_______________________
About the Teaching Assistant
Lloyd Morgan Crosgrave [PUT in LINK TO 1912-13 PRINCIPLES PAGE #Crosgrave]
General Examination in Economics, Wednesday, May 7, 1913.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History since 1750. 3. Statistics. 4. Public Finance and Railroads. 5. Labor Problems, including Social Reforms. 6. History of American Institutions since 1789.
Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), Ripley, Bullock, Fite, and Dr. Copeland.
Academic History: Indiana University, 1905-09; Harvard Graduate School, 1910-13. A.B., Indiana, 1909; A.M., Harvard, 1911. Teacher of History, Decatur High School, Ill., 1909-10; Instructor in Economics, Harvard, 1912-13.
Special Subject: Labor Problems.
Thesis Subject: “The American Glass Industry.” (With Professor Taussig.)
Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examinations for the Ph.D. (HUC 7000.70), Folder “Examinations for the Ph.D., 1912-13”.
_______________________
ECONOMICS 4a
Course Description
1912-13
4a 1hf. (formerly 5 1hf.). Economics of Transportation. Half-course (first half-year). Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professor Ripley, assisted by ——.
A brief outline of the historical development of rail and water transportation in the United States will be followed by a description of the condition of transportation systems at the present time. The four main subdivisions of rates and rate-making, finance, traffic operation, and legislation will be considered in turn. The first deals with the relation of the railroad to shippers, comprehending an analysis of the theory and practice of rate-making. An outline will be given of the nature of railroad securities, the principles of capitalization, and the interpretation of railroad accounts. Railroad operation will deal with the practical problems of the traffic department, such as the collection and interpretation of statistics of operation, pro-rating, the apportionment of cost, depreciation and maintenance, etc. Under legislation, the course of state regulation and control in the United States and Europe will be traced.
Source: Harvard University. Division of History, Government, and Economics, Courses of Instruction, 1912–13, pp. 60-61.
_______________________
Monographs/Books on Transportation by W. Z. Ripley
Transportation. Chapter from the Final report of the U.S. Industrial Commission (Vol. XIX) and privately issued by the author for the use of his students and others. Washington, D.C., 1902.
Railway Problems, edited with an introduction by William Z. Ripley (Boston: Ginn & Company, 1907).
Railroads: Rates and Regulation (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1912).
Railroads: Finance & Organization (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1915).
_______________________
ECONOMICS 4a
Course Enrollment
1912-13
Economics 4a 1hf. Professor Ripley, assisted by Mr. [Lloyd Morgan] Crosgrave. Economics of Transportation.
Total 156: 6 Graduates, 2 G.B., 36 Seniors, 85 Juniors, 24 Sophomores, 3 Other.
Source: Harvard University. Reports of the President and the Treasurer of Harvard College, 1912-13, p. 57.
_______________________
ECONOMICS 4a
Mid-year Examination
1912-13
- Compare the lease with stock ownership as a means of combination, stating the advantages and disadvantages of each.
- Show how recent interpretation of the Federal law may conceivably affect the status of railway traffic agreements.
- State very briefly the point raised in the following cases: —
(a) Portland Gateway.
(b) Illinois Central car supply.
(c) Alabama Midland (Troy).
(d) Orange Routing.
- Have any of the above points been since corrected by legislation; if so in what manner?
- Give reasons for the following differences in net capitalization per mile of line:
| Union Pacific |
$65,000 |
Reading |
$170,000 |
|
| Pennsylvania |
$86,000 |
Erie |
$170,000 |
- What particular circumstance materially affects the success of Government ownership and operation:
(a) In Germany?
(b) In Italy?
(c) In Switzerland?
- What is the present attitude of the Federal courts toward the proper basis to be used in the determination of reasonable rates?
- How effective practically has been the “Commodity Clause” of the law of 1906?
- To whom properly belongs the surplus earnings of a railroad over and above a rate of return requisite to provide an adequate supply of new capital for future development? State your own view, but set forth your reasons fully.
Image Source: Monopoly game card for the Reading Railroad.
Earlier exams etc. for Economics 5,
Pol Econ 9
(Economics of Transportation/ Railroads)
1887-88 (James Laurence Laughlin)
1888-89 (John Henry Gray)
1889-90 [Omitted]
1890-91 (Frank William Taussig)
1891-92 (Frank William Taussig)
1892-93 (Frank William Taussig)
1893-94 (Frank William Taussig)
1894-95 (George Ole Virtue)
1895-96 (Frank William Taussig)
1896-97 (Frank William Taussig)
1897-98 (Hugo Richard Meyer)
1898-99 (Hugo Richard Meyer
1899-1900 (Hugo Richard Meyer)
1900-01 (Hugo Richard Meyer)
1901-02 (Ripley with Hugo Richard Meyer)
1903-04 (Ripley alone)
1904-05 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)
1905-06 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)
1906-07 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett and Walter Wallace McLaren). Also with the Assignment of Reports.
1907-08 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)
1908-09 (Ripley with Edmund Thorton Miller)
1909-10 (Ripley with Eliot Jones)
1910-11 (Ripley with Ralph Cahoon Whitnack)
1911-12 (Ripley with Arthur Stone Dewing)
….etc.
1906-07. Ec 17. Railroad Practice (Dr. Stuart Daggett)
1907-08. Ec 17. Railroad Practice (Dr. Stuart Daggett)