Categories
Agricultural Economics Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Marketing of agricultural commodities. John D. Black, 1947-48.

 

 

John D. Black took over the agricultural economics courses at Harvard that were previously the responsibility of Thomas Nixon Carver. The course of this post was co-taught by Professor Black and Dr. Charles D. Hyson and was simultaneously taught to both Harvard undergraduates and graduate students. Following the course syllabus for 1947-48 are the midyear exams for both the undergraduate and graduate courses and the final year-end exam for the undergraduates. I have been unable to find the graduate examination questions for the year-end final (they were not included in the collection of examinations archived at Harvard).

_________________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 7a. Professor Black and Dr. Hyson.—Consumption, Distribution and Prices (F)

Total 86: 43 Seniors, 30 Juniors, 11 Sophomores, 1 Freshman, 1 Radcliffe.

 

[Economics] 7b. Professor Black and Dr. Hyson.—Consumption, Distribution and Prices (Sp).

Total 44: 25 Seniors, 15 Juniors, 4 Sophomores.

 

[Economics] 107a. Professor Black and Dr. Hyson.—Consumption, Distribution and Prices (F)

Total 13: 5 Graduates, 5 Public Administration, 3 Radcliffe.

 

[Economics] 107b. Professor Black and Dr. Hyson.—Consumption, Distribution and Prices (Sp).

Total 8: 1 Graduate, 4 Public Administration, 3 Radcliffe.

 

Source.  Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1947-1948, pp. 89.

_________________________________

SYLLABUS FOR ECONOMICS 7 AND 107
1947-1948

The required readings for Economics 7 and Economics 107 will be chosen from the references given below. The symbols used for frequently cited references are as follows:

**S.D.—Stewart and Dwehurst, DOES DISTRIBUTION COST TOO MUCH?, Twentieth Century Fund, 1942.

**Shep.—Shepherd, G.S., AGRICULTURAL PRICE ANALYSIS, Iowa State College Press, 1947 (revised edition).

**Waite—Waite and Cassady, THE CONSUMER AND THE ECONOMIC ORDER, McGraw-Hill Co., 1939.

*Cassels—Cassels, J.M., A STUDY OF FLUID MILK PRICES, Harvard University Press, 1937.

**T.N.E.C.—PRICE BEHAVIOR AND BUSINESS POLICY, Temporary National Economic Committee, Monograph No. 1, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1941.

**Nourse—Nourse, E.G., PRICE MAKING IN A DEMOCRACY, Brookings Institution, 1944.

**Dew.—Dewhurst and Associates, AMERICA’S NEEDS AND RESOURCES, Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1947.

**Stig.—Stigler, G.J., THE THEORY OF PRICE, Macmillan Company, 1946.

**M.B.—Maynard and Beckman, PRINCIPLES OF MARKETING, Ronald Press, 1947.

*Nicholls—Nicholls, W.H., IMPERFECT COMPETITION WITHIN AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES, Iowa State College Press, (reprinted 1947).

**Com.—Department of Commerce, MARKET ANALYSES FOR BUSINESS, May, 1947.

 

PART I—INTRODUCTION

Ch. 1. Definition of the Field

M.B., Ch. 1.
Black, J.D. and Galbraith, J.K., “The Quantitative Position of Marketing in the United States”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1935.
S.D., pp. 3-14; 115-123.

Ch. 2. The Importance of the Field

Cassels, J.M., “The Significance of Early Economic Thought on Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, October 1936, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 129-133.
S.D., pp. 15-22; 123-126.

Ch. 3. The Evolution of Markets and Marketing

Marshall, A., PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS, 8th ed., Bk. V, Ch. 1.
M.B., Ch. 2.

PART II—CONSUMPTION ASPECTS

Ch. 4. The Field of Consumption Economics Considered in Relation to Marketing.

M.B., Chs. 3, 4, and 5.

Ch. 5. The Nature and Classification of Human Wants and Goods or Utilities

Dew., Chs. 5, 6, 7.
Waite, Chs. 1 and 14.
Scope and Method Bulletin No. 11, Research in Farm Family Living. Social Science Research Council, (1933), pp. 3-8; 45-58.

Ch. 6. The Dimensions of Utility and Its Measurement

Stig., Ch. 5.
Dew., Ch. 4.
The Review of Economic Statistics, November 1946, Five Views of the Consumption Function”.
Inadequate Diets and Nutritional Deficiencies in the U.S. Their Prevalence and Significance. Bulletin of National Research Council, November 1943.
Scope and Method Bulletin, cited above, pp. 13-18; 31-42.

Ch. 7. Levels of Consumption

Scope and Method Bulletin, cited above, pp. 8-18.
Dew.—Ch’s. 8, 9, and 10.
Waite—Ch’s. 3, 12, and 13.

Ch. 8. Consumer Income and Income Elasticity

Dew.—Ch’s. 11 and 12.
Woytinsky, W.S., “Relationship Between Consumers’ Expenditures, Savings, and Disposable Income”, Review of Economic Statistics, February, 1946.

Ch. 9. The Consumer Purchases and Related Studies

Waite—Ch’s. 9, 13, 16, and 17.

Ch. 10-11. Administration of Income

Dew.—Ch’s 13 and 14.
Waite—Ch’s 20 and 21.

Ch. 12. The Cost of Living and its Measurement

Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Cost of Living Index of the BLS, and appraisal of “The Cost of Living” by George Meany and R. J. Thomas, labor members of the President’s Committee on the Cost of Living, February 28, 1944.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Report of the President’s Committee on the Cost of Living, Monthly Labor Review, January, 1945.
Mills, Bakke, Cox, Reid, Schultz, and Stratton (Special Committee of the American Statistical Association), “An Appraisal of the BLS Cost of Living Index”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, December, 1943.
National Industrial Conference Board. A Critical Analysis of the Meany-Thomas Report on the Cost of Living, April 1944.
Waite—Ch. 5.

Ch. 13. Consumer Sovereignty

Dew.—Ch. 15.

PART III—MARKETING ORGANIZATION

Ch. 14. Production Economics Aspects of Marketing

M.B.—Ch’s 6 to 8.

Ch. 15. Approaches to Marketing Organization Analysis

[note: no reading item listed here]

Ch. 16. The Definition of a Market

Fetter, “The Economic Law of Market Areas”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1924.
Price, Marketing of Farm Products, Ch. 16.
Shepherd, MARKETING OF FARM PRODUCTS, Appendix A.

Ch. 17. Marketing Agencies

M.B.—Ch’s. 9 to 11.

Ch. 18. Classification by Commodities

M.B.—Ch’s. 13 to 15.

Ch. 19. The Census of Distribution

M.B.—Ch’s. 16 to 18.

Ch. 20. The Location of Markets

Dean, W.H., THE THEORY OF THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, Edward Brothers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1938.
S.D.—Ch. 4.

Ch. 21. Inter-Unit Marketing Organization

M.B.—Ch. 19 and 20.

Ch. 22-23. Intra-Unit Marketing Organization

M.B.—Ch. 36.
S.D.—Ch. 2, pp. 33, 36, 37.
Com.—pp. 86-91.

 

PART IVMARKET PRICE

Ch. 24. The Function of Market Prices

M.B.—Ch. 32.
Stig.—Ch. 2.
S.D.—Ch. 2.
Waite—Ch’s. 14, 15.

Ch. 25. The Behavior of Prices

Shep.—Ch’s. 1, 2, and 3.
Cassels, J.M.—Ch’s 1, 5, and 9.
Com.—pp. 43-50.
Nicholls—Ch. 18.

Ch. 26. Demand

Stig.—Ch. 6.
Shep.—Ch’s. 4, 5, and 6.
Cassels—Ch’s 1, 6, and 9.
Working, E.J.—“What Do Statistical Demand Curves Show?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 1927.
Waite—Ch. 10.

Ch. 27. Supply

Stig.—Ch’s 7 to 10, inclusive
Shep.—Ch’s. 10 and 11
Black, J.D., “The Elasticity of Supply of Farm Products”, Journal of Farm Economics, 1924.
Cassels—Ch’s 1 and 2.
Cassels, J.M., “The Nature of Statistical Supply Curves”, Journal of Farm Economics, April, 1933.
Mighell, R.L. and Allen, R.H., “Supply Schedules—Long Time and Short Time”, Journal of Farm Economics, August, 1940.
Reynolds, L.G., “The Canadian Baking Industry: A Study of an Imperfect Marekt,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1938.
Reynolds, L.G., “Competition in the Rubber Tire Industry,” American Economic Review, September 1938.
Waite—Ch. 6.

Ch. 28. Selling Prices under Imperfect Competition

Cassels—Ch’s. 9 and 10.
Nicholls—Ch’s 5 to 11, inclusive
Stig.—Ch’s 11 to 14, inclusive
TNEC—Part I, Ch’s 2 and 3.
Hyson, G.D. and Sanderson, F.H., “Monopolistic Discrimination in the Cranberry Industry”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1945.
Waugh, F.V. et al, “The Controlled Distribution of a Crop Among Independent Markets”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1936.
Waite—Ch. 6.

Ch. 29. Buying Prices under Imperfect Competition

Nicholls, Ch’s—16 and 17.
TNEC—Part III, Ch’s 1 and 2.

Ch. 30. Futures markets and Speculation

M.B.—Ch’s. 28 and 29.
Howell, L.D., Cotton Prices in Spot and Futures Markets, USDA Technical Bulletin No. 6851, 1939.
Shepherd, THE MARKETING OF FARM PRODUCTS, Ch’s 9 and 10.

Ch. 31. Price Forecasting

Shep.—Ch’s 7, 8, 9, and 13.

 

PART VSELLING AND BUYING

Ch. 32. The Selling Function

TNEC—Part I, Ch. 4[?].
S.D.—p. 225.

Ch. 33. Advertising

M.B.—Ch. 23.
S.D.—pp. 225-229.
Borden, Neil, “Findings of the Harvard Study on the Economic Effects of Advertising”, Journal of Marketing, April, 1942.
Waite—Ch. 11.

Ch. 34. The Buying Function

M.B.—Ch. 22.
TNEC—Part I, Appendix 2.
Nicholls, Ch’s. 12-15, inclusive.

Ch. 35-36. Price Policy

S.D.—Ch. 2.
Cassels—Ch. 6.
Nourse—Ch’s 6, 10, and 11.
TNEC.—Part I, Preface and C-h. 1.

 

PART VIMARKETING MARGINS, COSTS, INCOME, AND EFFICIENCY

Ch. 37. Margins and Costs

S.D.—Ch’s. 2, 6, and 7.
TNEC.—Part III, Ch’s. 2 and 3.

Ch. 38. The Incidence of Marketing Costs

S.D.—Ch’s. 10 and 11, pp. 333-349[?].
Nourse—Ch’s. 8 and 9.
TNEC., Part II, Ch. 1.

Ch. 39. Incomes in Commodity Distribution

S.D.—Ch. 5.

Ch. 40. Marketing Efficiency

M.B.—Ch’s. 37 and 38.

 

PART VIIAUXILIARY FUNCTIONS

Ch. 41. Transportation

M.G.—Ch. 24.
S.D.—Ch. 8, pp. 210-222.

Ch. 42. Warehousing and Storage

M.B.—Ch. 25.
S.D.—p. 225.

Ch. 43. The Financing of Marketing

M.B.—Ch. 27.
S.D.—pp. 229-244.

Ch. 44. The Insurance of Commodity Distribution

[note: no reading item listed here]

 

PART VIIICOOPERATION IN COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION

Ch. 45. Principles and Philosophy of Cooperation as Exhibited in Commodity Distribution

Black, J.D., Cooperative Central Marketing Organization, University of Minnesota Exp. Sta. Bulletin No. 211, April, 1924.
Childs, Marquis, SWEDEN: THE MIDDLE WAY, 1938, (conclusions only).

Ch. 46. Cooperative Selling

M.B.—Ch. 21.
S.D.—pp. 85-94.

Ch. 47. Cooperative Buying and Consumer Organization

M.B.—Ch. 12.
Sorenson, THE CONSUMER MOVEMENT, Ch’s 1, 4-9, inclusive.
Waite—Ch. 18.

 

PART IXPUBLIC ACTIVITY IN COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION

Ch. 48. The Functions of Government in Commodity Distribution and Prices

M.B.—Ch’s. 37 to 39.
S.D.—Ch. 11, pp. 349-367.
Nourse—Ch’s. 1 to 5 inclusive.

Ch. 49. The Marketing Services

M.B.—Ch’s. 26 and 30.
Waite—Ch’s 6 and 7.

Ch. 50. Government Controls

Nourse—Ch’s 12 to 14, inclusive.
S.D.—Ch. 11; pp. 333-348.

Ch. 51. Price Control

Shep.—Ch’s 14 and 155.
TNEC.—Part III, Ch. 1.

Ch. 52. Marketing Operations

Shepherd, G.S., MARKETING OF FARM PRODUCTS, Ch. 14.

Ch. 53. Intergovernmental Commodity Agreements

Mason, Edward, CONTROLLING WORLD TRADE, McGraw-Hill, 1946, Part II.
Davis, J.S., INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY AGREEMENTS: HOPE, ILLUSION, OR MENACE?, The Committee on International Economic Policy, New York, 1947.
REPORT OF THE DRAFTING COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARATORY COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND EMPLOYMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Council. Lake Success, New York, January 20 to February 25, 1947, Ch’s 5 to 7, inclusive.

 

PART XCONCLUSION

Ch. 54. Outlook and Policy

Com.—pp. 1-42; 51-85.
Dew.—Ch’s 6 and 26.
S.D.—Ch. 11.
Hyson, C.D., “Savings in Relation to Potential Markets”, American Economic Review, December, 1946.
Hyson, C.D., “Maladjustments in the Wool Industry and Need for New Policy,” Journal of Farm Economics, May, 1947.
Waugh, F.V., “Does the Consumer Benefit From Price Stability?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1944.

 

Source:  Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in economics, 1895-2003.   Box 4, Folder “Economics, 1947-1948 (1 of 2)”.

_________________________________

1947-48
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
MIDYEAR EXAMINATION
January 1948
ECONOMICS 7a

Commodity Consumption, Distribution and Prices

Answer No. 1, and 5 of the remaining 6.

  1.      a.  Cite all the conditions that may make competition “imperfect”.
    1. Point out the differences between Maynard and Beckman’s and Stigler’s sets of conditions.
    2. Why do Maynard and Beckman object to the term “imperfect” competition?
    3. Is their objection valid? Give reasons for your answer.
  2.      a.  Explain the statement that “utility has a time dimension,” and show the relevance of this time dimension to determination of the relative productivity of four or five different types of marketing operations or activities.
    1. Comment on the statement: Introducing the time dimension into measurement of utility does not introduce ethical considerations.
  3.      a. Explain and illustrate by a diagram unit elasticity of demand, elastic demand, and inelastic demand.
    1. Explain income elasticity.
    2. Show how demand elasticity and income elasticity are related to each other.
  4.     Outline the four approaches to analysis of marketing organization and indicate the advantages of each.
  5.      a. Make a classification of markets on two or more bases.
    1. Outline briefly the principles that are involved in the location of major types of markets.
  6.      Contrast the marketing systems for farm products and for manufactured products, defining the functions performed by the marketing agencies engaged in each.
  7.     Explain briefly 4 of the following 5:
    1. Standard of living.
    2. Consumer sovereignty.
    3. Inter-unit marketing organization.
    4. Regular wholesaler.
    5. Supplementary relationship.

MIDYEAR EXAMINATION
January 1948
ECONOMICS 107a

Commodity Consumption, Distribution and Prices

Answer No. 1; 4 questions out of the remaining 6 listed above; and 2 out of the following 3.

  1. Explain the aggregate consumption function and the individual consumption function, and show their significance in marketing analysis.
  2. Comment on the several attempts to determine the relative growth of marketing and other forms of economic activity in the United States.
  3. Explain briefly 3 of the following 4:
    1. Indifference curves (as explained, for example, in Stigler’s Chapter 5.)
    2. LePlay’s approach to consumption analysis.
    3. Principal features of the Consumer Purchases Study.
    4. Either Wicksteed’s or Patton’s main lines of thought on consumption economics.

 

Source:  Harvard University Archives. Harvard University. Final Examinations, 1853-2001.Box 15. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, …,Economics, …, Military Science, Naval Science. January, 1948.

_________________________________

1947-48
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
FINAL EXAMINATION
May 1948
ECONOMICS 7b

Commodity Consumption, Distribution and Prices

(Answer No. 1, and any 5 of the remaining 6)

  1. Outline the basic doctrines of a sound price policy as presented by Nourse. Appraise his doctrines and discuss them critically with particular reference to the price policy and business behavior of the individual firm. (45 minutes)
  2. Explain how the relative elasticities of the demand for Class I and for Class II milk are related to the practice of discriminative marketing. Illustrate with diagram. (27 minutes)
  3. What is the effect of speculation in futures contracts upon commodity prices? Does speculation stabilize prices? Appraise. (27 minutes)
  4. Prices of what types of commodities are flexible, inflexible? Why these differences? (27 minutes)
  5. Outline a group of measures and procedures that will promote efficiency in commodity distribution. (27 minutes)
  6. Discuss cost analysis as a tool of marketing analysis. (27 minutes)
  7. In what ways can cooperation contribute most effectively to efficiency in commodity distribution? (27 minutes)

[Note: examination questions for Economics 107b not included in collection]

Source:  Harvard University Archives. Harvard University. Final Examinations, 1853-2001.Box 15. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, …,Economics, …, Military Science, Naval Science. May, 1948.

Image Source:  Professor John D. Black in Harvard Class Album 1945.

Categories
Economists Johns Hopkins

Johns Hopkins. Economics Faculty, ca. 1950-ca.2008

 

Every so often I stumble upon a convenient chronology or list that is a useful reference tool for the history of a particular economics department. Rather than selfishly leave a copy on my hard disk, it is just as easy to provide the information here. Another service for you from Economics in the Rear-view Mirror!

_______________________

Faculty and Visitors at JHU Economics

The following list of permanent and visiting faculty was compiled in the Fall of 1996 by Christine Barbey and Robert Moffitt, with the assistance of Carl Christ. The list contains the names of all faculty who were in the department from 1950 to the present. Information was taken from the files of the Department of Economics, from archived files at Milton S. Eisenhower library, and from the personal records of Professor Carl Christ, and has been periodically updated by Joe Harrington. Particularly for the early years, there may be inaccuracies and areas of incompleteness. Anyone with information to add or correct to this list should contact Robert Moffitt in the Department.

Name Position Dates
Adelman, Irma Assoc. Prof. 1962-1966
An, Mark Visitor 2002
Anderson, Gary Visitor 2006
Anderson, Robert M. Visitor 1993
Arroyo, Cristino Visitor 2002
Ascheim, Joseph Asst. Prof. 1960-1963
Axtell, Robert Visitor 2000
Balassa, Bela Prof. 1966-1991
Ball, Laurence M. Prof. 1994-Present
Barbera, Rob Visitor 2004 – Present
Barnett, William Visitor 1980-1981
Barnow, Burt Joint Appointment 1993-Present
Bates, Charles Asst. Prof. 1984-1991
Bell, Clive Visitor 1985-1986
Bennett, Elaine Visitor 1990-1991
Berkowitz, Jeremy Visitor 2000
Bertrand, Trent J. Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1969-1978
Besley, Tim Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2008 Spring
Binmore, Kenneth Richard Ely Visiting Professor Fall 1998
Bishai, David Joint Appointment 2005 – Present
Bizer, David Asst. Prof. 1988-1991
Blackman, James Russian Project ca 1949-1955
Blough, Steven R. Asst. Prof. 1987-1993
Blundell, Richard Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2003 Fall
Boggess, Scott Visitor 2000 – Present
Burnside, Craig Visitor 2000
Carrington, William Asst. Prof. 1989-1997
Carroll, Christopher Asst., Assoc. Prof. 1994-Present
Chakrabarti, Subir K. Visitor 1992-1993
Chakravarty, Sukhamoy Visitor ca 1960
Chan, Jimmy Asst. Prof. 1998-2005
Chander, Parkash Visitor 1998
Chang, Myong-Hun Visitor 1995-1996
Chen, Yongjun Fulbright Scholar 2004-2005
Chew, Soo Hong Asst. Prof. 1984-1990
Christ, Carl F. Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1950-1955; 1961-2005
Copeland, Adam Visitor 2006
Cross, Philip Visitor 2002
Croushore, Dean Visitor 1994
Davidson, Sidney Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1949-1958
de Lima, Pedro Asst., Assoc. Prof. 1992-1999
Devereux, Michael Hinckley Visiting Professor 2003
De Vries, Barend A. Part-time, Visitor 1965-1967
Detragiache, Enrica Asst. Prof. 1988-1995
Devaney, Barbara Asst. Prof. 1977-1980
Dey Matthew Visitor 2005
Diebold, Francis X. Visitor 1995-1996
Domar, Evsey Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1948-1958
Driscoll, John Visitor 2004 – Present
Dynan, Karen Visitor 1998
Eason, Warren Russian Project, Lecturer, Research Assoc. ca. 1949-1955
Epstein, Larry Hinckley Visiting Professor 1988-1989
Erceg, Christopher Visitor 2000-2003
Evans, George H. Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1924-1970
Faust, Jon Prof. 2006 – Present
Flinn, Christopher Visitor 2003, 2004
Fohlin, Caroline Joint Appointment 2003 – Present
Fratantoni, Michael Visitor 2001
Gaddy, Clifford Visitor 2000, 2002
Gaynor, Martin Joint Appointment 1991-1995
Gersovitz, Mark Prof. 1994-Present
Ghezzi, Piero Asst. Prof. 1997-Fall, 1998
Gillmore, Curry W. Instructor ca. 1950-1953
Goldware, Faye Russian Project ca 1949-1955
Goodman, Allen Part-time 1978-1985
Gordon, Lincoln Prof. 1967
Gorman, W.M. (Terence) Hinckley Visiting Professor 1977-1978
Graham, Carol Visitor 2002
Graham, Edward Visitor 2006
Grant, Simon Visitor 2000
Haltiwanger, John Assoc. Prof. 1986-1987
Hamilton, Bruce W. Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1973-2001
Hanke, Steve H. Joint Appointment 1971-Present
Harberger, Arnold Asst., Assoc. 1949-1953
Harrington, Joseph Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1984-Present
Hatta, Tatsuo Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1978-1985
Heckman, James Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2005 Spring
Herk, Leonard Visitor 1990-1992
Hulten, Charles R. Asst. Prof. 1971-1978
Iversen, Carl Visitor ca. 1952-1953
Jaszi, George Visitor, Part-time 1961-1962
Karni, Edi Prof. 1979-Present
Kasdan, Saul Russian Project ca 1949-1955
Kawai, Masahiro Asst. Prof. 1978-1986
Khan, M.Ali Asst. Prof., Prof. 1973-1984, 1988-Present
Kindahl, James Asst. Prof. 1958-1963
Kirman, Alan Asst. Prof. 1965-1972
Klarman, Herbert E. Joint Appointment 1961-1969
Klemens, Ben Visitor 2004,2005
Knapp, J. Barkley Visitor 2004 – Present
Kotowitz, Yehuda Asst. Prof. 1961-1963
Krasnokutskaya, Elena Asst. Prof. 2003
Krause, Michael Visitor 2003
Krishna, Pravin Joint Appointment 2005- Present
Kuh, Edwin Lecturer 1953-1955
Kuperberg, Mark Visitor 2000
Kuznets, Simon Prof. 1954-1960
Kyle, Albert “Pete” Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2007 Spring
Lagunoff, Roger Visitor 2003
Laibson, David Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2006 Spring
Lancaster, Kelvin J. Prof. 1962-1966
LeBaron, Blake Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2001/2002
Lenstra, Andries Visitor Fall 1998
Levin, Dan Visitor 1992-2004
Levine, Ross Visitor 1995-1996
Levy, Robert Lecturer 1991-Present
Long, Clarence D. Prof. 1947-1965
Lord, William Visitor 1995-1996
Lubik, Thomas Asst. Prof. 1999-Present
Lyall, Katherine C. Joint Appointment 1973-1984
Lysy, Frank J. Asst. Prof. 1979-1984
Maccini, Louis J. Asst., Assoc.,Prof. 1969-Present
Machlup, Fritz Prof. 1948-1960
Mallar, Charles Asst. Prof. 1974-1981
Marris, Robin Visitor 1975-1976
Matthew, Shum Asst., Assoc., Prof. 2000-2008
McClelland, Rob Visitor 2002 – 2005
Meiselman, David Visitor 1963-1966
Miller, Charles L., Jr. Asst. Prof. 1980-1983
Miller, Frederick H., Jr. Asst. Prof. 1980-1984
Mills, Edwin S. Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1957-1969
Minhas, Bagicha S. Visitor 1977-1978
Mishan, Ezra Visitor 1971
Moffitt, Robert Prof. 1995-Present
Mohring, Herbert Visitor 1974
Mongin, Phillipe Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2002
Morgan, Barbara Adjunct Asst. Prof. 2003, 2004
Mueser, Peter R. Asst. Prof. 1983-1985
Mukhopadhyay, Badal Asst. Prof. 1970-1972
Musgrave, Richard Prof. 1959-1963
Nagy, Andras Visitor 1968
Newman, Peter Prof. 1966-1990
Ng, Serena Assoc. Prof. 2001-2003
Niehans, Jurg Prof. 1966-1977
Oakland, William Asst., Assoc., Prof. 1964-1975
Orphanides, Athanasios Visitor 1995-1996,2002
Owen, John M. Asst. Prof. 1963-1968
Pagan, Adrian Hinckley Visiting Prof. (1996), Ely Visiting Prof. (2000) 1996, 2000
Pakes, Ariel Richard Ely Visiting Professor 2001
Palander, Tord Russian Project ca 1950
Patinkin, Don Visitor 1965
Penrose, Edith Lecturer 1953-1961
Perlman, Mark Asst., Assoc. Prof. 1955-1962
Pomfret, Richard Visiting Scholar 1987-1988
Poole, William Asst. Prof. 1963-1969
Postan, Michael Visitor 1960-1961
Potter, Simon Visitor 2001, 2002
Pritsker, Matthew Visitor 2006
Reid, David J. Visitor 1968-1970
Ridder, Geert Visitor
Professor
Fall 1997
1998 – 2000
Rodin, Nicholas Russian Project ca 1949-1955
Rogers, John Visitor 2001, 2002
Rose, Hugh Prof. 1970-1986
Safra, Zvi Visitor 1985-1986, 1995-1996
Salkever, David S. Joint Appointment 1972-Present
Schmeidler, David Visitor 1987
Shore, Stephen Asst. Prof. 2007-
Shum, Matthew Asst., Assoc., Prof. 2000-2008
Sirageldin, Ismail Joint Appointment 1967-1995
Smith, Julie Visitor 2004
Smyth, David J. Visitor 1972-1974
Sommer, Martin Visitor 2006
Sparrow, Frederick, T. Asst. Prof. 1962-1980
Srinivasan, T. N. Visitor 1977-1979
Stettler, H. Louis III Asst. Prof. 1963-1964
Stevens, John Visitor 2005
Stone, J. Richard N. Visitor 1953-1954
Thomas, Brinley Visitor 1967-1969
Thorbecke, Erik Visitor 1967
To, Theodore Visitor 2006
Triest, Robert Asst. Prof. 1987-1988
Turner, Mark Joint Appointment 2001-2004
Turvey, Ralph Visitor ca. 1952-1953
Uselding, Paul Asst. Prof. 1970-1972
Velde, Francois R. Asst. Prof. 1992-1997
Vishwanath, Tara Visitor 1993-1994
Walters, Alan A. Prof. 1973-1991
Weiss, Frank Visitor 1998-Present
Weymark, John A. Hinckley Visiting Professor 1992
Williams, Elliot Visitor 2006
Wright, Jonathan Prof. 2007-
Woutersen, Tiemen Asst. Prof. 2004 – Present
Wymer, Clifford Visitor 1980-1981
Yaari, Menahem E. Visitor 1988
Young, Eric Visitor 2006
Young, H. Peyton Prof. 1994-2007
Zadrozni, Peter Visitor 2001
Zaman, Asad Visitor 1991-1993
Zame, William R. Prof. 1990-1993
Zamir, Shmuel Visitor 2006
Zilcha, Itzhak Visitor 1983-1985

 

Source: Johns Hopkins webpage listing permanent economics faculty and visitors found at the Internet archive Wayback Machine‘s snapshop from August 15, 2011.

Image Source: Seal of Johns Hopkins clipped from the yearbook, Hullabaloo 1951.

 

Categories
Exam Questions Fields Johns Hopkins

Johns Hopkins. Ten comprehensive economics PhD exams, 1965

 

 

This is what a full set (more-or-less) of written comprehensive examinations from a Ph.D. program in economics looks like as of 1965. The archival records from Johns Hopkins University are in pretty good shape for their graduate program. Earlier exams will be transcribed and posted down the road on the installment plan.

Six exams from 1961 are posted here.

____________________

[Handwritten Note:   Christ. FULL SET EXCEPT: 1) Hist of Theory: oral 2) Ops Res: Courses.]

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in MICROECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 19, 1965

Candidates should answer each question; all questions are assigned equal weight.

  1. “If a price system did not exist, it would be necessary to create one.” Discuss in some detail recent developments in general equilibrium theory (i.e. in the last fifteen years) that have increased and deepened our understanding of the meaning and limitations of this aphorism.
  2. Suppose that a firm, faced with a downward sloping demand curve for its single product, is maximizing its income from sales at an output where total average cost is rising. The firm is then sold on a competitive market to the highest bidder, who—it is assumed—will also maximize his income when he operates the firm.
    1. What considerations will determine the price paid for the firm?
    2. What will be the income of the new owner from operating the firm?
    3. How will the new output compare with the old?
    4. How will the slope of the total average cost curve in its new situation differ from that in the old?
  3. In a letter to Edgeworth, Marshall once wrote: “You know I never apply curves or mathematics to market values. For I don’t think they help much. And market values are, I think, either absolutely abstract or terribly concrete and full of ever-varying (though individually vital) side-issues. Also Ox for market values measures a stock and not a ‘flow’; and I found that if I once got people to use Demand and Supply curves which discussed stocks along this axis of x, they could not easily be kept from introducing the notion of a stock when flow was essential.”
    Discuss the following: (a) the relation of the ideas expressed in this quotation to Marshall’s period analysis of the firm and industry; (b) the Walrasian treatment of the same issues; (c) the current treatments of these issues, as exemplified in good textbooks on price theory; (d) your own opinion of the validity, relevance and usefulness of the distinction which Marshall is making here.
  4. The cost of providing service on a road bridge at a certain crossing of the Chapaqua River is C = dX + e. The consumer demand for the services of the bridge may be expressed as T = f – gX, ignoring differences in types of traffic. The time spent crossing the bridge by the average user is H = a + bX + cX2, and it is assumed that the opportunity cost of the average user is valued at 80 cents per hour.
    What toll should be set on this bridge?
    (C = cost, in dollars; H = time spent on bridge, in hours; T = toll per vehicle, in dollars; X = number of vehicles using bridge; a, b, c, d, e, f, g are constants in the problem.)
  5. “The real content of the equilibrium concept is to be found not so much in the state itself as in the laws of change which it implies.” (John Chipman).
    Would you agree with this characterization? If so, why? If not, why not? Analyse the concepts which are currently used in order to derive laws of change from consideration of equilibrium states.

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in MACROECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 20, 1965

[There are 180 points on the exam – allocate your time carefully.]

  1. Choose 4 from the following set of 5 questions. [Each is worth 25 points.]
    1. Suppose you were the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. Outline and defend your policy program for the next year, paying particular attention to the problems of full employment, growth, stability and the balance of payments.
    2. An extremely general form of an investment function may be written as:
      I = f(y, r, k-1, I-1)
      where I = investment, y = income, r = interest rate, k = capital stock.
      Relate this to

      1. the acceleration principle
      2. the Keynes-Hansen stagnation thesis
      3. the Goodwin model of the business cycle
      4. empirical studies of investment behavior
    3. Discuss the present state of empirical knowledge concerning the nature and properties of the consumption function.
    4. Here are two statements by prominent economists:
      1. “That Keynes’ theory of under-employment equilibrium depends on the assumption of rigid wages should be clear to everybody.” G. Haberler, QJE, Nov. 1949, p. 570.
      2. “The numerous remarks throughout the literature that Keynes relied on wage inflexibilities to obtain his results are entirely unsubstantiated.”
        R. Klein, The Keynesian Revolution, 1947, p. 90.

        1. Using a macro model of your choice, present the details of this classical argument.
        2. Either (1) attempt to reconcile these opposing views,
          or (2) pick one side and defend it.
  1. Give two analyses of macroeconomic behavior, (a) for full employment and (b) for unemployment, using the equation MV = Py (or M = kPy) in each case, where M = money stock, V = 1/k = velocity of money, P = price level, y = real income.
  1. Answer all of the following 5 questions (Each is worth 16 points).
    1. “In growth models of the Harrod-Domar type, behavioral shifts toward more saving have a stimulating effect on GNP, yet in a simple Keynesian model, the opposite is true.” Is this contradiction apparent or real?
    2. Attack or defend the following proposition: “Microeconomics and macroeconomics are not two distinct fields, but are one and students should not be asked to study them separately and be examined in them separately.
    3. Briefly summarize the several empirical and theoretical arguments which support the hypothesis that the stock of money willingly held should be a function of the interest rate.
    4. Discuss briefly the “Patinkin controversy” concerning Say’s law and the quantity theory of money.
    5. “Compensatory fiscal policy must have a weaker effect in the short run if consumption depends on ‘permanent income’ than if consumption depends on current income, other things the same.” Discuss.

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in AMERICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 22, 1965

Do both questions in Section I and three out of six in Section II.

  1. a. The attached table presents information on an American industry. Discuss the technological change evident in the data. Is the pattern typical of other nineteenth century industries? Does the pattern tend to substantiate Habakkuk’s position?
    1. Choose any open question in American economic history. Discuss the current thought about this problem and propose some feasible approach to the problem which might dispel much of the uncertainty now obvious in the literature.
  2. a. The nineteenth century immigrant was attracted to the United States by the high American standard of living. Discuss.
    1. What were the principle sources of capital for industry and transportation in the pre-Civil War era?
    2. What role did the foreign sector play in American development during the nineteenth century?
    3. Except for short 3-6 year fluctuations, the rate of growth of the United States has remained relatively stable. Discuss.
    4. Discuss and evaluate one development policy followed by the government in the nineteenth century orthe governmental development policies in one area during that period.
    5. A recent proposal suggests that the growth process can be considered in three stages – each characterized by the principle constraint to growth. During the first stage growth is constrained by the insufficiency of skill, during the second by a lack of domestic capital, and during the final stage by considerations of foreign imbalance. Discuss the application of such a theory to the American experience.

Table

Year U.S. Mass. Large Firms
OUTPUT
(Physical Units)
1820 3,053 468
1831 23,046 7,923 1,264
1837 12,632 3,545
1845 17,568 4,843
1849 76,368 29,875 7,221
1855 31,500 9,165
1859 114,825 41,529 10,560
CAPITAL
(Machine Sets)
1820 215 20
1831 1,246 340 52
1837 565 136
1845 817 174
1849 3,527 1,288 254
1855 1,520 331
1859 5,235 1,673 362
EMPLOYEES
1820 153
1831 621 133 12
1837 198 28
1845 207 33
1849 980 287 45
1855 348 54
1859 1,220 385 53

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 23, 1965

3 hours, maximum points 180.

PART I (10 points each). Answer all.

  1. Explain the principle of comparative advantage, and illustrate with a diagram.
  2. Derive the expression giving the equilibrium relationship between the spot exchange rate and the 90-day forward rate in a two country model with interest rates assumed fixed in both countries.
  3. The official U.S. measure of a balance-of-payments surplus or deficit is the “overall balance.” Define the “overall balance” and indicate the principal shortcomings of this measure.
  4. Define “terms of trade” and indicate the significance of the concept.
  5. What is the “transfer problem”?
  6. Derive the expression for the change in national income resulting from an autonomous increase in exports.

PART II Answer 3 out of 5 (40 points each).

  1. Utopia is a small, highly developed country with capital (K) as its only factor of production. Utopia consumes two goods, x1and x2, and its community utility function is given by U=x1x2. Its production function for xis x1= a1K, and its production function for xis x2= a2Kb. (a1, a2, b are all greater than zero). Its endowment of capital is K. Since Utopia is a small country, it takes the world prices of x1and xas given.
    1. For what values of b is it certain that Utopia will produce either all xand no xor all xand no x1?
    2. If b = 1/2, at what world price of xin terms of xwill Utopia produce only x2?
    3. If b = 1/2, at what world price of xin terms of xwill Utopia produce only x1?
  2. It has been argued that a fixed exchange rate system works better the greater the interest elasticity of international capital flows, and that a flexible rate system works better the smaller the interest elasticity. Being careful to define “works better”, discuss the assumptions that might underlie this contention.
  3. “In a purely static analysis it is clear that a country, far from being annoyed, should be delighted when foreign countries “dump” their exports on world markets at low prices. But dumping invariably gives rise to cries of dismay in the country importing the dumped goods, and rightly so. A consideration of the dynamic effects of dumping leads to the conclusion that a protective tariff is justified in this case.” Discuss.
  4. “In a sense, practically all arguments for tariffs are second-best arguments. If it is desired to alter the internal distribution of income, then the “first-best” policy would be to do so by direct taxes and subsidies. If this is not possible (i.e. there is a constraint in tax policy), it may be done by tariff protection. But while this will achieve the aim it will also have side effects which are adverse, and the welfare attained with the tax constraint will not be as high as without it; indeed, welfare could fall. (Corden)
    Discuss the above contention with respect to any possible aim or aims of tariff policy other than income redistribution.
  5. “The verdict, so far, on the various attempts to test the Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory is, quite simply, ‘inconclusive’.” Discuss this with respect to the predictions of the theory and one or more of the tests to which these have been subjected.

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in LABOR

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 23, 1965

PART I. (2 hours, 15 minutes)

  1. Why do people travel faster today than they used to?
  2. Some people believe that there has been no technological change in the education “industry”. Others believe that there has been the same rate of technical change in this area as in the rest of the economy. What implication does this have for the question of whether the rate of return on education has changed over time?
  3. G. Lewis maintains that unions have not raised wages in the U.S. by very much. Do you think this is an accurate statement? Are there any circumstances under which unions might have a substantial effect on real wages?
  4. Do you think that there are any circumstances under which the introduction of featherbedding into a collective bargaining agreement would yield a better allocation of resources?

PART II. (45 minutes)

  1. Define, and comment briefly on each of the following terms:
    1. equalizing difference
    2. secondary boycott
    3. structural unemployment
    4. productivity
    5. wage-push inflation
  2. Most Keynesian macro models include the assumption that the supply of labor is infinitely elastic, at least up to full employment, at the existing money wage. Can this macro rigid money wage assumption be reconciled with the micro assumption that only relative prices matter?

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in LOCATION

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 24, 1965

Do all three sections.

  1. Choose an unsettled problem in location theory. Discuss and criticize the current state of the literature. How would you proceed in extending the present knowledge concerning this problem?
  2. a. How would you proceed in analyzing the factors influencing the location of a single industry?
    1. Apply your method to some industry.
  3. a. Discuss the effect of external economies on some industry. (You may not use the industry of section II, part (b).)
    or

    1. Discuss and criticize the technique used in measuring the geographical concentration of industry and regional specialization.

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 23, 1965

Answer 4 questions.

  1. The following are well-known equations summarising certain aspects of the behavior of an individual consumer
    \frac{\partial {{x}_{s}}}{\partial {{p}_{r}}}=-{{x}_{r}}\frac{\partial {{x}_{s}}}{\partial M}+{{x}_{rs}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( r,s=1,2,\ldots ,n \right)
    where xj, pjrepresent quantity and prices of the jthcommodity, M represents money income, and  {{x}_{rs}}=\lambda \frac{{{U}_{rs}}}{U}, where U is the consumer’s utility function.

    1. Derive the equations from a standard model of consumer behavior.
    2. Discuss the sign of the term xrr
    3. Give an interpretation of \lambda .
    4. Outline the effects on the equations of replacing U by f(U), where f´(U) > 0 for all U.
  2. Choosing any suitable general equilibrium model which involves both production and consumption, define an equilibrium for the model, set out postulates which are sufficient to guarantee the existence of the equilibrium, and sketch out the role played by each postulate in giving the guarantee of existence.
    What, in your opinion, is the function of proofs of the existence of an equilibrium?
  3. In a linear production model, there are two activities which use three resources in quantities (2, 1, 1) and (1, 3, 1), respectively, per unit activity level. The resources are available in quantities (10, 10, 5.5) at most. Receipts from unit levels of the two activities are (4,3).
    1. Set up the problem of maximizing total receipts in linear programming form.
    2. Write down the dual problem.
    3. The solution is included among activity vectors (4,2), (4.5,1), (3.25, 2.25) and dual vectors (1,0,2) (0,3,1). Identify the infeasible activity vector and the optimal activity vector, giving reasons.
    4. State the maximum prices the firm would be willing to pay for its resources.
    5. Discuss the relationship between dual variables in linear programming theory and prices in economic theory.
  4. Set out the leading properties of square non-negative matrices. Show how these properties are used in economic theory in relation to
    (a) input-out models of Leontief type, and
    (b) stability analysis of multi-market equilibrium.
  5. Carefully describe the Von Neumann growth model, interpreting its chief results and relating them to other, not necessarily linear, multisector growth models.

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in MONEY

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 23, 1965

PART I (60 points). Indicate whether each of the following statements is true, false, or uncertain, and explain your answer.

  1. If the quantity theory holds, the level of real output and the price level are independent of the supply and/or mix of non-money financial assets.
  2. At full employment the equation of exchange goes from an irrefutable identity to a useful price-level empirical relationship.
  3. The rate of interest is purely a real phenomenon if money is neutral.
  4. The Treasury should lengthen the average maturity of the public debt when long-term interest rates are low.
  5. The demand for money is a function of the real rate of interest rather than the money rate of interest.
  6. If a commercial bank raises new capital by a common stock issue, its reserves will rise permitting a multiple expansion in the money supply.

PART II (60 points). Listed below are four proposals for new legislation. For each proposal, discuss the probable economic effects were the proposal to be enacted and indicate your views on the desirability of the proposal. (Consider each proposal separately; i.e., as you discuss one proposal assume that none of the others has been enacted.)

  1. Require the Federal Reserve to support the prices of Government securities whenever their yields reach 4 ¼ percent.
  2. Allow commercial banks to pay any interest they deem proper on demand and time deposits.
  3. Require the Federal Reserve to produce a money supply which is as close as is practicable to a 3 percent annual rate growth path.
  4. Provide that members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may be appointed to, or removed from, office at any time by the President of the United States.

 

PART III. (60 points). Answer two.

[Handwritten note: THIS PAGE WAS NOT GIVEN. (i.e. Part III)]

  1. “Economists are frequently skeptical about the effects of price flexibility in goods markets because they feel that price declines will lead to expectations of further price declines resulting in a reduction in consumption. If expectations as to future prices of long-term bonds are determined in a similar way, the liquidity trap will not exist and, in fact, the economy will be very sensitive to changes in monetary policy.” Discuss.
  2. Today, monetary policy is generally considered to be useful for dealing with economy-wide stabilization problems but not with regional stabilization problems; overheated regions and depressed regions must be treated with different medicines. But the Federal Reserve System consists of twelve regional banks and its founders thought a regional monetary policy was possible. What economic conditions would have to prevail before a regional monetary policy would be possible?
  3. Outline the major aspects of the Gurley-Shaw hypothesis, and discuss its merits. What empirical observations would lead you to accept or reject the hypothesis? (Is the fact relevant that in recent months the rate of growth of money supply plus time deposits has remained unchanged while the rate of growth of money supply alone has declined substantially?)

    ____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in PUBLIC FINANCE

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 24, 1965

PART I (40 min.)

For each of the following indicate whether the statement is true, false, or uncertain, and then explain your reasoning. (Statements in parentheses may be taken as correct.)

  1. (In a suburban Los Angeles owner-occupied housing development in a recent year, real estate tax payment as a fraction of annual family income was higher for lower-income families than for higher-income families.) The foregoing fact shows that the residential real estate tax is a regressive tax.
  2. There is no advantage or disadvantage to the investor in holding tax-exempt municipal bonds because market demands will have adjusted so as to equate the after-tax yields on the two.
  3. (Available empirical evidence indicates that the after-tax rate of return on equity in the corporate sector has changed very little since the late 1920’s despite the fact that the corporate income tax rate has increased from 11% to over 50%.) From this evidence one can conclude that the effect of the tax has been to raise corporate product prices or to lower the prices of corporate-hired factors of production, or some combination of these two, so that the tax has been simply shifted away from corporate profits with no change in resource allocation.
  4. Marginal cost pricing should be employed for all public utility undertakings.

 

PART II (70 min.) Answer any 2 of the following:

  1. Discuss briefly the issues raised by the proposal of Mr. Heller (former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers) to transfer certain Federal tax receipts to the states.
  2. Discuss briefly the consequences of Representative Patman’s proposal to finance the Great Society by a loan of $25 billion from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury at an interest rate of ¼ of 1% per year.
  3. Discuss the likely impact of the current proposal to reduce excise taxes upon
    1. The level of aggregate demand
    2. The degree of automatic stabilization of the economy
    3. The distribution of income if taxes on luxury items are eliminated.
  4. Compare, contrast, and evaluate the effects and merits of the following programs to stimulate investment:
    1. Militant easy money programs
    2. Tax inducements such as
      1. Accelerated depreciation
      2. Investment tax credits
      3. Shifts to consumption-expenditure taxation away from income taxation.

 

PART III (70 min.) Answer any 2 of the following:

  1. Indicate the role of government in promoting economic growth in the following models:
    1. Neo-classical models of economic growth à la Solow.
    2. Fixed-proportions models à la Domar.
    3. An economy where government stabilization policy is required to maintain full employment.
  2. Define a public good; a social want. What special problems do they pose to a government which is interested in both resource allocation and optimal income distribution?
  3. Two countries decide to join in an economic union. They wish to have free trade and optimal resource allocation within the union.
    1. One country has a tax system relying solely on a value-added tax and the other one has a proportional income tax. Would an adjustment to exporters or importers be necessary for these taxes?
    2. Suppose the taxes were a value-added tax and a proportional tax on consumption. Would your answer be the same?
  4. How could the government use fiscal measures to improve resource use in transportation?

____________________

Ph.D. Written Comprehensive Examination in ECONOMETRICS

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
April 24, 1965

Part I

Define or explain briefly:

  1. multicollinearity
  2. consistent estimator
  3. asymptotically efficient estimator
  4. asymptotic variance of an estimator
  5. asymptotically normally distributed estimator
  6. best linear unbiased estimator
  7. Monte Carlo study
  8. specification bias
  9. specification error
  10. autoregressive disturbances

 

Part II (answer two out of three)

  1. Write an essay on the identification problem in which you indicate (a) the definition of “identification”, (b) why the problem arose in the economic literature rather than in the broader statistical literature, (c) the relation of identification to estimation, and (d) some of the important theoretical results concerning identification criteria. In (d), be careful to state carefully the assumptions on which the results rest.
  2. Describe the two-stage least squares estimator in words. Then write down a mathematical expression for it, defining your symbols.
  3. Discuss some of the principal difficulties in estimation that are sometimes encountered when disturbances are serially dependent, and indicate under what circumstances each arises or does not arise. Indicate also what techniques (if any) are available to deal with each difficulty, and how they deal with the difficulty.

 

Part III (answer two out of four)

  1. Suppose that current consumption cwere a linear function of current expected income yet, with an additive disturbance uthat is serially independent with mean zero and constant variance. Suppose also that current expected income is a weighted average of current actual income yand lagged expected income ye,t-1, with constant weights and with an additive disturbance vthat is independent of uand serially independent with mean zero and constant variance. Suppose also that income is exogenous. What problems would be encountered in the attempt to obtain consistent and asymptotically efficient estimators of the slope and intercept of the consumption function described? What information and techniques would enable you to solve them? Explain.
  2. Discuss the effects of multicollinearity upon the estimation of parameters by ordinary least squares. In your discussion assume that the distribution of disturbances is spherical and that the regressor observation matrix X is fixed in repeated samples.
  3. Specify the necessary conditions under which the method of instrumental variables provides consistent estimators in circumstances where ordinary least squares fails to do so.
  4. If a regressor is correlated with the disturbance then classical least squares estimation will result in a biased estimator of the influence of variations in the regressor on variations in the regressand. What can you say about the direction and extent of this bias?

 

Source:  Johns Hopkins University, Eisenhower Library, Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy, Series 6, Box 1, Folder “Comprehensive Exams for Ph.D. in Political Economy 1947-1965”.

Image Source: From the Johns Hopkins University seal on the cover of the 1966 yearbook Hullabaloo.

Categories
Chicago Courses

Chicago. Milton Friedman nixes “Microeconomics” and “Macroeconomics”, 1965

 

From an August 9, 1965 memorandum to the faculty of the Chicago economics department we can see that there was actually a faculty meeting in which adoption of  new course titles, “Micro-Economic Theory” and “Macro-Economic Theory”, had been decided. However, Milton Friedman (presumably not at that meeting) protested this concession to the mainstream and ever since Chicago has faithfully remained home of “Price Theory” and “Income Theory” as seen below in the course titles from 2000-2001 and 2010-2011 (along with course descriptions). Incidentally the two sequences have grown a third quarter since the mid-sixties.

I don’t have a copy of the June 12, 1965 protest letter from Friedman to Lewis, but am reasonably confident that someone will eventually find a copy (most likely a carbon copy of the letter in Milton Friedman’s correspondence with Lewis).

_________________

H. Gregg Lewis to Milton Friedman

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Chicago 37, Illinois
Department of Economics

June 18, 1965

Professor Milton Friedman
Orford,
New Hampshire

Dear Milton:

Thanks for your letter of June 12 regarding the labeling of 301, 302, 331, and 332.

I want to have the decision with respect to the labels reconsidered this summer. Until the decision is reconsidered, I am making no changes in the titles of the courses.

Meanwhile, I would appreciate it if you would suggest alternative titles for the courses that are acceptable to you.

With best wishes to you and Rose.

Sincerely,
[signed] Gregg
H. G. Lewis

HGL/agm

[Friedman’s handwritten notes at bottom of letter:]

301, 302 Price Theory[;] Relative Price Theory

331, 332 Money and Employment Theory[;] Money, Income, Employment[;] Theory of the Price Level and Aggregate Output, Money

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 79, Folder 3 “University of Chicago Minutes. Economics Department, 1965-1966”.

_________________

Memo from H. Gregg Lewis to the economics department

August 9, 1965

To: Members of the Department of Economics

From: H. Gregg Lewis

At the last meeting of the Department (June 4, 1965), the Department decided to change the name of Economics 301 and 302 to Micro-Economic Theory and Economics 331 and 332 to Macro-Economic theory. The purpose of this note is to request that the Department reconsider this action and adopt a different pair of names for these two sets of courses (and the corresponding parts of the Ph.D. Core Examination).

The term micro-economics commonly is used to denote the economics of the individual household and the individual firm. It is, therefore, a misleading title for 301 and 302. Furthermore, it is surely misleading to represent 331 and 332 as not involving consideration of the economics of individual households and firms.

For 301 and 302, I recommend that we keep the present title (Price Theory) or change it slightly to Relative Price Theory. For 331 and 332, I recommend that one of the following be adopted:

The Theory of Income, Employment, and Money
or         The Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
or         The Theory of Income, Employment, Interest, and Money

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 79, Folder 3 “University of Chicago Minutes. Economics Department, 1965-1966”.

_________________

Course descriptions from the 2000-2001 Brochure

301 PRICE THEORY I (Becker/ Murphy)

Theory of consumer choice, including household production, indirect utility, and hedonic indices. Supply under competitive and monopolistic conditions. Static and dynamic cost curves, including learning by doing and temporary changes. Uncertainty applied to consumer and producer choices. Property rights and the effects of laws. Investment in human and physical capital. (=Law 436)

[Reading List from one year later: Autumn Quarter 2001]

302 PRICE THEORY II (Reny/ Chiappori)

Economics of uncertainty. Models with asymmetric information. Game theory. PQ: Econ 301 or consent of instructor.

303 PRICE THEORY III (Chiappori/ Rosen)

The theory of production, division of labor and organization of work. The economics of the firm and the theory of supply. Cost functions, product differentiation and spatial equilibrium. Investment theory, firm size, and incentive problems. Externalities and the role of markets and prices. PQ: Econ 301 and 302 or consent of instructor.

330 THE THEORY OF INCOME I (Townsend/ Alvarez)

This course begins the study of income and macroeconomics by embedding firms, households, and financial institutions into the standard general equilibrium model. The course thus studies Pareto optima, Walrasian equilibrium, and the core in economies with separation in space, uncertainty, and/or multiple time periods and incorporates private information, incomplete markets, and other impediments to trade. Various phenomena and applications are stressed: private monies and the potential role of the monetary authority; the evaluation of local, regional, and national level financial systems in their ability to reallocate risk; the determinants of economics growth; growth with increasing inequality and financial deepening; occupation choice under wealth constraints and its impact on growth and inequality; the existence of networks such as industrial conglomerates in economies with moral hazard; optimal fiscal policy; and the role of social security. Examples are drawn from Asia, Latin America, Europe, and Africa and well as the U.S.

331 THE THEORY OF INCOME II (Lucas)

This course will deal with modern capital and monetary theory, and with applications of the theory to issues in fiscal, monetary, and banking policy.

332 THE THEORY OF INCOME III (Mulligan)

The course shares with the other two Theory of Income courses the objectives of (1) explaining human behavior as evidenced by aggregate variables and (2) predicting the aggregate effects of certain government policies. The focus of Economics 332 is to assess the empirical success of prevailing theories. Some hypotheses to be considered are consumption smoothing, intertemporal substitution, the q-theory, the neoclassical approach to fiscal policy, and the intergenerational transfer view of Social Security. The course confronts several empirical issues that are also encountered outside the field of macroeconomics such as the construction of aggregate data, choice of data set, and the measurement of expectations.

 

Source:  University of Chicago, Department of Economics Graduate Program. Brochure 2000-2001. Webpage: Courses.

_________________

Course descriptions from the 201011 Brochure

30100     PRICE THEORY I  (Murphy / Becker)

Theory of consumer choice, including household production, indirect utility, and hedonic indices. Models of the firm.  Analysis of factor demand and product supply under competitive and monopolistic conditions.  Static and dynamic cost curves, including learning by doing and temporary changes.  Uncertainty applied to consumer and producer choices.  Property rights and the effects of laws.  Investment in human and physical capital.  (=LAWS 43611)

30200     PRICE THEORY II  (Becker / Murphy / Sonnenschein)

The first five weeks of this course are a continuation of ECON 30100, Price Theory I.

The second half of the course will be devoted to the Walrasian model of general competitive equilibrium as developed by Arrow and Debreu.  This will begin with a brief development of the consumer and producer theories, followed by the welfare theorems connecting equilibria and optima and a treatment of the classical existence of equilibrium theorem.  The core of an economy, a limit theorem relating the core to the set of competitive equilibria, and models in which agents are small relative to the market will also be considered.  Finally we will study general equilibrium under some alternative assumptions; such as, informational asymmetries and rational expectations equilibrium, public goods and Lindahl equilibrium, financial general equilibrium and asset pricing.  (=LAWS 43621)

30300    PRICE THEORY III  (Reny / Myerson)

The course begins with expected utility theory, and then introduces the fundamental ideas of game theory: strategic-form games, Nash equilibrium, games with incomplete information, extensive-form games, and sequential equilibrium.   Then the course will focus on the effects of informational asymmetries in markets and the problems of moral hazard and adverse selection. Topics include: optimal risk sharing, signaling and screening in competitive markets, principal-agent problems, strategic and informational incentive constraints, incentive efficiency, and mechanism design for auctions and bilateral trading.

33000     THE THEORY OF INCOME I  (Alvarez)

This course formulates and analyzes aggregate general equilibrium models to study classical questions in macroeconomics. The course starts with the formulation and analysis of competitive equilibrium in the general equilibrium models, including the 1st and 2nd welfare theorem. The first applications of this model are: social security (using an OLEG model), optimal risk sharing, and asset pricing (using a one period model with uncertainty). Most of the remaining applications focus on dynamic models without uncertainty. To do so we study tools to characterize optimal solutions of control problems: Hamiltonian, calculus of variations and dynamic programming. The main application of these tools is the neoclassical growth model in many variations: determinants of steady state and balanced growth path, endogenous growth, effect of variable labor supply, TFP changes and of investment specific technical progress, habit formation, the q-model of investment, taxation of capital and labor, optimal taxation a la Ramsey, among others.

33100     THE THEORY OF INCOME II  (Stokey)

This course will focus on the use of recursive general equilibrium models to study various macroeconomic questions.  On the substantive side, particular topics include models with idiosyncratic (insurable) and aggregate (uninsurable) risk; issues in dynamic fiscal policy (Ricardian equivalence, tax smoothing, capital taxation); models of asset pricing; issues in monetary policy (money demand, the welfare cost of inflation); time consistency; and aggregate models with price setting. On the methodological side, the course will focus on dynamic programming and other recursive modeling techniques.

33200     THE THEORY OF INCOME III  (Mulligan)

The course shares with the other two Theory of Income courses the objectives of (1) explaining human behavior as evidenced by aggregate variables and (2) predicting the aggregate effects of certain government policies.  Economics 33200 considers some of the prevailing business cycle theories, and their application to the recession of 2008-9.  Some hypotheses to be considered are the q-theory of housing investment, the neoclassical approach to fiscal policy, and whether government spending has a “multiplier.”  The course confronts several empirical issues that are also encountered outside the field of macroeconomics such as the construction of aggregate data, choice of data set, and the measurement of expectations.

Source: University of Chicago, Department of Economics Graduate Program 2010-11, Introduction. Webpage: Graduate Course Descriptions, 2010-11.

Image: Irwin Collier (right) taking a break during an earlier archival expedition to the Hoover Institution Archives…Milton Friedman (left).

 

Categories
Johns Hopkins Suggested Reading

Johns Hopkins. Reading List for Macroeconomic Theory course. Carl Christ, 1963

 

The life and career of Carl Christ has been honored at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror in an earlier post. His syllabus for an econometrics course he taught in 1957 at the University of Chicago has been posted as well. Today we have a new-economics themed macroeconomics course, perhaps inspired by the first year of the legendary Council of Economic Advisers under President John F. Kennedy.

_____________________

Political Economy 302:
Economic Theory (Macroeconomics)

Spring 1963
Johns Hopkins University

Dr. Christ

Reading List

  1. Texts

Bailey, Martin J., National Income and the Price Level, Appendix on Income and Chs. 1, 2, 6,8, 3.

U.S. President, Economic Report, January 1963, as assigned after publication.

  1. Other Readings

Ackley, Gardner, Macroeconomic Theory, pp. 3-120, Ch. XV, pp. 505-42 and pp. 549-53 (see next item)

Ruggles, Richard and Nancy, National Income Accounts and Income Analysis, 2d ed., pp. 1-143 (an alternative to Ackley, pp. 3-101).

Keynes, J. M., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

Chs. 1,3; Ch. 6, Sec II; Ch. 7, Sec V; Chs. 8-11; Ch. 12, Secs I-II and p. 164; Chs 13-15; Ch 17, Secs I-IV; Chs 18, 2; Ch 20, Sec [II? or III?].

Samuelson, P.A., “The Simple Mathematics of Income Determination,” in L. Metzler et al, Income Employment and Public Policy

Samuelson, P.A., “Interactions Between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration,” Rev. Econ. Stat., Vol. 21, No. 2 (May, 1939), pp. 75-78; also in Readings in Monetary Theory.

Patinkin, Don, “Price Flexibility and Full Employment,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

Mitchell, W. C., “Business Cycles”, in Readings in Business Cycle Theory.

Abramovitz, Moses, “Resource and Output Trends in the U.S. since 1870; Am. Econ. Rev. Vol 36, No. 2 (May, 1956), pp. 5-23; reprinted as N.B.E.R. Occasional Paper No. 52.

Harris, S. E., P. A. Samuelson, G. Haberler, A. H. Hansen, H. C. Wallich, C. L. Schultze, O. Eckstein, and W. L. Smith, “Economic Policy for 1962: A Symposium”, Rev. Econ. Stat.Vol. 44, No. 1 (Feb., 1962), pp. 1-24.

Friedman, Milton, “A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability,” Amer. Econ. Rev. Vol. 38, No. 1 (June, 1948), also in Readings in Monetary Theory, also in Friedman’s Essays in Positive Economics.

 

Source:  Johns Hopkins University. Milton S. Eisenhower Library, Ferdinand Hamburger, Jr. Archives. Department of Political Economy. Series 6, Box 1, Folder 3 “Department of Political Economy, Course Outlines and Reading Lists. C. 1900, c. 1950, 1963-68.”

Image Source: Clipped from the Johns Hopkins University yearbook, Hullabaloo 1964, p. 42.

Categories
Courses Curator's Favorites Exam Questions Lecture Notes M.I.T. Problem Sets Suggested Reading Syllabus Uncategorized Undergraduate

M.I.T. Principles of Macroeconomics. Slides, problems sets, exams. Krugman, 1998

 

One might think that putting together robust links to economics course materials found in the internet archive, Wayback Machine, would be relatively straightforward, and sometimes it is. But most of us are inconsistent with the use of folders and sometimes pages get updated by other people so that traditional archival persistence is generally required to find missing pieces to the historical puzzle. In any event, today’s post manages to pack links to course content for a principles of macroeconomics course taught at M.I.T. exactly two decades ago by Paul Krugman.

I remember that semester well, because immediately after Paul Krugman finished his teaching obligations at M.I.T. for that fall term, he came to Berlin to receive an honorary doctorate from Freie Universität Berlin. The audio recording to his lecture “The return of demand-side economics” can still be heard (beginning around minute 2:00) at a webpage maintained by the John-F.-Kennedy Institute for North American Studies of Freie Universität.

_________________

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics
Fall 1998
Professor Paul Krugman

Course Syllabus

Text: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics.

Schedule (with links to lecture slides and exams)

Note: the lecture slides may differ slightly from those presented in class.

September 14 — Chapter 2: Preliminary Concepts

Slides: Tracking the Macroeconomy: Five Key Aggregates

September 16 — Chapter 3 & 4: The Goods Market (lecture by Roberto Rigobón)

September 21 — Chapter 5: Financial Markets

Slides: Review. Multiplier Analysis

Handout by Adam B. Ashcroft on bond yields about here

September 23 — Chapter 5: More on Financial Markets

Slides: The Federal Reserve and the Money Supply

September 28 — Chapter 6: IS-LM

Slides: The IS-LM Model

September 30 — Chapter 7: Expectations

Slides: Expectations and Macroeconomics

October 5 — Chapter 8: Expectations, Consumption, and Investment

Slides: Consumer Behavior–Not that simple

October 7 — Banks and the Banking System

Slides: Banking and the Financial System

October 8
Exam 1

Exam #1 Questions
Solutions

October 13 — Chapter 9: Expectations and Financial Markets

Slides: (missing)

October 14 — Chapter 10: Expectations and Policy

Slides: Expectations and Macroeconomic Policy 

October 19 — Chapter 11: Introduction to the Open Economy

Slides: The Open Economy

October 21 — Chapter 12: The Open Economy Goods Market

Slides: Macroeconomics in the Open Economy

October 26 — Chapter 13: Interest Rates and Exchange Rates

Slides: What Determines Exchange Rates

Handout on exchange rates about here.

October 28 — Chapter 13: Exchange Rate Regimes

Slides: Fixed Exchange Rates

November 2 — Chapter 14: Expectations, Crises, and General Mayheim

Slides: (missing)

November 4 — Chapter 15: The Labor Market

Slides: Why Study the Labor Market?

November 5
Exam 2

Exam #2 review
Exam #2 questions
Solutions

November 9 — Chapter 16: General Equilibrium

Slides: Putting It All Together–AS-AD

November 16 — Chapter 17: The Phillips Curve

Slides: From Aggregate Supply to the Phillips Curve

November 18 — Chapter 18: Disinflation

Slides: Long-run Unemployment-Inflation Dynamics [note: “?” for the greek letter pi, i.e. rate of inflation]

November 23 — Chapter 19 & 21: Seigniorage and Devaluation

Slides: Inflation, Interest Rates, and Hyperinflation

November 25 — Chapter 22 & 23: Long-run Growth

Slides: Economic Growth

November 30 — Chapter 24: Technical Progress

Slides: Savings, Investment, and Growth

Handout on growth about here.

December 2 — Chapter 20: Great Depression and European Unemployment

Slides: High Unemployment and Growth Slowdowns 

December 7 — Zuckerman & Krugman Foreign Affairs articles (lecture by Roberto Rigobón)

[Paul Krugman, Debate: America the Boastful, and Mortimer B. Zuckerman, Debate: A Second American Century,  Foreign Affairs (May/June 1998)]

December 9 — Course Review

Slide: Overview Graphic [Note: graphic cut-off on right hand side]

Final Examination (December, 2018)

Final Exam Review
Pablo Garcia’s Review
Final Exam Questions 

 

Problem Sets

Set Number Assigned Due Returned
1 9-11 9-18 9-21
2 9-18 9-25 9-28
3 9-25 10-2 10-5
4 10-9 10-16 10-19
5 10-16 10-23 10-26
6 10-23 10-30 11-2
7 11-6 11-13 11-16
8 11-13 11-20 11-23
9 11-20 12-4 12-7

 

Problem Set 1
Solutions

Problem Set 2
Solutions

Problem Set 3
Solutions (missing)

Optional Problem Set 1
Solutions

Problem Set 4
Solutions

Problem Set 5
Solutions

Problem Set 6
Solutions

Problem Set 7
Solutions

Optional Set 2
Solutions

Problem Set 8
Solutions

Problem Set 9
Solutions

Optional Set 3
Solutions

 

Image: Photograph taken in December 1998 at Cecilienhof, Potsdam (Germany). Irwin Collier and Paul Krugman.

Categories
Cambridge Exam Questions

Cambridge. Economics Tripos Examinations, 1921

 

The following eighteen examinations constituted the Economics Tripos at Cambridge University in 1921. Fifteen exams covered economic theory, policy, history and statistics with three exams covering politics and international law.

Previously posted Cambridge economics exams have been posted at the following links:

Guide to Moral Sciences Tripos 1891
Economics Tripos 1931
Economics Tripos 1932

___________________

ECONOMICS TRIPOS
PART I

Monday, May 30, 1921. 9–12.
GENERAL ECONOMICS. I.

  1. Comment on the following passage: “Les vérités d’économie politique pure fouruiront la solution des problèmes les plus importants, les plus débattus et les moins éclairés d’économie politique appliquée et d’économie sociale.”
  2. “Prices may be determined over a short period by demand and supply; but in the long run they are governed by the superior force, Cost of Production.” Comment on this statement.
  3. What do you understand by the term, Joint Products? Would you apply the term to the production of chocolate and cocoa by the same factory? What principles govern the prices of Joint Products?
  4. “The ordinary progress of a society, which increases in wealth, is at all times tending to augment the incomes of landlords.” Discuss this statement. What effect would you expect a great development of internal transport facilities to exert upon urban rents?
  5. Consider the relative advantages of wages settlements for any industry (a) upon a uniform national basis, (b) upon varying district bases.
  6. Compare the attempts of trade unions to raise wages with those of combinations to raise prices as regards (a) the methods which they employ, (b) the economic conditions of their success.
  7. Distinguish the various types of business which it is customary to describe as Cooperative, indicating in each case the strong and weak points and potentialities of future development.
  8. Comment on the following passage: “General low wages never caused any country to undersell its rivals; nor did general high wages ever hinder it from doing so.”
  9. Is there any inconsistency between the views that the foreign exchanges are determined (a) by the demand for and supply of bills of exchange, (b) by the relative purchasing power of the currencies of the countries concerned? What do you consider the correct view of the matter?
  10. “It is impossible for any country to finance a great war without an inflation of the currency.” Discuss this statement.

 

Monday, May 30, 1921. 1½–4½
RECENT ECONOMIC AND GENERAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE BRITISH EMPIRE.

  1. Show how Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations influenced the economic policy of England. What influence had it outside England?
  2. Outline the different measures which have been taken since 1783 for reducing the burden of the National Debt.
  3. What were the main objects which Mr. Gladstone had in view, when selecting the sources from which his revenue was to be derived?
  4. What light is thrown by railway and banking history on the attitude of Parliament towards monopoly?
  5. How far was the distress of the hand-loom weavers and frame-work knitters in the middle of the nineteenth century caused by the introduction of steam power?
  6. What happened to the surplus agricultural population which before the Poor Law of 1834 was maintained, wholly or in part, at the expense of the parish?
  7. (a) “Down to 1870 England’s colonial policy was a policy of drift.”
    (b) “The theorists of 1830 were animated by a mastering passion for liberty, and it is because they succeeded in making it the basic principle of England’s colonial policy that the British Empire is to-day a fact of such cardinal importance in the world.”
    Which seems to you the more correct view, and why?
  8. “The discovery of gold precipitated Australia into manhood.”
    Discuss this; and point out the social problems confronting a new country which possesses precious metals in abundance.
  9. Describe the chief forms of land tenure existing in India, and account for their diversity.
  10. Examine the methods which have been adopted in different parts of the British Empire for the avoidance and settlement of industrial disputes.

 

Tuesday, May 31, 1921. 9–12.
SUBJECTS FOR AN ESSAY.

  1. “Une extrême justice est souvent une injure.”
  2. “In all essentials the problem of industrial peace resembles that of international peace.”
  3.  “The economic relationship of nations is essentially one of cooperation, rather than of rivalry: the prosperity of each country is to the advantage of the others.”
  4. “The nineteenth century was the outcome of French ideas and English technique.”
  5. The Restoration of the Gold Standard.

“From this unrest, so, early wrecked,
A future staggers crazy,
Ophelia of the Ages, decked
With woeful weed and daisy.”

 

Tuesday, May 31, 1921. 1½–4½.
RECENT ECONOMIC AND GENERAL HISTORY OF EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES.

  1. Contrast the map of Europe, as it was in 1815, with the map of Europe as it is to-day.
  2. To what causes do you attribute the instability of the political institutions of France between 1789 and 1870?
  3. “The German Empire was built more truly on coal and iron than on blood and iron.”
    What evidence is there to support this statement?
  4. “Le Gouvernement provisoire de la République française s’engage à garantir l’existence de l’ouvrier par le travail;
    Il s’engage à garantir du travail à tous les citoyens.” (Moniteur du 26 fevrier 1848.)
    What was the origin of this decree, and to what did it lead?
  5. “Gewiss ist es der Kaiser gewesen und konnte nur der Kaiser sein, der den Fürsten schliesslich entlassen hat, aber die moralische Autorität des Mannes, der das deutsche Reich geschaffen und 27 Jahre an der Spitze der Regierung gestanden hatte, war so ungeheuer, dass es für den Kaiser, der noch so wenig Regierungserfahrung hatte, eine moralische Unmöglichkeit gewesen wäre, sich von ihm zu trennen, wenn nicht eben der Kanzler durch sein Verhältniss zur Majorität des Reichstags sich in eine unhaltbare Position gebracht hätte.”
    Do you agree with this explanation of Bismarck’s dismissal? Give reasons for your answer.
  6. “In France the average unit of agriculture remains as small as ever it was, and its typical manager is still the working peasant or the very small farmer.”
    Why is it that the small farmer has held his own so successfully in France?
  7. Outline the main stages in the growth of the German Zollverein.
  8. Compare the railway systems of Germany and the United States, with particular regard to
    (a) the purposes for which they were planned;
    (b) the part played by the State in their development and control.
  9. How was it that the United States, which Huskisson regarded as our most serious shipping rival, had so small a mercantile marine in the second half of the nineteenth century?
  10. Why were the attractions of Canada, as a field for immigration, inferior to those of the United States during the greater part of the nineteenth century?
  11. What were the chief issues between North and South which led to the American Civil War?

 

Wednesday, June 1, 1921. 9–12.
GENERAL ECONOMICS. II.

  1. “If we wish to get a clear view of English industrial inefficiency at the present time we have only to contrast the average output per worker in American industrial establishments with the average output in English establishments; or to set side by side the average output of each cotton spindle employed in Japan with the corresponding figure for English spindles. In both comparisons England’s position is unsatisfactory almost beyond belief.” Criticise this argument.
  2. What meanings can be attached to the statement that a country is “over-populated”? In what sense, if any, can the statement be applied to this country at the present day?
  3. “The socialistic activities of modern states, by checking the natural play of those forces that tend to bring about the elimination of the relatively unfit, threaten a progressive deterioration of the qualities of the race.” Discuss this statement.
  4. Indicate the chief difficulties in the way of estimating accurately the change in the real earnings of any group of wage-earners in 1921, as compared with 1914.
  5. Are trade unions well advised (a) in attempting to prohibit the entry of female workers into specific occupations, (b) in insisting on equal pay for male and female workers in occupations where both are normally employed?
  6. “Plasticity of wage rates would be the sovereign remedy for the evil of unemployment.” Discuss this view.
  7. Analyse the various causes, both temporary and relatively permanent, which may bring about a disparity between a country’s recorded exports and imports. Illustrate from actual instances.
  8. Discuss the effects of increasing supplies of gold upon the short period and the long period rate of interest in a gold-standard country.
  9. “It is not an essential part of the principle of a gold standard that gold coins should freely circulate within the community adopting that principle, or even that gold coins should be freely minted.” Discuss this statement.
  10. “If all citizens were intelligently alive to their own interests and could also be depended on to be strictly honourable in all their dealings with the State, no taxes on commodities would be tolerated.” Comment.

 

Wednesday, June 1, 1921. 1½–4½.
EXISTING POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS.

  1. “Distrust of the elected legislature is the outstanding feature of the new German constitution.” Discuss this statement.
  2. Compare the functions and the effective powers of the Senate of the United States with those of any one other existing Senate.
  3. Indicate the limitations under which the Referendum is usually instituted, giving reasons for the precautions adopted.
  4. Contrast, in broad outline, the stages by which responsible government has been developed in the Dominions with the steps taken towards its establishment in India.
  5. Describe the relations of the Executive and the Legislature in modern Switzerland. What are their chief advantages and drawbacks? How far could the same system be made applicable in England?
  6. “British and American constitutionalism especially safe- guards the independence of the judiciary in order to ensure the liberty of the subject; European practice aims rather at rendering the powers of the administrators of the law effective against the individual with a view to the safety of the State.” Indicate the extent to which this may be considered a correct statement.
  7. “In America the President and his Cabinet possess executive and administrative functions only; the British Cabinet’s essential functions are of a widely different character.” Comment.
  8. “A written constitution is not the same as a rigid constitution.” Explain this dictum, illustrating from existing constitutions.
  9. Compare Canada with either Australia or the United States as a type of federal state.
  10. In what various ways are the powers of local authorities limited and controlled in the United Kingdom?
  11. “In a unitary state it is impossible to maintain two co-equal legislative chambers.” Comment on this.

 

Thursday, June 2, 1921. 9–12.
GENERAL ECONOMICS. III.

  1. “Eine Grubenabgabe keine Rente ist, mag sie auch oft so genannt werden. Denn ausgenommen den Fall, dass Gruben, Steinbrüche und so weiter praktisch unerschöpflich sind, muss der Überschuss ihres Ertrages über die direkten Auslagen zum Teil wenigstens als der Preis aus dem Verkaufe aufgespeicherter Güter angesehen werden.” Comment on this statement.
  2. “C’est un fait remarquable dans le cas de l’or, que d’un côté les prix des marchandises ayant augmenté depuis 1914 à cause de la diminution sur le marché et pour des autres raisons, la puissance d’achat de l’or à l’égard de ces marchandises a diminué et que d’un autre côté, l’or fait prime parce que de nombreux pays—spécialement les pays d’Asie—montrent une préférence marquée en sa faveur.” Indicate the phenomena thus summarised and investigate the conclusions arrived at.
  3. “It is often said that a high rate of interest hampers production and makes it dearer. This is false.” Examine this view.
  4. Is it to the advantage of a country like Great Britain that its people should invest abroad a large proportion of their annual savings? Discuss the probable economic consequences of attempts to restrict the export of capital.
  5. Examine the effect upon international trade of the payment of a large indemnity by one country to other countries. Is it the case that Great Britain could only receive an indemnity from Germany by increasing her imports of German goods to a corresponding extent?
  6. “A vast unfunded debt is a standing menace to the stability of the banking and currency position.” Discuss.
  7. What data would you require in order to form an opinion as to whether the inhabitants of any European country were under-taxed or over-taxed in comparison with those of other countries?
  8. “Monopolistic combinations promise both steadier levels of prices and steadier conditions for the wage earner than can be expected under the present system of anarchic competition.”
    Discuss this opinion.
  9. “There can be no rise in the value of labour without a fall of profits.” Ricardo. Critically examine this theory.
  10. Discuss the economic significance and consequences of modern advertising.
  11. Comment on the following: “The art of making yourself rich in the ordinary sense is equally and necessarily the art of keeping your neighbour poor.” Ruskin.

 

PART II

Monday, May 30, 1921. 9–12.
ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES.

  1. Write short notes on (a) elasticity of demand and supply, (b) consumer’s surplus, (c) economic rent, (d) quasi-rent.
  2. What determines the selling price of an article under conditions of (a) free competition of purchasers and producers, (b) monopoly?
  3. Examine the relation between the rate of interest and the supply of capital in various classes of investment.
  4. Define “normal profits,” and explain the part played by this conception in Marshall’s theory of distribution.
  5. Consider the advantages of fixing wages on a sliding scale based (a) on the cost of living, (b) on the selling price of the product of the industry, (c) on the aggregate output of the industry. Give instances of each method.
  6. Consider the arguments for and against a countervailing import duty on goods imported from a country, of which the currency is greatly depreciated in terms of the currency of the importing country.
  7. Would it be beneficial if a State Bank, having the right to issue inconvertible notes, were to make loans for all approved purposes without interest, provided the borrower was able to furnish war loan or similar stock with a 10 per cent, margin as security? Frame your answer so as to persuade a person inclined to hold the opposite view to your own.
  8. What would be your test of over-population? Apply it in a general way to present conditions in India, Germany, England and the United States.
  9. “On peut trouver entre les faits d’ordre économique des relations de dépendance que l’on peut essayer d’exprimer par des formules algébriques, alors même qu’on ne pourrait pas les traduire en chiffres.”
    Give three or four examples of this.
  10. “Kapital ist der Teil des Vermögens, welcher, selbst Produkt menschlicher Arbeit, wieder zur Produktion bestimmt ist. Nach dem Sprachgebrauche liegt sowohl der Begriff des Vorrats für künftige Nutzung, wie der des Erwerbsmittels darin doch erscheint es richtiger, das Kapital im Gegensatz zur Natur als bestimmten Teil des Vermögens hinzustellen und den Nachdruck auf die Art der Verwendung zu legen, welche die Güter finden sollen, weil sich so die schärfste Abgrenzung des Begriffs durchführen lässt. Es sind nicht darunter zu begreifen die Güter, deren Wert nicht geschätzt werden kann, wie persönliche Fähigkeiten, der Staat usw. und die freien Güter.”
    Restate the salient points of this definition in your words, and point out the respects in which a different view has been or might be taken.

 

Monday, May 30, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
THE ECONOMIC FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT.

  1. “Now that Public Finance is deliberately used as an engine for the redistribution of wealth, the conception of justice in taxation has become meaningless.” Examine this view.
  2. On what principles should the cost of elementary education be distributed between the National Exchequer and the Local Authority concerned?
  3. Consider the case for the State endowment of motherhood.
  4. “Taxes on business transactions are open to all the same objections as taxes on commodities, and should be entirely abolished.” Consider this contention.
  5. Investigate the view that even in ordinary times the State should control the price and ration the supplies of essential articles of food.
  6. How far can the allocation of public funds be made in such a way that the marginal pound will yield equal advantage in each direction of public expenditure?
  7. Discuss with illustrations the obligation which rests on a modern State to take steps to conserve the wasting natural resources contained within its borders.
  8. “A municipality should not undertake to supply any article or service unless it is prepared to become the sole supplier.” Do you consider that this advice is sound?
  9. “In einer Zeit, in der man eifrig nach neuen Steuereinnahmen Umschau zu halten hat, ist es begreiflich, dass insbesondere angesichts der Umwerfungen der Werte in rasch aufblühenden Gemeinwesen nicht nur bei radikalen Bodenreformern, die zunächst eine Verstaatlichung des Bodens, eine Wertzuwachsteuer immerhin als Abschlagszahlung wünschten, sondern über diese Kreise hinaus der Ruf ertönte nach einer Steuer die 1. mühelos erworbene Gewinne für die Gesamtheit möglichst stark mit Beschlag belegen sollte, 2. auf die Benützer des Bodens nicht überwalzbar erschien.” Discuss.
  10. “Entre les trois procédés de couvrir les dépenses de la guerre par l’impôt, par l’emprunt, ou par l’association des deux, M. Helfferich est demeuré bien en arrière de ses collègues d’Angleterre et même de Russie. L’Angleterre a couvert par les recettes de l’impôt 25% des énormes dépenses de guerre.”
    Consider the arguments for the various policies pursued by the belligerents in this respect.

 

Tuesday, May 31, 1921. 9–12.
STRUCTURE AND PROBLEMS OF MODERN INDUSTRY.

  1. “The liner she’s a lady.”
    “The black Bilbao tramp.”
    Explain the problem of ocean freights, as between these two services.
  2. Discuss the advantages of the holding company and the merger respectively as methods of combination, (a) with reference to industrial efficiency, (b) from the financial standpoint.
  3. Consider the problem of “Key industries,” (a) as to definition, (b) as to a right policy of development.
  4. Describe the prevailing systems of land tenure in England. What is there to be said in favour of the landlord?
  5. “Unfair methods of competition are hereby declared un- lawful.” (Federal Trade Commission Act, Sect. 5.)
    By what principles should a Court be guided in enforcing this clause? Illustrate by reference to special practices.
  6. What features of the existing structure of industry lead to proposals for the limitation of profits ? Give instances of such proposals, and discuss their effects.
  7. Suppose a scheme to be established for the benefit of operatives, e.g. in the cotton or in the engineering industry; how would you define the “industry” for this purpose? Show by examples the problems which would arise.
  8. Compare the organisation of the Cotton and the Wool Textile Industries as regards (a) the market for the raw material, and (b) the market for the finished articles.
  9. On what grounds has the present organization of the British coal industry been criticised from the standpoint of efficiency?

 

Tuesday, May 31, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
DISTRIBUTION AND LABOUR.

  1. Examine the probable effect on the real incomes of house-owners if the cost of building increases, other prices generally remaining unchanged, (a) when there is no legal restriction on rent, (b) under such an act as is now in force.
  2. Suppose a gradual transference in income, owing to rising prices and wages, from owners of securities bearing fixed rates of interest to workmen. How is the rate of saving affected, and what are likely to be the ultimate effects on national income if the transference results in a higher standard of living for workmen?
  3. Discuss the incidence of compulsory provision of insurance against (a) unemployment, (b) sickness, if the contributions are paid in part by the state, in part by employers and in part by wage-earners.
  4. Examine the conditions under which the establishment of a minimum wage in an industry does not result in diminution of employment, illustrating your answer from the experience of Australia or of the Trade Boards Acts in the United Kingdom.
  5. Among the effects of the wage-changes in 1915 to 1920 were the diminution of inequalities of wages between industries, between occupations and between localities. How far were such inequalities due to economic causes and how far to custom or to accident?
  6. A workman’s needs generally increase between the ages of 20 and 40, while in many occupations wages are irrespective of age. Can any methods be suggested by which this anomaly can be avoided?
  7. The causes of poverty can be roughly classified as economic or personal. Indicate some methods by which trade organisation can remove the former and state organisation the latter.
  8. Analyse the difference between the methods of settling wage disputes by compulsory arbitration, voluntary arbitration, and such organisations as Whitley Councils, giving illustrations from the practice of this or any other country.
  9. During the generation before the war there is evidence of a steady increase of the number of salaried persons relatively to the number of wage-earners. Consider the effects of this tendency on the statistics of the growth of the national income as they are usually classified.

 

Wednesday, June 1, 1921. 9–12.
MONEY, CREDIT, AND PRICES.

  1. Write a brief essay on the Quantity Theory of Money, describing in outline at least two methods of approach, and stating which you yourself prefer.
  2. State the chief theoretical difficulties in compiling an index number of the cost of living which shall be valid for comparisons between different places over a considerable period of time. Is there any important theoretical distinction between “cost of living” index numbers and index numbers of the value of money generally?
  3. Analyse and compare the different ways in which the term inflation is used by the wise and the foolish.
  4. How do you explain the fall of prices during the past twelve months? Do you expect it to continue?
  5. Compare the position of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in the banking system of the U.S. with that of the Bank of England in the British system.
  6. Give an account of the probable career from start to finish of a cotton bill drawn to finance the purchase of American cotton by a Liverpool merchant.
  7. Give a careful account of the chief factors which influence the foreign exchanges, and forecast, with your reasons, the probable level of the dollar, franc and mark exchanges six months hence.
  8. Restate the theory of international trade for the case of a set of countries of which the currencies are not on a gold basis but consist of unrelated inconvertible paper moneys.
  9. Make practical proposals for obtaining from Germany as large as possible a sum in payment of Reparation.

 

Wednesday, June 1, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
SUBJECTS FOR AN ESSAY.

  1. The Money Motive.
  2. Business men in politics.
  3. Frontiers.
  4. Types of national leadership in Industry.
  5. Education and Industry.
  6. Bolshevism.

 

Thursday, June 2, 1921. 9–12.
MISCELLANEOUS ECONOMIC QUESTIONS.

  1. “Light is the sovereign antiseptic, and the best of all policemen.” Do you regard this maxim as an adequate guide for the State to follow in its dealings with industrial combinations?
  2. Consider how far the ordinary arguments against artificial interference with prices are relevant to arrangements for controlling the price and rationing the supplies of bank loans.
  3. “The great national Trade Unions, by their insistence on uniformity of conditions, are really hindering the workman in his attempt to better his lot and to secure a greater share in the government of industry.” Comment on this opinion.
  4. Examine the view that there is a danger of experiments in scientific management being carried further than the true interest of the nation demands.
  5. “The policy of giving subsidies to unemployed workmen necessarily involves inflation of currency, and therefore aggravates the evils it is designed to cure.” Discuss this statement.
  6. In what ways, if any, could the State usefully intervene to check the wastes caused by competitive advertisement?
  7. Examine the arguments for compelling railway companies to carry workmen going to and from their work at unremunerative rates.
  8. Consider the proposal that wage agreements negotiated by bodies representing the majority of employers and employed in any trade should be made legally binding on the remainder of the trade.
  9. Can you suggest any practicable scheme for the issue of an international currency by the League of Nations, in order to facilitate the resumption of international trade?

 

Thursday, June 2, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
THE THEORY OF STATISTICS.

  1. “The precision of the average of the measurements of n objects selected at random from a large group is proportional to \sqrt{n}.” Explain carefully the meaning of this statement, discuss the conditions under which it is true, and give examples of its use.
    What modification is needed if n/N is not negligible, where N is the number of objects from which selection is made?
  2. How does the analysis, which gives the ordinate of the normal curve of error as the limit of nCpn+xppn+xqqn-x when n is great, break down if pn is not great, and what is the resulting form?
  3. Distribution according to age of railway guards.

Age

Number of persons per 1000

Under 15 years

0

15—

8
20—

48

25—

252

35—

334
45—

223

55—

125
65—

10

75 and over

0

1000

Estimate by any method of interpolation the relative numbers in the age groups 30 to 35 and 35 to 40 years. State the hypotheses on which the method rests.

  1. For the frequency group in question 3 calculate the average, median and mode, and obtain one measurement of deviation and of asymmetry.
    Give a verbal description of the group, using your results, in language which avoids technicalities as far as possible.
  2. A six-faced die is thrown seven times; the numbers of the pips shown in the first five throws are added (x) and also of those shown in the last five (y). Show that if the experiment is repeated the value of the product-sum coefficient of correlation between x and y tends to be 3/5.
    Discuss the question whether any useful meaning can be given to the coefficient of correlation (obtained by the product-sum formula) in a case where nothing is known of the genesis of x and y and their distribution is not normal.
  3. Describe any one method by which association between non-measurable attributes (such as intellectual ability of pairs of brothers) can be tested, and consider whether a valid numerical measurement of association can be obtained.
  4. Find (by any method) the equation of a regression plane applicable to the following table, regarding each of the 15 entries as of equal importance.
    Compute the corresponding values from the equation and comment on the differences between the observed and computed numbers.
    What further information would be needed to calculate regression coefficients’?

    Age of wife at marriage

    Children born per 100 couples by age of husband
    15 – 25 25 – 35

    35 – 45

    15–20 years

    813 714 629
    20–25 661 595

    540

    25–30

    498 462 434
    30–35 364 341

    322

    35–40

    171 160

    150

  5. In a certain population the number of males over 25 years old is 875712, and the numbers who were 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 years last birthday respectively 29556, 29336, 29078, 28816, 28542. From these data, fill in the following, where the letters have the meanings usual in life tables:

    Age

    lx Lx dx qx

    mx

    24

    26

    27

    28

    29

If qx is the rate of mortality, mthe central death rate, and \mu_{x} the force of mortality, show that q_{x}= \frac{2m_{x}}{2+m_{x}} and approximately \mu_{x}= m_{x-\frac{1}{2}}.

  1. What data are necessary for measuring how far a low birth-rate is compensated by low infant and child mortality? Show in some detail the form of statistical results obtainable.

 

Thursday, June 2, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND 1823-1828,
AND CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL THOUGHT.

  1. Give an account of Place’s efforts to defeat the reactionary intentions of the Government in 1825 with regard to the Combination Act of 1824.
    How far is he justified in his statement that “Ultimately the Act (of 1825) differed very little from Mr Hume’s Act. It is substantially the same”?
  2. On what grounds did Huskisson advocate
    (a) the retention of the “long haul” clause in the Navigation Act,
    (b) imperial preference?
    Was the U.S.A. justified in regarding the latter as a continuance of the old tariff discriminations?
  3. “The question, then, looking at it practically, is this: In what degree is Prohibition better, as against smuggling, than a well-regulated duty?—by which I mean, a duty sufficient to protect the British manufacturer, without being so high as to afford a premium to the smuggler.” (Huskisson: Speech on the Silk Manufacture, Feb. 1826.)
    Show how this consideration guided Huskisson in the changes which he made in the customs tariff.
  4. What were the leading ideas in the programme of the early London Cooperators, and from what source or sources were they derived?
  5. Why were the problems of the Irish Poor and the English Hand-loom Weavers treated by the Emigration Committees of 1826 and 1827 as a single problem?
  6. Show how the fear of a redundant population dominated the recommendations of the Emigration Committees of 1826 and 1827.
  7. “In Lancashire there appear to be among the Hand-loom Weavers two classes almost wholly distinct from each other; the one who, though they take in work in their own homes or cottages, are congregated in the large manufacturing towns; and the other, scattered in small hamlets or single houses in various directions throughout the manufacturing country.” (Emigration Committee, 1827.)
    Was this distinction of long standing? Was it peculiar to Lancashire?
  8. Illustrate from the Rural Rides Cobbett’s first-hand acquaintance with agricultural conditions.
  9. “The Ricardian Socialists, though fairly unanimous in their criticisms of the existing system, differed greatly as to remedies.”
    Illustrate this from the writings of William Thompson, Thomas Hodgskin and J. F. Bray.
  10. If you were engaged in an investigation into social conditions in England (1823-8), which are the trades about which you would find it most difficult to obtain information, and why?

 

Thursday, June 2, 1921. 1.30–4.30.
INTERNATIONAL LAW.

  1. Describe the system of Colonial Mandates in the Covenant of the League of Nations. Indicate what are the important changes introduced and, in particular, consider the question of the sovereignty over the mandated areas.
  2. How far do you consider that the principle of “Self- Determination” has a basis in International Law?
    Comment on the following statement of Mr Lansing: “It is an evil thing to permit the principle (i.e. of Self-Determination) to continue to have the apparent sanction of the nations when it has been thoroughly discredited.”
  3. Compare the position in International Law of the Suez and Panama Canals.
  4. Examine the following statement of Lord Stowell: “In my opinion there exists a general rule in the maritime jurisprudence of this country by which all trading with the public enemy, unless with the permission of the sovereign, is interdicted. It is not a principle peculiar to the maritime law of this country.”
    On what grounds is such a principle to be justified?
  5. Comment on one of the following passages:
    (a) “II y a donc, voulue par la conscience universelle, une certaine limitation aux moyens d’hostilités, limitation encore bien imparfaite et qu’il est ambitieux de décorer du nom pompeux de lois de la guerre. Disons, plus modestement, qu’il existe des usages de la guerre dont le droit international demeure le guide moral et l’inspirateur.”
    (b) “Gegenüber der rechtmässigen Ausübung des Anhaltungs-, Durchsuchungs- und Wegnahmerechts gibt es für das Kauffahrteischiff kein Recht der Notwehr. Die Notwehr ist begrifflich die Verteidigung gegenüber einem rechtswidrigen Eingriff in ein Rechtsgut. Dies gilt allgemein für die neutralen wie für die feindlichen Kauffahrteischiffe. Die letzteren nehmen keine Ausnahmestellung ein. Auch sie besitzen kein Recht der Notwehr.”
  6. To what treatment are merchant ships belonging to the citizens of a belligerent state which are in the ports of the other belligerent at the outbreak of war subjected by International Law?
    What course was taken by Great Britain, with regard to German and Austrian ships in British ports at the outbreak of the war in 1914?
  7. Discuss the origin and development of the doctrine of “Continuous Voyage.”
  8. Do you consider that any violation of neutrality has been committed in any of the following cases?
    (a) The export of munitions by neutral manufacturers to one of two belligerents.
    (b) The granting permission by a neutral state for the passage through its territory of the sick and wounded of a belligerent’s army.
    (c) The granting of permission by a neutral state to belligerent warships to effect repairs in its ports.
  9. Discuss the propriety of the use of the term “Blockade” in relation to the measures taken by Great Britain under the Order in Council of 11 March 1915.
  10. What is the effect of lapse of time upon the binding force of a treaty?
    Discuss the action of Austria in annexing Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1908.

 

Friday, June 3, 1921. 9–12.
POLITICAL SCIENCE.

  1. “By Liberty I mean the assurance that every man shall be protected in what he believes his duty, against the influence of authority and majority, custom and opinion.” (Acton.)
    Use this opinion to show how you define Liberty.
  2. How has the argument regarding the rights of property been affected by the development of modern industrial conditions?
  3. State and examine Rousseau’s distinction between the General Will and the Will of All.
  4. Discuss Mill’s view of the conditions essential to the success of representative government.
  5. What are the conditions or grounds of objection which give a minority the strongest right to refuse obedience?
  6. On what principle should the relations between a first and a second chamber be regulated in a modern democracy?
  7. Give a critical estimate of the position which has developed between the State and Labour, through the Social Reform movement of the last generation in England.
  8. Explain the alternative implied in Weltmacht oder Niedergang. What reactions on the life of the great State have been attributed to the development of colonial possessions?
  9. What are the main considerations which determine a sound theory of punishment?
  10. “The separation of powers in politics corresponds to the fixity of species in natural science; and both ignore evolution.”
    Comment on this statement.

Source: Cambridge University Economics Tripos Papers, 1921-1926. With the papers set in the Qualifying examinations 1925 & 1926. Cambridge at the university press 1927, pp. 1-21.

Image Source: Kings College, Cambridge England. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, D.C. 20540.

Categories
Harvard Teaching Undergraduate

Harvard. Memos on teaching assistants and grading in economics courses, 1911

 

Six memos primarily concerned with the supervision of teaching assistants in economics courses, but also other interesting incidental detail is revealed. Of the six professors listed on economics department letterhead, Taussig was able to get a memorandum from everyone except for O. M. W. Sprague.

I have provided additional information from the published course announcements, annual Presidential Reports, along with some additional information on the subsequent careers of some of the teaching assistants named.

__________________

Taussig’s Cover Letter

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts
March 22, 1911.

Dear Mr. Blake:

You remember that you made some inquiries on the President’s behalf concerning the extent to which the work of assistants was supervised in the various courses. I enclose a batch of memoranda concerning the courses in our Department, and think they tell the whole story. If further information is desired, we shall be glad to supply it.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Mr. J. A. L. Blake

__________________

Frank W. Taussig and Edmund Ezra Day’s Courses

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

[Economics] 1. Principles of Economics. Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professor Taussig, assisted by Drs. [Charles Phillips] Huse [Harvard Ph.D., 1907], [Edmund Ezra] Day [Harvard Ph.D., 1909],  and [Robert Franz] Foerster [Harvard Ph.D., 1909], and Messrs. Sharfman [not included in ex-post staffing report in President’s Report] and  [Alfred Burpee] Balcom [Harvard A.M. (1909), S.B. Acadia (1907), Nova Scotia].

[Economics] 182hf. Banking and Foreign Exchange. Half-course (second half-year). Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructorFri., at 1.30. Dr. [Edmund Ezra] Day [Harvard Ph.D., 1909].

[Economics] 12 1hf. Commercial Crises and Cycles of Trade. Half-course (first half-year). Mon., Wed., Fri., at 10. Dr. [Edmund Ezra] Day [Harvard Ph.D., 1909].

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Memorandum regarding Economics 1

The professor in charge lectures twice a week. For the third hour the men are divided into sections, conducted on the familiar plan. Every Thursday afternoon, throughout the year, I meet the section instructors and discuss the work of the week with them. Questions to be asked at the section meetings are proposed by the instructors, are approved, vetoed, or modified, by myself. Usually we come to an understanding as to the topics to be discussed in the sections after the papers have been written. Not infrequently we arrange for diagrams or figures to be used, identically in all the sections; these touching points which it is desired to make clear. Immediately after the mid-year and final examinations I always meet the instructors and we read a batch of blue books together; we compare our grades, questions by questions, and try to make sure that the same standard is applied in all cases. My experience is that there is substantial uniformity in the grading.

Some of my instructors, who have charge of large numbers in their own courses, have readers to assist them in the examination of the weekly papers. Dr. Day reports as follows concerning the weekly papers in his sections: “I always instruct the “reader” as to exactly what is expected in answer to the question assigned. Students are encouraged to refer to me any cases of grading where injustice seems to have been done and, where such cases disclose any error or inaccuracy in the grading, the matter is carefully reviewed with the reader.” I may add that Dr. Day reports that he personally grades all the papers both in Economics 12 and 8b.

__________________

Courses of Thomas Nixon Carver

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

[Economics] 3. Principles of Sociology.—Theories of Social Progress. Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Fri., at 1.30. Professor Carver and an assistant [Lucius Moody Bristol listed in President’s Report 1910-11 as the course teaching assistant].

[Economics] 141hf. The Distribution of Wealth. Half-course (first half-year). Tu., Thu., at 1.30.Professor Carver.

[Economics] 142hf. Methods of Social Reform.—Socialism, Communism, the Single Tax, etc. Half-course (second half-year). Tu., Thu., at 1.30. Professor Carver.
Open only to those who have passed satisfactorily in Economics 14a.

Information about the teaching assistant actually named by Carver

Harvard A.M. (1911), but no Harvard Ph.D.

Philip Benjamin Kennedy received his A.M. from Harvard in 1911; A.B. Beloit (Wis.) 1905; Litt.B. Occidental (Cal.) 1906.

Source: Quinquennial catalogue of the officers and graduates of Harvard University 1636-1915.p. 574.

Additional biographical information.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Dear Taussig:

In Economics 3 the class is divided into two sections for Friday conferences. Mr. Kennedy, the assistant, takes one section and I take the other, but we alternate. Each section has a fifteen-minute paper on the day when Mr. Kennedy has it. There is no paper in the section meeting when I conduct it.

As to blue book reading, etc., I do not read any of the Friday papers. I read hour and final examination papers only in those cases where Mr. Kennedy gives and A or an E, where he is doubtful, and where the student is dissatisfied with his mark. Then, too, I always read the paper for any student who asks me to. Mr. Kennedy and I go over all the grades together and make up the final return.

In Economics 14a and 14b, there are no section meetings. The blue books are marked and the term averages made out in the same way as in Economics 3.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
T. N. Carver
[initials:  O.H.]

Professor Taussig.

__________________

William Morse Cole’s Accounting Course

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

[Economics] 18. Principles of Accounting. Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Fri., at 11. Asst. Professor Cole and an assistant [Messrs. Johnson and Platt].
Course 18 is not open to students before their last year of undergraduate work. For men completing their work at the end of the first half-year, it may be counted, with the consent of the instructor, as a half-course.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts
February 23, 1911

Dear Professor Taussig

With regard to the supervision of assistants’ work in Economics 18, I have to report as follows:

There are no section meetings in charge of assistants, though if competent assistants were available I might have such work done. The work of my chief assistant is reading short papers written in the classroom and reading outside written work and blue-books. I have attempted to keep a uniform standard where several men have been reading for me at once by having a bunch of papers read by all the readers and then by me in their presence for comparison and comment. Even then there has been some variation and I have sometimes myself reread all questions where variation seemed most likely to occur. For that reason, I have this year had all reading of short papers and blue-books done by one man, who has shown himself of unusually sound judgment. I have been over all short papers with him, and read after him a bunch of mid-year books—-after I had been through several books with him. In all cases where a few points would affect a man’s grade I have personally examined the blue-book in confirmation of my assistant’s judgment. This is his third year of work for me, and I have very great confidence in him, for after innumerable checks on his work I have never found it erring more than human frailty is bound to err.

His other work has been of two parts: assisting me occasionally in the voluntary conferences which I offer weekly for assistance to men who cannot keep the pace that I set for the class work as a whole (on the principle that the quick men should not be required to attend three meetings a week if the third is necessary only for those who do not take naturally to this sort of thing); and holding required conferences with thesis writers, and reading theses. I have not had much check on the conference work and the reading of theses, for two reasons: the theses are on reports of corporations, and since no man can be familiar with the annual reports of many score of such corporations, he can not determine omissions of facts (since there is no uniformity), but only the application of certain fundamental principles, which I know that my assistants are familiar with; the theses are written merely to give the men practice in reading between the lines of actual reports, and the result of that practice shows not only in the theses themselves but in all a man’s work, especially in the final examination, so that the reading of the thesis is done rather to determine whether a man has used the opportunity afforded him for practice, than to determine how much good he has got out of it—-for the amount of good is reflected in many ways, and to pass judgment on the correctness of the conclusions drawn in each particular thesis would require that the judge should have devoted long study to the reports with which the thesis is concerned.

The reading of theses, and the conference work in connection with them, is done by four or five assistants.

With the additional funds allowed by the contribution of the visiting committee, I shall have more short papers done in the third-hour meetings and shall make attendance required for men whose work shows that they need it.

Sincerely yours
[signed]
William Morse Cole

__________________

Economic history courses of Edwin F. Gay

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

Economics 6a. European Industry and Commerce in the Nineteenth Century. Fall term, 1910-11 taught by Professor Edwin Francis Gay, assisted by Julius Klein.

Economics 6b. Economic and Financial History of the United States. Spring term, 1910-11 taught by Professor Edwin Francis Gay, assisted by Julius Klein.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Office of the Dean

Cambridge, Massachusetts
March 4, 1911

Dear Taussig:

I have assistance, as you know, in only one course, 6a and 6b. In this course as I have run it this year a half-hour test on reading is given every fortnight and a thesis is written. The reading of the papers for the half-hour test is left almost entirely in the hands of the Assistant. When I am breaking in a new man I usually look over some of the papers at the beginning to see that he gets the proper idea in regard to grading. He holds a series of conferences with the students in regard to their theses, referring them in cases of difficulty to me. The Assistant reads the theses but I myself make it a point to read them all in addition, since it is very difficult to grade these properly. The Assistant reads the final blue books in the course but I myself sample the final blue books and in all doubtful cases read the final blue book in addition to the thesis.

I think this answer the points raised by your question.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
Edwin F. Gay.

Professor F. W. Taussig

__________________

Public Finance Course of Charles Bullock

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

[Economics] 7 2hf. Public Finance, considered with special reference to the Theory and Methods of Taxation. Half-course (second half-year) Mon., Wed., Fri., at 10. Professor Bullock and an assistant.

[Note: in the ex post staffing report in the President’s Report the instructor is listed as Dr. [Charles Phillips] Huse [Harvard Ph.D., 1907], assisted by Wilfred Eldred (Harvard Ph.D. 1919) and Roscoe Russell Hess (Harvard A.B. (1911) magna cum laude)]

Possible Harvard Undergraduate as a teaching assistant

Roscoe Russell Hess [I am guessing this was the teaching assistant in the public finance course]

Source: Quinquennial catalogue of the officers and graduates of Harvard University 1636-1915.p. 449.

Bowdoin Prizes for dissertations in English for undergraduates: first prize of $250, Roscoe Russell Hess ’11, of Seattle, Wash., on “The Paper Industry and Its Relation to the Conservation and the Tariff”

Source: Harvard Crimson, May 17, 1911.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts
March 7, 1911

My dear Taussig:

My arrangements with the assistants in Economics 7 are substantially as follows:

I meet with them on Wednesday at 3.30 and go over with them fully the work for the conferences on Friday and Saturday. We first select questions for the paper that we set the men at the sections, aiming of course to make the questions given the different sections a nearly as possible of equal difficulty. I also go over the subjects treated in the assigned reading for the week and indicate the points which I think the assistants would better emphasize in the oral discussion in the sections.

During the early part of the half-year I also meet the assistants each week to confer with them about the marking of the weekly papers. The method that we follow is to read together several papers in each of the divisions, discussing the proper marks to be assigned to the papers until we find that we have come to substantial agreement.

I think in general you can say that the method followed in 7 is substantially like the method followed in Economics 1.

Yours sincerely,
[signed]
C. J. Bullock
[initials: O. H.]

Professor Taussig

__________________

Labor and Transportation Courses taught by W. Z. Ripley

From the Course Announcements, 1910-11

[Economics] 5 1hf. Economics of Transportation. Half-course (first half-year). Tu., Thu., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Sat., at 10. Professor Ripley, assisted by Mr. Whitnack.

[Economics] 91hf. Problems of Labor. Half-course (first half-year). Tu., Thu., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Sat., at 1.30. Professor Ripley, assisted by Mr. Whitnack.

Teaching assistant Whitnack probably never awarded Ph.D. from Harvard

According to the Quinquennial catalogue, Ralph C. Whitnack did receive an A.M. from Harvard in 1911. Ralph Cahoon Whitnack, formerly Ralph Cahoon Whitenack; A.B. Brown 1906; Prof. Pol. Eco., Keio Univ. (Japan) 1914-.

Source: Quinquennial catalogue of the officers and graduates of Harvard University 1636-1915.p. 574.

Whitnack’s dissertation listed being “in progress” in 1915

Doctoral dissertation “Social stratification” in progress listed in the AER list of doctoral dissertations in progress American Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 (June 1915), p. 477.

Whitnack’s death in 1919

Professor Ralph Cahoon Whitnack, formerly professor of economics at Keio University, Tokio, died April 14, 1919. At the time of his death Professor Whitnack was serving as joint revenue commissioner for the native state of Baroda, India. He had direct jurisdiction over the departments of excise and customs, agriculture and cooperative credit. During 1918 and until his death he was price controller and director of civil supplies.

Source:  Notes in American Economic Review, Vol. 9, No. 4 (December 1919), p. 946.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague

Cambridge, Massachusetts
24 February 1911.

Dear Professor Taussig,–

I have pleasure, in accordance with your note of even date, and in the absence of Professor Ripley, in submitting the following memorandum concerning the relations between instructor, assistant and students in Economics 5 and 9a.

The weekly section meetings are held under the direction of the assistant, after conference in each case between the assistant and instructor as to the issues to be discussed and general methods pursued.

Conferences concerning theses are held concurrently by the instructor and assistant at advertised hours. Each student is required to confer at least once with either instructor or assistant before handing in thesis.

The instructor has three hours per week, and the assistant one or more as required, for general conference with students who seek it.

The correction of weekly papers is done by the assistant.

The correction and grading of hour examinations, theses and blue books is done by the assistant under the supervision and in conference with the instructor. In particular all grades of E, A and D are scrutinized by the instructor, who goes over the blue-books and theses and assigns finalgrades in consultation with the assistant.

Very sincerely yours,
R. C. Whitnack
Austin J. Fellow: Ec. 5 and 9a.

__________________

Source for the memoranda: 

Harvard University Archives. President Lowell’s Papers, 1909-1914. Box 15, Folder 413 “1909-14”.

Source for course listings information:

Harvard University. Announcement of the Courses of Instruction offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences for the Academic Year 1910-11.

Source for ex post staffing of courses:

Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1910-1911, pp. 48ff.

Source for Harvard economics Ph.D.’s:

Economics in the Rear-view Mirror’s page “Harvard. Doctoral Dissertations in Economics, 1875-1926”.

Image Source: Harvard University #2, Cambridge, Mass, c1910. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA.

 

 

Categories
M.I.T. Suggested Reading Syllabus

M.I.T. Undergraduate intermediate macroeconomics. Blanchard, 1984

 

Since relatively few people can be expected to stumble upon an M.I.T. course syllabus of Olivier Blanchard in Evsey Domar’s papers, I figure it is part of the value-added of Economics in the Rear-view Mirror to provide a transcription of such hidden treasure. Earlier Blanchard’s graduate M.I.T. course syllabus for 1997 was posted.

__________________

Intermediate Macro Theory
14.06
O.J. Blanchard
Fall 1984

This course is a continuation and extension of 14.02. It is divided in two parts of approximately equal length The first builds on the aggregate demand and aggregate supply apparatus developed in 14.02. The second examines three topics of current interest.

There will be a midterm exam, covering the first part of the course, and counting for half of the course grade. Students will then have the option of taking a final exam or writing a course paper on one of the three topics covered in the second part of the course.

 

Background Readings

Dornbusch and Fischer, Macroeconomics, 3rded. (D.F.)

Economic Report of the President, February 1984.

R.J. Gordon, “Postwar Macroeconomics: The Evolution of Events and Ideas”, Chap. 2, in the American Economy in Transition, Feldstein, ed.

As the course starts, you may want to review Chapters 1 to 5 in D.F.

 

Part I. Aggregate demand and aggregate supply

  1. The ISLM in the closed economy

D.F. Chapters 6 to 9

F. Modigliani, “Monetary Policy and Consumption”, (in xerox packet at Graphic Arts). pp. 12-46.

L. Summers, “Taxation and Corporate Investment: A q-theory approach”, Brookings Papers (BPEA), 1981, 68-119.

J. Tobin, “Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission Mechanism”, Southern Economic Journal, January 1978.

  1. The ISLM in the open economy

D.F. Chapters 18, 19-1.

Economic Report of the President, 1984, chapter 2.

R. Dornbusch and S. Fischer, “The Open Economy, Implications for Monetary and Fiscal Policies”, mimeo, MIT 1984.

R. Dornbusch, Open Economy Macroeconomics, chap. 3 (optional)

  1. Aggregate demand aggregate supply

D.F. Chapters 11, 12, 13, 14, 19-2.

R. Lucas, “Understanding Business Cycles”, in “Studies in the Business Cycle Theory”, 215-239.

J. Tobin, “How Dead is Keynes?”, Economic Inquiry, Oct. 1977.

J. Tobin, “The Wage-Price Mechanism”, in The Econometrics of Price Determination”, Eckstein ed., 1972, 5-15.

 

Part 2. Three topics

  1. Real wages and unemployment in Europe

E. Malinvaud, “The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered”, Wiley 1977.

R. Dornbusch et al., “Macroeconomic Prospects and Policies for the European Community”, CEPS Paper 1, 1983.

J. Sachs, “Wages, Profits and Macroeconomic Adjustment: A Comparative Study”, BPEA 1979-2, 269-332.

J. Sachs, “Real Wages and Unemployment in the OECD Countries”, BPEA 1983-1, 255-289.

  1. The Volcker disinflation

W. Poole, “The Theory of Monetary Policy under Uncertainty”, in Readings, W.L Smith and R. L. Teigen, 1974, 360-369.

O. Eckstein, “Disinflation”, DRI Economic Studies 114, October 1983.

W. Buiter and M. Miller, “Changing the Rules: Economic Consequences of the Thatcher Regime; BPEA 1983, 305-365 (optional).

T. Sargent, “the Ends of Four Big Inflations”, on Reserve (optional).

B. Friedman, “Lessons from the 1979-82 Monetary Policy Experiment”, American Economic Review P&P, May 1984, 382-87.

M. Friedman, “Lessons from the 1979-82 Monetary Policy Experiment”, American Economic Review P&P, May 1984, 397-400 (Authors not related).

R. Gordon, “The Conduct of Domestic Monetary Policy”, on Reserve, pp. 1-33 only (optional)

  1. U. S. fiscal deficits and the world economy

D.F. Chapter 15

“Setting National Priorities: The 1984 Budget”, J. Pechman ed., Chapters 2, 8.

M. Feldstein, “Budget Deficits, Economic Activity and Net Capital Formation”, Testimony to Congress, 1983.

R. Dornbusch, “The Overvalued Dollar”, mimeo, MIT 1984.

O. Blanchard and R. Dornbusch, “U.S. Deficits, Europe and the Dollar”, mimeo MIT 1983 (optional).

O. Blanchard and L. Summers, “High Real Interest Rates”, on Reserve (optional).

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Evsey D. Domar Papers, Box 15, Folder “Macroeconomics. Lecture Notes, Exams, Paper: ‘Stability Without Planning? The American Experience’”.

Image Source:Olivier Blanchard’s MIT homepage, captured June 2, 2001 by   Wayback Machine.

Categories
Economists Gender Harvard Radcliffe

Harvard-Radcliffe. Economics Ph.D. alumna, Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain, 1950

 

 

According to her New York Times obituary, Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain (April 24, 1918—April 1, 2013) became known as “the fairy godmother of women’s studies” during her time as program director at the Ford Foundation (1971-1981). But before beginning her highly successful career in research project sponsorship, she had taught at Connecticut College, the School of General Studies at Columbia University, and at Hunter College, having studied undergraduate and graduate economics at Radcliffe-Harvard. She was awarded in 1950 a Ph.D. for her thesis, “Investment Policy in Large Corporations”.

After listing her scholarship awards at Radcliffe along with the dates of her academic degrees, I include two items that provide the testimony of a few of those who knew her professionally and personally. We learn (among many genuinely important things) that towards the end of her long life, she was a regular reader of Paul Krugman’s New York Times columns and “for whatever reason[,] she wanted to see, meet, engage, or possibly hang out with men”. She was clearly an inspirational figure for many and that “she loved being an economist”.

________________________

From the Radcliffe College Annual Presidential Reports

Freshman Year

Marian [sic] Kenosian (class of 1939). Recipient of an “Emergency Award” from the Permanent Charity Scholarship Fund.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1935-36, p. 37.

 

Sophomore Year

Marion [sic] Kenosian (class of 1939). Recipient of a Lois M. Parmenter Undergraduate Scholarship.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1936-37, p. 32.

 

Junior Year

Mariam Kenosian (class of 1939). Recipient of a partial Abby Y. Lawson Memorial undergraduate scholarship.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1937-38, p. 31.

 

Mariam Kenosian (class of 1939). Recipient of a partial Permanent Charity Fund undergraduate scholarship.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1937-38, p. 33.

 

Senior Year

Mariam Kenosian (class of 1939). Recipient of an Ellen M. Barr undergraduate scholarship.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1938-39, p. 30.

 

Mariam Kenosian Bachelor of Arts (June 1939) cum laude (Honors) in economics.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1938-39, p. 35.

 

Graduate School

Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain, Master of Arts (March 1948).

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1947-48, p. 21.

 

Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain, Ph.D.  (June 1950).

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Business Organization and Control. Dissertation, “Investment Policies of Large Corporations”.

Source: Radcliffe College, President’s Report for 1949-50, p. 20.

________________________

In Memoriam: Mariam K. Chamberlain, 1918–2013
Posted on April 3, 2013

Dr. Mariam K. Chamberlain, a founding member of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research and the founding president of the National Council for Research on Women, was the driving force behind the cultivation and sustainability of the women’s studies field of academic research. She is the namesake of IWPR’s prestigious Mariam K. Chamberlain Fellowship for Women in Public Policy, which trains young women for successful careers in research. Throughout her life, Dr. Chamberlain fought discrimination, established new roles for women, and championed the economic analysis of women’s issues. She passed away on April 2, 2013, at 94, just a few weeks shy of her 95th birthday, following complications from heart surgery.

A Lifetime of Lifting Up Women’s Voices in Academia and Research

The daughter of Armenian immigrants, Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain was born and raised in Chelsea, Massachusetts, a working class suburb of Boston. Interest in the prevailing conditions of the depression led her to economics. She attended Radcliffe College on a scholarship and worked as a research assistant in the summers for Wassily Leontief, who later won the Nobel Prize in economics. During World War II, she worked at the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), on the staff of a “brain trust” of economists and other social scientists assembled by General William (“Wild Bill”) Donovan to aid in the war effort. As part of the research and analysis branch, she worked on estimates of enemy, military, and industrial strength.

In 1950, Mariam Chamberlain received her Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, making her one of the few women of her generation to earn a Ph.D. in the field. In 1956, Dr. Chamberlain joined the Ford Foundation, where she served as a program officer in Economic Development and Administration, and then Education and Public Policy, until 1981. While at Ford, she spearheaded the funding of the academic women’s research and women’s studies movement; she is said to have provided nearly $10 million in support of new feminist initiatives. Her projects fostered a new analysis of women’s position in society, expanded women’s choices in the university, and supported the development of equality in law. She played a major role in building the academic infrastructure necessary to better understand women’s experiences and inform improved policies for women. In short, she paved the way for organizations like IWPR to thrive, and stocked the research pipeline with skilled women and men who have made important contributions to the study of women and public policy.

Economics and the elimination of discrimination against women around the world remained the heart of her wide-ranging activities. After leaving the Ford Foundation in 1982, she headed the Task Force on Women in Higher Education at the Russell Sage Foundation. The Task Force’s work culminated in a published volume, Women in Academe: Progress and Prospects. Before leaving Ford, she had funded an initial meeting of a group of women’s research centers. That meeting established the National Council for Research on Women, which unanimously elected her its first president. She served in that role until 1989, after which she continued to go into the office every day as Founding President and Resident Scholar.

A Legacy of Training the Next Generation of Women Policy Researchers

IWPR owes much to Dr. Chamberlain. In 1987, Dr. Heidi Hartmann founded IWPR out of a need for comprehensive, women-focused, policy-oriented research. Dr. Chamberlain, who dedicated her career to lifting up women’s voices in academia, recognized the importance of a policy research institute centered on women, grounded by social science methodology, economics, and rigorous data analysis. Applying academic research to inform better policies for women was a natural extension of Dr. Chamberlain’s work, and she became a founding member of IWPR and served on its Board of Directors for nearly 20 years.

IWPR endowed the Mariam K. Chamberlain Fellowship in Women and Public Policy to recognize the legacy of Dr. Chamberlain’s tireless efforts to open doors for the women researchers who came after her. Nearly 20 young women have gained valuable research experience as Fellows at IWPR since the beginning of the Mariam K. Chamberlain Fellowship. Past Mariam K. Chamberlain scholars have gone on to hold positions at government agencies such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Congressional Research Service, earn advanced degrees from universities such as Harvard University, Columbia University, Stanford University, The George Washington University, and Brown University. Rhiana Gunn-Wright, IWPR’s current Mariam K. Chamberlain Fellow, was just recently named a 2013 Rhodes Scholar. The fellowship has allowed IWPR to expand its research capacity, strengthen its commitment to cultivating the next generation of women researchers and leaders, and ensure that a pipeline of experienced women researchers are at the policy-making table.

The fellowship helps sustain Dr. Chamberlain’s legacy, built on the belief that relying on credible data and research, rather than anecdote and bias, leads to better policies for working women, which in turn contribute to improved long-term outcomes for their families. May she not only rest in peace, but rest assured that, because of her efforts, there are many more women able to take up the torch she leaves behind.

Source:  Institute for Women’s Policy Research.  Blog post captured by the internet archive, Wayback Machine, on May 13, 2013.

________________________

Excerpts and selections from speeches at Mariam Chamberlain’s Memorial

From Florence Howe, founder of Feminist Press, blog post (July 15, 2013).

From the Eulogy by David Kenosian (nephew)

I got my first impressions of Mariam through my father, her younger brother Harry, who told me about her life as the daughter of Armenian immigrants in Chelsea, Massachusetts, as a student at Radcliffe, and as a pioneering career woman. He admired his sister because, I think, she epitomized what he saw as key Armenian values, education and hard work. She herself affirmed those values; she insisted that her older brother Tony was the scholar in the family who set the standards of achievement. But following Tony’s example meant overcoming poverty and possibly the reservations of her parents who, like many Armenian parents back then, assumed that their daughter would marry and have a family. In continuing her education Mariam took the best of Armenian culture to break free from its constraints, and later did the same on a larger scale. At Harvard she like other women had to use a different entrance to some buildings than men. She later committed herself professionally to opening doors for women across the country in decades of tireless work.

Mariam’s talents impressed her professor, Edward Mason, who helped build an economic research branch in the OSS. Last December, Mariam told my nephew Tom and me that Edward Mason took her and other assistants to a summit meeting in Canada to support the American delegation: without eight years of entering Radcliffe, Mariam had gone to a conference where Churchill and Roosevelt met. With characteristic modesty she added that she never saw Churchill or Roosevelt. As a woman, she had a better working relationship with her British counterparts than with the men in the American delegation. You can see the hallmarks of her later career; her determination to overcome barriers, her service in the cause of justice, and the collaborative and at times international spirit of her work…

 

Professor Lois Gray, “On Mariam Chamberlain”

I first met Mariam Chamberlain in 1959—fifty-four years ago—not in New York City where we both lived but in Jamaica, West Indies, where her husband, Neil Chamberlain, and I were invited as speakers at an International Conference on Labor. Neil, a leading scholar and writer in the field of industrial relations, was my professor at Columbia University where I was studying for my Ph.D. Both of us brought out spouses to the conference. Neil bonded with my husband who was a labor leader, and Mariam and I discovered our common interest in opportunities for working women. A long lasting friendship grew out of this chance encounter in the Caribbean. [Note: Mariam and Neil were married in 1942 and divorced in 1967?/1970?]

Over the years I came to know about and admire Mariam’s path-breaking role at the Ford Foundation where she was responsible for funding women’s studies programs in universities throughout the United States and other countries. At our occasional lunches she casually referred to experiences in Nairobi, Pakistan, Europe, and South America. I also witnessed her emergence as a leader in the American Economics Association, where she was able to bring feminist issues to the fore in a profession dominated by men. In the year 2000 we were both involved in a comparative analysis of women’s progress toward leadership recognition in various professions, ranging from military to corporate. I wrote the section on Women in Labor Unions, and Mariam, on Academic, for a book published by the American Woman. We had fun comparing notes on our findings. (Women do better in achieving leadership roles in academe than in corporations or unions.) Throughout my more than fifty years of knowing Mariam Chamberlain, I never ceased to be amazed—awed—by her any accomplishments in creating lasting institutions and programs for the advancement of women. Always unassuming and laid back, Mariam was a powerhouse who changed our world. Her life of selfless dedication is a role model for us all.

 

From Dr. Debra L. Schultz, “Remarks”

…Because of Mariam, I learned that as a woman, one simply obtained a PhD. I had no role models for this and she demystified it for me. If getting a doctorate in economics at Harvard as the girl child of Armenian immigrants during World War II was no big deal, what did I have to complain about?

Mariam loved being an economist. During our last visit in March, she reminisced about her time as a Radcliffe undergraduate, when her mentor, future Nobel Prize-winning economist Wassily Leontief, would read the students chapter drafts sent over by John Maynard Keynes! For a moment, I felt her transform into that excited young woman intellectual and it was thrilling.

Averse to the touchy-feeling side of feminism, she nevertheless drew circles of adoring young women around her, by keeping track of our every personal and professional move. I’m proud to have followed in her footsteps to become a feminist in philanthropy—I never knew such a thing existed before Mariam and the Ford stories—and to work with women internationally, which Mariam did decades before it was trendy.

Mariam never seemed to inhabit a particular age, and she also had a slightly naughty twinkle in her eye. Very little got past that eye, even if she pretended not to notice slights or injustices that came her way. Her satisfaction came from supporting, connecting, and catalyzing. When I had the great opportunity to help start the first international women’s program at the Soros Foundation, Mariam told me ruefully that as a program officer, “you give away your best ideas and let others implement them.” She modeled a generous way of empowering others, not aggrandizing herself…

 

Marjorie Lightman, “Remarks”

…Since girlhood Mariam had probably regarded the people and opinions voiced around her with an alienated eye. She certainly set expectations for herself in line with an internal compass. After all, at 18, while her brother chose Boston College she chose Radcliffe.

Mariam often told me that she was fortunate to have always worked in organizations that were young and making their mark on the world. Who would not thrill at Harvard classes reading John Galbraith’s newest works in manuscript; or working at the OSS in Washington during the World War II, when Gen. Wild Bill Donovan brought together “best and the brightest” to outwit the enemy?

Her commitment to elite institutions on the rise never wavered. When she lived in New Haven with her husband, Neil Chamberlain, who was an economist at Yale, she became part of the Yale Growth Center – an economic think tank founded in 1961. After her divorce, she joined the Ford Foundation, which under McGeorge Bundy had the heady atmosphere of new possibilities and the kind of intellectual energy that made risk into an adventure.

Working under Marshall Robinson she became part of Ford’s audacious $40 million investment in reconceiving business education. The plan to effect change in undergraduate business education and to institute an academically acceptable Masters in Business administration privileged large and mostly elite institutions with funding that sometimes dwarfed mere mortals. Rarely have a foundation’s plans been so successful.

By the time women’s clamor for change had reached the ears of Ford in the early 1970s, Mariam had become a skilled program officer and absorbed lessons of success from the business education program. With a pot of money that was approximately ¼ that spent on business education, she sought out nascent organizations that could become long-lasting institutions and anchor women-centered research and education into the future.

She spread her funds among research centers, academic programs, and scrappy grass-roots organization and coalitions. Not surprisingly they included Stanford, Michigan, Wellesley, and two centers at Radcliffe – Schlesinger and the Bunting. However, risk was the nexus of her intellectual landscape. She was, after all, an economist who thought in algebraic equations. The unknown “x” factor was central to her calculations. And it was in this space – between the provable, the probable and the possible – that she made her most original decisions. She believed that the Feminist Press, IWPR, and the National Council for Research on Women would be the institutions of the future.

It was also in this space that our friendship thrived. We had very different kinds of minds and education. We often disagreed. Her conviction that economics was the queen of disciplines was never shaken. She would ask why I spent my time on history, let alone ancient history. Just recite the facts, she would say. I would respond that the facts had different interpretations. She would parry: not if you presented them properly. I liked life lived on the margins. She was unwavering in her conviction that change came through institutions. She wanted data; I insight. We were intellectual sparring partners who never were bored by our exchanges and who never were threatened by our differences…

 

From “Eulogy” by Mary Rubin

…In 1982, Mariam asked me to join her at the Russell Sage Foundation on a book project to examine progress and prospects for women in higher education, a companion assessment to an earlier book by Alice Rossi. Immediately she welcomed me into Russell Sage’s heady atmosphere of notable social scientists, and often invited me to tag along at elegant meals and meetings she hosted for prominent feminists. Today, whenever I invite a guest for lunch at the Harvard Club, I relish following the tradition she established.

Becoming a Resident Scholar at Russell Sage represented a crucial transition in Mariam’s life. She could have chosen to envelope herself in nostalgia for what Ford had enabled her to achieve. But that was never Mariam’s way. Instead, she stayed vigilant for opportunities. She maintained her accessibility to a steady stream of feminist scholars and practitioners who arrived seeking her advice and contacts in the foundation world. In these meetings, I learned to pay as much attention to what she didn’t say as to what she actually said.

Not only did she help me to find my voice in discourse with thinkers who’d completed their doctorates before I was born, she introduced me to Zabar’s coffee beans, elegant Italian leather boots by Galo, and the pleasures of eating only hot fudge sundaes for dinner. I had barely started working for her when she agreed to guarantee the lease on my first-ever apartment—a railroad flat on the Upper East Side with a claw foot bathtub in the kitchen. In characteristic fashion, she shared my delight, while simultaneously withholding her opinion of its truly miniscule size.

No matter how early I arrived at work, or how late I stayed, she was always ensconced in her office; however, she never pressured me to adopt the same schedule. She set high expectations, but rarely criticized. Hers was a quiet form of guiding and shaping. She taught me to listen intently, to ask probing questions, to be steadfast in advocating my perspective. Her goal always was to win others over, never to squash them. When a discussion moved in an unproductive direction, I watched how she lightened the atmosphere by describing a favorite New Yorker cartoon—and then resumed her line of argument. I’m guessing she used this technique frequently while at Ford…

 

Dorothy O. Helly, “Remarks”

I came into Mariam’s orbit in the late 1970s through Marjorie Lightman and the Institute for Research in History. We connected in the following years over a number of shared interests, one in particular being curriculum transformation, first at Hunter College and later among the faculty throughout the City University. She often urged me to “write it up,” for to Mariam, if it was worth doing, it was worth telling others about it. We traveled in the same groups that went to Nairobi and Beijing, and through these years of international women’s studies concerns, I became a “station” on the way for women from abroad seeking information about grants, coming to me at Hunter and being sent by me to Mariam, wherever she was located, from Russell Sage to Roosevelt House to the latest offices of the National Council for Research on Women.

Mariam, Florence, and Helene became a troika in my life as well, and they always surprised me with their delightful hostess gifts at the annual New Year’s party my husband and I gave to celebrate the Millennium and the decade that followed.

Mariam and I met up over the years at the conferences of National Women’s Studies Association and the Berkshire Conference on Women’s History, often having at least one dinner together to discuss whatever was the latest news or just to schmooze. Many times these dinners included at least one other woman, and I listened to their projects being presented to her for help and approval. I remember in particular the dinner with Heidi Hartmann when her policy organization was barely more than a gleam in her eyes.

I also remember being in the same university dormitory in Nairobi and chatting in the hallway before going to bed. We were in the same Swiss-run hotel in Beijing, seeing each other at breakfast and dinner. In other words, Mariam and Women’s Studies were intertwined in my life, a person with whom one could talk about the latest issues, particularly transforming the curriculum and the problems facing the new Ph.D. programs in Women’s Studies. I know that Mariam was an important sounding board for many people. It was a way for them and her to keep up with the latest activities in the field . It also provided a way to tap her suggestions, based on her wide, wide knowledge of who was doing what and, of course, where it might be possible to get project funding.

Mariam’s generosity was open and casually extended. When she had to cancel her trip to Australia for a meeting of the International Congress on Women, she offered me her prepaid room. I accepted, and then, in the same spirit, shared it with another woman who did not have a place to stay. Mariam, of course, wanted a full report when I returned.

We sat together, often literally, on the board of the Feminist Press, and across the table at Parnell’s with people like Marjorie and Blanche Cook. On the trip from Beijing, via Helsinki, we both accepted a $200 bribe from the airline to bump us off our flight to take another one three-hours later. That allowed us time to wander the Helsinki airport, window shopping, and my personal coup was to convince Mariam, who never seemed to buy herself any personal luxury, to purchase a large amber and silver ring. She wore that ring on occasions like Feminist Press and NCRW galas, and she was wearing it the last time I saw her this year. Like so many others, my life was touched by hers, and I have many happy memories by which to remember her.

 

From Lybra Clemons “Eulogy for Mariam”

…After graduate school and years of working at nonprofits, I began working at the National Council for Research on Women (the Council) in 2003. My office was next door to Mariam’s….

Towards the end, it was quite interesting to see Mariam. She had good days and not so great days. I have to say that her unpredictability was somewhat entertaining. I wonder if she was doing this for us….just to keep us on our toes and to get a giggle every now and then.

Honestly – I would walk in the door of Parnells (her favorite restaurant), and wonder what decade Mariam thought she was in today. Sometimes it was 1972….. and all of her stories would center around that decade. Then it was 1935…… But – we indulged her.

Again –there were days when Mariam was so sharp, that I felt downright stupid and couldn’t keep up. If you had not read and/or analyzed Paul Krugman, she was not amused.

One of our last outings together at Parnells was particularly interesting. Mariam, Gwen, Joan and I dined with Mariam and observed her becoming more concerned with the “lack of men”. She kept saying “where are the men?”… and pointing to people at Parnell’s. She would see a man and say “there’s a man”. Clearly she wanted to make sure we included men…. Well, I think that was the point. I love Mariam dearly, but for whatever reason she wanted to see, meet, engage, or possibly hang out with men – I knew that Parnell’s was likely the last place that we should look for sourcing these types of men. But – the point was well taken….

 

From “Remarks” by Helene Goldfarb

Good evening. My name is Helene Goldfarb and I am the President of the Feminist Press at CUNY. I am here to speak of Mariam as a friend for many years but also as a very important part of who the Feminist Press was and what it has become over the years because of her nurturing and caring. Mariam, who was a Program Officer at the Ford Foundation, was one of the first to make a grant to the Feminist Press. It was for $12,000 for Who’s Who and Where in Women Studies. Interestingly, she wouldn’t let us use computers because she “didn’t want to become involved with us” but she changed her mind and introduced us to Terry Saario also at Ford who gave us our first large grant for the “Women and Work” high school series. Mariam continued her interest in the Press and gave us a small grant to bring five women to Copenhagen in 1980 and to organize two weeks of workshops and panels on women’s studies.

Even after she left Ford in 1982, Mariam’s interest in the Press never flagged. She became a very active member of the Board of Directors of the Press and remained on our board until she passed away last month. While she was not as active as she would have liked to be this past year or so, whenever Florence and I met her for dinner at Parnell’s, the Press was always on her mind. I miss those dinners at Parnell’s and Sunday is a little lonelier for the lack of them.

It is always a little difficult to express thanks publically for the many years she contributed not only expertise to the Press but also donations. Without her support, our Galas would not have been as successful and we certainly would not have been able to print many of the books that are found in bookstores today…

 

Heidi Hartmann

Mariam Chamberlain was a cherished adviser to myself and to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. She was a founding member and a generous supporter from its inception in 1987. She served 18 years on our Board of Directors. She was knowledgeable and wise about the ways of foundations, and while she was unfailingly encouraging and supportive, I learned to pay attention to the rare instances in which she expressed skepticism about the likelihood of getting funding for some particular project or other. More often her suggestions of where to go and whom to meet with led to productive relationships for IWPR. She understood that nonprofits would actually sometimes have negative profits, and I recall one instance when several of IWPR’s board members were a bit agitated about a couple of years in the red in a row, when she said something like, “aren’t deficits normal for nonprofits?” and then she lent us funds so we could pay our bills until some expected grants arrived. Her general view seemed to be that if an endeavor was worthwhile it might go through some ups and downs but it would prove its worth in the long run. And she was in it for the long run.

Mariam and I both studied economics at similar institutions and knew many of the same people and, despite the difference of a generation, had had some of the same experiences in being a small minority in a male-dominated field. I believe I first met Mariam at a business meeting of the American Economics Association, probably in the early 1980s when a group of progressive members was trying to pass a set of resolutions. My cohort was sitting together, and when our resolutions would come up we would all raise our hands while the rest of the hands remained down, except for one, a small, older, very professional-looking woman. The content and the outcome of the motions are long forgotten, but I recall Mariam like it was yesterday. That event provided a hint of the deep and abiding radicalism that was Mariam.

I got to know Mariam better at the 1987 NWSA meetings held at Spellman College when we, both being frugal, stayed in the dorms and asked them to assign us a roommate and we got each other. Just then in the process of forming IWPR, I shared my dreams for IWPR and we shared some personal stories in late night discussions. My mother is virtually the same age as Mariam and came to America on her own in 1938, and so I like Mariam was an immigrant daughter. And like her I rose up from poverty through getting good grades and earning a scholarship to a top school. Perhaps because Mariam was so much like my mother (both very smart, courageous, kind, and persistent), I thought of Mariam as my intellectual mother, an intellectual version of my own working-class mother.

Mariam loved IWPR because we use economics to advance women and she knew how much difference having numbers makes in the policy world. She loved being part of that world through IWPR. She valued the fellowship we named after her in 2001. IWPR typically funds a young woman en route to graduate school to work at IWPR for an academic year to learn practical research skills in a policy setting. More than 100 young people apply every year, and thousands of graduating students learn about Mariam and the opportunity to use social science to help achieve social justice. I am very pleased to let you know that Mary Rubin and the Borrego Foundation have generously provided IWPR with a challenge grant of $95,000 to honor Mariam’s 95 years by expanding our Mariam K. Chamberlain fellowship to give an opportunity to a second fellow each year.

Mariam’s choice to recognize the Feminist Press, the National Council for Research on Women, and IWPR in her will reflects her lifelong commitment to the radical idea of considering women fully human. Many of us here share that commitment and share our love of Mariam….

 

Image Sources:  Mariam Kenosian Chamberlain from Radcliffe Yearbook, 1939 and New York Times obituary (April 7, 2013).