Categories
Funny Business

On the second day of Christmas my colleague wrote with me…

a doggerel about 2-016:

“A Visit from St. Vlad” by Michael Burda and Irwin Collier.

 

Image SourceTrump Tower @ 5th Ave by Victor Harota posted on Flickr: .

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T.

M.I.T. General Exams in Macroeconomics, 1959-71

________________________

The original plan of Economics in the Rear-View Mirror was to provide a single artifact for each post. Larger (composite) data sets are given dedicated pages (e.g. Harvard Ph.D.’s in economics 1875-1926; Chicago Ph.D.’s in economics 1894-1926Economics Rare Book Reading Room). Sometimes I come along a group of artifacts that are best kept together so I end up with a post like today’s that prints out as more than 25 pages of text. 

Today’s treasure is a fairly complete run of MIT general examination questions in macroeconomics for the period 1959-1971 found in a folder in the Evsey Domar papers at the Economists’ Papers Archive at Duke University. For a few of the exams we even have handwritten records indicating the questions chosen by the examinees and the grades awarded (I have omitted the names).

________________________

May 22, 1959
General Examination in Macroeconomics

Answer four questions, including at least one from each group.

I.

  1. (a) Explain the basic economic philosophy which forms the foundation of modern national income (and gross product) estimates in Western countries.
    (b) Show how this philosophy is transformed into specific criteria used by the U.S. Department of Commerce in their estimates of Gross National Product, National Income, and Consumer Disposable Income. Be as specific as you can.
  2. Present a careful analysis of the problem of “Price Flexibility and Employment” and trace its discussion (that is, of its principal points) through economic literature beginning with Keynes’ General Theory.
    What practical conclusions follow from this discussion?
  3. It was repeatedly said in 1946 that “Increased production is the best cure against inflation.” Comment on this statement as completely as you can. (Hint: Consider the dual aspect of the production process.) In the light of your finding, do you think a labor strike to be deflationary or inflationary?

II.

  1. Construct a “flexible” multiplier-accelerator model in which the government plays an active role. That is, it levies a proportional income tax and engages in stabilizing expenditures.
    1. Imagine first that the tax on last year’s income is collected this year, while consumers recon their disposable income on a cash basis (i.e. income earned minus taxes actually paid). Government expenditures are constant. How do changes in the tax rate affect the behavior of the model?
    2. If the tax system should go on a withholding basis, so that the tax on this year’s income is collected this year, how does that affect the stability and other characteristics?
    3. Taking taxes as in (b), suppose government expenditures are proportioned to the gap between full employment income and last year’s income. Is this stabilizing?
    4. Suppose government outlays are a decreasing linear function of the observed rate of change of income. Is this stabilizing?
  2. It is often said that the cause of any depression is the previous boom and its “excesses.” Does this make sense in terms of modern business cycle theory?

III.

  1. “The purpose of taxation is never to raise money but to leave less in the hands of the taxpayer.” Comment fully and critically. Can you identify the author? (No great penalty if you cannot.)
  2. To the best of your ability, try to analyze the incidence of a corporate income tax. What empirical information would you need for this purpose? (Please be reasonable).
  3. “People are always willing to become wealthier. The problem of economic growth in advanced countries is: will the public be willing to add to its holdings of physical assets an amount equal to the unconsumed portion of full employment output?” Discuss fully including a description of the alternatives to holding physical assets, the efficacy of the price system, policy measures.

________________________

 

February 8, 1960
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY

For the old-style exam (microeconomics alone), answer the first question (one hour) and any three of the others in Part I (two hours). For the new-style exam, answer any three questions in Part I (two hours) and any three questions in Part II (two hours), but without including both 3 and 4. Use separate books for Parts I and II.

PART I

  1. In a purely competitive economy, the only goods are food (F) and clothing(C), and the only factors are labor (L) and land (T), both fixed in supply. Each household supplies either L or T, but not both. Both goods are produced at constant returns to scale with both L and T. Isoquants are normally curved for both products; and, at any given marginal rate of substitution, a higher ratio of T to L is implied for F than for C.
    1. Show how the economy’s transformation curve for F and C is derived. Could it be either concave or convex or linear, and why?
    2. If everyone in the economy always divides his income equally between F and C, show how this determines uniquely what goods are produced, how they are produced, and for whom.
    3. How is that general equilibrium modified if the government imposes a tax on F and distributes the entire proceeds equally among all of the labor-supplying households. (Assume for simplicity that the tax and subsidy involve no administrative costs.)
    4. Would there be better ways of achieving the same redistribution of income? Explain fully why or why not.
  2. The demand for a monopolist’s produce is given by p = 50 – .001q. Within the relevant range, his total cost as a function of his output is C = 40q – .0005q2.
    1. In the monopolist’s long-run equilibrium, what are his price, output, and profit?
    2. How are those magnitudes affected if demand now increases to p= 56 – .001q?
    3. In general, what factors determine whether a monopolist’s equilibrium price will rise or fall in response to an increase in demand? Explain how the actual result in the present example fits in with those general principles.
  3. Plant capacity for a certain product costs $6 per year per unit of output. Given a plant of any particular size, any output up to the capacity level can be produced at a variable cost of $12 per unit; and outputs in excess of capacity are impossible. Demand is given by p = 24 – .001q (where p is the price of the product in dollars per unit and q is the quantity of product demanded per year).
    1. What are the long-run-equilibrium prices, outputs, and profits under conditions of (i) monopoly and (ii) pure competition?
    2. How are those equilibrium magnitudes affected in both the short and long run if new technological knowledge suddenly makes it possible to produce the product with a new type of equipment at a capacity cost of $5 per year per unit of output and a variable cost of $9 per unit of output. (Assume that, in the short run, new capacity can be added but none of the pre-existing capacity wears out. In the long run, all of the old capacity does wear out.)
  4. Show how an individual’s labor-supply curve can be derived from his basic preferences for leisure and income, assuming that he also has a fixed income from other sources. Then show the comparative effects of three alternative taxes that might be imposed to extract the same revenue from this man: (a) a lump-sum or poll tax, (b) a proportional income tax, and (c) a progressive income tax.
  5. Summarize Ricardo’s theory of rent, and evaluate its correctness and realistic relevance. In what sense, if any, does rent not enter into cost? Explain carefully.

PART II

  1. Discuss the role played by population growth in modern theories of economic development and business cycles. Be specific.
  2. Write an essay on the subject of “The General Theory After Twenty-Five (almost) Years.” Include in it, among other things, your evaluation of the usefulness of the book from the point of view of: (a) an advanced capitalist economy like the U.S.; (b) an underdeveloped mixed economy like India; (c) a centrally directed socialist economy like the USSR.
  3. Present your favorite theory (traditional, eclectic or entirely original) of the business cycle. Explain the empirical tests which you would subject it to. Be specific.
  4. Present an explanation of the causes of the current inflation in this country. Indicate the empirical tests which your explanation would have to pass. Be specific.
  5. (a) Explain the reasons why the economic activities of the government create special problems in national income (or gross product) accounting. Analyze critically the treatment of these problems by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
    (b) “Existing methods of international comparisons of per capita national income have an upward bias in favor of advanced countries.” Comment. “Don’t forget to indicate what these methods are.)

 

Comprehensive Exam Grades in Macro Theory
MIT Feb. 1960

[Student]

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Average Remarks
[1] 50 (F) 30 (F) 60(D) F+ Fail
[2] 60(C-) 20(F-) 60(C-) D ? [guess: “Directed information to who? , ≥4 fail”]
[3] 70 (C) 65 (C) 70 (C) C Fair –
[4] 70 (C) 70 (C) C Fair –

A: 90-100
B: 75-89
C: 60-74
D: 50-59
F: less than 50

________________________

 

September 19, 1960
General Examination in MACROECONOMICS

Answer three questions; at least one from each part.

I.

  1. Discuss Savings as an economic problem.
  2. a. Write an essay on the subject of “The Problem of Intermediate Products in National Income and Product Accounting.” Be as comprehensive as you can.
    b. Compare briefly the treatment of intermediate products in the Input-Output and Flow-of-Funds systems.
  3. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Economic Significance of the Rate of Interest.”

II.

  1. Write on the capital-output ratio as a tool for economic analysis, including some comment on:
    1. The problem of defining, measuring and interpreting the concept.
    2. Known facts about the historical course of the ratio..
    3. The role the concept plays in theories of growth and fluctuations.
  2. What are the facts about the relative magnitude of cyclical fluctuations in the output of capital goods and consumer goods? What are the theoretical implications of the facts as you know them? Discuss in this light the mildness of post-war economic fluctuation in the U.S.
  3. Write an essay on the contribution to the theory of economic growth of one of the following: Wicksell, Schumpeter, Kaldor, Tobin.

 

Macroeconomics Grades
Sep. 1960

Part I Part II Aver.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3
[1] G- G- F+/G- G-
[2] G F+ F-/Fail
[3] G+ F+ G- G-
[4] G+ G/G+ G- G/G+
[5] G G+ G- G
[6] G G G G

 

________________________

 

February 6, 1961
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Part II—Macroeconomics—Two Hours

Answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each Part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I.

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “International Comparisons of National Income and Product”.
  2. Discuss saving as an economic problem. Trace the treatment of saving in the relevant economic literature.
  3. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Economic Significance of the Rate of Interest”.

Part II.

  1. Assume that inventory behavior is governed in the following Metzlerian way:
    1. Desired inventory is proportional to expected sales.
    2. Planned inventory investment behaves according to the capital stock adjustment principle (“flexible acceleration”).
    3. Expected sales equal last period’s sales.
    4. Current sales are proportional to current income, with unexpected sales made from stock.
    5. Income is the sum of Sales, exogenous government and fixed investment expenditures, and inventory investment (including unplanned!).

Now suppose operations research succeeds in (i) reducing the desired inventory-sales ratio and (ii) increasing the speed of adjustment. What effects will this have on the cyclical behavior of the system?

  1. Discuss the role of (i) floors and ceilings and (ii) autonomous investment in theories of growth and fluctuation, and say something about the realism of each concept.
  2. Formulate a one-sector model of economic growth using the following assumptions:
    1. One commodity, usable either as consumer good or as capital good.
    2. Its output is given by a production function with the stock of the capital good and labor as inputs, under constant returns to scale. (Consider various degrees of substitutability.)
    3. Depreciation proportional to stock of capital.
    4. Supply of labor grows geometrically, and exogenously, and is inelastically supplied.
    5. Competitive profit-maximizing rules.
    6. All profits are saved, all wages consumed.

Within this model, discuss the properties of the full-employment growth path (i.e. the development of output capital, wages, etc., which will equate desired saving and investment at full employment).

________________________

 

May 22, 1961
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Macroeconomics—Two Hours

Answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. (Course XV students answer ONE question from each part only.) USE A SEPARATE EXAMINATION BOOK FOR EACH QUESTION.

Part I.

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Measurement of Economic Growth”. Include in it the description of existing methods, their rationale (the most important part) and your suggestions for improvement.
  2. Write an essay on “The General Theory after Twenty-Five Years”.
  3. a. Explain the nature and the rationale of the definition of the concept of money in “Price Flexibility and Employment” problems.
    b. “If the ‘Balanced-Budget Multiplier’ is correct, isn’t Say’s Law also correct?” Comment fully.

Part II.

  1. “By making existing capital assets obsolete, technological progress is alleged to create new investment opportunities and thus raise the level of income and employment. But to the extent that such obsolescence was foreseen, the assets were depreciated over a shorter period and thus gave rise to larger gross savings. Therefore, expected technological progress fails to stimulate the economy.” Comment fully.
  2. Present your favorite (traditional, eclectic, or original) business cycle theory. Indicate the empirical tests to which it will be subjected.
  3. “In order to prevent a cost-push inflation, wage rates in each firm or industry should not increase faster than its labor productivity; price increases will thus be avoided.”
    Comment fully and critically; indicate and justify your wage and price policy.

 

General Exam Grades “MacroTheory” May 22, 1961

[Part] I [Part] II
[Student] Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Average
[1] G G-/F+ F+ G-
[2] G- G-/F+ F- F+
[3] F+ G- G G-
[4] E- G- E- G+
[5] G+ G- F G-
[6] E-/G+ G F G
[7] G+ G- F- G-
[8] E- E- G+ E-
[9] Failed F F-/Failed Fail+
[10] F+ G G- G-
[11] G G F- G-
[12] G- G-/F+ F- F+
[13] F+ G- G G-
[14] G+ G- G G
[15] Failed G G-/F+ F+
[16] F-/Failed Failed Failed
[17] G-/F+ F F+

 

________________________

 

September 18, 1961
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Macroeconomics—Two Hours

Answer FOUR questions, TWO from each part. USE A SEPARATE EXAMINATION BOOK FOR EACH QUESTION.

Part I.

  1. State, explain and justify the treatment of government expenditures (Federal, state and local) in the computation of national product and its components. Why is government treated differently from other sectors? What is the logical foundation for such treatment?
  2. Compare and contrast the Keynesian and the so-called Classical systems.
  3. Contrast the investment criteria applicable to (a) an individual firm, (b) the U.S. government, (c) the government of an undeveloped country. Explain clearly your reasons for such differences, if any.
  4. Write an essay on “The History of the Consumption Function.” Indicate and evaluate the major contributions. How significant are they? Which one do you prefer and why?

Part II.

  1. Describe fully the “economic indicator” approach to economic forecasting. Evaluate its performance. Compare it with the use of projected models of GNP.
  2. Describe the long-term trends in (a) population, (b) output, (c) capital, (d) real wage rates, (e) interest, (f) relative shares, (g) capital-output and other important ratios. What constancies have people claimed to observe? What behavior is explicable by a simple neoclassical model? What points to technological change or to various non-neoclassical growth theories? Mention authors as well as theories.
  3. Summarize briefly the historical facts on business cycles or fluctuations here and abroad. What theories have been suggested? Besides naming names, give your own best way of cataloguing the different theories (e.g. non-linear, etc.).
  4. Give the basic facts on “growth” here and abroad, recently and in history. How could America increase its sustained growth rate? Be analytical and specific.

________________________

 

February 5, 1962
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Part II—Macroeconomics
TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each Part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I.

  1. “Existing methods of national product computation exaggerate the rate of growth of real product over time in a given country, and overstate the ratio between the real product of highly developed and of undeveloped countries.”
    Comment fully.
  2. Compare and contrast the economic effects (on growth and level of income, employment, income distribution, and on any other phenomena you consider important) of population growth and of the growth of the capital stock.
  3. a.Explain the basic assumptions and reasoning used in the “Price Flexibility and Employment” discussions. (If you can, identify the authors involved.)
    b. Explain the nature and definition of the concept of money used in the same discussions.
    c. “If the ‘Balanced-Budget Multiplier’ is correct, isn’t Say’s Law also correct?” Comment fully..

Part II.

  1. Analyze a one-sector growth model in which net output is produced by labor and capital by a smooth neoclassical constant-returns-to-scale aggregate production function experiencing no technical change. Net output is divided up into consumption and net capital formation (or investment). Consumption, according to Modigliani, is 100 per cent of income when the capital wealth-to-output ratio is, say, 3, being a fraction at lower ratios and exceeding unity at higher ratios.
    1. First, let labor supply be stationary. Starting with very low capital, describe the evolution of the system’s output, wage rate, interest rate, capital, and various ratios (Q, w, r, k, k/L, Q/L, Q/k, wL/rk, etc.)
    2. Do the same if labor will always grow at 2 per cent per year.
  2. Describe and contrast business cycle approaches of (a) The National Bureau of Economic Research, (b) Econometricians like Tinbergen and Klein, (c) other typical modern Evaluate with respect to policy, prediction, explanation and present-day relevance.
  3. How can President Kennedy increase “growth” in a world with problems of international payments, possible wage-price “creeps,” fiscal burdens for defense, and stubborn productivity and personal thrift patterns. Prescribe, diagnose, and compromise dilemmas if there are any.

________________________

 

May, 1962
GENERAL EXAMINATION—MACROECONOMICS

 

Answer three questions, including at least one from each part.

PART I

  1. a. Write an essay on the subject of “The Problem of Intermediate Goods in National Income and Product Accounting”.
    b. Suppose you were asked to compute national income and product for an economy consisting of a Prince and a number of slaves, from the point of view of the Prince. Explain the modifications of the usual methods that this assignment will require. Do you think it will result in a larger or a smaller income?
  2. A critic of Keynes’ General Theory once said that “What is new in it is wrong, and what is right is old”.
    Comment fully.
  3. “The problem of price flexibility and employment is a silly game based on the inclusion of some debtor-creditor relationships and the exclusion of others”.
    Comment fully.

PART II

  1. Is an economy which has been growing at full employment (and full utilization of capacity) helped or hindered in the maintenance of full employment (and utilization) by a more rapid rate of growth of the labor force?
  2. It is sometimes said that the widespread adoption of scientific inventory control, permitting lower inventory-sales ratios on the average, will have the effect of damping inventory fluctuations. Discuss this theoretically. Do the same for the advent of improved forecasting methods.
  3. Discuss the relation between the propensity to save and the rate at which potential output increases.

 

________________________

 

September 17, 1962
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Part B—Macroeconomics

TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I

  1. Write an essay on the role of microeconomics in the construction and the testing of macroeconomic theory.

Part II

  1. Discuss and evaluate the treatment of government in the U.S. National income Accounts. Give special emphasis to the problems involved in using the figures for intertemporal and international comparison of the role of government both as a user of resources and as a producer.
  2. Write an essay on the “history, nature and significance” of the consumption function. 

Part III

  1. Discuss the issues of concept, theory, inference, and measurement that are involved in estimating the relation between investment and the growth of potential output.
  2. What is your theory of inflation? How does it tie in with modern business cycle theory?

 

________________________

 

GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
February 4, 1963

ANSWER ONE QUESTION FROM EACH PART (THREE QUESTIONS IN ALL).

Part I.

  1. Suppose that in an economy in equilibrium a large number of enterprises operating as proprietorships and partnerships decide to incorporate.
    1. List the principal ways in which the national income accounts might be affected in the short run. (Make explicit any reasonable assumptions you may want to make about real changes in the flows of spending and income.)
    2. What fallacious conclusions might you draw as to structural changes in the economy from these changes in the accounts if you did not know their source?
  2. Explain the basic economic philosophy which forms the foundation of national income and product estimates in the United States. Indicate how this philosophy is applied by the Department of Commerce in its estimates of Gross National Product, National income, and Disposable Income. (Be specific.)

Part II.

  1. Discuss, making use of an explicit model of income-determination, the various ways in which prices and wage rates enter into the determination of national income. In particular, what are the issues of theory and fact which are relevant to the debate about “underemployment equilibrium”?
  2. Identify and discuss, briefly and concisely, the nub of the issues raised by each of the following (where appropriate use an explicit model)
    1. “The rate of interest bears no necessary relation to the quantity or value of the money in circulation. The permanent amount of the circulating medium, whether great or small, affects only prices; not the rate of interest.” (J. S. Mill)
    2. “If it is true that the marginal propensity to consume of wage earners is higher than of profit recipients, one way to cure a deflationary gap and unemployment is to raise the money wage rate.”
    3. “Increased production is the best cure against inflation.”
    4. “The cause of any depression is the previous boom and its “excesses”.”

Part III.

  1. Discuss the critical issues of fact, theory, and value that are involved in designing a fiscal-monetary policy for the United States for the mid-1960’s. Elaborate, in particular, the criteria in terms of which you (“as economist”) would evaluate any particular mix of instruments.

 

________________________

 

General Examination in Macroeconomics
May 13, 1963

Answer three questions in all, including at least one from each part.

I.

  1. In the earlier postwar period it was often said that “Increased production is the best cure against inflation.” Comment on this statement. In the light of your comment, do you think a prolonged strike is inflationary or deflationary?
  2. a. Set up a reasonable aggregative model appropriate to a closed economy where the money wage rate is rigid ownwards (only downwards).
    b. Assuming that the initial equilibrium configuration yields “full employment” and that the money wage rate cannot fall below the initial equilibrium wage rate, trace the effects on the critical variables of

    (i) an increase in the nominal stock of money

    (ii) a decrease in the nominal stock of money

    (iii) an autonomous fall in the volume of investment

    c. In each case, how would your answers differ, especially as regards the possibility of “under-employment equilibrium”, if the money wage rate, as well as all other prices, were fully flexible?
    d. How would your answers differ if money wage rates were governed by two-way escalator clauses?

  3. Write an essay on the theoretical and empirical foundations of an eclectic macroeconomic theory of demand for investment.

II.

  1. In Kaldoria, the marginal (=average) propensities to save out of wages and out of non-wages are different. The latter exceeds the former by a considerable margin. Together wages and non-wages exhaust national income. Markets are such that when national income exceeds a certain value Y*, the share of profits in national income tends to rise, and when national income falls short of Y*, the share of profits tends to fall. Finally, all investment is exogenous.
    1. Show that Y* is a stable level of national income.
    2. Calculate the share of profits when national income is Y*.
    3. Can you think of any reasons why Y* should correspond to “full employment”?
    4. Discuss the factual validity of the theory. That is, does Kaldoria resemble any country you know well?
    5. Can you modify the theory to include a marginal propensity to invest out of profits?
  2. Suppose investment behavior is such that all investment opportunities which offer a rate of return greater than or equal to some fixed target rate R are instantly adopted. Labor and capital are the only factors of production and constant returns to scale prevail. (Use a Cobb-Douglas production function, if you like.) The labor force grows exogenously at a fixed annual rate g.
    1. What saving rate, relative to national product, will just maintain full employment equilibrium?
    2. How does that saving rate vary with g?
    3. What do you make of the common notion that a rapidly-increasing labor force makes it harder to maintain full employment?
  3. Describe the approximate timing of inventory investment during postwar American business cycles, and compare this with the results of some formal model of inventory fluctuations.

 

________________________

 

September 16, 1963
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE QUESTIONS, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I.

  1. a. Write an essay on the subject of “The Problem of Intermediate Goods in National Income and Product Accounting”.
    b. Suppose you were asked to compute national income and product for an economy consisting of a Prince and a number of slaves, from the point of view of the Prince. Explain the modifications of the usual methods that this assignment will require. Do you think it will result in a larger or a smaller income?
  2. A critic of Keynes’ General Theory once said that “What is new in it is wrong, and what is right is old”.
    Comment fully.
  3. a. Explain the nature and the rationale of the definition of money in “Price Flexibility and Employment” problems.
    b. “If the ‘Balanced-Budge Multiplier’ is correct, isn’t Say’s Law also correct?”
    Comment fully. Explain the nature of both propositions.

Part II.

  1. Discuss the role of (a) floors and ceilings and (b) autonomous investment in theories of growth and fluctuations.
    Indicate the empirical tests to which the propositions expounded by you can be subjected.
  2. “In order to prevent a cost-push inflation, wage rates in each firm or industry should not increase faster than labor productivity.”
    Comment fully and critically. Indicate and justify your wage and price policy to achieve economic growth and stability.
  3. Explain and compare the roles which the growth of population and the growth of capital (separately and together) play in modern growth and business cycle theory.

General Examination Grades in Macroeconomics September 1963

Questions
 Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Grade
[1] 18 25 22 65 Fair
[2] 29 24 26 79 G
[3] 30 29 29 88 E-
[4] 22 20 23 65 Fair
[5] 29 24 25 78 G

 

________________________

 

February, 1964
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
MACROECONOMICS—TWO HOURS
[Note: this exam recycled in February, 1968]

Answer THREE QUESTIONS, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “Comparisons of National Income and Product in Time and Space.” Indicate the biases which arise in such comparisons.
  2. “The problem of price flexibility and employment is a silly game based on the inclusion of some debtor-creditor relationships and the exclusion of others.” Comment fully. Indicate what definition of money used in your discussion.
  3. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Interrelationships between Money, Prices and the Rate of Interest.” Include brief reviews of the relevant theories.

Part II

  1. “In order to prevent a cost-push inflation, wage rates in each firm or industry should not increase faster than its labor productivity.” Comment fully.
  2. “If Hansen is correct, the faster is the rate of growth of population, the lower will be the unemployment level in the U.S.” Discuss fully. Include natural growth of population and immigration. In what respect does the growth of population differ from that of the stock of capital?
  3. Write an essay on “Floors and Ceilings in Business Cycle Theory.” Indicate the specific theories and your methods of testing each.

 ________________________

 

February 8, 1965
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I.

  1. Write an essay on the subject of “Keynes and Patinkin on the Relation between the Quantity of Money on the One Hand, and Interest Rate, Price Level and National Income on the other.”
  2. It is frequently said that existing methods of national income computations exaggerate the present-day American per capita income in comparison with that of less developed countries and in comparison with American income in the past. Comment fully and critically. Are there statistical methods which may impart an opposite bias?
  3. Compare and contrast the economic effects (on growth and level of income, employment, income distribution, and on any other economic phenomena you consider important) of population growth and of the growth of the capital stock.

Part II.

    1. According to the 1965 Economic Report of the President:
      1. “The general guide for wages is that the percentage increase in total employee compensation per man-hour be equal to the national trend rate of increase in output per man-hour.”
      2. “The general guide for prices calls for stable prices in industries enjoying the same productivity growth as the average for the economy; rising prices in industries with smaller than average productivity gains; and declining prices in industries with greater than average productivity gains.” (p. 108)
        1. What would this policy imply for:
          1. average unit labor costs
          2. average product prices
          3. income distribution
          4. labor allocation among industries and skills
        2. According to theories of inflation you find most persuasive, what aspects of the price-wage mechanism would be most likely to frustrate the Council guideposts that are outlined above?
      1. The U. S. economic recovery from 1961 to the present has been accompanied by less inventory investment, especially in manufacturing, than occurred in previous recoveries. Some pertinent data are presented below.

 

Manufacturing
(Monthly averages for year)
$ billions
Sales Inventories Ratio
1950 18.6 31.0 1.48
1951 21.7 39.3 1.66
1952 22.5 41.1 1.79
1953 24.8 43.9 1.76
1954 23.3 41.6 1.81
1955 26.4 45.0 1.62
1956 27.7 50.6 1.73
1957 28.7 51.8 1.80
1958 27.2 50.0 1.84
1959 30.2 52.7 1.70
1960 30.8 53.8 1.76
1961 30.9 55.1 1.74
1962 33.3 57.7 1.70
1963 34.7 60.1 1.69
1964 37.1 62.2 1.64

Source: 1965 Economic Report, p. 237.

 

It has been said that this development has

    1. substantially improved the ability of the economy to avoid a recession;
    2. made it more likely that if a recession does occur, that it will be milder than it would otherwise have been.
      1. Briefly evaluate the validity of this remark by reference to the data, distinguishing intended from unintended investment to the extent possible. What minimum additional information would be required in order to make a rigorous distinction between intended and unintended inventory investment?
      2. Discuss this observation critically in the context of a sensible model of cyclical fluctuations. Do so on the presumption that improved methods of inventory control have lowered the desired inventory-sales ratio.

REMARK: Part A will be given 1/3 weight. Part B will be given 2/3 weight.

      1. Consider several alternative growth models which include technical change, labor and capital. What effects would the following policy measures have on growth rates, output/head and consumption /head:
        1. A decrease in the rate of interest;
        2. An increase in the ratio of investment and savings to toal output;
        3. A decrease in the rate of population growth.

________________________

 

May 17, 1965
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I.

  1. (A) National product is defined as the sum of all final goods each multiplied by its price.
    (B) National income is defined as the sum of all net incomes of certain recipients.

Discuss the following questions:

i. What is a final good in (A)? What special problems arise from the presence of certain types of organizations?
ii. What is the rationale of multiplying each product by its price? What assumptions are implied in this procedure? Are they realistic?
iii. Whose net incomes are aggregated in (B)? What assumptions does this procedure imply? Are they realistic?
iv. Could you propose changes or improvements in the above procedures? What additional comments would you like to make?

  1. Explain the following concepts with a particular stress on the assumptions underlying them.
    1. The ordinary (Keynes’) multiplier
    2. The balanced-budget multiplier
    3. The acceleration principle

Indicate the virtues and defects of each concept and their use in economic analysis.

  1. Discuss saving as an economic problem. Trace the treatment of saving before Keynes, by Keynes and after Keynes. Evaluate the contribution of the several authors you mention critically.

Part II

  1. Consider a one-sector economy with:
    1. A conventional, constant-returns to scale, diminishing returns, technology
    2. A labor force growing at a constant geometric rate
    3. No technical progress
    4. A ratio of net saving to output which is a falling linear function of the wealth-output (i.e., capital-output) ratio

Trace out the evolution of such an economy under conditions of full employment and full utilization of capacity, starting from an arbitrary stock of capital; and show how its stead-state properties are determined.

  1. “The ‘built-in stabilizers’ cannot stabilize the economy at a full employment level but can dampen oscillations.”

Analyze this statement using the following model:

(1) Yt = Ct + It + Gt Income Definition
(2) Ct = α(Yt-1Tt-1) Consumption Function
(3) It = β(YtYt-1) Investment Equation
(4) Tt = λCt Tax Equation

Note: the tax equation is the stabilizer in this model. Assume government outlays Gt are constant through time.

  1. Some economists believe recent high unemployment levels in the United States are structural in nature, others that the main cause has been a fairly simple Keynesian demand deficiency.
    1. Explain the main elements of the “structuralist” position. (It will be assumed that you understand Keynesian National Income analysis.)
    2. Show how the correct interpretation of these (not mutually exclusive) causes affect the analysis of price level movements in the United States over the past decade, with reference to two or three of the main theories that have been applied.

________________________

 

September 13, 1965
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
Two Hours

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

PART I.

  1. “The problem of price flexibility and employment is a silly game based on the inclusion of some debtor-creditor relationships and the exclusion of others.” Comment fully. Why is a special definition of money required here?
  2. “Existing methods of national product computations exaggerate the rate of growth of real product over time in a given country, and overstate the ratio between the real product of highly developed and of underdeveloped countries.” Comment fully and critically.
  3. In the early postwar period it was often said that “Increased production is the best cure against inflation.” Comment fully on this statement. Assume that the increase in output is indeed possible, but indicate what kind of output you have in mind. What other information would you require? In the light of your comments, do you think that a prolonged strike is inflationary or deflationary?

PART II.

  1. According to the 1965 Economic Report of the President:
    1. “The general guide for wages is that the percentage increase in total employee compensation per man-hour be equal to the national trend rate of increase in output per man-hour.”
    2. “The general guide for prices calls for stable prices in industries enjoying the same productivity growth as the average for the economy; rising prices in industries with smaller than average productivity gains; and declining prices in industries with greater than average productivity gains.” (p. 108)
      1. Using relevant aspects of production theory, what would this policy imply for:
        1. Income distribution
        2. Labor allocation among industries and skills
      2. According to theories of inflation you find most persuasive, what aspects of the price-wage mechanism would be most likely to frustrate the Council guideposts that are outline above?

Your answers should consider departures from competitive behavior where pertinent.

  1. Describe the long term trends in (a) population, (b) output, (c) capital, (d) real wage rates, (e) interest, (f) relative shares, (g) capital-output and other important ratios. What constancies have people claimed to observe? What behavior is explicable by a simple neoclassical model? Which of these regularities seem to require the introduction of technological change or the abandonment of central neoclassical propositions? Mention authors as well as theories.
  2. Discuss the role of (a) floors and ceilings and (b) autonomous investment in theories of growth and fluctuations.

________________________

 

February 7, 1966
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
Two Hours

Answer three questions, including at least one from each part.

PART I:

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Distinction between Final and Intermediate Products in economics”.
    Include in your essay (but don’t limit yourself to) the following points:

    1. The basic philosophy
    2. Governmental receipts and expenditures
    3. Input-output systems
    4. Federal Reserve Index of Industrial Production
  1. Discuss the following aspects of the “Price Flexibility and Employment” problem:
    1. The basic statement as presented by Patinkin
    2. The role and definition of money
    3. The role of expectations
    4. Your conclusions
  2. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Economic Effects of a Redistribution of Income from the Upper to the Lower Income Groups”. Indicate the positions on the subject of several economists whose views are relevant to your essay.

PART II:

  1. Is an economy which has been growing at full employment (and full utilization of capacity) helped or hindered in the maintenance of full employment (and utilization) by a more rapid rate of growth of the labor force?
  2. “I take leave to doubt whether there has ever been a trade cycle, i.e. a self-perpetuating cyclical movement, as opposed to a series of fluctuations due to the propensity of a private enterprise economy to exaggerate its response, either way, to the changes of history as it meets them.” Discuss this remark of Joan Robinson’s.
  3. Consider a conventional one-sector neoclassical growth model (i.e. constant returns to scale and smoothly diminishing returns in labor and capital, full employment). There is no depreciation and the labor supply is growing exponentially. The ratio of investment to output is constant. There is “disembodied” purely labor-augmenting technological progress going on exponentially at the rate a/j where j is the elasticity of output with respect to labor input (not necessarily a Cobb-Douglas constant).

Analyze how the steady-state rate of growth depends on the value of the investment-output ratio.

________________________

 

May 13, 1966
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
Two Hours

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

PART I

  1. Beginning at least with Adam Smith, there has been much ado in economic writings about productive and unproductive activities and about their proper treatment in national income and product accounts (and in their subdivisions).
    Write a comprehensive essay on this subject. Include in it, but do not limit yourself to, the following points:

    1. The principles and procedures followed by the U. S. Department of Commerce
    2. Alternative methods which might be followed and the reasons for them
    3. Special problems created by the presence of governmental activities
    4. The Marxist position on this subject
  2. Write an essay on the subject of “Economic Effects of an Increase in the Stock of Money.” Indicate the position taken by several important economists familiar to you.
  3. Explain the investment criteria which should be used by:
    1. A private American enterprise
    2. U. S. government
    3. A Planning Board of some under-developed country.

Emphasize the differences in criteria to be used and the reasons for the differences.

PART II

A short well-organized answer is best.

  1. Formalize the following assumptions into a model:
    1. Current consumption is proportional to last year’s national income;
    2. Current investment is proportional to last year’s profits;
    3. Current profits are an increasing linear function of current national income and the change in national income since last year;
    4. National income is the sum of consumption and investment.

Will the model generate cycles if disturbed, for plausible values of the parameters? (Assume that, other things equal, 40% of a year-to-year increase in national income flows into profits.)

Describe how the response of the model economy would be affected by the imposition of a proportional income tax (with consumption proportional to disposable income).

Same for a proportional profits tax, with investment proportional to after tax profits.

Compare the stabilization effects of the two, if the profits tax is levied so as to raise the same amount of revenue as the income tax at a constant level of national income.

  1. Following is the text of a letter from James Tobin.

“Following is the text of a letter from Joan Robinson:

‘Many thanks for sending me the offprint from Econometrica (Money and Growth). Your Keynesian long-period theory is very different from mine and Kaldor’s. I should say that a lower rate of interest will make the rate of profit higher. The rate of profit r = g/sp, i.e. is equal to the rate of growth divided by the proportion of profit saved. I should say that, within reason, and provided that an appropriate part of investment is in research and training, a higher rate of investment will generate a higher natural rate of growth, so that deepening need not occur.’

Does this make sense?”

Answer Professor Tobin’s question. (The “rate of interest” refers, say, to the rate on government bonds, the only asset apart from real capital. The “rate of profit” can be taken to be the marginal product of capital in a one-sector economy near a steady state.)

Compare the behavior of output per man or per man-hour in the short-run (i.e. in the course of economic fluctuations) and in the long run, for the economy as a whole. Comment on any analytical issues raised by the behavior.

________________________

February, 1968
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
MACROECONOMICS—TWO HOURS
[Note: recycled exam from February, 1964]

Answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

Part I

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “Comparisons of National Income and Product in Time and Space.” Indicate the biases which arise in such comparisons.
  2. “The problem of price flexibility and employment is a silly game based on the inclusion of some debtor-creditor relationships and the exclusion of others.” Comment fully. Indicate what definition of money used in your discussion.
  3. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Interrelationships between Money, Prices and the Rate of Interest.” Include brief reviews of the relevant theories.

Part II

  1. “In order to prevent a cost-push inflation, wage rates in each firm or industry should not increase faster than its labor productivity.” Comment fully.
  2. “If Hansen is correct, the faster is the rate of growth of population, the lower will be the unemployment level in the U.S.” Discuss fully. Include natural growth of population and immigration. In what respect does the growth of population differ from that of the stock of capital?
  3. Write an essay on “Floors and Ceilings in Business Cycle Theory.” Indicate the specific theories and your methods of testing each.

[handwritten note: “special exam… She received good-/fair+ with charity]

________________________

14.452
FINAL EXAMINATION
May 23, 1968

Please answer each question in a separate examination booklet. Indicate on the front page of each booklet whether you are seeking only a grade in 14.452 or a grade in the general examination in economic theory. Those who seek only a grade in 14.452 should answer two questions in part I and two questions in Part II. Those who are taking the general examination in economic theory should answer two questions in Part II and two in Part III.

Part I

  1. Construct a difference-equation model embodying the following assumptions:
    1. Consumption is a linear function of disposable income lagged one time-unit;
    2. Tax revenue is proportional to national product;
    3. Investment is the sum of a component proportional to the current change in consumption and a component proportional to national product lagged one tie-unit;
    4. Imports are proportional to national product lagged one time-unit;
    5. Government purchases are constant.

Write down formally the conditions for an oscillatory response of the model to disturbance. When are the oscillations damped? How do variations in the tax rate affect these conditions? Suppose part of government purchases were made negatively proportional to the last observed change in national product?

  1. Why is technical progress an important part of the usual model of economic growth? Could increasing returns to scale play the same role? What is the special role of purely labor-augmenting (i.e. Harrod-neutral) technical progress?
  2. Imagine a planned economy choosing among steady states in the one-sector model, without technical progress. The planner values both consumption per head and capital per head (as a measure of national strength, say) and his preferences can be expressed by a system of conventionally-shaped indifference curves in consumption per head and capital per head.

Use this indifference map and the requirements for a steady state to show how the optimal steady state is chosen. Prove that the optimal capital per head will exceed the “Golden-Rule” (maximal consumption per head) level. Show what happens to the optimal position if the rate of population growth increases. Discuss briefly the case of a one-time upward shift in the production function.

Part II

  1. In the generalized multiplier-accelerator model, the equation \frac{dK}{dt}=I\left( Y,K \right) means that “investment decisions are always carried out”, so that when

I\left( Y,K \right)\begin{matrix}  > \\  < \\  \end{matrix}S\left( Y \right)

“unintended consumption or saving” occurs. Replace the above equation with \frac{dK}{dt}=S\left( Y \right) and interpret and analyze the resulting model. Compare its behavior with the case analyzed in class.

  1. Suppose I = I(Y,K) and S = S(Y) are the schedules of desired investment and saving. In what sense is IS a measure of excess demand in the aggregate commodity market?

How is it that no specific supply variables (labor force, for example) appear in this measure? Under what circumstances is it natural to suppose that dY/dt responds to (IS)? (Y = real output, p = commodity price level). Under what circumstances is it natural to suppose that dp/dt responds to (IS)?

  1. Consider a one-sector non-monetary model of growth under the following assumptions:
    1. The production function in intensive form is q = Akb;
    2. The wage is equal to the marginal product of labor;
    3. Investment demand is such that the after-tax return on capital is always at a target level r*;
    4. There is a tax on profits at rate t and the government spends all its revenue on consumption;
    5. The savings rates from wages and after-tax profits are both equal to a constant s.

Find the tax rate that will permit a steady state at full employment. When will it be between zero and one? How does it change if s changes? Interpret.

  1. Consider a one-sector growth model, with two factors of production (capital and labor), constant returns to scale, and no technical progress. Suppose that the propensity to save out of profits and capital gains is equal to one, and the propensity to save out of wages and transfer payments (taxes = negative transfers) is zero.

Money, which is non-interest-bearing government debt, is the only alternative asset to capital. The desired money-capital ratio is of the form \frac{m}{k}=L\left( {f}'\left( k \right)+{{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}^{e}} \right) where m is the real per capita stock of money, k is the capital-labor ratio, and  {{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}^{e}}is the expected rate of inflation which is equal to the actual rate {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; in the steady state.

Government purchases are zero and the budget deficit, which is equal to the excess of transfers over taxes, is financed by issuing money.

    1. Describe the steady-state characteristics of the model.
    2. Find the rate of inflation that maximizes steady-state consumption per head.
    3. Suppose that {{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}_{o}} is the rate of inflation in (b) that maximizes steady state consumption per head. Would a higher rate of inflation lead to a higher or lower long-run capital-labor ratio?

Part III

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Problem of Weights in National Income and Index-Number Construction”.
    Explain the criteria which are used, should be used (for what purpose?) and why.
  2. Discuss the economic effects of an increase in the stock of money. Include an evaluation of the positions of several (not less than two) prominent economists familiar to you. How would you test the correctness of their positions?
  3. Discuss the effects of inflation of the level of real investment.

________________________

 

GENERAL EXAMINATION IN ECONOMIC THEORY
Macroeconomics—Two hours
Sept. 1968

Answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question.

PART I

  1. “Existing methods of national product computation exaggerate the rate of growth of real product over time in a given country, and overstate the ratio between the real product of highly developed and of underdeveloped countries.”
    Comment fully.
  2. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Interrelationships between Money, Prices and the Rate of Interest.” Include brief reviews of the relevant theories.
  3. Write an essay on the subject of “The Economic Effects of a Redistribution of Income from the Upper to the Lower Income Groups.”
    Include in your essay the evaluation of several current theories on the subject.
    Consider as many economic effects as you can.

PART II.

  1. “In order to prevent a cost-push inflation, wage rates in each firm or industry should not increase faster than the growth of its labor productivity.”
    Comment fully.
  2. Consider the effects of technological progress on employment of labor. Be as comprehensive as you can.
  3. What are the built-in stabilizers and how do they work? Can we rely on them to achieve price stability and full employment?
    Discuss the subject fully.

________________________

 

Spring, 1969
GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
Three Hours

Please answer FOUR QUESTIONS distributed as follows:

Part I—without choice—1 hour
Part II—any two questions—40 minutes each
Part III—any one question—50 minutes

Use a separate examination book for each question.

PART I

The Federal Government wishes to stop the current inflation of the aggregate price level. What are the issues in choosing among various fiscal and monetary policies directed to this end? Try to use macroeconomic models (expressed algebraically, graphically or verbally) to illustrate the problems involved.

PART II

  1. Write an essay indicating what you think are the most important ideas about the determination of the rate of investment in economic theory and in economic practice. (Suppose the problem came up in the course of presenting the static Keynesian macroeconomic model of income determination.)
  2. In the two-asset neo-classical growth model à la Tobin or Sidrauski we have two basic equations:
    1. \dot{k}=sf\left( k \right)-nk-\left( 1-s \right)\left[ \dot{m}+nm+{{\pi }_{m}}m \right]{{p}_{m}}
    2. {{p}_{m}}m=L\left[ {{p}_{m}}m+k,{{\pi }_{m}},{f}'\left( k \right),f\left( k \right) \right]

Suppose we add the requirement that

    1. {{\dot{p}}_{m}}=\pi _{m}^{*}{{p}_{m}}, that is that the government always vary its deficit to produce a constant rate of deflation \pi _{m}^{*} (which would, of course, be an inflation if .) \pi _{m}^{*}<0

 

    1. Show that this model can be expressed by the two equations

1a) \dot{k}=\frac{sf\left( k \right)-nk-\left( 1-s \right)n\left( {{p}_{m}}m \right)}{\left[ 1+\left( 1-s \right)C \right]}

where C={\left[ {{L}_{1}}+{{L}_{3}}{f}''+{{L}_{4}}{f}' \right]}/{\left( 1-{{L}_{1}} \right)}\;>0

2a) {{p}_{m}}m=L\left( {{p}_{m}}m+k,{{w}_{m}},{f}'\left( k \right),f\left( k \right) \right)

Why are the pairs of k and (pmm) which make \dot{k}=0 the same regardless of \pi _{m}^{*}? HINT: When \dot{k}=0 what is the increase in the per capita real money supply? What determines the increase in the total real money supply?

    1. Show the dynamics of this system graphically by sketching the combinations of (pmm) and k that make \dot{k}=0 and those that satisfy 2a) (the aa schedule). What is the effect of a higher {{\pi }_{m}} on the stable steady-state stock of capital?
    2. Under what conditions can the government force the economy to the golden-rule capital stock by enforcing an appropriate \pi _{m}^{*} through fiscal policy without changing s (assume that pmm must always be positive for any \pi _{m}^{*})?
  1. Consider a vintage growth model with fixed factor proportions (clay-clay) a constant labor force (n=0), and Hicks neutral technical change at rate γ. Suppose the economy in question invests every year in a given fixed quantity of new machines (not a constant fraction of income), and has always followed this policy. Assume perfect competition, and full employment.
    1. Write down the production function for a given vintage. What rates labor and capital-augmenting technical change are implied?
    2. What is the labor requirement per machine of vintage τ?
    3. Find the economic life time of capital.
    4. Describe the growth paths of output, wages, quasi-rents and the labor share of income.
    5. Suppose the economy suddenly doubles its investment and then holds it constant. What will happen to wages and the life-time of capital as time passes?
  2. What growth model or growth model ideas would be helpful in studying the effects of a redistribution of income from businessmen to workers on investment and/or growth? You may develop a model explicitly or simply write an essay reviewing the important concepts and their relevance to the question.

PART III

  1. You are asked to compare the per capita national income of some underdeveloped country, such as Brazil, with that of the United States. Assume that the Brazilian currency (a) is convertible into dollars and (b) that it is not convertible.
    Discuss as thoroughly as you can the problems involved in this comparison and the methods used for dealing with them. Evaluate these methods critically and present and justify your own recommendations.
  2. Explain what is meant by “The Money Illusion” and what role does its presence and absence play in theories of employment, interest and prices. Be as comprehensive and as critical as you can.

 

General Examination Grades in Macroeconomics
Spring 1969

Spring 1969
90 = perfect
[1] 83 Ex+
[2] 79 Ex
[3] 78
[4] 77
[5] 75 Ex-
[6] 75
[7] 75
[8] 74 Ex-/G+
[9] 74
[10] 73 G+
[11] 72
[12] 72
[13] 71
[14] 71
[15] 71
[16] 70 G+/G
[17] 70
[18] 69 G
[19] 69
[20] 69
[21] 69
[22] 69
[23] 68
[24] 67
[25] 67
[26] 67
[27] 66
[28] 66
[29] 66
[30] 65 G/G-
[31] 65
[32] 64 G-
[33] 64
[34] 62
[35] 61
[36] 57 F+
[37] 56
[38] 53 F
[39] 50 ?
[40] 49
[41] 48

________________________

MACRO GENERAL
February 3, 1971

DO THREE QUESTIONS, AT LEAST ONE FROM A AND ONE FROM B. 40 Minutes each

A

  1. There has been a long-standing dispute among economists whether money is or is not neutral. Explain what this dispute is about, what the major positions are, and present and justify your own position on the subject.
  2. In order to stimulate investment expenditures by business, President Nixon has suggested a more accelerated treatment of depreciation for income tax purposes. For simplicity assume that every depreciable capital asset can be written off for tax purposes in half the usual time. Analyze the proposal and state and justify your conclusions.
  3. The Bergson Index may be defined as the ratio of Soviet output (industrial production or GNP or a similar measure) to Soviet inputs (labor and capital) divided by a similar ratio for the U.S., first in Soviet and then in American prices for some given year. On finding that this Index is less than one, Bergson has concluded that the Soviet economy is less efficient than the American.
    1. Which comparison (that is, in Soviet or in American prices) is more likely to be more favorable for the USSR? Why? (This is the less important part).
    2. Evaluate critically Bergson’s conclusions. (This is the more important part).

B

  1. Use a simple macroeconomic model that describes the interaction of the real and financial sectors to describe a theory of determination of the price level. Is simultaneous unemployment and inflation consistent with this theory? What parts of the theory would you modify to take account of simultaneous unemployment and inflation?
  2. Define the “golden rule” growth path and derive conditions for an economy to be on it. Compare some actual economy’s performance to the golden rule and, if you can, estimate the saving necessary to reach it. Would you favor such a policy?
  3. Consumer spending in the U.S. is currently in a slump. What hypotheses can you advance to explain this fact?

 

________________________

 

GENERAL EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS
June 24, 1971
TWO HOURS

Please answer THREE questions, at least ONE from each part. Use a separate examination book for each question. Write your CODE NUMBER on your book but not your name.

PART I

  1. In a recent speech, Simon Kuznets suggested the following method for expressing the relative rate of growth of real national income of a country: calculate the relative rate of growth of real income of each person (or family) and then take the unweighted arithmetic mean of these rates. Let us call the resulting rate
    1. Compare the rationale behind Kuznets’ suggestion with that of the conventional computation of the rate of growth.
    2. For what purposes would you use each method? Why?
    3. Suggest other ways for achieving Kuznets’ objective.
    4. How would the magnitude of K compare with that of the conventional rate?

(Note: do not worry about the distinction between national income and gross product.)

  1. Write an essay on the subject of “Economic Effects of the Retardation of Population Growth in the U.S.” (You may choose a comprehensive approach or concentrate on some issues you regard particularly important and interesting.
  2. Analyze the effects on aggregate demand and supply, both in the short and in the long run, of a prolonged strike in some important industry. Consider several relevant cases.

PART II

  1. When the current Republican administration came into office it faced substantial and rising rates of inflation, and inherited from the last Democratic administration a moderately restrictive fiscal policy. Write a memo to the President outlining his macroeconomic policy options with pros and cons for each. (Would you list different options if you were Paul Samuelson rather than Milton Friedman?)
  2. Use some complete macroeconomic model to discuss the ways monetary policy influences aggregate demand. Try to judge which mechanisms are likely to be strong and reliable, which weak and uncertain.
  3. Capitalia is a two-class society in which land is not a constraint, workers save and capitalists invest. Its population growth rate is 1%. Nothing has ever happened in Capitalia except exponential growth.
    1. What is the rate of return to capital?
    2. Does the production function make any difference to your answer in part a)? Explain.
    3. If the production function is Cobb-Douglas with capital exponent .2, find the capital per head, output per head, and consumption per head.
    4. In an unexpected development, population growth doubles. What begins to happen to the rate of return, per capita saving, and the saving as a fraction of output?
    5. The government decides to maintain earlier levels of per capita saving “to avoid the impoverishment of our nation” by taxing workers. Comment on this policy. What will per capita consumption be under this policy?

________________________

Source: Duke University. Rubenstein Library. Evsey Domar Papers, Box 16, Folder “Ph.D. Economic Examinations. Macroeconomics.”

Image Source:From the Flying Car to the Giant R2-D2: The Greates MIT Hacks of All-Time“, by Robert McMillan. Wired, March 20, 2013.

“Boston’s Harvard Bridge is 364.4 Smoots long. And the fact that anybody would remember this in 2013 was probably the furthest thing from MIT freshman Oliver Smoot’s mind on the October 1958 night that he lay himself down, time and again, along the bridge, allowing his fraternity brothers to measure its length (each Smoot is about 5 feet, 7 inches). It was a fraternity prank, but the next year the bridge’s Smoot markers were repainted. Thus, an MIT landmark — and a unique unit of measurement — was born.

Smoot himself went on to become a board member of the American National Standards Institute — a standards man through and through.”

 

Categories
Chicago Courses Syllabus

Chicago. Graduate Price Theory. Economics 300A. Harberger, 1955

_______________________

Thus far Economics in the Rear-View Mirror has been able to provide syllabi for the following four professors who had taught the first core price theory course at the University of Chicago spanning nearly a quarter of a decade during the middle third of the 20th century:

Today I add the syllabus for Arnold Harberger (a.k.a.”Triangle Man”, see the photo credit below). Note: chapters from Samuelson’s Foundations are only recommended readings, not yet required.

_______________________

 

Economics 300A
Mr. Harberger
Autumn 1955

 

Texts:

  1. Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, 8th
  2. George Stigler, Theory of Price, revised ed.
  3. H. Knight, The Economic Organization

 

Supplementary material (Purchase not required):

  1. American Economic Association, Readings in Price Theory
  2. Milton Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics
  3. Milton Friedman, Notes on Lectures in Price Theory (mimeographed)

Students are expected to be familiar with the materials in Stigler’s Theory of Price before entering the course. Readings marked with an asterisk (*) are recommended, not required.

 

Reading List

 

  1. Introduction:

Knight, The Economic Organization, pp. 1-37
Stigler, Theory of Price, Chs. 1-3
Friedman, “The Methodology of Positive Economics” in Essays in Positive Economics

  1. Demand:

Stigler, Theory of Price, Chs. 4-5
Marshall, Book III, Chs. 2-4, Book V, Chs. 1-2
Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Ch. 3
Hicks, Value and Capital, pp. 11-52
Working, “What do Statistical Demand Curves Show?” Quarterly Journal of Economics
*Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. 5

  1. Supply:

Stigler, Theory of Price, Chs. 6-8
Marshall, Book V, Chs. 3-5, 12, Appendix H
Robinson, Joan, Economics of Imperfect Competition, Ch. 2
Clark, J.M., Economics of Overhead Costs, Ch. 9
Viner, “Cost Curves and Supply Curves”, Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie, Book III (Sept 1931) pp. 23-46, reprinted in Readings in Price Theory, pp. 198-232
*Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. 4

  1. Market Organization:

Stigler, Theory of Price, Chs. 9-13
Stigler, “Monopolistic Competition in Retrospect” in Five Lectures on Economic Problems
Harrod, “Doctrines of Imperfect Competition”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1934, pp. 442-461
Chamberlin, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Chs. 3, 5
*Robinson, E.A.G., The Structure of Competitive Industry
*Robinson, E.A.G., Monopoly.

  1. Utility and Welfare Economics:

Alchian, “The Meaning of Utility Measurement”, American Economic Review, March 1953, pp. 26-50
Friedman and Savage, “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk”, Journal of Political Economy, August 1948, pp. 279-304. Reprinted in Readings in Price Theory, pp. 57-96
Scitovsky, “The State of Welfare Economics”, American Economic Review, June 1951, pp. 303-315
Hicks, “The Four Consumers’ Surpluses”, Review of Economic Studies, XI (1943-44), pp. 31-40
*Hotelling, “The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates,” Econometrica (VI) (1938), pp. 242-269
*Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chs. 5-7

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman, Box 77, Folder “77.1 University of Chicago Econ 300 A & B”.

Image Source: “[Arnold] Harberger strips down to reveal himself as “Triangleman” at the University of Chicago Economics Christmas Party, probably December 1970”. Robert J. Gordon’s website.

Categories
Chicago Funny Business

Chicago. Two Christmas Songs, “Economized” Lyrics. Undated.

Copies of the following bastardized Christmas Carols from the University of Chicago Department of Economics can be found in Milton Friedman’s papers at the Hoover Institution Archives. They are filed with other skit party materials in a folder marked “University of Chicago, Miscellaneous”.

These texts are undated, one might say timeless.

From the same collection: a HMS Pinafore parody; “Ode to an Economist”).

_______________________________

THE TWELVE WEEKS OF CLASSES
(tune: “The Twelve Days of Christmas”)

On the first week of class my Professor said to me:

                                    We must maintain consumer sovereignty!

Second week:             Uncertainty is no answer, and
Third week:               Impute costs,
Fourth week:             Lunch is never free,
Fifth week:                 Free Enterprise!!!
Sixth week:                Marshall is our hero;
Seventh week:           M V equals P T;
Eight week:                Manna comes each Monday;
Ninth week:               Inflation is an evil;
Tenth week:               This week do the readings;
Eleventh week:          Answer true or false please;
Twelfth week:            SORRY, BUT I FLUNKED YOU!

_______________________________

SONG FOR AN ENTREPRENEUR
(To the tune of Jingle Bells)

 

Maximize, maximize, that’s the crucial key.
Allocate resources by their productivity.
Equalize VMP’s with their prices, and
Your production function is the finest in the land.

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman papers. Box 79, Folder “79.6 University of Chicago, Miscellaneous.”

Image Source: From a 1939 Nativity Play in Rockefeller Chapel in 1939. University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf4-03011. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

 

Categories
Chicago Courses Curriculum Economic History

Chicago. Proposal for interdisciplinary MA courses on Capitalism and Democracy. Hoselitz, 1947

With the election of Donald J. Trump to the U.S. Presidency, it is perhaps time well-spent to yet again reflect upon the relation between capitalism and democracy. Today I post a 1947 proposal for the creation of a complementary pair of interdisciplinary seminars on problems of capitalism and democracy to be taught in the University of Chicago’s Divisional Social Science M.A. program. The proposal was written by a 34 year old Austrian, Berthold Franz Hoselitz ( the future founding editor of the journal Economic Development and Cultural Change), and presumably circulated among the respective departments of the Division of Social Science for approval. The copy transcribed here comes from Milton Friedman’s papers at the Hoover Institution together with the agenda for the faculty meeting when the proposal was scheduled to be discussed. We see from the course announcements that the proposal was accepted.

The poor image of Hoselitz from 1940 is partially compensated for by the fact that it is (up to now) the only image I have been able to find of him at all.

_____________________________

Fun Fact: Hoselitz taught John Nash

Q. …Did you have any teacher through your period at university which was particularly a role model to you?…

John Nash: I certainly had some good teachers who were very helpful to me and influential. For example, in economics I only took one economics course and I was an undergraduate study in Pittsburgh at what is now called Carnegie Mellon, but by coincidence the person who taught the course, it was a course in international economics, and by coincidence this was someone who came from Austria. So there’s actually to consider Austrian economics is like a different school than typical American or British. So I was by coincidence influenced by an Austrian economist [Bert F. Hoselitz, Associate Professor of Economics appointed October 1, 1947, resigned September 1948, Carnegie Institute of Technology.] which may have been a very good influence.

Source: Interview with Dr. John Nash at the 1st Meeting of Laureates in Economic Sciences in Lindau, Germany, September 1-4, 2004.    Interviewer: Marika Griehsel.

_____________________________

Biographical Note

Bert F. Hoselitz was born Berthold Frank Hoselitz in Vienna, Austria in 1913. He received his doctor of law degree in 1936 from the University of Vienna. He left Austria in 1938, traveling first to England, then to the U.S., where he taught briefly at Manchester College in North Manchester, Indiana. He enrolled in the University of Chicago , receiving an M.A. in Economics in 1945. Hoselitz joined faculty at Chicago as an instructor in 1945, and became emeritus in 1978.

Hoselitz advocated interdisciplinary scholarship and his work pushed the common wisdom within economics at the time by considering the role of cultural and sociological factors on economic development. In pursing this line of inquiry, he developed professional relationships with scholars around the globe, though particularly in Asia, and participated in both a research and advisory capacity for a broad spectrum of academic research projects that spanned traditionally distinct social science disciplines. In 1962, Hoselitz supervised a pair of National Science Foundation sponsored studies examining the social and economic entailments of developments in science and technology within Asia, primarily India. At a broader level, he was also active in efforts to bring diverse social science disciplines into conversation with one another. In 1958 began participating in an editorial and authorial capacity for the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.

Hoselitz’s scholarly activities were not confined to academic research and teaching. He was also active and engaged in policy discussions concerning development and the developing world. In the early phase of his career Hoselitz participated in an array of applied research projects, advising work and professional associations related to economic development and development policy more broadly. For example, he wrote for the United Nations on issues related to economic development, beginning with a 1952 technical-assistance mission to El Salvador, and in the late fifties he served on a team of advisors to the government of India concerning the plan for the national capital region.

In addition to his global professional engagements, Hoselitz also remained an active participant and organizer in the scholarly community of his home institution at Chicago. In 1952 Hoselitz founded the Research Center in Economic Development and Cultural Change at Chicago as well as the affiliated interdisciplinary journal Economic Development and Cultural Change, published through the University of Chicago Press. Hoselitz served as editor from the journal’s inception until 1985. He also served on the committee of the Norman Wait Harris Memorial Foundation based at the University of Chicago which focuses on issues of international interest and works to facilitate the exchange of knowledge about the diverse peoples of the world. In this capacity, Hoselitz organized visits by lecturers, funded conferences and facilitated the foundation’s publishing efforts.

Considered an interdisciplinary pioneer and an expert on the social and cultural dimensions of economic development, Professor Emeritus Bert Hoselitz died in Chicago on February 14, 1995.

 

Source: University of Chicago Library. Guide to the Bert F. Hoselitz papers, 1923-1987.

_____________________________

 

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

A G E N D A
Tuesday, June 3, 1947, at 1. p.m. in Room SS 424

 

  1. Students’ Business:
    1. Tom, Chiu-Faat Joseph: Petition to take Chinese as second language.
    2. Berkman, Herman G.: Petition to take Planning as major field of specialization; to take intensive examination in French only.
    3. Murphy, J. Carter: Petition to substitute Mathematics for second language.
    4. Schwitzer, Selma: Petition for Mathematics to be one of secondary fields of specialization for A.M. (alternative). Other fields statistics and theory.
    5. Weil, R.A.: Petition to waive residence requirement.
      Recommendation to Candidacy. Tentative approval of thesis topic: “Federal Aid to Achieve State-Local Co-operation in a Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policy.”
  2. Weil, R.A.: Petition to waive residence requirement.
    Recommendation to Candidacy.
    Tentative approval of thesis topic: “Federal Aid to Achieve State-Local Co-operation in a Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policy.”
  3. Seminar, course and staff for “Problems of Capitalism and Democracy”
  4. Plans for counseling students during summer and next fall.
  5. New business.

_____________________________

 

OUTLINE FOR A PROGRAM ON THE “PROBLEM OF CAPITALISM AND DEMOCRACY”

I. Background

Some two years ago the History Department of the University of Chicago discussed the possibility of instituting in their Department so-called “problem-courses”. Instead of subdividing the subject matter of history on the basis of time periods and countries or regions, they felt that major problems, notably those of capitalism and democracy, should be studied in their historical perspective. These plans were thought over for some time but were not put into effect during the war, chiefly because of lack of suitable personnel who could be charged with the preparation and execution of these courses.

When, a few months ago, the Divisional Masters Committee met, and when it was decided that the Divisional Master’s program should provide for a more generalized program than that provided by departmental courses, the suggestion was made that the courses on the history of capitalism and the history of democracy might be worked out in a manner in which not only the historical sweep of the two institutions would be under consideration, but where also the problems arising in the two areas would be studied. The courses were thus conceived by the Divisional Masters Committee as comprising an analysis of historical background as well as the “nature” and problems of capitalism and of democracy.

When these courses were discussed it was the feeling of some members of the Divisional Masters Committee that what was needed to be stressed more and made more explicit than could be done by giving two apparently unrelated courses in isolation, was the problem of the interrelations of capitalism and democracy, or (in different words) the relationship of economic organization and the realization of political values of liberty, equality, and justice. This dilemma was met by the Masters committee by declaring the courses to be long into one “field” of study and by suggesting that the students be asked to take the courses simultaneously, by providing for parallel planning and teaching of the courses, as much as possible, and by providing an examination over the two courses (the field) in which the interrelations between economic organization and political values was stressed.

This plan was submitted to the Executive Committee of the Division of the Social Sciences and accepted as part of a program for the Divisional Masters Degree. At a later meeting between representatives of the Divisional Masters Committee and members of the Department of Economics, Political Science, and History, the problem was discussed again, and reasons for combination of the two courses, as well as reasons against brought forward. In addition the proposal was made and accepted that a faculty seminar be established which concern itself with the whole problem raised by the relationship of economic and political organization, notably the interrelations of capitalist, free enterprise, economic organization and political democracy.

 

II. Some Thoughts on a Program for Studying the Problem of Capitalism and Democracy.

A seminar or a combined course on the problems of capitalism and democracy seem to me to involve two sub-problems which ought to be separated from each other. One is the examination of the relationship of given economic institutions in the particular political framework and the processes which would be set in motion both in the political and economic field by attempts to realize certain aims of human welfare, or other chiefly political values, such as justice, freedom, etc.

The other problem would involve a study of actual processes of the interaction of political and economic institutions, their mutual interrelations in the past under different conditions in their dependence upon it given set of values in the particular hierarchies in which these values were accepted in certain countries and at certain times.

Both approaches may be dynamic but the first would primarily be analytical in that it would study the probable consequences of economic and political policies upon each other and therefore would in part deal with the study of how the existing institutions would be shaped by policies designed to meet social objectives in a more adequate way then is being done at present. In this analysis existing institutions such as constitutional arrangements, legal rules, the whole economic structure and possibly the international power structure as they affect the various countries, would be the starting point of the examination. This analysis would deal with problems which are of the utmost importance in the light of the discussion going on currently. It would have to take up those problems which presently are generally assumed under the heading of the relationship of freedom and planning. I think that it might be well for the Department to arrange the questions of a general and wide character affecting the whole social structure be included as well as more limited problems dealing with very specific economic or political policies in particular fields and their repercussions on the whole social structure.

The historical part could be used, it appears to me, for the following purposes.

(1) It could throw light on the coexistence of particular economic and political institutions especially on the historical coexistence of capitalism and democracy.

(2) It could provide evidence to show how and to what extent changes which either of the two institutions undergo undergoes in industrial civilization, have affected the other, and therefore could provide a basis for making certain analogies which present policies actually in operation or proposed.

(3) It would have to be supplemented by an analysis of the influence of the institutions of industrial capitalism and democratic political organization upon the formation of human personality, and vice versa the influence of human motivations and psychological factors upon the social, economic and political organization of the time.

(4) I am not certain whether an analysis of the origins of capitalism would be fruitful in this connection, but I think that it would be useful in the historical part to provide for a comparison between the social structure of the 19th century in the economic organization which it manifested in political values which it claimed to realize, and other societies, their economic and technological equipment and their political organization. If this can be supplemented by a comparison of the “basic personalities” in the two cultures, this might throw additional light on the question whether industrial capitalism and political democracy are bound up with each other, whether the ties exist in the social field exclusively, what ties are provided by the personality structure of the individuals composing the society and what evidence is provided by the historical incidence of attempts simultaneously to realize certain economic and political aims.

It seems to me, therefore, a defect that in the original planning of the program social psychologists and social anthropologists did not participate and I would think that both of these have important contributions to make.

Although it would be difficult clearly to separate the analytical approach which is concerned with examination of concrete presently existing problems confronting us in America and European countries as well as some of the “backward” countries, from the historical problems, I don’t think that such a separation would be necessary as long as it is logically plain that in the one area we are dealing with the application of generalizations drawn from history and other social sciences on practical policies, whereas in the other field we deal with an attempt to give a comprehensive examination of why particular processes occur, when and where they occurred and what factors were responsible for their occurrence. In other words, the two approaches would complement each other and would give opportunity to representatives of all the social science disciplines to make a contribution.

We frequently talk about the problem of modern society and I think we mean primarily by this the set of problems outlined above. Although as individuals we feel inclined that we must provide answers of what will be the probable effects of concrete policies, all of us attempt to build those answers into a logical framework which comprises the totality of social arrangements in which, therefore, is colored by our conception of political and cultural processes as well as economic ones. Any clarification of the relationships of these processes in present-day society which can be deduced by analytical study or by an examination of historical periods from which analogies for present-day action can be provided might therefore give at least a partial answer. I would like to see both the seminar and a course or combination of courses be carried on on the basis of these thoughts. If a more complete outline is desirable I shall gladly provide one.

Respectfully submitted
Bert Hoselitz

May 22, 1947

Source: Hoover Institution Archives, Milton Friedman Papers, Box 79, Folder “79.1 University of Chicago, Minutes, Economics Department 1946-1949”.

_____________________________

DIVISIONAL COURSES

[…]

Social Science 300A,B,C. The Nature and Problems of Capitalism. A study of the economic institutions of capitalist society in the more critical phases of their development up to the present, with particular emphasis on the social and political context in which economic change occurs. Closely correlated with Social Science 301A, B,C, which is taken concurrently. Enrolment limited to students under the Divisional Master’s Program. Aut, Win, Spr: MWF 10:30; Staff.

Social Science 301A,B,C. The Nature and Problems of Democracy (identical with Political Science 300A,B,C). Examination of the political institutions of Western society, especially in their relation to the development of democratic ideals and practices. Major concern is with American institutions as they operate in the context of both democratic ideals and political reality. Taken concurrently with Social Science 300 A, B, C. Enrolment limited to students under the Divisional Master’s Program. Aut, Win, Spr: MWF 10:30; Staff.

 

Source: University of Chicago, Announcements Vol. XLIX, No. 9 (July 1, 1949). The Division of the Social Sciences, Sessions of 1949-1950. p. 10.

Image Source: Declaration of Intention to apply for U.S. citizenship by Bertold Franz Hoselitz (alias Hazlitt), August 8, 1940.

Categories
Columbia Curriculum

Columbia. Comments on Programs of Study in Economics and Business. Shoup, 1944

The Columbia Provost, Frank D. Fackenthal, must have sent out a request to department chairs to answer a set of questions regarding their departments’ educational programs early in 1944. I have found a copy of a letter dated April 10, 1944 in which Carl S. Shoup (1902-2000) provides his reply in which he was able to comment both on graduate economics as well as business education. Shoup refers to an “accompanying memorandum” in which his thoughts are spelled out more precisely. That memorandum was not filed with the copy of the letter I found, so it must be left to another archival visit to see if there might not be some copy filed elsewhere.

Note to self (or others): the “accompanying memorandum” might be found in Provost Fackenthal’s papers.

____________________

Letter to Provost Frank D. Fackenthal from Professor Carl Shoup on the educational programs in economics and business at Columbia University
April 10, 1944

COPY
[Omitting some minor points, as explained in letter to Professor Mills, April 18, 1944]

April 10, 1944

Mr. Frank D. Fackenthal
Provost of the University
Low Memorial Library

Dear Mr. Fackenthal:

This letter and the accompanying memorandum are in reply to your request of February 18 for suggestions on the educational program of the University.

It so happens that during some spare moments last summer and fall when I was in Washington with the Treasury Department, I drew up a memorandum on graduate instruction in the American universities in the fields of economics and public finance, with special but not exclusive reference to Columbia. I had for some time been of the opinion that the training given to graduate students was falling short of what it might accomplish, and this memorandum was an attempt to systematize my thoughts. Upon returning to Columbia I found that Professor Mills, as head of the Department of Economics, was planning to appoint a curriculum committee and also hold a series of Department meetings in which the curriculum of the Department would be analyzed and suggestions for improvement made. I showed him my memorandum, and he thought it advisable to circulate mimeographed copies among the members of the Department. Since this memorandum contains most of what I have to say on the educational program, I am enclosing a copy; but I also add a few remarks below, addressed more specifically to some of the questions raised in your letter, and to Columbia rather than graduate schools in general.

My remarks here and in the mimeographed memorandum, rest upon three general assumptions: (1) that graduate students in economics and public finance are willing and even eager to assume a more responsible and professional attitude toward their work, which involves more hours of work and more intense work, the satisfying of more exacting standards in examination, and a realization of the damage they can cause if they go into government or private research, or teaching, without adequate training; (2) that many, perhaps most, faculty members (including certainly myself) have not been fully aware how small have been our direct efforts to challenge the graduate student to higher standards, and to help him reach them, perhaps because we have to readily assumed that by continually improving ourselves through research and study we could help the mature student about as well as we could in any other way; (3) that, finally, there is indeed no real conflict between this value we customarily put on faculty research and the producing of highly trained graduate students, but that the faculty member’s research experience needs to be made more available to the graduate student through participation by the latter at least some of the research carried on by the faculty. Unfortunately for the chances of formulating a specific program, I have not yet been able to devise a mechanism (to train the graduate by participation in research) that will be highly effective in a graduate department which, like Columbia’s, already has a long history of development along somewhat different lines. It may be that the idea is impracticable except for a graduate department that is founded primarily with this end in view. The problem of mechanism is discussed in some detail in the accompanying memorandum. In any case it would be essential to guard against the development of the research work into an element of so-called (“prestige” whereby it became necessary to grind out a certain amount of published product regularly for the public view. The results should be good enough to warrant publication, but not on any monthly or other periodic schedule.

To turn out to the specific subjects suggested in your letter of February 18, 1944:

            (1) Comment on the Department of which I am a member (I am a member of the School of Business and also of the Faculty of Political Science).

(A) The most troublesome problem facing the graduate Economics Department in curriculum construction is in my opinion caused by the wide variety in background and in aims of our graduate students. The difficulty takes this specific form: shall we introduce so-called “first graduate-year courses” (or “intermediate courses”) in subjects like public finance, international trade, and monetary theory, for students who have had few if any undergraduate courses in economics, or who, having majored in economics, have not had courses in one or more of these particular subjects? There are diverse views on the principles we should follow, but my present inclination – subject to change, of course, as we debate the matter further – is that we cannot do work on this intermediate level without forgoing a good deal of work on the higher level, and that we therefore should not attempt to make good the undergraduate’s course deficiencies except by special reading assignments and special examinations. If we had a much larger faculty, we might be able to offer a satisfactory selection of “intermediate” courses without decreasing our advanced offerings. Even so, I should doubt the desirability of going far in that direction. Before we realized it, we might find ourselves taking over much of the work of undergraduate colleges. From a long run point of view, the effect would be to weaken undergraduate work, not strengthen it.

The School of Business is revamping its entire curriculum. I am a member of a central curriculum committee that has been appointed to suggest what changes should be made, and since we are in the middle of our deliberations at the moment, I have nothing specific to report at this time. I am also a member of a curriculum sub-committee of the Department of Economics, but this sub-committee is awaiting the close of a series of conferences now being held by the Department, before assembling to consider whether specific changes in the curriculum should be recommended.

(B) I believe that it might be good practice for the Department of Economics and the School of Business to appoint a two or three-man committee to become thoroughly acquainted with the record, and to assess the possibilities of, any individual – within or outside the University – who is suggested as a possible member of the Department. This small committee would make an extended report to the Department after some period of time, perhaps six months or so. I think we need some much practice as this to avoid letting ourselves drift into accepting someone largely because there is a general impression that he seems to be the best one readily available at the moment. Perhaps it would be better to appoint a small committee whenever there is a vacancy, with the instructions to search carefully throughout the country to find the best possible prospect and to report back a year later. It is, I think, worth our while to take unusual pains in this respect, for the University has great pulling power, and should not waste it.

(C) As to relations with other departments, the major point, both for the School of Business and for the Department of Economics, is the relation between these two. Fortunately, the two faculties are keeping in close touch with each other. There is almost surely substantial duplication of effort at the present time, more of it than is desirable in some fields, especially, in my opinion, in money and credit theory. It is to be hoped that the two curriculum committees will suggest ways of eliminating needless duplication.

(D) I know very little about present methods of finding, and opening the way for, the brilliant student in the undergraduate group who should devote himself to scholarship and research, but I suspect that the supply of brilliant scholars could be substantially increased if some general effort were made to call to the attention of A-grade undergraduates the possibilities of careers and research and in college or university teaching.

(E) I have no suggestions on scholarships and fellowships, since I happen to have had very little to do with choosing from among the candidates or with examining the general system of selection.

 

            (2) Comment on the programs of study.

(A) In my opinion the program both of the School of Business and the Graduate Department of Economics have lacked sufficiently definite aims and standards, in standards sufficiently high. There is no specific suggestion I should want to venture at the moment, pending completion of the discussions in our two curriculum committees, but some of the suggestions and the accompanying mimeographed memorandum will indicate in a general way what I have in mind. We do not want rigidity in curriculum and teaching; indeed, we need experimentation, but it needs to be experimentation by the department or school as a whole, with some agreement on what we are trying to do. During the 1930’s, particularly, I have the impression that both the School of Business and the Economics Department rather drifted along, each faculty member being concerned chiefly with his own work as it affected himself, not in its relation to the group as a whole (at least I am sure I fell into that habit). We are beginning to overcome this tendency, as a result of frequent group meetings, but the former attitude has become so deeply ingrained in us that I am not optimistic for the future unless there is somewhat more concerned over the problem of training the graduate student then I have noticed thus far. The lack of regimentation, the freedom given at Columbia to each faculty member to go his own way, is a fine thing in we must of course be careful not to decrease it much, if at all. It is a prerequisite for outstanding work in research. The group action that I have particularly primarily in mind is designed rather (1) to provoke in each of us a greater feeling of individual responsibility for (a) ascertaining what our shortcomings are with respect to the training of graduate students and (b) using our imagination to devise improvements; and (2) to create the mechanism for cooperative effort where cooperative effort is deemed essential to making the improvements. But if the group action – in the form of the group discussions we are now engaged in – turns out not to have the effect described in objective (1) above, it would be dangerous to try to move on rapidly to objective (2). A widespread and fairly strong sense of dissatisfaction with our present degree of achievement in training graduate students is a prerequisite to the success of any thoroughgoing change. It remains to be seen whether such a feeling exists. If the current discussions show that it does not, we must conclude either that after all there is no real ground for substantial change or that the change must start elsewhere.

(B) I do not get the impression that competition with or imitation of the programs of other institutions have lowered our standards or over-extended our efforts. Rather, we have probably failed to learn as much as we should about what other institutions are doing.

(C) There is now – in contrast to the situation some years ago, as noted above – ample opportunity for the general discussion of educational matters.

(D) The faculty members’ participation in outside work has benefited the University. It is essential that a considerable amount of outside work be allowed. Such work has however, in my opinion, been carried well of beyond the optimum point in many cases (including my own). In the accompanying mimeographed memorandum I discuss this problem in some detail. My present opinion is that the University should create “research professorships”. Such professorships would not call for any lowering of the teaching schedule beyond the four hours a week now prevailing in the graduate department (but would call for a change in the School of Business’ minimum of eight hours). Anyone accepting such a professorship would agree to engage in no outside work for pay to himself except, say, during one year out of seven. He would be free to undertake any other outside paid work, but the fees would be paid into the University. Such professorships would carry his salary substantially higher than at present obtain – perhaps 75 per cent to 100 per cent higher at the lower salary levels, and 50 per cent higher at the higher salary levels. (I understand that the University of Chicago is offering, or may shortly offer, contracts on the basis something like that suggested for these “research professorships”).

 

            (3) Comment on the facilities for research.

(A) the School of Business library, through which I work, is, in my opinion, doing an excellent job. My only reservation for the library as a whole has to do with the availability of works in foreign languages. We may need to develop a better system for guarding against gaps here and there, after the war, for I have found some omissions that have hampered my work a little. I am not yet, however, prepared to make any recommendations.

(B) I have not encountered any of the resources of the metropolitan area that were not open to me.

(C) I have had limited experience, especially in recent years, with undergraduate teaching, so had little to say on this subject. My impression is that undergraduate teaching, while not incompatible with research, is not exactly conducive to it.

(D) Probably the most important steps that could be taken to increase the research accomplishment of the University staff are:

(a) Slightly lighter teaching schedules (in the School of Business not the Department of Economics).

(b) The introduction of research professorships as suggested in 2 (D) above.

(c) Full pay for the entire sabbatical year with an understanding of the faculty member will use the time in study or in some activity, paid or not (unless he is on one of the research professorships) of direct importance to his long-term product program of self-development. The present system of granting full pay for a half-year’s leave induces almost everyone to take a half-year leave. In most cases this cost the university more money than the full-year half-paid leave, and results in less uninterrupted time for research.

                       (E) As to sources of financial support I have no suggestions (aside from the fees that would come to the University under the research professors’ outside work (2 (D) above), which would be needed to pay the higher salaries) except the general and perhaps impractical one that the University seek mass support from thousands of middle-class sponsors would contribute regularly say $5 to $25 a year and would receive in exchange reports on the progress of the University, special seating privileges at Commencement, exclusive attendance privileges at occasional special lectures by members of the faculty, and any other marks of attention that could make them feel a sense of part ownership in, and pride in, a great University.

Sincerely yours,

Carl Shoup

 

Source: Columbia University Libraries. Manuscript Collections. Columbia University Department of Economics Collection. Carl Shoup Materials, Box 10, Folder “Columbia University—General”.

Image Source: The Columbia Spectator Archive. March 8, 1967.

Categories
Courses Curriculum Harvard Undergraduate

Harvard. Major Expansion of Economics Course Offerings. 1883

Harvard’s decision to significantly increase its course offerings in political economy in 1883 received some national press coverage (that story posted earlier in Economics in the Rear-View Mirror). Today we have the announcement published in the Harvard Crimson. The trio Charles F. Dunbar, J. Laurence Laughlin and Frank W. Taussig were on their way to launch the take-off into a full academic program of economic study.

______________________

POLITICAL ECONOMY.
Courses of Study for 1883-84.

Harvard Crimson
May 24, 1883

Arrangements recently completed have enabled the college to offer a more extended course of study in Political Economy than that which has been announced. A full statements to be substituted for that given on page 14 of the Elective Pamphlet, will be found below.

On page 15 of the pamphlet, line 13, for Course 6 read Course 7.

  1. Mill’s Principles of Political Economy. – Lectures on Banking and the Financial Legislation of the United States. Mon., Wed., Fri., at 9. Prof. Dunbar and Asst. Prof. Laughlin.
  1. History of Economic Theory and a Critical Examination of Leading Writers. – Lectures. Mon., Wed. at 2 and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Fri. at 2. Prof. Dunbar.
  1. Discussion of Practical Economic Questions. – Theses, Tu., Th., at 3, and a third hour to be appointed by the instructor. Assistant Professor Laughlin.
  1. Economic History of Europe and America since the Seven Years’ War. – Lectures. Mon., Wed., Fri., at 11. Professor Dunbar.
    Course 4 requires no previous study of Political Economy.
  1. Economic Effects of Land Tenures in England, Ireland, France and Germany. – Theses. Once a week, counting as a half course. Asst. Professor Laughlin.
  1. History of Tariff Legislation in the United States. – Once a week, counting as a half course. Mr. Taussig.
  1. Comparison of the Financial Systems of France, England, Germany and the United States. – Tu., at 2, counting as a half course. Professor Dunbar.

As a preparation for Courses 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 it is necessary to have passed satisfactorily in Course 1.

Course 1 is in Examination Group I.; Course 2, in Group V.; Course 3, in Group XII.; Course 4, in Group III.; Course 7, in Group XI.

The first two courses are intended to present the principles of the science, while the remaining five treat the subject in its historical and practical aspects. No. 2 will take up the principal writers of the present day, as Cairns, Carey and George, together with the current literature of the science. No times of recitation have been assigned to courses 5 and 6, as this will be arranged between the instructors and the students choosing the course. The department intend issuing a full descriptive pamphlet describing the different courses, which can be had at the office in a few days.

Image Source:  Charles F. Dunbar (left) and Frank W. Taussig (right) from E. H. Jackson and R. W. Hunter, Portraits of the Harvard Faculty (1892); J. Laurence Laughlin (middle) from Marion Talbot. More Than Lore: Reminiscences of Marion Talbot, Dean of Women, The University of Chicago, 1892-1925. Chicago: University of Chicago (1936).

Categories
Courses Harvard Undergraduate

Harvard. Principles of Economics. Taussig, Andrew and Bullock. 1906-07

The popularity of the introductory course in economics at Harvard led Frank Taussig to establish a structure of two one-hour lectures per week with ca. 15 sections (of about 25 students) taught by four teaching assistants who administered (and presumably then graded) a 20 minute quiz on a week’s reading assignment that would be followed up with a 35-40 minute class discussion. 

Apparently Taussig’s Columbia University colleague, E.R.A. Seligman, asked Taussig how Harvard ran its principles of economics course. Maybe he was just curious to hear whether Harvard was about to adopt his Principles of Economics With Special Reference to American Conditions. In his answer, Taussig clearly stakes his claim to have invented the large lecture with small recitation sections format. 

 

_________________________

[Copy of letter from Frank W. Taussig (Harvard)
to E.R.A. Seligman (Columbia)]

Cotuit, Mass.
Aug. 8, 1906

Dear Seligman:-

Our present system in Economics 1, is as follows. There are three exercises a week, of which two are lectures, and the third is for section work, something like what you call a quiz. The lectures are given to all the men in a large lecture hall. During the first half year I give all the lectures; during the second half year it will be given (1906-7) by Andrew and Bullock. For the section work the men are divided into sections of about 30 men each, and meet weekly in separate rooms, and at various hours, in the charge of younger instructors. Each instructor has three to four sections, there are four or five instructors. The first thing at the section meetings is a sort of examination. The question is put on the board and answered in writing during the first twenty minutes; these papers are read and a record kept of the results. The rest of the hour, thirty-five or forty minutes, is given to oral discussion.

Last year we used three text-books, Mill, Walker, and Seager. Specific assignments of reading are made for each week. The lectures cover the same topics as the reading, and the question of the week is on both reading and lectures.

To ensure consistency, the lecturer in charge (for instance myself) meets the younger instructors weekly at a stated hour. Then the questions to be asked by the instructors are submitted for approval, and the work of the week talked over.

This system is of my devising, and has worked better than anything we have tried. It has now been adopted into other large courses, History 1, and Government 1. Any other information I can give you are very welcome to.

I was extremely sorry to hear of your bereavement, and sympathize with you very fully [Seligman’s daughter, Mabel Henrietta died October 30, 1905 at age eleven]. Ripley has returned from Europe. His present address is New London, N. H. I have written a review of your book for our Journal, in which I have said some things that may not please you. But I take it you agree with me that the only object of reviews is to elicit frank statement of opinion. [Taussig’s review of Seligman’s Principles of Economics, Seligman’s Reply and Taussig’s Rejoinder]

Sincerely yours,
F. W. Taussig.

Prof. E.R.A. Seligman,
Lake Placid, N.Y.

_________________________

Course Announcement 1906 (no description)

ECONOMICS
Primarily for Undergraduates

  1. Principles of Economics. Tu., Th., Sat. at 11. Professor Taussig, Asst. Professors Bullock and Andrew, assisted by Messrs. Howland, Lewis, Huse, and Mason.

 

Source: “Announcement of the Course of Instruction offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences 1906-07, 2nd edition”. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. III, No. 15, Aug. 1, 1906. P. 47.

_________________________

Course Announcement 1910-11 with Description

INTRODUCTORY COURSES
Primarily for Undergraduates

  1. Principles of Economics. Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professor Taussig, assisted by Drs. Huse, Day, and Foerster, and Messrs. Sharfman and Balcom.

Course 1 gives a general introduction to economic study, and a general view of Economics for those who have not further time to give to the subject. It undertakes a consideration of the principles of production, distribution, exchange, money, banking, international trade, and taxation. The relations of labor and capital, the present organization of industry, and the recent currency legislation of the United States will be treated in outline.

The course will be conducted partly by lectures, partly by oral discussion in sections. A course of reading will be laid down, and weekly written exercises will test the work of students in following systematically and continuously the lectures and the prescribed reading.

 

Source: History and Political Science, Comprising the Departments of History and Government and Economics, 1910-11. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. VII, No. 23, June 21, 1910, p. 52.

Note: The course description is almost a verbatim copy of that for 1902-03, so we can presume the same description for 1906-07.

_________________________

Course Enrollment 1906-07

  1. Professor Taussig and Asst. Professors Bullock and Andrew, assisted by Messrs. Martin, Mason, G.R. Lewis, Huse, and Holcombe,–Principles of Economics.

Total 392: 1 Graduate, 15 Seniors, 43 Juniors, 252 Sophomores, 50 Freshmen, 31 Other.

 

Source: Harvard University. Reports of the President and the Treasurer of Harvard College, 1906-07, p. 70.

Image Source: Harvard Class Album, 1906.

 

Categories
Courses Exam Questions Problem Sets Syllabus

MIT. Core Microeconomic theory III. Hal Varian, 1975

Hal R. Varian, chief economist at Google since 2007, was a 28 year old assistant professor at M.I.T. in 1975 when he taught my cohort the third in a sequence of four half-term courses that constituted MIT’s required core of graduate microeconomic theory. He assigned draft chapters from his graduate textbook Microeconomic Analysis (published in 1977). For this post I have transcribed the course outline, five problem sets and the final examination for the course.

Core microeconomic theory at MIT in 1974-75:

14.121 (linear models and production) was taught by Martin Weitzman,
14.122 (competitive and noncompetitive market structures) taught by Robert L. Bishop,

14.123 (theory of the consumer and resource allocation) was taught by Hal Varian,
14.124 (capital theory, uncertainty and welfare economics) was taught by Paul Samuelson.

_______________________

14.123—Microeconomic Theory III
Theory of the Consumer and Resource Allocation

Professor Hal R. Varian, E52-353, 3-2662
Spring, 1975

Feb. 5 advanced placement exam
Feb. 10 utility; demand; expenditure
Feb. 12 indirect utility; Slutsky equation
Feb. 17 no class
Feb. 19 no class
Feb. 24 demand functions; duality
Feb. 26 expected utility; properties
Feb. 28 general equilibrium; existence
Mar. 3 welfare theory
Mar. 5 the core of an exchange economy
Mar. 10 general equilibrium and production
Mar. 12 dynamics and general equilibrium
Mar. 17 malfunctions of the market mechanism
Mar. 19 final exam

Course text will be lecture notes available from me. Malinvaud and Arrow and Hahn are highly recommended secondary reading. There will be four or five problem sets and a problem session on Fridays, 9-10:30.

_______________________

 

14.123 Spring, 1975
Professor Hal R. Varian

Consumer Theory I

  1. Consider a consumer with a Cobb-Douglas utility function:
    u(x,y) = a ln x + (1-a) ln y.
    Calculate:

    1. demand functions for x and y
    2. the indirect utility function
    3. the expenditure function
    4. the Hicksian demand functions.
  2. In a general equilibrium analysis, we cannot take income as an exogenous variable in the demand function since income, y = p.w, depends on the vector of relative prices. Derive the Slutsky equation for Dpm(p, p.w) in this case.
  3. At a general equilibrium price vector p*, we have aggregate supply equal aggregate demand:
    Σ mi(p*, p*.w) = Σ wi. Show that if all agents have identical marginal propensities to consume each good (Dymi(p*, p*.w) = Dymj(p*, p*.w) for all i and j) then all aggregate demand curves must be downward sloping at equilibrium. More generally, show that Dp(Σ mi(p*, p*.wi)) is negative semi-definite.
  4. Define eij = (-pj/xi) Dpjmi(p,y) be the cross price elasticity of good i with respect to price j, and ri = pmi(p, y)/y, the income share of commodity i.
    Show that r1e11 + r2e21 +r3e31  = r1.

_______________________

14.123 Spring, 1975
Professor Hal R. Varian

Consumer Theory II

  1. A consumer is found to have a utility function of the form
    u = -1/x1 – 1/x2.

    1. Starting from the utility function, compute the market demand functions for the consumer when he has income y and faces prices p1 and p2.
    2. Use the market demand functions to show that the indirect utility function is
      u = -( √(p1) + √(p2))2/m.
    3. Compute the expenditure function from the indirect utility function.
    4. Compute the consumer’s compensated and market demand curves from the expenditure function.
  2. Suppose at prices (p1, p2) = (5,10) and income y = $100, a rational consumer consumes the bundle (6,7). Assume that we have measured the following derivatives:

∂H1/∂p(p1, p2, ū) = -2
∂H1/∂p(p1, p2, ū) = +1
∂M1/∂y (p1, p2, y) = 2/7

where H1 and H2 are the Hicksian demand functions for goods 1 and 2 and M1 is the Marshallian demand function for good 1. Find an estimate of the consumption bundle of the consumer at (p1, p2) = 5,11).

  1. Suppose a consumer has an expenditure function of the form e(p, u) = u.g(p). Show that his utility function is homogenous of degree one. Suppose e(p,u) is of the form e(p,u) = h(u)g(p). How does the consumer’s behavior differ?
  2. Suppose a consumer has a differentiable expected utility function for income with Dyu(y) strictly positive. Show that he will always take a small enough bet as long as it has positive expected value.

_______________________

 

14.123 Spring, 1975
Professor Hal R. Varian

General Equilibrium III

  1. Show that Walras law holds for a production economy with fully distributed profits.
  2. Prove the theorem that a general equilibrium is pareto efficient for an economy with production.
  3. Suppose we have a productive economy with two agents. The producer has a production function x = q1/2 where x is output and q is labor.
    The consumer has a utility function u(x,q) = x1/2(1-q)1/2. Calculate the general equilibrium real wage and equilibrium level of profits.

_______________________

 

14.123 Spring, 1975
Professor Hal R. Varian

General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics I

  1. Show that any solution to

max Σ ai ui(xi), ai>0
s.t. Σ xi ≤ w

is necessarily pareto efficient.

  1. Suppose we have two agents with indirect utility functions

v1(p1, p2, y) = ln y –a ln p1 – (1-a) ln p2
v2(p1, p2, y) = ln y –b ln p1 – (1-b) ln p2

and initial endowments

w1 = (1,1)
w2 = (1,1)

Calculate the market clearing price.

  1. We have two agents with utility functions

u1(x1, y1) = a ln x1 +(1-a) ln y1
u2(x2, y2) = b ln x2 + (1-b) ln y2

and initial endowments

w1 = (1,0)
w2 = (0,1)

Calculate the market equilibrium prices in terms of the parameters a and b.

_______________________

 

14.123 Spring, 1975
Professor Hal R. Varian

General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics II

  1. Two agents with strictly convex preferences have equal initial endowments
    w1 = w2. They trade to an arbitrary allocation in the Core (w1,w2), (x1,x2). Prove that this allocation is necessarily fair:

    1. Draw an Edgeworth box and give a geometric argument;
    2. give an algebraic argument in the general case (there is a one-line proof.)
    3. Show in a three person economy there are allocations in the equal division core that are not fair.
  2. Suppose we have n agents with identical, strictly convex preferences and we have some initial bundle of k goods to be divided among them. Let x be a fair allocation; show that x must give the same bundle to each agent. (Recall that a fair allocation is one that is strongly pareto efficient and such that no agent prefers any other agent’s bundle to his own.)
  3. Show that under appropriate assumptions of convexity, every pareto efficient allocation is necessarily a solution to a problem of maximizing a weighted sum of utilities. What is the economic interpretation of the weights?
  4. Suppose we are at a market allocation that is considered good. Since it is a market equilibrium it is pareto efficient and therefore maximizes a certain weighted sum of utilities Σ ai* ui(x). Accordingly, we will use Σ ai* ui(x) to evaluate small projects. Suppose we are considering a small project that will change x = (x1,…, xn) to x´= (x1´,…, xn´). Show that it should be undertaken if and only if it increases national income; that is, iff Σ p.(xi´-xi) >0.

_______________________

 

14.123 FINAL EXAMINATION
March 19, 1975

Professor H. Varian

Answer any 2 out of 4. All questions have equal weight. Good luck!

  1. A consumer has a utility function of the form u(x1, x2) = ln x1 + x2. He faces prices p1 and p2 and has income y. Calculate:
    1. his Marshallian demand functions for each good
    2. his indirect utility function
    3. his Hicksian demand functions
    4. his expenditure function.
  2. There are two consumers A and B with the following utility functions and endowments:

UA(XA1, XA2) = a ln XA1 + (1-a) ln XA2 , WA = (0,1)
UB(XB1, XB2) = min (XB1, XB2) , WB =(1,0)

Calculate the market clearing prices and the equilibrium allocation.

  1. We have n agents with identical strictly concave utility functions, u1(x1),…,un(xn). There is some initial bundle of goods w. Show that equal division is a pareto efficient allocation.
  2. A consumer has a differentiable expected utility function u(y) with u´(y) > 0. (There are no conditions on u´´(y)). His initial level of wealth is w and he is contemplating a bet which gives him $e with probability p > ½ and he loses $e with probability 1-p. (Notice the bet has positive expected value.) Show that he will always take the bet if e is small enough. (Hint: try Taylor series.)

 

Source: Personal copies.

Image Source: Detail from 1976 departmental group photo.

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T.

MIT. Microeconomic Core Theory II. Bishop, 1974

_______________________________

Microeconomic Theory II”, the second of four half-semester core microeconomic theory courses at MIT, was actually the first offered during the academic year 1974-75. It was taught by Professor Robert L. Bishop. In this post we find 29 sample questions for the five sets of topics covered in the courses. Also included are the waiver exam for testing out of the course and the final examination for the students who took the course

The course “text” was the mimeographed manuscript on economic theory written by Bishop that was on closed reserve at Dewey Library and consulted by presumably at least a dozen cohorts over the 1960s (perhaps even earlier) and 1970s. A copy of that manuscript can be found in the Edwin Burmeister papers at Rubenstein Library of Duke University. 

 Two papers (especially the second) by Bishop covering some of the course material are:

Bishop, Robert L. “Duopoly: Collusion or Warfare?” The American Economic Review 50, no. 5 (1960): 933-61.

Bishop, Robert L. “The Effects of Specific and Ad Valorem Taxes.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82, no. 2 (1968): 198-218.

Core microeconomic theory at MIT in 1974-75:

14.121 (linear models) was taught by Martin Weitzman,
14.123 (duality) was taught by Hal Varian,
14.124 (capital theory, uncertainty and welfare economics) was taught by Paul Samuelson.

_______________________________

 

Topics in 14.122, with Sample Questions

  1. Review of demand and supply, elasticities. Walrasian v. Marshallian stability conditions. Demand and supply as seen by the individual seller or buyer.
    1. What various formulas have been proposed for measuring the arc elasticity between two points on a demand curve, (q1,p1) and (q2,p2)? Discuss the virtues and defects of the various definitions. Can any one be said to be “best”?
    2. Compare the Walrasian and Marshallian stability conditions as to (a) their content, (b) the types of markets in which they are realistically applicable, and (c) the situations in which they do not agree.
    3. If 1000 sellers have fixed supplies of 50 units each of a good, how does the demand confronting each individual seller relate to the market demand (a) as to slope, (b) as to elasticity? How are the answers affected if each seller has a positively sloped supply schedule?
  2. Review of the revenue and cost curves of the firm and its long-run and short-run equilibrium. Comparative implications of competitive and monopolistic equilibrium.
    1. Show how the price elasticity of demand for a good is related to average and marginal revenue. Why is a monopolist never in static equilibrium in the range where his demand is relatively inelastic?
    2. Given the linear demand p = a –bq, show that price elasticity depends only on p and a, or only on q and a/b. When do two linear demands have the same elasticity (a) at any given price, (b) at any given quantity?
    3. Given two linear demand (with different slope and different axis-intercepts) and a point on one of them, find geometrically the point on the other with the same elasticity.
    4. A linear demand and a demand that is concave from above are tangent at a particular point. In the vicinity of that output, how much can you say about the relative magnitudes, slopes , and curvatures of the respective marginal revenue curves?
    5. Given relevant segments of a monopolist’s AR, MR, and MC curves (but not AC), show how much his profit is reduced if he is forced to charge a somewhat lower price than his profit-maximizing one—on the assumption that he still has an incentive to satisfy the full demand at the new price.
    6. “Short-run marginal cost is typically smaller than long-run marginal cost, since the former reflects only variable cost while the latter reflects full cost.” Discuss.
    7. Discuss the virtues and limitations of Lerner’s concept of the degree of monopoly power, M = (AR-MC)/AR. Would it make any difference if he had defined it as M´ = (AR-MR)/AR?
    8. “A profit-maximizing monopolist, in contrast to a pure competitor, would always prefer to sell more than he actually can, at the price he hooses to set. This is why monopolists frequently advertise and pure competitors never do; and it is also why equilibrium can be analyzed by means of demand and supply curves in pure competition but not in monopoly.” Discuss.
  1. Long-run and short-run equilibrium of the purely competitive industry, with comparative statics problems. Supply curves reflecting pecuniary v. real or technological externalities.
    1. Give as many distinct reasons as you can why a purely competitive industry’s long-run supply curve may be positively sloped? Negatively sloped?
    2. “If a purely competitive industry’s long-run equilibrium is disturbed by a sudden increase in demand, the effects on price are likely to be greater in the short run than the long, and the effects on output are likely to be just the opposite.” Discuss.
    3. Under what circumstances, if any, is the Marshallian producers’-surplus area above a supply curve a defensible concept? When is it clearly indefensible?
    4. In a purely competitive industry with negatively sloped demand, can a commodity tax lower the price? Can it raise price by more than the amount of the tax? Show that the answers differ according as the stability conditions are assumed to be Walrasian or Marshallian.
    5. In a purely competitive industry where firms all have u-shaped costs and the industry’s long-run supply is horizontal, compare the effects of a specific commodity tax, a franchise tax, and a limited licensing of firms—such that all would have the same effect on industry output.
    6. Assume that a distinctive type of grape can be grown only on a distinctive type of vineyard land, which is valueless in any other use. This land varies widely in quality from one acre to another. The only other factor, labor, is homogeneous and in perfectly elastic supply to this single industry. (Assume, for convenience, that one firm always cultivates just one acre, irrespective of relative factor prices.)
      1. If the land is widely owned and the grape industry is purely competitive, show how its long-run supply curve is derived. Then, for some given grape demand, show how the aggregate equilibrium rent is determined.
      2. What would be the comparative effects of a tax on the grapes and a tax on the vineyard land that would raise the same revenue? Might the landlords ever prefer the latter tax?
      3. Starting from the equilibrium in (a), assume that laborers become free to allocate themselves on the vineyard land and receive equal per capita shares of the total grape revenue. How would this affect the price and quantity of grapes, incomes, and allocational efficiency?
    7. Explain why, in some purely competitive industries, social marginal cost may be different from private marginal cost.
  2. Comparative statics of monopoly: changes of demand, cost, taxes, various regulations. Equilibrium with advertising, with price discrimination, with systematic seasonal shifts of demand.
    1. In a monopoly with negatively sloped demand, can a specific tax lower price? Can it raise price by more than the amount of the tax? Show that the answers depend on the second-order conditions for a profit maximum. Are these special results more or less likely than in pure competition (cf. question 15).
    2. For any given specific tax, does a fully equivalent ad valorem tax exist (a) in pure competition, (b) in monopoly?
    3. “Not only does a monopolized industry produce less than a competitive one would, but also when superior productive equipment becomes available, the monopolist is motivated to introduce it more slowly.” Explain wherein you agree or disagree.
    4. What determines whether a static-equilibrium monopoly price will rise or fall in response to an increase of demand? Does it make any difference whether the demand increase is spontaneous or induced by advertising? Can an increase in demand ever reduce a monopolist’s equilibrium output?
    5. Under what circumstances will a price ceiling imposed on a monopolist
      1. leave him with incentive to satisfy the full demand at that price,
      2. induce him to produce an output that is positive but not great enough to satisfy the full demand, or
      3. drive him out of business?
    6. “The greater is a firm’s degree of monopoly power (in Lerner’s sense), the more likely is it to find advertising profitable.” What can be said for and against this proposition?
    7. When is it profitable to discriminate as to price in two markets for a physically homogeneous product? Are there any circumstances in which the buyers in both markets may benefit from the discrimination?
  3. Monopolistic competition: oligopoly and product differentiation.
    1. Why are none of the duopoly solutions proposed by Cournot, Bertrand, Stackelberg, and Chamberlin wholly satisfactory?
    2. If duopolists produce differentiated products, what are the comparative consequences under (a) price-quoting and (b) quantity-setting? Specifically, compare the Cournot and Bertrand equilibria, the corresponding Stackelberg equilibria (and warfares), the potentialities for collusion, and the potentialities for warfare.
    3. How and why is the problem of oligopolistic interdependence allegedly avoided in Chamberlin’s large-group case of monopolistic competition? Are you satisfied that it is really avoided? Compare it in this respect with pure competition.
    4. As compared with simple monopoly, what additional sources of uncertainty are there with respect to comparative-statics problems under monopolistic competition?

_______________________________

Waiver Exam—14.122
September 11, 1974

Answer any TWO questions (about 40 minutes each):

Question 1:

  1. Show how the total, average, and marginal cost curves of a one-product firm are related to one another in the long-run—as to intersections, minima, inflection points, etc. (Assume that the total-cost function is continuous up to at least its second derivative and that production is subject first to net economies of scale and then to net diseconomies.)
  2. Show how those same long-run cost curves are related to their short-run counterparts, identifying all notable points of correspondence.

Question 2:

In a small community surrounding a lake, workers can get all the employment they need in industry at a wage of $20 per day. An alternative employment is to catch fish in the lake and sell it in the environs at a constant price of $10 per bushel. With labor valued at the going wage, the cost of fish per bushel rises with the total amount of fishing. Specifically, the average cost of fish (in dollars per bushel) is related thus to the total number of bushels caught per day:

C = 2 + .005q

  1. With free entry to the lake, how much fish will be caught?
  2. Show that everybody can be made better off if the community levies an appropriate tax per bushel of fish. What is the optimal tax?
  3. If, alternatively, the lake were privately owned and the owner could hire labor to catch fish at the same cost as before, what output would maximize his net income?
  4. Would it always be appropriate, as in (b), to impose a tax on any competitive industry with a positively sloped supply curve? Explain briefly.

Question 3:

“If a specific tax of given magnitude is imposed on a good that is producible at constant unit cost, the equilibrium price may be raised either more or less under monopoly than under competition. Even when the price rises by an appreciably smaller amount under monopoly, however, it is still very likely to be socially disadvantageous to tax such a monopolized good rather than competitive ones.” Explain fully wherein you agree or disagree with each sentence.

_______________________________

14.122
November 1, 1974

One hour and a half
Answer any FIVE of the following six questions:

  1. If a specific tax is imposed on a commodity produced by a purely competitive industry, what effects on price can be ruled out under the stability conditions specified by (a) Marshall; (b) Walras? Explain.
  2. You are given this cost function:

C= aqc + bq,

where C is total cost, qc is an absolute-capacity output (fixed in the short run), q is the actual output (less than or equal to qc), and a and b are positive constants. Draw carefully the implied long-run cost schedules and several sample sets of short-run cost schedules—total, average and marginal. Comment on the relationship between long-run and short-run marginal cost.

  1. “When the demand for a monopolist’s product increases, his profit-maximizing price may rise, remain the same, or fall. The conditions governing this result are exactly the same whether the increase in demand is spontaneous or induced by advertising.” Explain why you agree or disagree.
  2. “Fully equivalent specific and ad valorem taxes are possible in pure competition but not in monopoly.” Explain why you agree or disagree.
  3. When does a positively sloped supply curve imply some form of producers’ surplus, and when does it not? Explain.
  4. In an oligopoly with differentiated products, would the price be lower in a Cournot equilibrium or a Bertrand equilibrium? Explain.

Source: Personal copies.

Image Source:Robert L. Bishop at MIT Museum  .