. 1 and 2
(9) Boulding — Welfare Economics in Survey of Contemporary Economics, vol. II.

III. Theory of supply and costs under competitive conditions

(A) Partial equilibrium approach — theory of Rent

(B) General equilibrium approach — production functions and marginal productivity

(C) General equilibrium of production and exchange under competitive conditions

(D) Some welfare implications

(E) Stability of equilibrium — comparative statics and dynamics.

(1) Viner — Cost Curves and Supply Curves, Readings in Price Theory
(2) Stigler — The Theory of Prices
(3) Samuelson — Foundations chs. 4, 9
(4) Lerner — The Economics of Control chs. 15, 16, 17
(5) Hicks — Value and Capital, Ch. VI and VII
(6) Mosak — Ch. V
(7) Cassel — The Theory of Social Economy Vol I. ch. 4, pp. 134-155

IV. Imperfect Competition Theories and Market Structures

(A) Classification of market structures

(B) Theory of monopoly

(C) Monopolistic competition, large group

(D) Oligopolistic competition

(E) The role of the conditions of entry.

(1) Cournot — Ch. 7
(2) Chamberlin — Theory of Monopolistic Competition
(3) Robinson — Economics of Imperfect Competition, Book V.
(4) Readings in Price Theory, Part V, Imperfect Competition
(5) Hall and Hitch — Price Theory and Business Behavior, Oxford Economic Papers, 1939
(6) Stigler — Notes on the Theory of Duopoly, JPE, 1947, page 521
(7) Fellner — Competition among the Few
(8) Hurwicz — The Theory of Economic Behavior, Readings in Price Theory
(9) Henderson — The Theory of Duopoly, QJE, December, 1954
(10) Bain — Barriers to New Competition. Esp. ch. 1, 3, 4, 6.
(11) Modigliani — New Developments on the Oligopoly Front. JPE June 1958, pp. 215-232.
(12) Cyert and March — Organizational Structure and Pricing Behavior in an Oligopolistic Market. AER March 1955, pp. 129-139
(13) Cyert and March — Organizational Factors in the Theory of Oligopoly. QJE Feb. 1956, pp. 44-64

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T8. Folder “(Notes on Advanced Monetary Theory III , 1953-1960”.

Final Examination for GI 581 in 1959 and 1960 has been posted!

 

____________________________________

Final Examination Economics 202, Fall Semester (1957-58)

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
ECONOMICS 202

Answer questions 1, 2, and two of the remaining three. Question 1 will be given double weight.

  1. Assume that the government fixes by law the price of a commodity and hands out to the public ration coupons equal in number to the number of units of the commodity produced. Assume throughout that the supply is perfectly inelastic.

a) Show graphically the opportunity locus of an individual consumer, in terms of the usual indifference diagram, with one of the axes representing money. Under what condition would a consumer not use all of his coupons?

b) Show that consumers would be better off if they were free to buy or sell their ration coupons in a free market.

c) Supposing now that coupons could be bought and sold in a free market, explain how one could derive an individual consumer’s demand curve for coupons. (Hint: the situation is analogous to the consumer being forced to buy his ration of the good at the legal price and then being allowed to sell it or buy more of it on a free market.)

d) Explain the formation of the equilibrium market price of coupons.

e) What can be said as to the relation between the legal price, the price of coupons, and the price which would prevail in the absence of price control and rationing? Under what condition would the sum of the first two be equal to the third?

  1. Wicksell states two alternative conditions under which entrepreneurial profits would be zero:

“…either that large-scale and small-scale operations are equally productive, so that, when all the factors of production are increased in the same proportion, the total product also increases exactly proportionately; or at least that all productive enterprises have already reached the limit beyond which a further increase in the scale of production will no longer yield any advantage.”

Explain the reasoning behind Wicksell’s statement of these conditions. Is either of them sufficient, or must other conditions be added?

  1. Discuss the significance of free entry to the relation of the long-run equilibrium size of the firm to its optimum size.
  1. A profit maximizing monopolist buys factors of production in a perfect market.

a) Discuss the long-run effect on his demand for each of the factors he uses and on his selling price of a tax on one of the factors. (Give a graphic treatment for the case of two factors.)

b) Suppose that one of the two factors is fixed in the short run. Contrast the change in the long-run and short-run demand for both factors when a tax is placed on either.

  1. Evaluate the methodological positions of Friedman and Koopmans. Would an agreement with one as against the other make any difference as to the direction of economic research?

January 25, 1958

 

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T8. Folder “(Notes on Advanced Monetary Theory III , 1953-1960”.

 

____________________________________

 

[Handwritten cover page to course lecture notes]

 

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS II
Harvard—Spring 1958
Outline

I. Welfare Economics and Critique of Laisser faire

II. Dynamics with Certainty

III. Theory of Choice Under Uncertainty

IV. Money and Keynesian Economics

 

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T6. Folder “Economics 1956-57”.

 

____________________________________

 

[Two mimeographed sheets of course outline and readings]

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 202

Spring, 1958

VI. Economics of Welfare

Readings:

Lerner, A. P., The Economics of Control, Chap. 1-14 (as a review)

Hicks, J. R., “The Foundations of Welfare Economics,” Economic Journal, Dec. 1939.

Scitovsky, T., “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Tariffs,” Review of Economic Studies, Volume 9, 1941

Samuelson, P., “Evaluation of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, Jan. 1950

J. de V. Graaf, Theoretical Welfare Economics

Baumol, William J., Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State (omit Ch. 8)

Ruggles, N., “The Welfare Basis of Marginal Cost Pricing,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XVII, 1949-50.

Vickrey, W., “Some Objections to Marginal Cost Pricing,” JPE, June 1948

*Burk (Bergson) A., “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, 1938

*Samuelson, P., Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chapter 8

*Koopmans, T. C., Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, I—Allocation of Resources and the Price System.

VII. Dynamics under Certainty

Temporal theory of consumer choice — the notion of interest — inter-temporal equilibrium without production — temporal theory of production and capital — growth

Readings:

Fisher, The Theory of Interest, Chapters II, X, XI, XVI, XVIII.

Hicks, Value and Capital, Chapters IX, X, XI, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII.

Lutz and Lutz, The Theory of Investment of the Firm, Chapters I-X, XII, XV, XX.

Lindahl, Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital, Part III, Ch. 2, 3.

Samuelson, “Dynamics, Statics and the Stationary State,” in Clemence, Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. I

Modigliani and Brumberg, “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function,” in Kurihara, Post-Keynesian Economics.

*Mosak, General Equilibrium Theory, Ch. VI, VII.

*Koopmans, Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, Essay I, part 4, (Pp. 105-126).

VIII. Some Approaches to the Theory of Choice under Uncertainty.

Readings:

Arrow, “Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice under Uncertainty in Risk-taking Situations,” Econo metrica, 1951.

Modigliani, “Liquidity and Uncertainty,” (Discussion paper) AER, May 1949

Hart, Anticipations, Uncertainty and Dynamic Planning

Marschak, “Probability in the Social Sciences,” in Lazarsfeld, Mathematics 1 Thinking in the Social Sciences.

Friedman and Savage, “The Utility Analysis of Choice Involving Risk,” in Readings in Price Theory.

Strotz, “Cardinal Utility,” AER, May 1953.

Hart, “Risk, Uncertainty, and the Unprofitability of Compounding Probabilities,” in Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution.

*Herstein and Miller, “An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility,” Econometrica, April 1953.

 

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T6. Folder “Economics 1956-57”.

 

____________________________________

 

[Handwritten outline preceding notes for fourth part of second semester]

Money and Keynesian Economics
Outline

I. Introduction of uncertainty and money in dynamic general equilibrium framework

II. The supply and demand for money

(A) Supply side. The banking system and bank balance equation

(B) The demand side

(1) The transaction demand. Cambridge and Fisher equations.
(2) The formal closing of system with dichotomy and neutrality. Criticism. No connection between demand for money and demand for anything else. No [illegible] formal money market
(3) The role of interest rate on transaction demand
(4) Liquidity preference and the connection of Money and Bond market. The formal model of these markets in which funds are acquired or disposed of against bonds.
(5) Preservation of dichotomy under certain assumptions: the role of money in real system. Its disappearance with pure bank money and η =1.
(6) Sources of non-transaction or asset demand for money:

(a) Transaction costs on short funds.
(b) The so called speculative demand.

The case of a single short rate [for the supply of money to equal the demand for money] provided r01 >0.
Liquidity trap. No carrying cost, r cannot be negative.
The case of multiple rates. Speculative demand.

(7) The breakdown of the system. The Pigou effect. its implications on extreme fluctuations of price level.
(8) The consequence of price rigidity.

III. The Economics of rigid prices (rigid wages)

(A) Description of labor market and the [illegible]of rigidity.
(B) The emergence [consequence?] of the notion of Income. Capitalism. Property and non-property income
(C) Nature of demand and supply. Consumption and Investment.
(D) Why wage rigidity [illegible]a solution even when r of full employment is negative. Supply falls faster than demand
(E) The four quadrant analysis and its interpretation.

 

Source: Duke University, Rubenstein Library. Franco Modigliani Papers. Box T6. Folder “Economics 1956-57”.

Image Source: Franco Modigliani page at the History of Economic Thought Website.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Economy of Russia. Leontief, 1947-48

We are used to seeing professors restricting their teaching to their research comfort zones. We see here that Wassily Leontief also taught courses from his broad interests. Here the syllabus and final exam for a course on the “Russian” [“Soviet” would have a better word choice] economy.

During the following Fall term Alexander Gerschenkron taught a graduate seminar (Economics 212b) on the subject which was attended by only three graduate students, but the reading list was much more extensive. Leontief offered this undergraduate course (Economics 112b) in the Spring of 1949.

________________________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 12b. Professor Leontief. — The Economy of Russia (F).

Total 35: 16 Graduates, 5 Seniors, 7 Juniors, 2 Sophomores, 4 Radcliffe, 1 Other.

 

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1947-48, p. 89.

________________________________________

Economics 12b
The Economy of Russia
Fall Term, 1947-48

 

I.        From the Emancipation to the Revolution

1.       Agricultural development and reforms
2.         First stages of industrialization

Reading assignments:

Bowden, Karpovich, and Usher, An Economic History of Europe since 1750, Ch. 29, pp. 598-615.
Hubbard, L. E., The Economics of Soviet Agriculture, Chs. 1-8, pp. 1-63.
Maynard, J., The Russian Peasant, Chs. 1, 2, pp. 13-62.

II.      War and Revolution

1.         War economy up to the October Revolution
2.         Agrarian revolution and the nationalization of industries

Reading assignments:

Maynard, Ch. 6, pp. 63-81.
Baykov, A., The Development of the Soviet Economic System, Chs. 1, 2, 3, pp. 1-48.

III.     War Communism

1.          Industrial collapse
2.         Agricultural contraction

Reading assignments:

Dobb, M. Russian Economic Development since the Revolution, Chs. 3, 4, pp. 66-128.

IV.     The New Economic Policy

1.          Private enterprise and the socialized sector
2.         Agricultural recovery
3.         Industrial reconstruction

Reading assignments:

Maynard, Ch. 10, pp. 148-182.
Baykov, Chs. 4-9, pp. 49-152.

V.       The Economics of High Pressure Industrialization

1.         Capital accumulation
2.         Structural change

Reading assignments:

Yugow, A., Russia’s Economic Front for War and Peace, Ch. 2, pp. 30-42, and Ch. 9, pp. 198-219.
Baykov, A., Ch. 10, pp. 153-158.
Dobb, M., Ch. 8, pp. 177-208.

VI.     Socialist Agriculture

1.         The process of socialization (collectivization)
2.         The Kolkhoz
3.         The Sovkhoz and machine-tractor station
4.         Development of agricultural output and its allocation

Reading assignments:

Baykov, Ch. 13, pp. 189-311; Ch. 17, pp. 309-334.
Yugow, Ch. 3, pp. 43-81.
Maynard, Ch. 15, pp. 279-309.
Bienstock, Schwarz, and Yugow, Management in Russian Industry and Agriculture, Chs. 10-17, pp. 127-179.

VII.    Industrial Expansion

1.         The three Five-Year Plans
2.         Industrial organization
3.         Labor and unions

Reading assignments:

Yugow, Ch. 2, pp. 13-30; Chs. 7 and 8, pp. 149-197.
Bienstock…, Chs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 9.
Baykov, Ch. 11, pp. 159-187; Ch. 13, pp. 212-233; Ch. 16, pp. 277-308; and Ch. 18, pp. 335-363.
Bergson, A., The Structure of Soviet Wages, Chs. 1, 2, pp. 3-25; Chs. 11, 12, 13, and 14, pp. 159-210.
Report of the C.I.O. Delegation to the Soviet Union, 1947.
Dobb, M., Ch. 16, pp. 407-453.

 

VIII.   Functional Structure of the Economic System

1.         Prices, wages, taxes, and profits
2.         The governmental budget as an instrument of economic policy
3.         Methods of planning
4.         Principles of planning

Reading assignments:

Baykov, Ch. 15, pp. 251-276; Ch. 20, pp. 423-479.
Yugow, Ch. 4, pp. 82-95; Ch. 10, 11, pp. 219-243.
Bienstock…, Ch. 4, pp. 47-57; Ch. 6, pp. 66-90; Introduction, pp. xiii-xxxii.
Lange, Oscar, The Working Principles of Soviet Economy, American-Russian Institute.
Dobb, M., Chs. 13 and 14, pp. 313-348.

 

IX.     War and Post-War

1.          Soviet war economy
2.         The new Five-Year Plan
3.         Soviet econmy and world economy

Reading assignments:

Schwartz, Harry, Russia’s Postwar Economy
Gerschenkron, A., Economic Relations with the U.S.S.R.
Yugow, Ch. 5, pp. 96-122.
Dobb, M., Ch. 12, pp. 290-312.

General reading:

Gregory, J., and Shave, D. W., The U.S.S.R., A Geographical Survey, Part I, pp. 1-250.
Scott, John, Behind the Urals.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives , Wassily Leontief Papers (HUG 4517.45), Course Material Box 2, Folder “The Economy of Russia—1949”.
also: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 4, Folder “Economics 1947-48 (1 of 2)”

 

Reading Period
January 5-15, 1948

Undergraduate students:

E. Varga: Two Systems: Socialist Economy and Capitalist Economy, 1939
or
Manya Gordon: Workers before and after Lenin.

Graduate Students

Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume Eight, Part 8: Methods of Estimating Naitonal Income in Soviet Russia, Paul Studenski, from Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, 1946. or
Review of Economic Statistics, November, 1947 – Articles on Russia’s National Income.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 4, Folder “Economics 1947-48 (1 of 2)”

________________________________________

1947-48
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 12b

Answer any FIVE of the following SIX questions:

  1. Describe and appraise the general economic significance of the methods of income payments and income allocation in Soviet agriculture.
  2. Describe the methods which the Soviet Government used (a) to secure and (b) to allocate funds for capital investment.
  3. Compare the role of the trade unions in the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A.
  4. Characterize the successive Five-Year Plans by their principal distinguishing features.
  5. Indicate the reasons and analyze the implications of the recent Soviet monetary reform.
  6. Describe the organization and discuss some of the principal problems of Soviet economic planning.

Final, January, 1948.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives, Wassily Leontief Papers (HUG 4517.45), Course Material Box 2, Folder “Economics 12b”.

________________________________________

March 30, 1948
W.W. Leontief

Make-Up Examination for Economics 12b—Final Exam

Answer FIVE Questions Including Questions 1 and 2

  1. Describe the nature and the function of the turnover tax.
  2. Describe and interpret the organization and the role of foreign trade in the Soviet Economy.
  3. Describe and appraise the general economic significance of the methods of income payments and income allocation in Soviet agriculture.
  4. Describe the methods which the Soviet Government used (a) to secure and (b) to allocate funds for capital investment.
  5. Compare the role of the trade unions in the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A.
  6. Characterize the successive Five-Year Plans by their principal distinguishing features.

Source: Harvard University Archives, Wassily Leontief Papers (HUG 4517.45), Course Material Box 2, Folder “Economics 12b”.

 

Image Source: Harvard Album 1949.

 

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Graduate Mathematical Economics. Goodwin, 1948

In the Fall term of 1948-49 assistant professor Richard M. Goodwin took over the graduate course in Mathematical Economics at Harvard from Wassily Leontief (who last taught the course during the academic year 1946-47).

Earlier postings at Economics in the Rear-View Mirror for Goodwin:

Reading list for a course on business cycles,
Letters from Burbank and Schumpeter on Goodwin’s behalf to Columbia,
and a 1951 Harvard Crimson feature written by the Edward Snowden precursor, Daniel Ellsberg (who leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971).

Some might see “physics envy” in Goodwin’s selection of reference texts. But do remember, there was hardly a plethora of books on mathematical methods in economics to choose from at that time.

__________________________________

[Course Announcement]

Economics 204b (formerly Economics 104b). Mathematical Economics
Half-course (fall term). Tu., Th., 2:30-4. Assistant Professor Goodwin.

Properly qualified undergraduates will be admitted to this course.

 

Source: Harvard University. Final Announcement of the Courses of Instruction offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences for the Academic Year 1948-49, p. 77.

____________________________________

[Course enrollment]

[Economics] 204b (formerly 104b). Mathematical Economics (F). Assistant Professor Goodwin.

2 Graduates, 3 Seniors, 1 Junior, 1 Public Administration, 2 Radcliffe: Total 9

 

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1948-49, p. 77.

____________________________________

 

1948-49
Economics 204b

A
Partial Analysis

  1. The Role of Logical and of Empirical Elements in Economics
  2. Power Series and Linear Approximations
  3. Marshallian Static Market
  4. Dynamical Partial Equilibrium with examples of first and second order differential equations
  5. Durable Goods Markets, The Acceleration Principle and Simple Aggregative Mechanisms
  6. The Cob-web Theorem and the Multiplier
    First Order Difference Equations
  7. Inventory Cycles
    Second Order Difference Equations

Reading Assignments:

P. Frank, Foundations of Physics, Parts I, II and Section 14.
P. A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chs. I, II, IX, and X, pp. 302-307
Marshall, Principles of Economics, Book V, Ch. I, II, III
R. Frisch, “The Interrelation between Capital Production and Consumer Taking”, Journal of Political Economy, 1931.
M. Ezekiel, “The Cob-web Theorem,” in Readings in Business Cycle Theory
R. M. Goodwin, “The Multiplier,” in The New Economics, ed. S. E. Harris
L. A. Metzler, “The Nature and Stability of Inventory Cycles,” Review of Economic Statistics, 1941.
Ibid., “Factors Governing the Length of Inventory Cycles,” Review of economic Statistics, 1947.

 

B
General Interdependence

  1. The Leontief Matrix, Linear Systems
  2. The Multiplier as Matrix: Static Analysis, Inhomogeneous Systems
  3. The Multiplier as Matrix: Dynamic Analysis, Dynamical Difference Equation Systems
  4. Linear Dynamic Systems in Economics

Reading Assignments:

T. Haavelmo, “The Interdependence Between Agriculture and the National Economy, J.F.E. [Journal of Farm Economics], 1947.
W. Leontief, The Structure of the American Economy, pp. 1-42.
Ibid., “Output, Employment, Consumption, and Investment,” Q.J.E., 1944.
R. M. Goodwin, “Dynamical Coupling,” Econometrica, 1947.

Reading Period: (Read all of the following)

J. Tinbergen, “Econometric Business Cycle Research,” in Readings in Business Cycle Theory.
P. A. Samuelson, “Interactions between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration,” in Readings.
Ibid., “Dynamic Process Analysis,” in A Survey of Contemporary Economics, ed. by H. S. Ellis.
Ibid., Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chs. XI and XII.

 

[Handwritten on back of library copy
of reading list by Richard M. Goodwin]

To be put on reserve for
Ec 204b

A. C. Aitken, Determinants and Matrices
F. L. Griffin, Introduction to Mathematical Analysis
R. Courant, Differential and Integral Calculus vol I and II
L. A. Pipes, Applied Mathematics for Engineers and Physicists
R. G. D. Allen, Mathematical Analysis for Economists
P. A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis

____________________________________

 

[Handwritten note by Richard M. Goodwin]

 

Oct. 22, 1948

Reading Room
Widener Lib.

Dear Sirs:

I would like to have the following books put on reserve for Economics 204b.

A. C. Aitken, Determinants and Matrices
R. Courant, Differential and Integral Calculus vol I and II
L. A. Pipes, Applied Mathematics for Engineers
R. G. D. Allen, Mathematical Analysis for Economists
P. A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis
P. Frank, Foundations of Physics
S. Harris, editor, The New Economics

Thanking you, I am

Sincerely

[signed]
Richard M. Goodwin

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. . Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1), Box 4, Folder “Economics 1948-1949 (2 of 2)”.

Image Source: Harvard Album, 1946.

 

Categories
Courses Harvard Syllabus

Harvard. First year Graduate Economic Theory. Haberler, 1950-51

The first theory course for economics graduate students around mid-20th century, Economics 201 (earlier 101), was taught most of the time by Edward Chamberlin. But in 1950-51 Chamberlin was on leave in France as a Fulbright Scholar and Gottfried Haberler taught the first year of theory instead. 

New addition: Here is the link to the two semester final exams.

Somewhat peculiar is Haberler’s written intention to include Keynesian Economics together with Marxian Economics as the last item of his Fall semester course. However one can see that by the time the second semester rolled around, Haberler had decided to throw Marxian economics under the bus and Keynesian Economics then became the sole final theory to be discussed in his course. Also worthy of note are references to the recommended textbook treatments in German and French.

I’ll note here that the second year of theory, Economics 202, was usually taught by Wassily Leontief who, like Chamberlin, was also not listed in the course announcements for 1950-51 (he had been award a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship for the year). Instead the second year course was taught by William Fellner from Berkeley (the syllabus for his undergraduate History of Economics course has been posted earlier). I’ll post the Fellner reading list for Economics 202 soon. Thus we see that Austro-Hungarian hands were rocking the cradle of baby economists at Harvard at the exact midpoint of the twentieth century.

The last time I saw my undergraduate mentor William Fellner was when he took me to lunch at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. in 1976 or 1977. He was accompanied by his American Enterprise Institute colleague Gottfried Haberler, who was William Fellner’s regular AEI lunch buddy. Only with this posting did I realize that the two of them overlapped 1950-51 at Harvard.

_____________________________________

If you find this posting interesting, here is the complete list of “artifacts” from the history of economics I have assembled. You can subscribe to Economics in the Rear-View Mirror below. There is also an opportunity for comment following each posting….

_____________________________________

[Course Description]

Economics 201 (formerly Economics 101a and 101b). Economic Theory
Full course. Tu., Th., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Sat. at 10. Professor Haberler.

This course is normally taken by graduate students in their first year of residence.

 

Source: Harvard University. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XLVII, No. 23 (September 1950). Final Announcement of the Courses of Instruction offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences During 1950-51, p. 83.

______________________________________

 

Fall Term, 1950
Economics 201 – Economic Theory

I.       Introduction

“Scope and Method”
Types of Economic Theory
Historical Sketch

II.      General Survey of The Economic Process

The Institutional Setting
Income Flows
System of Markets

III.    Demand and Supply Analysis

Cost vs. Utility Theory of Value
Stability of Equilibrium
Some Formal Relationships
Demand and Supply Curves
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
Marginal, Average, Total Revenue
Marginal, Average, Total Cost

IV.     Theory of the Household and Consumption

Utility Theory
Indifference Line Analysis
Complementarity and Substitution
Income Effects, Substitution Effects, Price Effects
Application of Indifference Line Analysis to Theory of Exchange
Measurability of Utility
Interpersonal Comparisons
Joint Demand

V.      Theory of the Firm and Production

Cost Curves
Production Function
Marginal Productivity
Joint Supply

VI.     Theory of Distribution

A.      General
B.      Theory of Wages
C.      Theory of Rent
D.      Theory of Interest and Capital: The Time Factor
E.      Theory of Profits: Uncertainty

VII.   Theory of Market Structures

Competition
Monopoly
Discriminating Monopoly
Monopolistic Competition and Imperfect Competition
Duopoly and Oligopoly
Bilateral Monopoly
Theory of Games

VIII.  Welfare Economics

IX.     Keynesian Economics, Marxian Economics

 

Bibliography and Reading Assignments

The literature on the subjects covered by this course is enormous and is growing rapidly, textbook literature as well as monographs and articles on special topics. No hard and fast assignment will be made but rather suggestions from which students should choose according to their individual needs and preparation.

General

The general texts coming nearest to covering the topics which are treated in the present course are:

Boulding, Economic Analysis (1st or 2nd edition)
Stigler, Theory of Price

In German:
Erich Schneider: Einführung in die Wirtschaftstheorie (Vol. I and II, Vol. III to appear later)
H. v. Stackelberg: Grundlagen der theoretischen Volkswirtschaftslehre

In French:
Jean Marchal: Cours d’Économie Politique (Vol. I) or (shorter and better) Le Mécanisme des Prix [et la Structure de l’Économie] (2nd ed.)

A. Marshall’s Principles is still indispensable

See also:

Survey of Contemporary Economics (Especially Ch. 1)
Readings in Economic Analysis (Ed., R. V. Clemence, 2 vols.)
Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution (Blakiston)

I.      Introduction

Literature on “Scope and Method” is on the whole arid. Many texts have introductory chapters on those subjects (e.g., Stigler’s Theory of Price). Some reading on that subject along with, rather than prior to, the study of substantive problems is advisable.

Suggestions:

Readings Volume I, by Clemence, First two chapters
L. Robbins: Nature and Significance of Economic Science
J. N. (not M) Keynes: Scope and Method of Political Economy
O. Lange: “The Scope and Method of Economics,” in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XIII(1), 1945-46
L. Robbins: “Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics,” Economica, New Series, Vol. V, 1938
L. Robbins: “The Economist in the 20th Century,” Economica, New Series, Vol. XVI, 1949.
F. Machlup: “Why Bother With Methodology?” Economica, New Series, Vol. III, 1936.
M. Friedman, “Lange on Price Flexibility and Employment: A Methodological Criticism,” A.E.R., Vol. 36, 1946.
T. C. Koopmans: “Measurement Without Theory,” R.E.Statistics, Volume 29, 1947.
(Review of Economic Statistics, Vol. 31, 1949, Criticism by Vining and reply by Koopmans)
Numerous writings by F. H. Knight deal with methodological questions. Most of them are collected in The Ethics of Competition and Freedom and Reform
T. W. Hutchison: Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory (Positivistic)
Of older writers, Cairnes (Logical Method of Political Economy), N. W. Senior (Outline), and W. Bagehot (Postulates of English Political Economy) may be mentioned.

II.      General Survey of Economic Process

Modern literature on National Income frequently presents graphic pictures of economic process as a whole. See Schneider, op.cit., Vol. I.

III.    Demand and Supply Analysis

Henderson: Supply and Demand, Ch. 2
Marshall, Principles, Book V, Chs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, Appendix I
Mill, Principles, Book III, Chs. 1-4
Stigler, Chapter 4
Boulding, Parti I (See especially Appendix on Elasticity, p. 137)
J. Robinson: The Economics of Imperfect Competition, Ch. 2

IV.     Theory of Household and Consumption

Hicks: Value and Capital, Part I
Boulding: 2nd ed., Chs. 29, 33
Stigler: Chapters 5 and 6
Relevant chapters in Marshall
Relevant chapters in Stackelberg and Schneider
Leontief, “The Pure Theory of the Guaranteed Annual Wage Contract,” J.P.E., February, 1946

V.      Theory of the Firm and of Production

Hicks: Value and Capital, Chs. 6 and 7
Viner: “Cost Curves and Supply Curves,” reprinted in Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. II
Boulding: Economic Analysis, new edition, Chs. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 31
Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution, Chs. 6, 5
Knight, Risk Uncertainty, and Profits, Ch. 4
Marshall, Principles, Book V, Ch. VI, “Joint and Composite Demand and Supply”
Lerner: The Economics of Control, Chs. 10-18

______________________________________

Economics 201
Economic Theory — G. Haberler
Spring Term, 1951

I.       Theory of Distribution

A.      General
B.      Wages
C.      Rent
D.      Interest
E.      Profits

II.      Welfare Economics

III.    Theory of Market Structures

Perfect, pure, workable competition
Monopoly
Duopoly and Oligopoly
Bilateral Monopoly

IV.     Keynesian Economics

 

Literature

I.       Theory of Distribution

1.      General

Boulding, Economic Analysis, Ch. 11
J. M. Clark, Distribution in Encyclopedia of The Social Sciences and Readings in Income Distribution.
Douglas, Theory of Wages, Part I
Marshall, Principoles, Book V., Ch. VI, “Joint Demand”

Further Suggested Reading:

Stigler, Production and Distribution Theories
J. B. Clark, The Distribution of Wealth
Douglas, “Are There Laws of Production?” A.E.R., Vol. 38, 1948

2.      Wages

Hicks, Theory of Wages, Chs. 1-4
Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution, Ch. 12 (Robertson)
Lester-Machlup, Discussion on Marginal Analysis (A.E.R., 1946-47 and Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. 2
Stigler, “The Economics of Minimum Wage Legislation,” A.E.R., 1949 and in Readings in Labor Economics
Keynes, General Theory, Chs. 1,2

Further Suggested Reading:

Douglas, Theory of Wages
Readings in Income Distribution, Chs. 14, 16, 17, 18, 19
Readings in Labor Economics

3.      Rent

Robinson, Economics of Imperfect Competition, Ch. 8
Readings in Income Distribution, Chs. 31, 32.

4.      Capital and Interest

Böhm-Bawerk, Positive Theory of Capital, Book I, Ch. II; Book II; Book V.
Wicksell, Lectures, Vol. I, pp. 144-218
Fisher, Part I, II, III, Chs. X, XI
Schumpeter, Theory of Economic Development, Chs. IV, VI
Readings in Income Distribution, Chs. 20, 21

Further Suggested Reading:

Metzler, “The Rate of Interest and the Marginal Product of Capital,” J.P.E., August 1950
Knight, “Interest,” in The Ethics of Competition and Encycloopaedia of the Social Sciences
Readings, Chs. 22, 23, 26
Hayek, The Pure Theory of Capital

5.      Profits

Beddy James, Profits, Ch. X
Readings in Income Distribution, Chs. 27, 29.
Schumpeter, Theory of Economic Development

Further Suggested Reading:

Readings, Ch. 30
Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profits, Part III.

 

II.      Welfare Economics

Hicks, “The Foundations of Welfare Economics,” Economic Journal, Vol. 49, 1939
Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. VIII

Further Suggested Reading:

A. Burk (Bergson), “A Reformulation of Certain aspects of Welfare Economics”, Q.J.E., February 1938, and Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. I
Pigou, Economics of Welfare, Parts I and II
Lerner, Economics of Control
Reder, Studies in the Theory of Welfare Economics
Myint, Theories of Welfare Economics
Little, Critique of Welfare Economics
Samuelson, Evaluation of Real National Income
Ruggles, Nancy, “Marginal Cost Pricing,” two articles, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 17, 1949-50.

 

III.    Market Structures

Chamberlin, Monopolistic Competition
Fellner, Competition Among the Few
Hayek, “The Meaning of Competition,” in Individualism and Economic Order
J. M. Clark, “Workable Competition,” A.E.R., and Readings in the Control of Industry, 1940
F. Machlup, “Competition, Pliopoly and Profit,” Economica, February, May, 1942
Rothschild, “Price Theory and Oligopoly,” Economic Journal, Sept., 1947

Further Suggested Reading:

Cost Behavior and Price Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1943
Hall and Hitch, Price Theory and Business Behavior
Harrod, “Price and Cost in Entrepreneurs’ Policy,” Oxford Economic Papers, No. 2, May 1939
Pigou, Economics of Welfare, Chs. on “Discriminating Monopoly,” and “The Special Problem of Railway Rates”
Joan Robinson, Economics of Imperfect Competition, Book V

 

IV.     Keynesian Economics

Hicks, “Keynes and the Classics,” in Readings in Income Distribution, Ch. 23
J. H. Williams, An Appraisal of Keynesian Economics
Tarshis, An Exposition of Keynesian Economics
Lawrence Klein, “Theories of Effective Demand,” in Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. I.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1), Box 5, Folder “Economics 1950-1951 (2 of 2)”.

Copy also found in Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman Papers, Box 80, Folder 8 “University of Chicago [sic] Syllabi by others”.

Image Source: Harvard Album, 1950.